Vanamonde93
Welcome to Meta!
editHello, Vanamonde93. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
The Community Wishlist Survey
editHi,
You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.
You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Unblock request on English Wikipedia
editDear Vanamonde93,
First of all, I would like to apologize if this is not the appropriate venue for presenting my case to establish my innocence. I am writing to appeal against the recent block imposed on my english wikipedia account, where I have been mistakenly accused of being a sockpuppet of Ghalbeyakh and alleged involvement in the article Qatari soft power.
I would like to emphasize that I have no connection whatsoever with Ghalbeyakh or any affiliation with the purported group related to the article Qatari soft power. Until recently, I was entirely unaware of this user and their associated group, and I had no knowledge of the mentioned article.
Contrary to the accusations, I am a university student currently residing in Pakistan. My activities on Wikipedia are limited to using Pakistani IP addresses, in stark contrast to the accused users who predominantly use German IPs. Additionally, I have no awareness or association with the Nimbleway network, as suggested in the investigation.
I kindly request a thorough review of the evidence presented against me, as I believe there is a misunderstanding or misattribution in this case. I am more than willing to provide any further information or clarification necessary to demonstrate my innocence in this matter.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
Regards, Pakieditor (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The correct place to appeal your block is on the English Wikipedia on your talk page, as I see you have now done. I'm sorry, but based on CU evidence I do not find your explanation credible at all. However, I will let another CU take a look at your appeal, and perhaps they will see it differently. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. Pardon me but could you please clarify the meaning of " based on CU evidence"? I have been trying to grasp its meaning for hours but no avail. Maybe then, I might be able to write a better unblock appeal to prove my innocence. Pakieditor (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- A CU is a CheckUser. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. Pardon me but could you please clarify the meaning of " based on CU evidence"? I have been trying to grasp its meaning for hours but no avail. Maybe then, I might be able to write a better unblock appeal to prove my innocence. Pakieditor (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)