Meta:Requests for translation adminship/Nemo_bis

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Nemo_bis

This request is scheduled to be closed on 08:00, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Nemo_bis (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

I realised that [1] left me the translation adminship flag which was part of sysop package and I had never formally asked from the community, so I figured it would be better to remediate later rather than never.

I'm a translation admin on several wikis; "staff" group member on translatewiki.net, for which I manage the support; a Translate extension patch contributor, bug reporter/triager, co-author of Nikerabbit's docs and Mass migration tools mentor. As translation admin I'm mostly active on MediaWiki.org to set up the help pages: on Meta I need the flag to do pretty much anything as needed, usually stuff too tricky or arcane even for the hard-working Meta translation admins to handle. Blabla X years, Y edits blabla.

I hope Meta finds my service worth of my request. Regards, Nemo 08:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Stryn (talk) 16:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to remove. Good work with translations. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support This is a no-brainer. We should move on to a regular rfa already. Theo10011 (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Kolega2357 (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Jcornelius (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against removal and would prefer Nemo to get the administrator flag back. Vogone (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemo: Why not RFA? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree with both of you. I think Nemo would be a good RFA candidate. Eurodyne (talk | contribs) 03:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support —DerHexer (Talk) 23:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support odder (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this request is necessary since even though the shameful request for desysopping was carried out, the one who did it knew we would have a problem if Nemo wouldn't be a translation administrator anymore. Support of course. --MF-W 17:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Experienced user with translation extension. He has my trust. Alan ^(talk) 18:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason to oppose? No. Support. --Golden_burg111 21:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, there are good contributions. --Uğurkent^talk 17:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.snoopy. ✉ 18:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine by me. Eurodyne (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY 06:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - he paid me to do this ..... :P ..--Ste moc 11:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 07:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please do continue your work and thanks for the contributions. --Glaisher (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(formally) promoted - no right changes etc needed. Nemo's rights are with that now just approved formally. -Barras talk 15:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]