Wikispace

Wikipedia does have articles on outer space, however, wikipedia does not have 3d models of a planet, Wikispace is a library and 3d models of star systems and planets with composition and orbital velocity of a planet and temperature and mass of stars

This is a proposal for a new Wikimedia sister project.

WikiSpace
Status of the proposal
Status	procedurally closed
Reason	no reason this couldn’t be covered everywhere else Dronebogus (talk) 07:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Details of the proposal
Project description	database about outer space with 3d experiences
Is it a multilingual wiki?	Many language versions or single multilingual platform
Potential number of languages	Multilangguage
Proposed tagline	free space encyclopedia
Proposed URL	wikispace.org
Technical requirements
New features to require	ability to upload 3d files
Development wiki	No
Interested participants
SevenEagleX (Bicara)

Proposed by

SevenEagleX

(Bicara)

Alternative names

• Wikisky
• AstroWiki

Domain names

wikispace.org

People interested

• SevenEagleX
  (Bicara)
• Doctor Zoath (talk page)

Discussion

 Oppose Such models can go on Wikipedia. Faster than Thunder (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Comment but that's kinda weird, how is it possible that some articles on wikipedia have 3d images but others don't

SevenEagleX

(Bicara) 08:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

@SevenEagleX: "Some articles won't feature a 3D image" is not a valid reason to start a new wiki. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 15:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

 Weak support I would be in favor of this project if it was more similar to an online interactive planetarium rather than "Wikipedia but for astronomy". There is room that a new planetarium project and an astronomy subproject on Wikipedia could work together, but other than that Wikipedia and Wikidata can handle most of it. Doctor Zoath (talk page) 01:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I think we should just expand WMC’s 3D model collection and capabilities rather than creating a new project which will inevitably struggle to form any kind of independent identity and userbase. (The logo is dope though) Dronebogus (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose These types of 3D models are really cool and educational. But why not just add these 3D models to Wikipedia? I simply don't see why a separate wiki would be created for this, one that would almost certainly be a ghost town. Pecopteris (talk) 02:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)