Wikimedia Foundation elections/FDC Ombudsperson elections/2013/Candidates/ko
![]() |
The election ended 22 June 2013. No more votes will be accepted. The results were announced on 24 June 2013. |
Matthew Bisanz (MBisanz)
MBisanz (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA)
Susana Morais (Lusitana)
Lusitana (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA)
요약 정보 |
|
---|---|
연설 | I believe in the Wikimedia movement and that all the work we do has the final objective to grant every human around the world free access to the sum of all knowledge. |
필수 질문 | 1. 당신의 어떤 경험이 FDC의 작업과 추천 과정을 향상시킬 것이라고 생각하십니까?
Being a board member of Wikimedia Portugal since it's foundation has helped me understand how chapters function, and the work involved in developing programs and annual plans.
I am specially experienced in the dynamics of small chapters and their need for funding, and the difficulties concerning requesting/reporting.
2. 감사의 역할에 대한 당신의 생각은 무엇인가요? The Ombudsperson has to document complaints, so that difficulties and problems felt by all interested parties are adressed and the process can be improved. The Ombudsperson also has to summarize annually all feedback received concerning the process (from Portal navigability to clarity in the forms, etc.). To do this a good understanding of the FDC process is required. I think it is important that all complaints are taken into account, so that the process can be transparent and trustworthy. I also believe that the Ombudsperson's role can still be improved in the future, since we all made a great deal of learning this first year.
3. 당신이 믿는 감사와 함께 문서화 될 수 있는 FDC 처리 과정에 대한 몇몇 잠재적인 불만은 무엇이고, 당신은 그것을 어떻게 처리할 수 있습니까? Using as an example the complaints that were directed to me this last year (as Ombudsperson), be it a complaint about the eligibility process or about donations and fund allocations, I believe that, in case of the need for an investigation, it is important to look at the context of each complaint impartially and not deal with all complaints in a standardized fashion. It is important to gather all points of view and facts, so that the process is clear, and that we can all understand what went wrong, and how to make it better the next time.
|