Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Avjoska

< Stewards | Elections 2015

Avjoska

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: et-N, en-3, fiu-vro-2, ru-2, de-1, fi-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    • a link to my user account on Meta, and a link to a second active account that meets the prerequisites.
    • a list of languages I can read and write: et-N, en-3, fiu-vro-2, ru-2, de-1, fi-1
    • a short summary of my participation in the Wikimedia Foundation: admin on etwiki since April 2007.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Avjoska
    • The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

      Yes

    edit
    2. Sabbathbloodness (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sabbathbloodness (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. StarDeg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  StarDeg (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Nickispeaki (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Nickispeaki (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Hardenacke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Hardenacke (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Anatoliy (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Visem (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Visem (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Daemon2010 (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Maerzaries1985 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maerzaries1985 (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. PointsofNoReturn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  PointsofNoReturn (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. 장영재탐험단 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jangyeongjae Tamheomdan (張榮在探險團) (talk/profile) 02:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Ardiedan1995 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Ardiedan1995 (talk) 08:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. A1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  A1 (talk) 10:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Gotty14 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Gotty14 (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Fil211 (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bookvaedina (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. Coldcakes22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Coldcakes22 (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Orienomesh-w (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Orienomesh-w (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. א.פ עריכות (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  this seens like the Rational Option א.פ עריכות (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Jacky50412 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Jacky50412 (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Maestroso simplo (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Maestroso simplo (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Velirand (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Velirand (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  She seems to be ok. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Kuuskinen (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kuuskinen (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         WordSeventeen (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  WordSeventeen (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. The Winter's Tale (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  The Winter's Tale (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    41. 符环宇 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  符环宇 (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    43. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 15:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Biel1000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Biel1000 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Ochilov (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Ochilov (talk) 07:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Reneman (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Exx8 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Exx8 (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bulldoc (talk) 01:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Royalmate1 (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    48. WikiOriginal-9 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Nrgullapalli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Looks committed Nrgullapalli (talk) 07:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    50. Flixtey (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I think the candidate possesses an experience which may compliment the role he or she is standing for Flixtey (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mjesfahani (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Seven twentynine (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mehdi ghaed (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Jaredzimmerman (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Jaredzimmerman (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    53. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  స్వరలాసిక (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Dthomsen8 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    55. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Robert the Devil (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Robert the Devil (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 04:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    58. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Obaid Raza (talk) 04:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Jaceksoci68 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Jaceksoci68 (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Caro L (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Caro L (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    60. Cesaro2012 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Cesaro2012 (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Openskye (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Openskye (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    62. K.A.Gesell (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  K.A.Gesell (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Boboseiptu (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    64. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Lisek94 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Lisek94 (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    66. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    67. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    68. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  HalanTul (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Pittsburgh Poet (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Pittsburgh Poet (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Dfrr (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  I just want to vote. Dfrr (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Archolman (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dick (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    72. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Kubura (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    73. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    74. 1AnuraagPandey (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Anuraag Pandey (Leave a message) 05:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Hoccachhoc (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  good Hoccachhoc (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Claudre (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Claudre (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Rmb009 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Rmb009 (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    75. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  TeriEmbrey (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    76. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  DrTrumpet (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    77. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

      No

    edit
    2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No serious effort made to convince the voters why they should get our support. Rschen7754 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Nomination statement and lack of answers to questions do not inspire much confidence in ability to be a good steward. Furthermore, your cross-wiki experience is very limited. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Vogone (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 • , If I don't apply AGF I would think this is a joke nomination.--AldNonBicara? 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Based of of the questions page, this user has no desire to become a steward. Eurodyne (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mh7kJ (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  To write what you can not show how much you care this job. --Uğurkenttalk 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Freshman404 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Freshman404 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Lixxx235 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --L235 (talk) enwiki 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Has not been active on Meta since posting the candidature; did not answer the questions (also not after being informed of them on her home wiki). MF-W 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  There's no statement nor has this editor bothered to answer any questions at all, Quite frankly it's a joke. –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No serious/convincing statement. ~ Nahid Talk 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Long delay in answering questions. Stewards are human but a fairly quick response time is expected. Green Giant (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  If you're not answering questions, then you don't seem to take this election serious Mbch331 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Asav (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  As of above statements. Asav (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Ejensyd (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Iooryz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  as above Iooryz (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Legoktm (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Emptywords (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Too little contribution to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  You're not taking this election seriously. --Atcovi (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  SPQRobin (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The lack of a more in-depth nomination statement as well as the unresponsiveness to questions lead me to oppose this candidate, especially as the user has been active on their homeproject in the meantime :( Snowolf How can I help? 22:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  As others have mentioned above, the lack of a statement by Avjoska (who contends she can speak English well) seems to imply by her silence that either she does not care about the election, or cannot, in fact, speak English very well. From this I also am lead to believe that she has no opinion on why she should be selected or what she can contribute to the forum, and if that is the case, that she has no opinion, then she does not belong here. Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  While I clearly like short statements, it should at least give a basic idea of the candidate. -Barras talk 22:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Moony22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Doesn't seem to be taking this seriously. Moony22 (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 23:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Laberinto16 (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Laberinto16 (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I see no attempt to provide an election statement or answer questions. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  - tucoxn\talk 00:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Limited cross-wiki involvement and experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No convincing statement Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No crosswiki experience.[1] Nemo 08:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Herby talk thyme 09:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  I'm sorry but I see you've not answered to questions about your candidacy. Furthermore your statement is too short to convince me voting for you. Nastoshka (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No answers to the questions and imo this user doesn't have enough experience either. Trijnsteltalk 12:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Tombo208 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Tombo208 (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    47. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    48. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  No nom statement, didn't answer questions AmaryllisGardener talk 14:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Lack of effort to make a proper statement is a bad augury. Dweller (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    50. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 15:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    51. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    52. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Kusurija (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC) no time for a statement?? no vote from me![reply]
    55. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The candidate has not shown commitment not to answer the questions so far he made, nor clarifies its purpose in becoming steward, which in my opinion shows that he would have difficulty in performing the functions that he would be assigned, if elected Leon saudanha (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  -- Litlok (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    58. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Might be convinced to change my vote if the user answers the questions, but the delay is a bad sign. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    60. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Gilc (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 02:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    62. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  ● Mehran Debate 06:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Kevin12xd (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Kevin12xd (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    64. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wpollard (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Visdaviva (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  If you are not responsive during your own election, then you are either seriously caught up IRL or too lazy for the job. Visdaviva (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    66. Tom Morris (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  No nomination statement. Stewards are given a significant amount of power across all the Wikimedia projects. The least the community can expect in granting such a right is a statement from the candidate. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    67. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    68. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  CT Cooper · talk 14:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Atcan (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt) •  Atcan (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    72. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No attempt at even answering the questions. Cross-wiki activity better than average but not impressive either. Jasper Deng (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    73. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    74. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Hat mich in ihrer Stellungnahme nicht überzeugt. ST ○ 22:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    75. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    76. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    77. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    78. Bzweebl (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 04:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    79. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    80. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per other comments. Widr (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    81. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  candidate has not shown any interest to attempt questions till now and seems to be not so concerned over the elections and candidature too. --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    82. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 07:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    83. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not even answering questions. Torne (talk) 10:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    84. Gorpik (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Does not provide much info and does not even answer questions. Gorpik (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    85. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not very convincing nor talkative. Gonzolito (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    86. A wild Rattata (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  A wild Rattata (talk) 05:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    87. Kaganer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No answers to questions :( Kaganer (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    88. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Niesy74 (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Uchup19 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  more experience is needed. Uchup19 (talk) 09:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    89. محمد عصام (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  محمد عصام (talk) 09:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    90. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Eric schreiner (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Eric schreiner (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    91. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    92. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  The edits on estonian Wikipedia are not very convincing. The candidate created many redirects to pages which were created by IPs or 'one-article users', i. e. users whose only edit was to create one article. All the articles I checked were celebrity stubs or articles depicting a particular organisation. Mathmensch (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    93. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    94. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    95. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Artregor (talk) 23:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    96. Luizpuodzius (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Dr. LooLets talk about it 23:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    97. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    98. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    99. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    100. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  No answers to the questions is disqualifying. Pablo000 (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    101. Macdonald-ross (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Out of the question because replies to questions were lacking or inadequate. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    102. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Don-kun (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    103. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  თოგო (D) 14:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    104. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Statement, questions, crosswiki experience.    FDMS  4    15:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    105. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC) see Érico Júnior Wouters' vote[reply]
    106. Rabbabodrool (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Rabbabodrool (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    107. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  --Wnme 20:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    108. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Being inactive in the election stage does not bode well for the future. QueenCake (talk) 20:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    109. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    110. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Unresponsive. I'd consider that a must for stewardship. They appear to be active on etwiki, where another user attempted to make them aware of the question brought up here yet no effort has been made to respond to them. — MusikAnimal talk 01:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    111. The powder toy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  不重视。 The powder toy (talk) 06:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    112. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  This user did not even respond to the questions raised. Good afternoon (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    113. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    114. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 • lack of response--Vik-Thor (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    115. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  The candidate isn't really giving me any good reasons why I should vote yes. TCN7JM 23:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    116. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Not answering questions is not a good start. Base (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    117. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh 01:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    118. Challenger l (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Linguistically skilled, but leaves absolutely no impression whatsoever. Challenger l (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    119. Hmich176 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Hmich176 (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    120. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    121. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lack of engagement with some questions doesn't bode well Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 15:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    122. IPadPerson (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  You have a lack of time being active and you did not bother to answer a thing. IPadPerson (talk) 17:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    123. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  The candidate's lack of answering the questions, although having over a month to do so, is troubling to me. Steel1943 (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    124. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  answers are not completed Coekon (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    125. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    126. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    127. Zhaofeng Li (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lack of engagement Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 12:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    128. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Failure to answer questions Chris Troutman (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    129. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 23:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    130. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  The Banner (talk) 00:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    131. Kemuer (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kemuer (talk) 02:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    132. Hasteur (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ditto to lack of response to questions.Hasteur (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    133. Tomitomtom62 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomitomtom62 (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    134. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Harlock81 (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    135. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    136. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Alarob (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    137. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    138. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  No credible answers to the questions asked Bk1 168 (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    139. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  No reply to questions Miniwark (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    140. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    141. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Iich1960 (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    142. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --FocalPoint (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    143. Liz (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 • No statement and didn't response to questions Liz (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    144. KuboF (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 • eo: La petanto faris nur minimuman klopodon klarigi kial li volas esti stivardo kaj eĉ ne respondis mesaĝojn dum longa tempo. --KuboF (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    145. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I understand that answering the questions is voluntary, but not answering a single one indicates that Avjoska may not be willing to engage in the internal steward discussions necessary to determine consensus and apply policy and guideline properly. Avi (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    146. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No. I don't understand their reasoning to put their candidacy forward.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    147. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    148. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    149. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    150. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  FeralOink (talk) 07:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    151. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Touzrimounir (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    152. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  FiliP ██ 00:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Adirlanz (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    153. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    154. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    155. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Cpl Syx (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  User is non-responsive on questions page; does not appear to be overly interested in the election process. Cpl Syx (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    156. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    157. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    158. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No statement and no answered questions places doubt as to why this candidate should be promoted. —Gyaro–Maguus— 02:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    159. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    160. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  inactiv MAyo (talk) 13:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    161. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Not involved ? --Kikuyu3 (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

      Neutral

    edit
    2. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Pending response to questions on talk page, despite the fact the candidate has had quite a while to answer them, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt :) George.Edward.C (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I'm not know this user(s). Poti Berik (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I would be glad to see a new female steward, but do not see any serious effort from the candidate — NickK (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per George.Edward.C and NickK. PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The answering to questions thing. Xania (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Kyat02 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kyat02 (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Per PiRSquared17. Southparkfan 18:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Doctree (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kantatiskiwa (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 10:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Never seen outside of user's home wiki. Adriano Morelli (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Bjoertvedt (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Sebleouf (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. Jcl6543 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Jcl6543 (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Hngt1996 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Hngt1996 (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Bobherry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bobherry (talk) 02:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wikit 19:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Though I'd like a big diversity of languages among our Stewards, your lack of interest in your own selection doesn't give much confidence. RonnieV (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Waiting on answers to questions. John Vandenberg (talk) 10:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Trassiorf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Trassiorf (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Arshi1234 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Arshi1234 (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/Avjoska&oldid=24961067"