Talk:Sakura emad/Archives/2025

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} .

globalsul

edit

Currently the Krinkle's script is working properly, you can run the script again to create 100+ local accounts to your global account. Thanks in advance. Tryvix1509 (test) (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks, will do!! 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Translation request

edit

Hello.

Can you create the article en:Laacher See, which is the third most powerful volcano in Europe after Campi Flegrei and Santorini, in Sorani Kurdish Wikipedia?

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

hi didn't even notice you send this message till today. i can't guarantee. but i try. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Local requests for deletions on GSR

edit

Hi, can you not fill GSR with the reason "local requests for deletion"? Some of these aren't clear and GSs often deal with these appropriately by routinely checking Global sysops/Speedy delete requests/Data and these don't need to be urgently deleted. Thanks, //shb (tc) 11:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Noted. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, Sakura. :) //shb (tc) 11:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Empty Pages

edit

Hi, the empty pages you reported as GSR had content at one time but were blanked by different users/IPs (some of which are globally locked now). Please check the page history before reporting to make sure they should be deleted. Thank you! Ternera (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ternera; Just to clarify- I did review the page histories before reporting, including older revisions. Many of the pages, while not technically blank in the past, had either vandalism, inappropriate material, or content that didn’t meet basic Wiktionary standards (like proper formatting, sourcing, or lexical relevance).
For example, in the case of shtatanik, I checked the 2019 version before reporting. What looked like “content” was actually offensive material, not a valid dictionary entry. So I judged it as effectively empty and reported accordingly.
That being said, I completely understand your point. I’ll make sure to be more careful next time and explain more clearly when a page’s history includes content that seems inappropriate or unclear. Thank you for taking the time to point it out! 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

I edited your script, User:Sakura emad/global.js, to prevent it from being categorized for speedy deletion. — xaosflux Talk 22:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Xaosflux:: Oh, nice thank you, but what is going on, is there anything that i should be aware of, Metawise? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
No problem, just that text text of categories/templates get evaluated for category inclusion, even in javascript pages. It's a "feature". Otherwise, not much. — xaosflux Talk 22:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply