Stewards/Confirm/2020/Sjoerddebruin

Sjoerddebruin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: nl-m, en-3
Personal info: Hello everyone! In the beginning of the last year I've started working on a Wikimedian-in-Residence project, which took a lot of my time. After the end of the project there were some issues in my personal life that required my attention, so this wasn't a very active year. I did try to join conversation with the other Stewards and communities in the little spare time I've had by attending real life events and conference calls. I hope my personal life will become more stable soon so I can devote myself to the community again.

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about Sjoerddebruin

Remove Sorry but activity is too minimal: 1 action in March, 5 actions early April, April->August no activity, then using oversight on fawiki (a wiki with local oversighters - and no explicit claim of an emergency), then 1 more action, and then nothing from August->now. (In fact, he could be automatically removed on February 22 if he does not make any more steward actions, under Stewards policy#Inactivity - depending on whether we count his Meta blocks made under MSR as steward actions). Rs chen 7754 14:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC) Slight correction 03:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Way too inactive, but competent enough. Hope can see him more if confirmed.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to vote keep because we all have had ups-and-downs in our lifes. It looks Sjoerd's activity this year is indeed low, but he's competent and has been active in discussions as well, so he's not been totally inactive. I'm willing to trust his statement that this year he'll have more time to do more on-wiki stuff. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Camouflaged Mirage. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Rschen7754. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarcoAurelio. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Richardkiwi (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC) - (almost) not active[reply]
Remove per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Turkmen ^talk 15:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Marco. I have no problem with inactivity so long as they try to stay abreast and aren’t jerks. I don’t see that as an issue here. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarcoAurelio. I'm willing to give him a chance. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Marco. Mahir256 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove as I said elsewhere, I don't generally like opposing for a lack of activity but someone who's barely used the tools this term doesn't show a need or use for them. So I agree with Rschen's analysis. Praxidicae (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Some concerns are raised here, but mostly per MarcoAurelio, I'm undecided. --Stïnger （会話） 18:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Remove Gdarin | talk 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Marco stwalkerster (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Rschen7754. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Minorax (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per inactivity. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Eatcha (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754. Armbrust (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Linedwell ^[talk] 19:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Marco and others. Functionaries are still volunteers, and RL shouldn't be punished. Miniapolis 20:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Give him a chance. Ankry (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per MarcoAurelio. Trijnstel_talk 20:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Doesn't appear to have been that active in 2018 either. ST47 (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Marco and Miniapolis. --Kostas20142 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactively. --Wright Streetdeck 04:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--HakanIST (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per MarcoAurelio. I think we should give him a chance. --eldarado^✉ 12:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Kippenvlees1 (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - like every1 else he's not perfect & per Camouflaged Mirage Klaas `Z4␟` V: 18:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove La coince (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that inactivity is not a good reason to remove any user right. --Garam _talk 21:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Geonuch (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Maybe it is wiser to first get your personal life sorted out and than go for new steward rights. Keep the honours to yourself. RonnieV (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Bart Versieck (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Remove -Mardus (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Jusjih (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Camouflaged Mirage. --Poti Berik (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I hope this year You will find more time for the project. There is no reason to remove as long as You would ike to come backmasti <talk> 19:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I asked Sjoerd de Bruin to name three substantial things he had done last year. Sjoerd de Bruin's answer came back in a timely manner, with a ping as requested, and included enough to show me he is still committed to the Wikimedia movement which is the most important trait any steward should have. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per concerns above --DannyS712 (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry, not very active. --Uğurkent^talk 13:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zyephyrus (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Inactivity shouldn't be the reason to remove. Any help is good help. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity. GFJ (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 00:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity issues. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keeeeeep —Eihel (talk) 00:56, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Schniggendiller (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC) RL has ups and downs, sometimes the downs/the RL-busy-times are deeper/last longer then expected :-/[reply]