Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Techman224

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
ContentsYesNoNeutral

Techman224 talkcontribsSULutil (accounts) / stalktoyglobalcontribscrosswiki-nessconfirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: en-N, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello, my name is Techman224, and have been editing since May 2007. I started out on the English Wikipedia, where I first got introduced to counter-vandalism, and where I first got rollback. In late 2008 I started to get involved in CVN and SWMT. As time went on, I started to get involved in other projects. In February 2012 I became an administrator on Wikimedia Commons, and in early January 2013, I became an administrator on Wikidata. This brings me experience with multilingual projects. I also have done various other activities. I'm also an OTRS agent, working mostly in permissions. I have done some work with the Mediawiki software and even done a few commits in Gerrit. I also help deal with bugs on Bugzilla when I encounter one. If I become a steward I could help with cross wiki vandalism and spamming, which I currently report on Meta and in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect channel. Being able to globally block cross wiki spammers and vandals would help me greatly. I'm also comfortable with the Abuse Filter, which will come in handy when Global Abuse Filters are enabled on more wikis. I use it on both Commons and Wikidata, and it would help greatly against spambots. I also hang out on IRC, so I would be able to help with requests from there as well. I'm also open to doing other steward activities like Permissions and doing some Checkuser queries. I agree to follow all relevant policies that come with the tools, and I will be submitting my identification before the deadline. Thank you, Techman224Talk 18:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdraw: I withdraw my nomination. It looks like my nomination will not succeed. It's time to move on to other things. I'll be back. Techman224Talk 02:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Techman224


  Yes

  1. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   (weak support) I trust Techman, but I'm not sure he is completely ready. I think he would do a good job if elected, however. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Why not? —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    See the "No" section. Vogone talk 19:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kolega2357 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   No problem. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Nirjal stha (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   nShrestha (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Conny (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Conny (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Давид Блрцян (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Давид Блрцян (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Work2win (Not eligible, checked by Igna)   Work2win (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2012   Per PiRSquared17 Abd (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2012   --GZWDer (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   JurgenNL (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jusjih (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lumos3 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Lumos3 (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Drzewianin (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Carlosandres2000 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Carlosandres2000 (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   "My activity on here depends on what goes on in real life." yes life is unexpected, like I'm voting you now, cheers. --AldNonUcallin?☎ 19:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   He has much experience in many areas. Wpollard (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rome2 (talk) 10:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ivanaivanova (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   ок! Ivanaivanova (talk) 18:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  No

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I don't think Techman224 has enough experience dealing with relatively more complex issues than vandal-fighting. Also I must say that the temporary admin request on Meta (mentioned in the questions) was very off-putting to me. MF-W 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @MF-Warburg: Thanks for the comment, but do you mean by "more complex issues" exactly? Techman224Talk 03:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean things like conflict resolution, "difficult" policy interpretation, making closures of hard-fought discussions, ... It's not possible to give a complete list of areas in which experience would be useful, and of course I also don't expect anyone to have it in all of them. Maybe my feeling is similar to Snowolf's in Ajraddatz' candidature (neutral vote no. 1). --MF-W 19:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   weak contributions. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Per MF-W. Snowolf How can I help? 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Also per MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-W DangSunM (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   He recently used an invalid revdelete reason on Wikidata, so I am not sure that oversight access would be a good idea. A "not now" rather than a "never". Jasper Deng (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    See d:Wikidata:AN#Spam_Revdel for the discussion. For the record I did revert the action and brought it up on AN when he objected. Techman224Talk 20:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   not now, but your time will come (if you want ofc.) Stryn (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Emin message 19:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   rubin16 (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   D Eaketts (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-Warburg. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-W. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   John Vandenberg (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Armbrust (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Per MF-W, Jasper Deng, Stryn... etc. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. SleaY (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   SleaY (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   David1010 (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Byfserag (talk) 07:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Microchip08 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   — Microchip08 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014  Mehran Debate 11:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Goldenburg111 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Cedalyon (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Chris Troutman (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Taichi - (あ!) 07:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jafeluv (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Obelix (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Niesy74 (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Courcelles 02:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Alberto568 (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Florence (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Glaisher [talk] 17:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rzuwig 19:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Guerillero 02:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014  --Hubertl (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   "It's very hard to predict how much time I will spend here." This statement does not bode well. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Ronhjones (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   ST 22:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Maurice07 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Maurice07 (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Abaddon1337 (Verification pending)   While good cross-wiki experience, he lacks of foreign languages knowledges to help him in this task. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. George23820 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   George23820 (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

  1. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I can't decide which option to choose here, so I chose neutral. I agree with both "sides". Wiki13 talk 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Brateevsky (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Guycn2 (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Not sure yet. Trijnsteltalk 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Southparkfan 23:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   AGK [•] 23:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Bene* (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Steinsplitter (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Really difficult to judge this. Not enough for a yes, but not enough for no either. GyaroMaguus (talk) 02:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I agree with Gyaro. LlamaAl (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   No personal concerns about the candidate, though not enough internal ticks for a yes vote  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014   Not ready. Zerabat (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Clockery Fairfeld (talkenWS) 17:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Wikit 19:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I don't have a concrete opinion about the candidate as of now. Quentinv57 (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Not sure. Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Per Wiki13 Pratyya (Hello!) 04:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kapsuglan (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Żyrafał (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   —Locke Coletc 00:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]