Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Confirm/2012/es

< Stewards | Confirm | 2012
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
In other languages: Afrikaans (af) aragonés (an) العربية (ar) asturianu (ast) azərbaycanca (az) български (bg) বাংলা (bn) bosanski (bs) català (ca) čeština (cs) Cebuano (ceb) Cymraeg (cy) dansk (da) Deutsch (de) Ελληνικά (el) English (en) Esperanto (eo) español (es) eesti (et) euskara (eu) فارسی (fa) suomi (fi) français (fr) galego (gl) Alemannisch (gsw) עברית (he) हिन्दी (hi) hrvatski (hr) Kreyòl ayisyen (ht) magyar (hu) հայերեն (hy) interlingua (ia) Bahasa Indonesia (id) Ido (io) íslenska (is) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) ქართული (ka) қазақша (kk) ಕನ್ನಡ (kn) 한국어 (ko) kurdî (ku) Latina (la) Lëtzebuergesch (lb) ລາວ (lo) lietuvių (lt) latviešu (lv) македонски (mk) मराठी (mr) Bahasa Melayu (ms) မြန်မာဘာသာ (my) नेपाली (ne) Nederlands (nl) norsk (no) ଓଡ଼ିଆ (or) polski (pl) português (pt) Runa Simi (qu) română (ro) русский (ru) slovenčina (sk) slovenščina (sl) shqip (sq) српски / srpski (sr) svenska (sv) Kiswahili (sw) தமிழ் (ta) తెలుగు (te) ไทย (th) Tagalog (tl) Türkçe (tr) татарча / tatarça (tt) українська (uk) Tiếng Việt (vi) Volapük (vo) Winaray (war) ייִדיש (yi) 粵語 (yue) 中文（简体） (zh-hans) 中文（繁體） (zh-hant) [edit]
Español :

Las confirmaciones de 2012–13 empiezan el 8 de febrero y finalizarán el 28 de febrero.

Las confirmaciones de steward son una buena oportunidad para ver si aún estamos contentos con nuestros stewards actuales. Para facilitar el proceso, así es como se organizarán las cosas:

Para comentar, inicia sesión con una cuenta creada con anterioridad al 1 de febrero de 2012 y que tenga ediciones en algún proyecto. Durante las elecciones del 2012, menciona si estás descontento con alguna de las personas listadas debajo y por qué. Por ejemplo, puedes mencionar inactividad o comportamiento no conforme a las políticas que regulan la actuación de este grupo. Los stewards inactivos, de acuerdo a la correspondiente política perderán sus permisos. Sólo serán tenidos en cuenta los comentarios que tengan que ver con el uso y desenvolvimiento de sus tareas como stewards. Las confirmaciones no son una votación.

Al final de la elección, los stewards actuales, junto con los nuevos, considerarán los argumentos vertidos en esta página y tomarán una decisión, tomando en cuenta tanto los comentarios de la comunidad, como la propia perspectiva y entendimiento del trabajo propia. Todos los stewards pasarán por este proceso después de cada elección. La confirmación de aquellos elegidos en octubre de 2011 es opcional dado que todavía no han cumplido un año desde su designación. Éstos serán sometidos a revalidación obligatoria en febrero del 2013.

Ver también:


Purge the cache of this page?


Andre Engels

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: nl, de-3, en-4, fr-2.
  • Información personal: Definitivamente no soy el steward más activo pero sigo trabajando y estando disponible cuando un steward es necesario. Desde inicios de año la Fundación me ha contratado como analista de datos.

Comments about Andre Engels

edit


Avraham

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, he-2
  • Información personal: Me complace comunicar que durante el año pasado hemos tenido un influjo de nuevos stewards procedentes de muy diversos proyectos y espero que ello continúe. No obstante considero que todavía puedo ser util para los Proyectos como steward para este nuevo año que entra. Me encuentro razonablemente activo en la realización de tareas de steward, enfocado mayoritariamente a atender solicitudes de verificación de usuarios (CheckUser). Se me encuentra facilmente y respondo rápidamente tanto por correo electrónico, por IRC y a través de mi página de discusión en Meta. Muchas gracias por su apoyo en el pasado y espero poder seguir siendo merecedor de su apoyo continuado y confianza.

Comments about Avraham

edit


Barras

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: de, en-4
  • Información personal: Esta es mi primera confirmación como stewards en tanto he sido elegido hace un año. Creo que he estado bastante activo durante este año de servicio. He usado las herramientas steward para múltiples propósitos, como colaborar en borrados y bloqueos en múltiples proyectos (véanse mis registros). También me he lidiado con vandalismos y spam y he deshabilitado y bloqueado a muchos usuarios y direcciones IP. También he efectuado múltiples cambios de permisos, mayoritariamente a mi propia cuenta para prevenir abusos y retirar ediciones abusivas, pero también he cambiado los permisos de usuario de muchos otros usuarios. Normalmente ayudo allá donde es necesario, donde la ayuda es requerida, en el IRC pero también en el propio proyecto. Si tiene alguna cuestión no dude en preguntar. Muchas gracias.

Comments about Barras

edit



Bsadowski1

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Hola. Esta es también mi primera confirmación como steward. He estado bastante activo en este rol (enlaces: actividad como steward, registros de Meta-Wiki) realizando tareas anti vandalismo y anti spam tales como bloqueos globales a cuentas y direcciones IP. Me comunico regularmente por IRC respondiendo a solicitudes relacionadas con vandalismo en múltiples proyectos (en el canal de stewards). Espero poder continuar trabajando y ayudando con los actuales stewards. Un saludo.

Comments about Bsadowski1

edit


Darkoneko

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: My general statement isn't that different from last year's : as a steward, I sometimes make a few mistakes but I think I'm not doing a bad work overall.
    For those not aquainted to me yet:
    • My home wiki is frwiki, the french Wikipedia. I arrived in nov. 2004 and became a sysop there in march 2005. I also worked there as a bureaucrat for 3 years (jun 2006 - sep. 2009) but gave up the bit so I could spend more time on other things.
    • I manage a bot named Loveless (see [2] and [3])
    • I became steward at end of 2006. I don't really do steward requests on wiki but rather use my availability time to take care of the emergency people tells us of on IRC (#wikimedia-stewards). My public steward activities (everything but Oversight and Checkuser) are viewable on this page ; those local to meta (like right changes) on this one.

Comments about Darkoneko

edit


DerHexer

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-2, es-1
  • Personal info: Still being one of the most active stewards, I could not have been as active as in the last years. On my part, that's mainly caused by a lot of stress at the university and in my real life. I also decided to organize the very successful conference Wikipedia trifft Altertum, worked a bit more on my now featured article de:Laokoon, became a member of the community project budget of Wikimedia Germany and later also a member of the Board. But the main reason because I couldn't be as active as before are my wonderful fellows who did so many useful things more efficiently than I could do in my scarce free time. I'm proud that I could organize the 2011-2 election where we found more helpful fellows who still ask me, as an experienced steward, several times for help. Thank you, my fellows! I'd be happy to serve the community with my experience and free time for the next term, thanks.

Comments about DerHexer

edit


Dungodung

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Hi there. I've been a steward since December 2007, so I've got a lot of experience. Now, I know I haven't been using the tools that much lately, but that is mostly because I've had a shift in my life: I'm moved to the capital, got a job and changed my life completely, so I had little time left for much else. Once I fully adapt, I hope I'll be able to enhance my activity as a steward. I had long thoughts about whether I should quit or not, but several wiki-friends dissuaded me. I'll be thankful if I'm given another term to humbly serve Wikimedia and its projects. Thanks.

Comments about Dungodung

edit

(UTC)

  • Keep Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Dungo is a very kind and helpful person, even with those who were not so kind with him in the past. Always careful and with lot of selfcontrol. In situations of great tension, he always stayed calm and objective. He is young, but many older people can learn a lot from him. Strong support. --Maduixa (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Regardless of such an opening above, I also have experienced a totally opposite approach of Dungodung. We did not have had much conversation for some time and one could say he might have changed in the meantime, of which I would not be as certain as someone who occasionally sees his comments on sr.wiki. I do not expect this vote to have much impact on the confirmation outcome, but I also would make remark that if the voting outcome was all that matters, we would never advance and become better wikipedians. I intended my vote to be warning that certain improvements can be made in the approach, which can be initiated either by the environment, or by the candidate himself. When I notice such improvements, my vote will change. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 07:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I honestly don't know what you're talking about. Can you outline briefly what problems you have noticed in my behaviour/wikiing? You say "improvements", but how can I improve if I don't know what it is that needs improvement. Thanks --FiliP ██ 07:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    For quite some time yet there is a trend that addresses not only the necessity of a fine work that can be measured through the protocolar and other logs on Wikimedia servers, but also makes more demands on existence of strong ethical norms built within a person that has taken the role and acts as a steward not only on the projects but also on other occasions that are of importance for presenting the community under a steward's hood. I would remind the whole auditorium that I only supported Dungodung before 2007 2011, so it would be safe to assume he did a few very wrong moves in the meantime to earn such a vote. I must make remark that, in my very belief, his personality has changed in the way I would take the liberty of finding ethically dislikable. Reading this, I do not really feel encouraged to post here about the things that would be helpful in making my point. Although it does not really surprise me Dungodung *does not remember* what he did wrong when presenting himself as a Steward -- of course, here he can deny every mistake that is not really linkable, and I am not about to give him that joy -- I would assume good faith and offer him simple live talk. There is a whole year till the next vote.本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 22:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I understand that you have unresolved personal issues with Dungodung, and you voted the way you voted. But why you called a blocked sockpuppeter and his friends to come here to support you?Isn't that pathetic?--Wikit 19:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I am really displeased there are assumptions tending to reduce my partake in this vote to some low personal level, totally diminishing the need to assume I am acting in best faith -- for which I gave enough space to the best of my belief. As such, those assumptions speak rather of the ones who made them. But this comment above has gone even further to the level I shall classify as irrational shooting in the dark. Oh, I am getting it! The sockpuppeter guy below insults the whole lot of people and then I am the one to be addressed back by the ones who do not only fantasize I called him here, but also are trying to insult me back. I am just not getting how could *I* be called *pathetic* then. :D To elaborate: Thank you for the comment; it tells me how you are thinking and what you are probably doing on the sr.wiki project. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 08:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Како то тврдиш да су дошли по позиву само они који нису изразили сагласност, а ти си дошао спонтано? Зар није доказан супротан пример да су позивани гласачи и са друге википедије? Та „технологија” ти је много блиска. Ово смо гласање пресликали на излед гласања на ср вики и то захваљујући оваквој необјективности.--Sahara (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Bas-Celik (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Sahara (talk) 07:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --SmirnofLeary (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Insufficiently involved in disputes between users on project of Wikipedia in Serbian language. My voice against because once he sided with one group of users, and another group called „hyper-nationalists“. I think this is inappropriate behavior of one administrator.[reply]
  • Keep Keep Strong support.--Павлица talk 14:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Zašto mislim da Dungodung ne zaslužuje mesto stjuarda: - Nezaineresovan je za poboljšanje, dalji razvoj i unapređenje sr.Wikipedije, - krši Wiki pravila u cilju održavanja statusa kvo, - nekorektan je: priča jedno, radi drugo a misli treće, - zloupotrebljava ovlašćenja. Sve u svemu vreme mu je za abdikaciju.--Dusanbasic (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Heh, lies said by a user currently blocked on srwiki. --FiliP ██ 19:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I could agree with the word 'untrue', but 'lie' sounds too hard. Not only too hard, but it also might be incorrect, in case that the user believes all those allegations are true. Further diplomacy would lead us to the state of weak shock: 'I really do believe those allegations are untrue, and caused by the block you have on sr.wiki. I did not block you, so I would feel so free to assume you might be wanting to further damage sr.wiki by this vote and nothing more. Thanks.' 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • To što je Dusanbasic blokiran je tvoja sramota, istorijat je malo duži. Tvoja prethodna rečenica je jeftin način za diskreditovanje neistomišljenika. Ti i tvoja kamarila dovodite do ratnog stanja na sr. wikipediji. Na sve pozitivne predloge idete đonom a ovde se vajkaš da nema predloga. Ovde vidim ima reizbora, zašto se kod kuće ne založiš za to, nego pravite nedodirljive, a pokušaje uvođenja reizbora blokirate. Pravite od Sr. Wikipedije cirkus. Zar ti glavnu reč i politiku na sr. wikipediji vodi "žena u crnom". Odgovori mi samo na jedno pitanje ako sve ovo ne znaš zašto ne znaš, a ako znaš zašto to činite.--Dusanbasic (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • It would be nice if you can explain what this has to do with his use of the steward tools, because this is not the place to discuss sr.wp problems as Dungodung doesn't act as a steward on that project. mickit 16:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kad je čovek čestit on svaki posao može čestito da uradi, ako nije onda nastaju problemi. Ovo o čemu pišem, je moralna kategorija što verovatni ni ti, ni on, ni Bokica ne možete da shvatite jer vam to nije blisko. Svoju blokadu strpljivo podnosim pa kad se to završi sve vaše marifetluke ću izneti u javnost ako vas u međuvremenu čestiti korisnici ne počiste ili se sami međusobno ne "pojedete".--Dusanbasic (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Hoo man (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Béria Lima msg 23:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ceradon (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Eptalon

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: de, en-4, fr-3
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Eptalon

edit
Trijnstel, could you explain why you consider both of these cases to have been emergencies? The dewiki community did not share this judgement. Also the criticism wasn't so much that Eptalon did something that local Checkusers would have done as well, but the clueless way in which he/she tried to reign in in a very complex and high profile case whose eventual completion triggered wide media coverage in German media for weeks and months (this section alone lists 20 press articles).
And yes, we are all human and mistakes happen, but what is important is an ability to learn from them. Contrast this case, where I was happy to vote "support".
I don't question Eptalon's good intentions, but one of the most powerful user rights in Wikimedia projects should not be handed out based on AGF alone. There is a myriad of other ways to contribute which do not require the same level of diligence. Regards, HaeB 22:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Fr33kman

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Fr33kman

edit


J.delanoy

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, es-2
  • Personal info: Completing my studies at university, looking for a job, and real life in general have taken much more of my time than they have in past years. I cannot say how 2012 will go, but I think that I can still benefit the project as a steward. In any case, there are many more stewards now than there were last year at this time, and if many people feel that my activity levels are too low, I am definitely willing to step down. J.delanoygabsadds 04:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about J.delanoy

edit


Jafeluv

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: fi, en-4, fr-3, ru-2, de-2, sv-2
  • Información personal: Jafeluv no desea ser reconfirmado. Sus permisos steward serán retirados al cierre de las confirmaciones.

Comments about Jafeluv

edit


Jusjih

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: zh-hant, zh-hans-3, en-3, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello. Being a steward since late 2007 and active in 2011, I have processed Steward requests. I would like to serve Wikimedia as a steward for 2012 while reachable at my talk page and email. Thanks for your past support and I look forward to getting continued support.

Comments about Jusjih

edit


Jyothis

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I have been on a moderate activity level compared to the previous confirmation period due to changes in professional life. I still frequent the IRC and help out with the real time requests that comes thru. I have relinquished my local bits as an admin in malayalam wikimedia projects as I could not devote enough time on it. I would like to continue to support the community as a steward if the community agrees.

Comments about Jyothis

edit


Laaknor

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: nb (= no), en-3, nn-2, sv-1, da-1
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Laaknor

edit


Leinad

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: pl, en-2
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Leinad

edit


M7

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: it, en-3, de-1, es-1, fr-1
  • Información personal: Soy steward desde 2006 y me gustaría continuar en el equipo. Aunque no tengo una alta actividad, sigo la lista de correo y monitorizo los registros de Meta-Wiki y la página de permisos. Se me puede localizar facilmente en mi página de discusión en meta, la cual está configurada para enviarme un correo electrónico cada vez que es modificada. Gracias.

Comments about M7

edit


Matanya

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, he
  • Personal info: Hello, my first confirmation as well . I have been active this year : (links: steward activity, Meta logs), mainly anti-vandalism and SRP requests. A nice graph is available here. I'm on IRC regularly and one of the CVN staff. I'm planning to remain active this year, (if you still want me around). questions and comments are welcome. best Matanya 23:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya

edit
Sure. The enwiki incident was a poor misreading issue, as explained on my talk page. As for the OS in dewiki, it was while mass-OSing an excessive libel attack by edgar von-webren. I have opened many tabs and OSed one by one, without noting one of them was dewiki. I hope this is a good and clear reply,if you have any further questions I would be happy to answer. best Matanya 06:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that sounds reasonable (I assume it refers to both incidents on dewiki) and leads one to expect it won't happen again. Happy to Support Support now. Regards, HaeB 15:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see my explanation on my talk page; here. best Matanya (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep Liangent 12:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Magister Mathematicae

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: es, en-4. Y puedo entender textos simples en varios idiomas romances
  • Información personal: De nuevo, como cada año, vengo a pedir sus comentarios sobre mi trabajo de steward. He colaborado en esta área por varios años y, si la comunidad me da la oportunidad, quisiera hacerlo por un año más.

    Durante este año me he dedicado principalmente a investigar bots de spam, bloquear vándalos y otras áreas (hey ptwiki ¿hora de elegir nuevos checkusers, no? ;).

    Si se me permite, quisiera usar este breve espacio para agradecer a la maravillosa gente que colabora en nuestros proyectos (recuerden, no somos sólo wikipedia ;) y particularmente a los que me ayudaron este año en el que he sido objeto (junto con otros usuarios) de una campaña de acoso cobarde originando fuera de wikimedia y que hizo que pasase gran parte del año ocupado ayudando a mi comunidad a lidiar con esta disrupción. A toda esa gente maravillosa que ayuda: ustedes son lo mejor.

    Participo en varios roles en Wikimedia y, como cada año, mis páginas de discusión (así como el wikicorreo y todos los demás canales de comunicación) están abiertas los 365 días del año para escuchar comentarios sobre cada uno de mis roles y los comentarios son siempre bienvenidos. Acerca de la confirmación: agradezco de antemano por las notas que dejen, si son de apoyo las agradezco, y si no, también. Te aseguro que las tomaré en cuenta y, como cada año, me servirán para mejorar mi trabajo.

    Y entonces.. ¿en qué puedo ayudarte? es:Magister Mathematicae 14:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Magister Mathematicae

edit
-Usa Wikipedia como su facebook personal, Ejemplo 1, poniendo su foto en artículos de varios proyectos, Ejemplo 2, Ejemplo 3--AeroPsico 20:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC),[reply]
-Bloquea de forma desmedida, especialmente con los nuevos, y sin avisar ni informar de las políticas infringidas. Creo que este es un motivo por el que muchos usuarios nuevos, y no tan nuevos, dejan de editar en Wikipedia.--AeroPsico 11:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
-Admite tener una cuenta títere aquí, pero no especifica que cuenta es, violando la política de Wikipedia:Usuarios títeres, ya que entre otras cosas, podría participar en votaciones con dos cuentas.--AeroPsico 14:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think someone with such an important position in wikipedia (Steward) should not sabotage the donations to the foundation using your user page, threatening the existence of the project. "Magister. Why not donate to Wikipedia"[4] ¿A steward sabotaging Wikipedia?, it looks crazy
"I understand that Wikipedia is one of the 5 most visited pages on the Internet. I understand that maintenance costs are very high. I understand that hosting a site and cost $ 2 million. I do not understand is that $ 9 million earmarked for salaries. Magister. Why not donate to Wikipedia"
Honestly I found the mentioned private data by simply clicking a "history" button, if you care of your privacy you'd better ask for somerevdelete or oversight. --Vituzzu 20:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks Vituzzu for your advice and directions. I've asked sysops several months ago to do this. But please also see my comment below, I'm not opposing this reelection only because of the treatment of information about my real name. Mar del Sur 15:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These proxies are listed on several spamlist, do you have some evidence of some mistakes? NOP is a general policy, basically local Wikipedias couldn't allow proxy editing. --Vituzzu 20:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification. A couple years ago, the "Beard" article on eswiki had no picture. So I added mine. Eventually it got replaced and I never protested, nor reverted nor discussed it. And it is now being argued as proof I should not be steward?Now, how is this related to steward issues, once again, I point that this is a movement to use steward confirmation as a mean to vent local grudges. Now what, should I be punished for making an encyclopedic video (that even got featured on main page) and added it on es:Parábola (matemáticas) just because I briefly show up on it? es:Magister Mathematicae 20:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And relating to the block of proxies, I talked about it on the local pump in order to proceed and it is not related to my steward tools but a merely local issue,the action was prompted after several weeks of banned trolls abusing proxies (since their main ips were already blocked) in order to vandalize and harass on articles and userpages. So I applied m:NOP to put temporary blocks on many IP proxies. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think a better beard might solve this matter of life and death. --Vituzzu 21:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was eventually replaced. I merely added an image to an article that 2 years ago lacked one. Then someone thought replace it with a better one and I'm completely fine with it. That's my sin. es:Magister Mathematicae 21:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are not understanding my point and did not clarify anything, at least, in my eyes. The bottom line is not whether the picture is suitable for the articles, or wheter it is a good idea to make public private information of other users in the village pump, or calling "son of a bitch" to other users (who, to be honest, deserved that), but rather allowing yourself do edits that nobody else does. If everybody would behave like you es.wikipedia would be a jungle. As admin, checkuser, oversight and steward you should be an examplar user, and, in my opinion, you are far from that. Rather your style is -at least in es.wikipedia- as already said rude to others and haughty.
Regarding the proxies, of course I know NOP, and that is the reason why I suggested to him to coordinate something like that in meta instead of doing that in a local wikipedia. I am not aware of that there was any consensus anywhere.
Vituzzu, please, don´t ridicule my diff about the picture of the beard (there are other cases), I am talking serious. In fact I didn´t ever started this kind of discussion in meta, but in the last year I feel that Magister went far beyond the line and it needs a stop. Of course that all this applies mainly to a local Wikipedia, but I believe that if the job as admin in es.wikipedia is out of his depth, let alone the job as steward.
If you feel I abused my sysop tools on eswiki and I need to "be put a stop", there's a proper procedure to follow on eswiki in that regars. Meanwhile, I stand this is a grudge vote. es:Magister Mathematicae 23:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Grudge of what? Is this your way to presume good faith? You really seem not to know me a very little bit. If flags were the world to me I wouldn´t just give them up. About your suggestion to follow the proper procedure in eswiki, I will consider it. Anyhow, as I said, a steward job is a bigger number than sysop in any wiki and if I don´t consider that you cope with the latter, just cannot support you here. --Poco a poco 23:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Vituzzu, I would also like to use this opportunity to ask you to remove my sysop/bureacrat flags, as I asked 2 days ago. Keeping it in "hold" makes no sense anymore. I was a low profile (but one of the most actives) sysop user until now and will be a low profile user tomorrow, no big change. I am exactly missing a bit of that and of modesty in Magister. --Poco a poco 22:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done btw I didn't ridicule you diffs, as you can see I'm paying attention to all other accuses, but frankly the "beard case" doesn't seem relevant to me. --Vituzzu 23:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to add that drini and his obsession for notorioty made him include this image of the adorable teddydrini in an essay and God knows where else. --Billyrobshaw 05:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
...so what ? DarkoNeko 07:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Laura Fiorucci 21:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Ha realizado un trabajo estupendo. Siempre confliable.[reply]
  • Keep Keep Rastrojo (D•ES) 11:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Maragm 13:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC) MM believes that everyone who is opposing his candidacy holds a grudge against him and that is not precisely the case. I don't doubt that he is useful in other wiki projects but in es.wiki his behavior is arrogant, disruptive, uncontrolled, he does not respect confidentiality, discloses private info about other users at his whim whenever he feels threatened, has no qualms about insulting others, complains about being harasssed in an external blog but my impression is that he is reaping what he has sowed. The atmosphere in es.wiki is not very pleasant now for many users and not everybody who has voted so far against him has been blocked or holds a personal grudge against him.[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Wikisilki 15:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Recientemente ha divulgado información personal sobre una usuaria durante una denuncia en el TAB.[reply]
Of course you have some link, don't you? --Vituzzu 18:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And what does the abbreviation TAB mean? --Geitost diskusjon 19:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here reveals the name of a user: Marjorie Apel/Mar del Sur [5] --Petruss 20:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revealing? I thought she had her real name as her username not so long ago. Everyone can see it in the logs.--Jcaraballo 20:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, revealing. Mar del Sur pidió el cambio de nombre de usuario (y el borrado de alguna edición en que salía, si mal no recuerdo) hace más de un año, poco antes de su candidatura a bibliotecaria, precisamente para evitar que se la identificara por su nombre real. Magister sabía esto perfectamente y ha vuelto a sacar a la luz dicha información personal sin que tuviera relación con la denuncia. Saludos, Wikisilki 20:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was necessary to mention the previous username to sustain a local case related to her sockpuppetry.
I merely pointed to username changes log, and she never asked to oversight it (since privacy violation is claimed here) SHould it be oversighted, I would not have linked to the public log showing the previous username. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is just false: there is no evidence at all of sockpuppetry, and certainly no need to mention his real name. Wikisilki 20:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is currently being discussed locally on wiki by other administrators. I merely linked a public log since I considered when making my statement it was relevant. I repeat should it had been oversighted, I would not have linked it. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please correct me if I'm wrong, Drini is told to have outed another user by posting a link to a public log? --Vituzzu 20:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"His real name"? Are you talking about Rapel? Is his real name Marjorie Apel? Nixón 21:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your statement, Magister, has absolutely no relation with her previous username, there was no need to point her real name again.
Yes, vituzzu, the log is public, but you have to know her previous username to find it, so he actually revealed this to all the users (and there's a lot) registered after the change, people that didn't knew (till now) what was her real name. This is graver since she is also suffering the same harassment from the same people Magister points below, something he knows well.
You know pretty well who are we talking about, so you are purposely misunderstanding the point, Nixón. Wikisilki 21:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Ps: I'm doing a real effort writing in english here, it's not polite to make fun on others limitations, Nixón.[reply]
If you need I can understand "plain" Spanish quite well. Well, you can see MM "lacked of grace" but this wasn't, definitely, a privacy violation. --Vituzzu 22:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I learn english by myself and obviously I'm not that good on writing. But I have no problem to do it (with a little help of online dictionaries). I just found Nixón's intervention disruptive and disrespectful.
Beyond the letter, the principle of the privacy policy is that you don't release personal information on an user if he/she doesn't want to. You can call this real-name-issue a "lack of grace"; as an active user in es:wiki and considering the background and development of the case (as the previous release of checkuser information of the same user outside the wiki), I see that differently and really grave. As I see it, it was a conscious and gratuitous offence deliberately done. That's my point, that's why I oppose. Wikisilki 15:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC) PS: Let me say that, besides this, I have Magister in high esteem as wikipedian and I sympathize with the situation of harassment that many wikipedians receive, and these are not empty words. I really do. But as Parmenides will say (if he was a rock star) rain is wet and sugar is sweet.[reply]
Retiro mi voto en contra. No puedo votarle a favor por los motivos que he expresado, pero esto se ha convertido en un espectáculo de acoso y derribo en el que no estoy dispuesto a participar. Saludos, Wikisilki (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you have some link, don't you? --Vituzzu 18:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is the link for the user comment [6] --Petruss 19:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, half a year harassment on and off wiki, from Petruss among others. Including harassment via private mail from this user. But of course I can't handle conflicts.
In any case, the opposes listed here as mostly a vent or revenge over local issues and not related to steward issues. I wont' further argue them now since I'm being accused of not being able to stay calmed on a conflict and engaging on rehashing discussions going on locally will only funnel the fire. I'll simply wait until confirmation closes to debunk the claims and present a long documented evidence for my case to the committee, showing the origin of the revenge votes and the proof of the ongoing campaign to manipulate this confirmation, and the missrepresentations here. Thank you. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An user started using Wikipedia's email system to harass Magister Mathematicae and then he posted one of these email? Am I right? --Vituzzu 20:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, The case by the way was already sent and resolved by the OMbudsman Commitee and it was resolved that no misuse of privacy-related tools was done. I will forward the email from the OC to the election commitee when it asks me for it. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Afaik the was really a strong abuse: the abuse of Wikipedia's email system to send insults and the natural consequence is the block of the email function for the the abuser. Several users lost even their internet connections because of email abuses, emails are not a free-place for harassment. --Vituzzu 21:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will discuss the matter when the election committee asks us our feedback on the opposed. Meanwhile, let's not extend a thread with pointless comments. es:Magister Mathematicae 21:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It won't be necessary I'm investigating opposes as an ElectCom member :)
--Vituzzu 22:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Un)fortunately I can understand Spanish and I can see deleted/suppressed revs: here there's the email you sent to MM and it was sent via Wikipedia but, actually, it's quite worse than you said. Can you give me a link about the outing MM made about you? You can answer in Spanish if you like. --Vituzzu 22:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hadn't seen this answer befor, sorry. The insults you see on that previous log where after he blocked me infinite, being an interested party, for calling him via mail sinvergüenza. The next insults I've said and always will that where because I went absolutely mad, and I've always said I'm sorry for having said them, but I was out of my mind. --Billyrobshaw 04:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • [7] Here he even reveals my facebook. This will be my last comment here. I don't care no more for wikipedia. Magis and other sysops made me hate the place, after 25000 edits, and dozens of FA and GA's.--Billyrobshaw 23:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment Maybe this blog with nearly 150.000 visits may help see the situation and how unhappy many spanish users are or where. --Billyrobshaw 23:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but attackblogs are not allowed since they are definitely canvassing and quoting them is itself a personal attack. I'm about to put it on the blacklist. --Vituzzu 23:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment Sorry, that wasn't my intention. Magister used to be very active in that type of blogs, until things turned around. Anyway, my intention was to show that a blog with 150.000 visits in about a year, explains a bit of the es-wiki situation, permanent blocks, and other things happened around Mr Drini and other totalitarian spanish sysops. --Billyrobshaw 23:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 23:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose a) Unnecessary disclosure of personal data of Billyrobshaw and Mar del Sur. There is a precedent that Mar del Sur did not like her name to be used anymore [8].
b) Furthermore, it seems Magister used his personal blog to continue the conflict with this user: [9] (!!!). Sorry. Jaontiveros 00:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the last 24 hours, pl created 173 articles and es did 267. But certainly you're not implying that somehow I'm the sole cause that eswiki is declining. Wait. What does that linked page shows? Compare [10]. Facts, facts, facts. es:Magister Mathematicae 02:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your links do show that the Polish Wikipedia has more articles than the Spanish one. Thor8 also never said you were the only reason for the decline. Jafeluv (talk) 08:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Magister is not perfect, but his huge contribution to the project clearly makes up for this faults (which I don't consider that terrible). Experienced, capable and very devoted. Wikipedia works better wiht him aboard --3coma14 05:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment 3coma14 y muchos otros usuarios y bibliotecarios de la wikipedia en español que ahora le votan, son todos pertenecientes al mismo grupo de desalmados que trata con desdén al resto de usuarios de la wikipedia y que provoca la salida, la expulsión de muchos excelentes usuarios de nuestra wikipedia. No solo eso, los nuevos usuarios salen espantados ante el trato de esta red clientelar. Aunque Magister está fuera de ella no deja de jugar un papel fundamental en sus relaciones de poder con esta red y el resto del bibliotecariado, llegando incluso a usar sus privilegios de checkuser para chantajear a otros usuarios. Ejemplo de Mar del Sur, perteneciente a esta red clientelar que tiene a la wikipedia en español en decadencia (por mucho que digas que no, no te lo crees ni tú Magister, muchos artículos destacados en portada son patéticos porque ha bajado el nivel de exigencia). Mar del Sur tenía una cuenta títere (Rapel) que Magister ocultó y usó en forma de chantaje para ganarse a alguien de esa red de indeseables (muchos penosos editores, prepotentes y con un claro grado de psicopatía). Así que Magister, ahí donde lo tienen, es un ser desalmado, que no le importa en absoluto nada wikipedia, salvo el poder que le confiere respecto a otros usuarios (para él "inferiores"). Por favor, no hagan que Meta se convierta en el nuevo juego de este psicópata. Thor8 12:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Inappropriate comment struck (Election Committee action) PeterSymonds (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I request this to be struck. Thor8 already had a chance to speak his mind, but he's using it now for personal attacks. es:Magister Mathematicae 14:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Decir la verdad siempre fue inapropiado en una dictadura. No te he atacado, simplemente te he descrito, ahí no cabe insulto o ataque. Thor8 14:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I request a block. Not being enough calling people psychopaths, now he start throwing dictatorship accusations, excusing himself on "making a description". es:Magister Mathematicae 15:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment
  • There is not such network or group of users to which 3coma14 or I myself would belong to, neither now nor has been in the past.
  • I have not been blackmailed by Magister on this issue. I don't know about other users being subject to pressure by him.
  • I don't have any sockpuppets nor meatpuppets. I do have a husband, who is a Wikipedia user. This information and the fact, that we share one IP address was given to Magister as a checkuser by me via e-mail, shortly after my husband registered at Wikipedia (April 02,2010).
  • I also asked Magister for directions on how to globally change my user name on September 06, 2010. He knows well, I had (and have) profesional reasons to do so.
  • Since the editor/owner of the blog mentioned by Magister above in his presentation (and many visitors editing comments there) have also raised suspicions against me and Rapel, and I have also been a victim of spam, apparently originating from this blog, where they also insisted in linking my nick with private data (profession, real name, family relationships), I insisted with other sysops on the need of removing the links of my previous signatures in Wikipedia Discussions. I really do not think it was necessary for Magister to refer to my real name again.
  • The theory that Rapel and I are the same person was released by Magister in another external blog, which currently doesn't exist any more, but many sysops of es:WP, other Wikipedians (over 140 members, and many of the here voting pro and contra) participated. He came up there saying that this where results obtained by him as checkuser. I thought it was an error (it is most irregular to discuss checkuser information in a external site whitout asking Rapel or me before) but just a mistake. He saids, he has forgotten my e-mails and I forgive him. But I see that he still defends this theory and he changed a Wikipedia policy in order to declare sockpuppets people because of the mere fact of being members of the same family. It was not possible to discuss calmly about this, because he refused to restore the previous consensus. He asked for me to be blocked and for the expulsion of Rapel and both sanctions were executed within a few minutes, without letting us speak out in our defense.
  • I'm clarifying these things just for the record. However, this is not my reason for voting against his reelection, but mainly the fact that I disagree with his way of resolving conflicts, and still more with the way he has handled problems arising with novice users, as well as his behaviour solving problems outside of Wikipedia.

I'm sorry for the extension Mar del Sur 14:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bla, bla, bla... The political machiche members and Magister always lying. Only for information: en:Psychopathy Thor8 15:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I request a block. I'm up for confirmation, and while I may disagree, I listen and respect all constructive criticism. However having an open disposition does not mean users have a free ticket to personal attacks and start calling psychopaths to others. An ElectCom member already struck such comments but user persists on his disruption. es:Magister Mathematicae 15:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep I have been a sysop on es-wiki for more than 6 years and know Magister work quite well. He is a reliable, fair sysop and steward with an excellent knowledge of policies. Es-wiki really needs a person like him since, as a massive community conflicts are our bread of every day. Anna 18:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Oppose. Considering his general actitude, lately it seemms to me that he is showing an upsetting arrogance. He doesn't take into consideration other users and doesn´t ask berofe taking hard measures. Magister is behaving as if he were over the rest of users. His lack of humility makes me oppose his confirmation in order to remind him that no user is essential. I honestly consider he should take a rest.--Wikiléptico 20:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Magister has dealt with a dire harassment situation by undesirable users and I would like to take this chance to condem their actitud and their coments in this very confirm section.[reply]
  • Comment Comment I find absolutely incredible the attitude of Spanish wikipedians that simply believe what this person says. I give him permission to reproduce the emails I sent him. There was no harassment by my behalf, because after my email calling him a SINVERGÚEnZa, which is exactly what he is, he blocked me infinite, being an interested part, without consultation or trying any formal repair. His arrogance is annoying, and you can't all believe what he says. The emails that I sent after where of pure impotence. I've always said that I'm sorry about that, but, in Spanish wikipedia, the sysops are over good and bad and take unilateral decisions without consultation. Anyone that knows me, knows that I was a good editor, only that I could not deal more with these attitudes and I was completely sick of the situation. For anyone that doesn know (and because they erase Userpages so that that carries on that way) I had 25000 editions, nearly 700 articles creates, 12 FA's and more than 50 GA's. All that doesn't mattter when egos of sysops like Magister come in play. --Billyrobshaw 20:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're posting in the wrong place. If you'd like your block to be reviewed due to your distinguished contribs, you know the proper procedure to be carried for eswiki sysops to deal with. es:Magister Mathematicae 02:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry? I really didn´t want to talk to you. Distinguished contribs? Mr. arrogant is back! --Billyrobshaw 02:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Again, you're then on the wrong page. This is the page for giving me feedback on my steward work. MOreover, in your offtopic story, you forget to present several key facts causing a misrepresentation: you were already blocked due to disruptive behaviour when, without me even talking to you or a previous interaction, you started harassing me via email out of the blue. You always seem to mention these little detail when you tell your story. Just some background here since you seem keen to forget details.
But again, this is completely unrelated to the point of this page, feel free to continue offtopic, however. es:Magister Mathematicae 20:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disruptive behaviour? That's the idea you have. I sent that email because you are a sinvergüenza. What you have done whith editors like Rosymonterrey, Caskete, Elemaki, etc... has no name..
Facts are facts. You attacked me using wiki mail on august 26 while you were already blocked for 3 months precisely for attacking users. And it was certainly not your first block for that reason. So it's not truly accurate to say that you were arbitrarily banned because a whim of mine. You had a long long long trail of attacking users. As always in my case, I provide the evidence links. But.. you always omit that part when telling your side of the story. Now, why would you prefer publishing the details on a disruptive harassing blog that even got wikimedia-wide blacklisted instead of providing us here with your version of the story? (in re: ezarate). Post it here! es:Magister Mathematicae 05:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover.. What did I do to Elemaki, mind you? Did I block him? Did I ban him? Perhaps you'd like to review your facts one more time. What did I do to Caskete, mind you? Did I block him? Did I ban him? Perhaps you'd like to review your facts one more time What did I do to Rosymonterrey, mind you? Did I block her? Did I ban her? Perhaps you'd like to review your facts one more time. You know, for example, Rosymonterrey was blocked (by some other sysop) since she openly admitted canvassing votes in order to rig a vote. Yet you come here damning me for doing somethign to her. Of course, if you're just looking for excuses in order to come here using the confirmation as a revenge venue, you don't need to be accurate with facts, do you?.
However, the sad thing is that some users are falling for your lies thinking I did someting to those users. I congratulate you on achieving your goals, even at expense of the truth.
Post here so I can openly debunk your falsehoods, instead of opaquely spreading misinformation. Post here! es:Magister Mathematicae 05:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment Harassment would be if it had carried on in time, but that's not the case. All those emails where sent in less than an hour, and I've never, ever sent him an email again. Just for the records. He's lying. ¿Could any sysop from here have a look at the history of his UserPage, where he has laughed of other users, used it to promote his blog, and talk againt the Foundation? He's (as always) used his sysop buttons to hide a lot of that. --Billyrobshaw 21:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+Comment Comment And just for the records, I've sent User:Vituzzu a complete explanation of what's been happening in Spanish Wikipedia the last years. Anyone who might like a copy only has to ask me for it. Thanks for your time. --Billyrobshaw 21:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Billy, para dar transparencia a este procedimiento, puedes publicar en algún lugar visible para todos la carta que le enviaste a Vituzzu asi todos pueden analizar los hechos? Esteban 13:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A usted no le daría ni un beso en la mejilla. --Billyrobshaw 03:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I bet that letter is a great example of NPOV, without any bias at all. Please Billy now that you're off es:wiki you should try to avoid slandering around. Time to move on, kiddo.--Wikiléptico 18:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment Kiddo??? Well, I think you've answered by yourself. It's funny that precisely you, an active participant of an external blog where insults where an everyday issue, have something to say about me. I didn't exactly go insulting people on a normal basis, like you or other sysops that frequented that place. --Billyrobshaw (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Debunking falsehoods is called being conflictive, Angus. es:Magister Mathematicae 07:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Either the numerous complaints in this page are justified, or they are, as you repeat in comments, a way to take revenge on you for "local grudges". Either way, you cause a lot of people to hold grudges against you (be they justified or not). In my book, that's being conflictive. --Angus 08:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you for the clarification. Either the opposes are justified (and therefore it's my fault) or they are not justified (and then it's also my fault). es:Magister Mathematicae 14:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me put it in different words: either you do wrong, or you do right in an unnecessarily antagonizing way. --Angus 16:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment Sorry, "you shouldn't make generalisations like this" Mar del Sur 11:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment So, so many "banned" users - also trolls? Thompson.matthew 13:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I understand it as "ignore the banned trolls" not "all opposes are banned trolls". That is: Ignore those trolling coming from users which are banned. It does not say "ignore the nonbanned trolls", "ignore the banned nontrolls" neither "ignore the nonbanned nontrolls". Now, why do people have so much trouble with some elementary set theory? There must be some psychological explanation I believe. es:Magister Mathematicae 14:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I really think those last two sentences didn't help at all. Thompson.matthew 14:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mathematics is hard. And I think the explanation for it must come from the social sciences. es:Magister Mathematicae 14:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mathematics is the human practice to think rigourously. I think things we do with numbers could also be explained psychologically. But I really very simply wanted to cite Darkoneko's words, which also are pertinent here. Mar del Sur 23:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback. I'd be even more thankful if you point me what part of the steward role I've been fulfilling for several years has caused so much conflict, or alternatively, what part of my steward work I've been not able to fulfill due to the purported conflictiveness of mine. es:Magister Mathematicae 16:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Superzerocool 17:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Strong oppose I think we can assess by ourselves if it's a good think or not that MM continues to be a steward.
    I can't trust the user because of his misuse of private data. Not only he "points" to real names with no reason (Mar del Sur case), he reveals real names (Petruss case), email adresses and Facebook profiles (including the friends' names of the FB user in the process) of some users. In addition, when he was a member of the now defunct eswiki Arbcom, he unilaterally revealed the private internal discussions of the committee without saying a word to the other members about it (I can't provide a link, Vituzzu, but I'm sure MM would like to confirm this). By policy, he must agree with the committee to do such action. And no external site was harrasing him on those days.
    We know that MM likes to expose himself publicly, it's not hard to find his real name, images (almost using Commons as Flickr) and his academic degree, heck, he even put images of himself in the Wikipedia articles (he coudn't find a better image to illustrate a beard, huh?) and in a essay (protecting the page [11] and using the abusefilter tool [12] in order to preserve the image). But when it comes to respect other people's right to keep some stuff private, he repeatedly failed, creating unnecessary conflicts.
    He should also respect the reasons given here to oppose his confirmation, not saying what can and what can't we say here.
    Bottomlime, I can't trust him because of his misuse of private data which leads to unnecessary conflicts. And someone said he should ignore the trolls, well, he does the opposite. --Ferrari 1 19:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This (the arbcom leaks, not the image-drama) may be the only serious issue to be keep in consideration (currently there are no other stuffs related, at least by far, with steward activities) but there must be evidences.--Vituzzu (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I'm just trying to establish that the ArbCom leaks and all the outings may be related to how MM behaves. These are not isolated episodes, but you're the ElectCom member and I'm not ;). BTW, so nice of you asking me for evidences few hours before the end of the voting period, I hope I'm not dealing with a deadline here. Still, I think that the easiest way is MM confirming this, but if he denies it or "plead the fifth", I'll see what I can do. For starters, the ArbCom used an external wiki site for their private discussions. For obvious reasons, only the members of that ArbCom term had knowledge of this. The site address was crc3.wikidot.com, you can check Internet Archive. So, at least one member had to leak it. Who? Well, here's an idea, we can ask them who did it. I may come back with more. I have to go deeper... --Ferrari 1 (talk) 20:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You know this aptitude to see plots everywhere is the worst visiting cart for you? As you can see I didn't take part at this discussion from the 10th to the 27th. Should I list all the plots I did during these days? By the way I found this which doesn't seem to be by far related to arbcom. Finally you are arguing MM was a member of the ArbCom, the ArbCom had a wiki and...then? --Vituzzu (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While this seems to be related to. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now you care about "aptitude", great. Why are you saying I see plots everywhere? I'm saying, I don't see right to doing this on the last day. I don't care what reasons you have to ask me for evidence today and not earlier, I'm just saying it's wrong, period. Also it's wrong the whole "you see plots everywhere", that was uncalled for. And you didn't answer, am I dealing with a 00:00 UTC deadline or not? Let's go to the argument, one more time. Step by step so all can get it. Eswiki ArbCom choosed to keep its discussions privately, the now defunct ArbCom policy allowed that. The only way to make them public is by agreement of the committee. For that, they used a wiki. No one knew about the existence of the wiki except the ArbCom members of that term, for an obvious reason, keep it private. One day, MM unilaterally revealed that wiki, with the purpose of exposing the private discussions. That was against the ArbCom policy because he didn't said a word to his fellows members. Any questions? I got one. Why MM isn't denying this? More evidence are coming. I hope. --Ferrari 1 (talk) 22:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So there was a leak from ArbCom, but how can you say it was MM? --Vituzzu (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm working on it, I didn't keep diffs. Some others ArbCom members complained about it and I'm trying to find those comments on eswiki, hopefully before Midnight UTC since you didn't tell me if it would helpful to provide this evidence after that deadline. Meanwhile, I found this other interesting "drama". Some days after the ArbCom leak, an eswiki sysop tried to built an external wiki for sysops' private discussions. MM also revealed that wiki address. This one wasn't against eswiki policy but still... like I said, I'm establishing a conduct.--Ferrari 1 (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just stopped looking on eswiki, I coudn't find evidence, I'm sorry about that. I did find something outside wiki. A couple of quotes by ArbCom member (on those days) es:user:Góngora on a blog of current eswiki sysop es:user:Raystorm. I'll do my best translating one of the quotes, the original comments are here: 1 2. "Drini, without any doubt was out of line, because he made public the ArbCom wiki without knowledge or consent, of all those who, with him, were members of the mentioned committee".
Now you may ask for proof that those comments are legit, if they actually belongs to the eswiki user and former ArbCom member Góngora. Well, if you check out his blogger profile by clicking on his username on Raystorm blog, you would find some blogs listed, owned by Góngora. One of them is "Wikipedia semanal" (Wikipedia weekly), the same blog promoted a couple of years ago on his user page on eswiki. Also, the blog it's currenly promoted on Raystorm eswiki user page. --Ferrari 1 (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por el comentario. Aunque no puedo dejar de sentir que esto es simplemente una respuesta al hecho de que ayer cerré un hilo en el tablón de biblitoecarios de forma contraria a tus deseos. Quisiera pensar que no considerarás esta intervención mía (así como la respuesta en donde me disculpo por no resolver como querías y te explico que los problemas no son ocasionados sólo por un tipo de usuarios) como una muestra de falta de calma en situaciones de presión (otros bibliotecarios lo hubieran manejado de otra forma, supongo). es:Magister Mathematicae 16:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pues si, si es por eso. Es lo que me ha movilizado a votar. Pero no porque has resuelto contra mis deseos sino porque lo has hecho al márgen de las políticas. Y no, no me refiero a esa última intervención tuya, sino a otras dónde por presiones del blog tan conocido llamas "hijos de puta" a usuarios cerrando puertas a todo tipo de vuelta atrás al conflicto, de tu parte.--Juan José Moral 16:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Una vez más gracias. Aunque me permito hacer una precisión: jamás he proclamado ser perfecto ni santo Job. Y me señalas un caso específico en el que perdí la paciencia tras varios meses de acoso continuado (acoso al que sigo sometido, por cierto), y sin embargo no me ves ahora perdiendo la calma. Y también estás sesgado (por un caso extremo) al no tomar en cuenta los cientos de ocasiones que durante varios años he intervenido y ayudado en situaciones conflictivas sin mayor problema. Pero supongo que es normal, el carácter humano es dar mucho más peso a una vez que se falle que a cientos de veces que se hizo el trabajo bien. Gracias por tu aportación.
Me acusas de corporativista y arbitrario. ¿No crees que si así fuera, simplemente hubiera borrado de forma directa esa página? Y por el contrario, te di mis opiniones y participé en un debate exponiendo las justificaciones de mi postura (que tienes todo el derecho de aceptar como inválidas, si no te agradan). Claro, si hubiera borrado la página me hubieras acusado de arbitrario, pero no haberla borrado no significa nada (sólo vale un lado de la moneda, entiendo entonces). ¿Y no estás de acuerdo también en que parte de los problemas también tiene su origen en usuarios que no son bibliotecarios? es:Magister Mathematicae 17:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose per MZaplotnik. --N KOziTalk 08:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Yes, yes of course. You're the only one who dares debunking. Even if you're not renewed, we need you. Please, we know those machinations an schemes. Wikipedia is not conservative. Wikipedia is not liberal. Wikipedia is wikipedia. And we need people like you, even when you're worn out, you have a clear vision of what Wikimedia is indeed. Dodo was your friend. Mar Was your friend. But Wikimedia is more important than Dodo and Mar, Thor8, and Mar, and you have, in spite of the hard pressures,do your duty. I'm your fan, MM. We really need you, because you're far of extrange influences. A steward is a person who makes his duty. This hero is MM. MM is not perfect, of course, but he has taken the right decissions in the right moment. That's enogh for me.Gustavocarra (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment @Gustavocarra: I wasn't and I'm not a friend of anybody (neither an "enemy"). Would you please comment your vote objectively without mentioning me? Thanks. Mar del Sur (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment CommentI'm very Sorry Mar, but I think that this is the best place to talk about "the big question". And it's all about the 2 factions that have risen the last 2 years, and undoubtly and objectively, you belong to one of them, as it is a fact that Thor8 belongs to the opposite faction. What we are seeing here is that those mortal enemies are now allied against an uncomfortable foe. But the truth behind, the truth that MM is trying to bring to light is that those 2 factions are not so disparate and even have a common link, and, even more bizarre, they have another common link with a person that MM has banned globally for stalking the former ChapCom committee president. I know this link, and evidences have been shown to me.
It's time to realize that the es-wikipedia of factions is over. It's time to take this seriously as grown up people. It's time to forget and forgive, just to give a chance to this new wikipedia and the new users who never have heard about our fights. It's time to make people comfortable while editing, and it's time, I advice you MM, for not to be so rude and easy trigger. And that's all I have to say. Now, I'm very busy.Gustavocarra (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Would you be kind enough to keep your personal exchanges on your talk pages? I'd be very grateful if you can do so. And gustavo, please refrain to elaborate theories about "my intentions", since you don't seem to be making much sense. Please. es:Magister Mathematicae 04:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment I'm sorry, but telling that this poll is, except in some cases, faction-oriented, is far from being a personal question, it's just the naked truth. And no kindness or politeness are suposed to include my disclaiming to tell the truth. I'm not making any theory about your intentions, but only presenting my own one, based in personal contacts, emails and some strong clues as in some words told by me in private situations which have been repeated to me anonymously years before. And this person is the hidden link between "bloquéame", "la marrana" and amical. You tried to debunk and you got strong enemies in doing so, enemies who now look for retaliation.
I don't like your temper, I don't like the way in which you interactuate with others, and even I don't like the way in which you handle private information sometimes. But I can't shut up while the same people who now claim for privacy, two years ago hailed the exposing of personal data, I'm referring the Ray's case. And also I can't shut up anymore while people who are continuously exposing personal data in blogs now are blamig you for doing so, even when the "victim" belongs to the other faction. This all leaves you as the only one, the only guarantee who can balance all this madness, even when I disagree with you in other points. This is another debate.
Please, despoil yourself of that bad habit of telling me to hush, I'm grown up, more than you are. And start to listen. Gustavocarra (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose --Geitost diskusjon 21:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC) per XanaG and my comment on the talk page, there isn't any reason at all to post other people's e-mail addresses onwiki, I'm seeing no reason here and the addresses are still onwiki, I don't understand that at all. And I don't see any regrets about that, so I don't know, what will happen another time, when there will be any conflicts. Noone should do reveal personal information, but a person who does should never have checkuser or oversight rights.[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose ---seb- (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Corruption[reply]
  • Support Support Érico Júnior Wouters (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep has helped a lot and worked a lot for us all. --Zyephyrus (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose Technopat (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC) While the controversy around Magister does not stem from his duties as a steward, but is almost exclusively due to events over at the Spanish Wikipedia, it does show that he has lost much credibility and can no longer count on the consensus vote of the community. Although he has, undoubtedly, long been a stalwart of the Spanish Wikipedia, a reference for those of us who have been editing there for several years, his way of dealing with things there over the last few months suggests that he take a break and reflect on what is at the root of much of this. After reflecting long and hard on the matter, I have finally decided to vote against the confirmation of Magister as a steward.[reply]
As can be seen from the lack of consensus here, the prevailing atmosphere at the Spanish Wikipedia is extremely unpleasant, and is due, in part, to Magister having "surrounded" himself a praetorian guard of biblios (admins) who seem to spend much time and energy at the village pump, on the IRC and arbitrarily blocking other, longstanding and dedicated admins and wikipedians. The net result is that many of these admins, with the tacit and implicit support of Magister, rather than devoting time to supporting the constructive work of an encyclopedia, are making many long-standing wikipedians, including myself, consider throwing in the towel and leaving the project.
It is clear that Magister has been the victim of totally unacceptable and vicious attacks, but so have several other wikipedians, and when he requested a vote of confidence, he received many, mine included.
As the Spanish Wikipedia no longer has an arbitration committee which could, in theory, help to defuse many of the extremely nasty conflicts which arise on an almost daily basis, this kind of situation will be a recurring feature of the Spanish Wikipedia, and Magister, a central and influential figure, is clearly not helping to resolve matters.
  • Keep Keep All those who speak of "arrogance" are those who don't remember what we´re doing here. Magister's work speaks for itself. He doesn't handle personal information with secrecy? Com'on, if he didn't, a lot of people would be out of the proyect a long time ago (sic). Real names? FYI: Google it. Campaign VS Wikipedia? If I remember (And certainly i do) "many" do not feel represented by the foundation or the chapters that exist. The beard theme, Illustrate an article i guess it's called... Would someone had a problem if the user was a Victoria's Angel wearing and illustrating a thong? Why not talk about the harassment he suffered and he remained ahead? Why not mention that he always attend applications fast and simple? It's easier to destroy 'cuz he doesn't acted as we wanted. Saloca (talk) 00:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose Wikipedia is governed by dictators (Magister, Wikisilki, Eccemal/Shonen Bat -his co-worker-, Escarlati, Mar del Sur/Rapel -her husband-, Kordas...) and almost nobody does anything to prevent it. They intimidate, threaten, they impose, they beset... Magister is one of them. Mar del Sur and Wikisilki are clones of Magister, but in this case they are right. It is my duty to vote against. For the cleanup of wikipedia. --Belibaste (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2012
  • Keep Keep --LadyInGrey (talk) 03:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment It is not my intention to cast a vote, since, for starters, my account does not meet the requirements to do so. Nonetheless, I want to leave a comment here, with the intention of setting the record straight regarding (of course, from my POV) some of the discussions on what has been called "the Spanish drama". I have spent several days tying all the loose ends about this drama, since the evidence is scattered all over the internet, and only part of it can be found in the wikimedia projects. There is a key point that I believe the ElectCom should take into account before making a decision on the steward confirmation of Magister Mathematicae (MM): Magister Mathematicae does not look as being harassed. There is no such thing as harassment in this case. He may perceive it as harassment, and it is natural for him to want to see it that way, since he is undeniably receiving some e-blows outside wikipedia. But the situation is not "harassment", since it appears that before that, MM willingly -yes, willingly- conducted a series of actions to taunt, provoke and challenge a number of banned wikipedia users. These banned users were either banned directly by MM, or their banning was supported by MM. After the banning, MM began to make fun of them, mock them, he engaged in name-calling, and of course received payback for this. Who started the conflict is now irrelevant, as I will detail below.
Sources of what I am mentioning are MM's twitter account @combinatorica, and MM's personal blog eswiki.wordpress.com. MM wanted to draw attention on him, and he got it with this behavior. Otherwise, how come that MM has banned many users over the years, and there has never ocurred a conflict of this magnitude before? Only the users banned in the recent year got some "grudge against him" as he calls it. The answer is simple: this time around, MM's behavior was to engage in a post-ban mock of the banned, bragging about his own untouchability, and making fun of the impotence of the banned users to replicate. A non-exhaustive list of examples follows:
  • [13] Before this post in his blog, MM had been virtually unnoticed, at least in the antagonistic blog MM despised, the banned users were focusing their grudges mostly against other admins. MM threw himself in the arena with this post, and deepened his involvements in the commentaries. The post is practically inocuous, but in the comments to the post, MM himself merrily entered into the name-calling game: "los cerditos se enojaron, uuuuy" (traslation: "the little pigs got angry, oh my")
  • [14]. This nickname stuck among MM's friends in es-wikipedia, and now all of them call the banned users "the pigs", both outside and inside wikipedia
  • [15] resorting to name-calling again
  • [16] "Problem, Petruss?" - MM challenging one of his antagonists this time from his twitter account, using the well-known trolling expression. This twit was published two days after user Petruss was banned permanently from es-wikipedia
  • [17] translation: "its clearer and clearer that the piggies' boat is sinking"
  • [18] -MM created the hashtag #oinkoink to again taunt them
  • [19] - MM bragging about his position as an admin. RECAB is the procedure in which an admin is reconfirmed or removed in es-wikipedia. The twit says "Now I learned that there is a RECAB coming for me, MWAHAHAHAHA"
There are many other examples, some of them as screenshots uploaded even in the blog despised by MM (where MM was also a commentator before he decided to engage in this petty little war). Understandably enough, MM might have received many unpleasant emails and he has been for sure been publicly criticized and ridiculized outside wikipedia. His response? He decided to ignore the fact that he participated in starting the fire. He decided to bring back this war into wikipedia again, writing in the village pump of es-wikipedia on 11/26/11, this time around publicly calling S.O.B.'s to the ones he previously called pigs.
To finalize, I do not know who is right and who is wrong in this silly war waged in twitter and blogs; perhaps both sides are at fault. This is not really relevant to my comment and perspective. What is actually relevant, is that one of the parties involved is a wikimedia steward, checkuser and admin who chose not to simply ignore it and let it pass but chose instead to immaturely enter into the conflict. This individual, being what he is, has at his disposal the checkuser and admin tools attached to his wikimedia roles (whether he has used them for his fights or not is also irrelevant, the fact is that his position is supposedly above this type of conflicts. Before 2010, he had behaved maturely and role-modeling, but now he seems a completely different person who not only is part of this conflict, but also keeps bragging about his unbeatability, calls for a boycott on the donations to the foundation, and publicly makes fun of the executives at wikimedia). This kind of personality in a steward of wikimedia is concerning. We expect that a steward, checkuser and admin will behave with maturity, keep his temper, lead by example and be a role model of what wikimedia stands for. Regrettably what I gathered from reading all the drama, is that the individual with most capabilities in es-wikipedia, turned out to be exactly the opposite; and not because of alleged harassment, but because of his willingness to engage in puerile playground bullying. The saddest thing is that MM does not realize that he is as guilty as any of his antagonists for the escalation of this conflict. I cannot conceive that any other steward would behave in the same immature way. If anyone wants to taunt, provoke, and in sum, wage petty playground wars, ok, that is their decision, but should a wikimedia steward behave like that, for months? The ElectCom should decide on that.--Uponieft (talk) 17:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, do you think a clear "single-shot" account can be trusted? --Vituzzu (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on our proficiency in logics. Being a single-shot account does not render the arguments invalid. You may choose to ignore them, but that does not make them less true, it will only be a huge flaw in the evaluation process. Anyways, if the process does not rely upon who is bringing the arguments, but the arguments themselves, you can follow all of the links and draw your own conclusions. --Uponieft (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Actually it's quite easy to find your main account, without a checkuser) but it's true thesis shouldn't generally evaluated basing who is writing them only if there are strong evidences. Your evidences show an heavy level of conflict among MM and a certain (maybe many, I cannot evaluate) es.wiki's users, but, again, there's nothing related to stewards activities: if MM would be even undef. blocked on es.wiki he will go on being a stewards, unless there are misuse of stewards' tools. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but anyone can get confused after seeing the extreme fervor used by MM to try to dismiss negative votes [20], [21], or the vehement defense (again, non-steward related) that MM's friends are making [22], or even your interest expressed in poking all the details of non-steward related comments [like line 163. Believe me, this page's debates are far from being straightforward. Now to the point, since I don't want the ElectCom to miss it. First, after reading my long comment I hope that all attempts from MM to dismiss the negative votes arguing they are "accusing him out of harassment" are disregarded; these votes have the same value as others as there doesn't appear to have been any harassment. Second, my long intervention may not point to a clear violation of Stewardship guidelines. However, let us not be so naïve as to think that a user might be able to kill Jimbo and still get away with being a steward. It is of course expected that a user has to have a minimum trait of personal integrity, ethics, and reliability. The policy does not mention it expressly, but it doesn't need to. In my intervention, I attach links that demonstrate that MM is not reliable. Filter out my personal opinions and let the facts presented speak for themselves, that should be enough for drawing conclusions. I am also saying that the ElectCom should reflect on whether this is the type of person they want to have as wikimedia steward. That's it. --Uponieft (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Venía a decir lo mismo: ¿por qué no es confiable su testimonio? Si dice la verdad, qué tiene que ver que su cuenta tenga una sola edición? No sería mejor comprobar si lo que dice es cierto? Lo que no causa la menor confianza aquí es que se descalifique un argumento, solamente porque el usuario ha tenido que apelar a una nueva cuenta para expresarlo. Algo, por lo demás, esperable, en tanto que existe el temor razonable de que cuando uno se manifiesta en contra de injusticias y abusos de bibliotecarios, en la Wikipedia en Español pasa a ser el blanco de estos mismos abusos. Lamentablemente en diversas ocasiones el mismo Magister ha sido promotor, por obra o por omisión, de ese estado de cosas.
Yo, por mi parte, doy la cara y hago mía cada una de las palabras del anónimo. ¿Yo tampoco soy de confianza?
Algunos puntos para agregar. El hecho de que Magister se defienda con uñas y dientes ante cada voto o argumento en contra es en sí mismo un síntoma de su extravío. Se ha anquilosado y quiere conservar su cargo, como si este por sí mismo fuera deseable y un premio. Ha perdido el norte. Cualquier persona que mantuviera su centro, en su lugar habría renunciado no sólo a su cargo de Steward, sino al de Checkuser y el de Bibliotecario, y esto, sin esperar remociones forzosas. Aquí han venido no solo usuarios bloqueados y participantes de blogs que lo acosan: hemos venido muchos usuarios que no somos parte de la guerra que él mismo ha sostenido e incrementado con sus intervenciones. Esto debería haber sido suficiente para convencerlo de renunciar y que esto no es ni un acoso concertado externamente, ni todos somos sus enemigos. Él sí es parte de esa guerra, y tiene su derecho, pero lo que no debería haber hecho es tomar decisiones en las wikis que tengan como horizonte tales escaramuzas.
Se le haría un gran bien a MM si se le retira el permiso de Steward, ya que él no puede tomar la decisión por sí mismo por haber perdido el punto de referencia de su conducta en Wikipedia. No solo merece, necesita un buen descanso para replantearse su rol. --Juan José Moral (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep in mind votes without comments (especially sockpuppets' ones) are not even taken in consideration. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment Re your remark, Vituzzu, does that apply to Keep Keep and to Oppose Oppose votes or just to oppose votes? Maragm (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You know, the central idea of "confirmation" is "bringing argument against", basically the burden of proof belongs to opposes. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep Helpful, polite, useful QU TalkQu 19:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]



MarcoAurelio

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: es, fr-2/3, en-2/3. Puedo llegar a comprender bastante bien (aunque no escribir mucho): an, ast, ca, gl, ext y pt; y demás lenguas romances.
  • Información personal: Estimada comunidad. Ante todo hago notar que soy el usuario que fue en su día conocido como Dferg. Esta es, por tanto, mi segunda confirmación desde que fuera elegido en 2010; la primera puede ser vista aquí. Aunque el proceso de cambio de nombre fue prácticamente global, algunos registros todavía siguen apuntando a mi viejo nombre. Durante este año he continuado atendiendo solicitudes en todas las áreas; incluyendo monitorización de pequeños proyectos y detección de spam. Este gráfico (Ojo: herramienta nueva, algo incompleto todavía) muestra mi distribución de tareas durante este año. Asimismo sigo siendo un participante activo en las listas de correo checkuser-l, stewards-l y en nuestra cola de OTRS donde también se reciben frecuentes peticiones así como en diversos canales de IRC al mismo propósito. Con más de 1.600 acciones registradas durante este año y más de 5.300 acciones en total desde mi elección, soy el segundo steward más activo del equipo. Considero humildemente que he estado lo suficientemente activo y diligente durante este periodo y he servido al propósito para el que fui designado. Me gustaría continuar y por lo tanto les pido su confianza por segundo año consecutivo agradeciéndoles los comentarios que sobre mi trabajo como steward deseen realizar. En la parte superior tienen enlaces a los diferentes registros públicos sobre mi actividad dentro y fuera de Meta-Wiki. Muchas gracias por su atención, quedo de ustedes y atentamente. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 19:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MarcoAurelio

edit


Mardetanha

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: az, fa, en
  • Personal info: I hadn't been active as my previous years but I was active most of the year, mostly helping IRC requests (where I am available most of the time). for now I think I would have time to serve as steward for another year. Mardetanha talk 09:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mardetanha

edit


Mav

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, es-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone! I've been a Steward from the start in 2004 and would like to continue helping. I mostly help with setting bot and sysop flags and with deletions on small wikis.

Comments about Mav

edit


Melos

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Hi everyone, I was a bit busy with my real life but I tried to be enough active. Like the last year I'd like to continue fighting vandalism and helping the community as steward. Thank you in advance for your consideration :-) --Melos 17:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Melos

edit


Mentifisto

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, it-2
  • Personal info: Hi there. I have mostly been active earlier last year, although I'm still 'passively' around lately (handling the more background tasks, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL. Ultimately, I'd be unable to objectively judge whether my level of activity is sufficient, or whether my actions are adequate - so I'll leave this for you to decide! :-) -- Mentifisto 02:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mentifisto

edit


Mercy

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: cs, sk-2/3, en-3, de-1, fr-1, es-1, la-1, grc-1
  • Información personal: Mercy no desea ser reconfirmado. Sus permisos steward serán retirados al cierre de las confirmaciones.

Comments about Mercy

edit


Millosh

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

Comments about Millosh

edit


Pathoschild

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, fr
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Pathoschild

edit


PeterSymonds

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Hola a todos. Soy steward desde el año pasado, y me gustaría mucho continuar siéndolo. Soy un usuario muy activo, y respondo solicitudes en diversas áreas. Estoy disponible regularmente en el IRC para cualquier emergencia, y respondo a gran número de ellas.
    Comprendo muy bien las políticas que rigen a los stewards y no tengo miedo de actuar ante las emergencias y consultar a otros cuando sea necesario. Espero que la comunidad esté conforme de mi desempeño hasta ahora. Mi registro habla por sí solo, sin embargo, si tienes alguna pregunta no dudes en hacérmela. Muchas gracias. PeterSymonds (discusión) 00:18, 15 Enero 2012 (UTC)

Comments about PeterSymonds

edit


Quentinv57

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-3, de-1, lb-1
  • Personal info: Hi. This is my first steward confirmation (I should be confirmed in one year as I was elected on last elections but I prefer to hear your impressions right now). During this period, I've dealt as promised with on-wiki steward requests and have tried to do the best I can to answer user requests on IRC. But last months I've especially worked on improving the way stewards can detect long-term vandals and on repairing their damages. I really invite you to check my steward actions and to tell me if you have any suggestion that could make me improve the way I work as a steward. Thank you.

Comments about Quentinv57

edit


Ruslik0

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en-3, ru-N
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Ruslik0

edit


Shanel

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, fr-2
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Shanel

edit


Shizhao

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: zh, en-1, ru-1
  • Información personal: ¡Hola a todos! Soy steward dese el 2005. Estuve bastante activo durante el año pasado, procesando las solicitudes a stewards, y revisando los proxies abiertos, y bloqueando los abusos globales en las wikis (cross-wiki abuses). Me gustaría seguir sirviendo a la comunidad de Wikimedia en este 2012. Muchas gracias por su constante apoyo.

Comments about Shizhao

edit


Wpedzich

edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pl, en-4, de-2
  • Personal info: (Unfortunately?) per my election statement, I do not have as much time to devote to Wikimedia projects as I would love to - combined professional, family and school duties do not always allow me to be aware of what I am doing (OK, let us just say I am not always that full of energy to act). Still, I try to hang around, offer any word of advice that I can spare if I know the correct answer, and try to react in emergencies, especially when being called upon to do my steward duty while on IRC. If the Community accepts my limited availability and occasional grumpiness, I will be happy to serve yet another term as a Wikimedia steward. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Wpedzich

edit
Yeah of course, it's why I used the brackets ;-) . But I mean if we a have to give this tools, I prefer to transmit it to peoples who'll really use it than to peoples who'll sit on it. By the way I don't tell they are inactives in generals, I'm sure they take lot of time to take care of sysop tasks or just contribute to some projects. But if they prefer spend more time to their projects than took care of stewards tasks so maybe they shouldn't purchase the steward tools. It's my point of view and I express it on this confirm 2012 with a neutral. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 02:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Confirm/2012/es&oldid=10932360"