Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Tufor

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: pl-N, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Serwus!

    My wikiname is tufor and I would like to serve global community as a steward.

    I have been pl.wikipedia administrator for year and a half now. I also have sysop rights on pl.wikimedia. Once in a while I like to answer an e-mail or two in OTRS system (I have an access to info-pl and info-pl-baninfo queues). For some time I held global rollbacker rights but in June 2015 I requested to have them removed.

    I might be known from my presence on IRC channels, most notably #wikimedia-stewards, where I often idle. And when something action-worthy catches my eye, I report it there to those with global mops.

    As a steward I would like to continue doing what I've been doing for about a year – but by myself :-) That means dealing with LTAs, spambots and handling IRC requests. Moreover, I might come in handy with handling requests on meta and renaming user accounts.

    Even though I surely won't be the most active steward (I'd describe my planned activity level as 'moderate' ;) I think I still might be useful.

    Well, it's up to you, dear community, if you would like me to have these rights ;) May the Force be with you,

    tufor (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Withdraw: I withdraw my candidature from the elections as it has no chance of succeeding and there is no point in further continuing. I really appreciate every bit of support I was given and acknowledge reasons of those who voted against or neutral. Thank you all! See you around ;-) tufor (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Tufor


  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   User often makes valid requests for steward assitance. Electing him could reduce the workload for stewards and since we lost a lot of stewards this/last year I do believe the other stewards could use his help. Also, giving up rights when you are to busy/not using it enough is a great quality so this can only be an plus. Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Holder (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Vituzzu (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   RadiX 15:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   GodeNehler (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Wieralee (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ejensyd (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Net positive. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Natuur12 and OlEnglish. Miniapolis 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Euphydryas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Euphydryas (msg) 21:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Emptywords (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Doctore (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Doctore→∞ 22:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Nedops (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Nedops (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mo Cuishle (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mo Cuishle (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pnapora (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Myopic pattern (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Myopic pattern (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   A bit prematurate in my opinion but I found answers pretty convincing — NickK (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Michał Sobkowski (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 08:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Andrzei111 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Andrzei111 (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mkw98 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Mkw98 (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Sir Lothar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Active, reliable person. Great knowledge of Wikimedia projects. Sir Lothar (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Definitely. One of those helpful users on IRC. Him being granted stewardship would reduce the workload for the others. Trijnsteltalk 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Buggia 14:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Ptjackyll (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Zbrnajsem (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       "Coreytaylor" (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   "Coreytaylor" (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Don't see why not. Agree with Trijnstel. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Elfhelm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Elfhelm (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Micpol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Micpol (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Silvanka (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Silvanka (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Rzuwig 21:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Halibutt (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Halibutt (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  45. Stanko (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Stanko (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   per Trijnstel. Active at IRC. Maybe helpful when urgent. rxy (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MikeZah (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MikeZah (talk) 22:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Павел Петро (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I'm sorry, but I don't see much cross-wiki activity (about 90% of edits in one wiki, and that when the candidate was a Global Rollbacker before). Also he doesn't have much administrative experience (only a sysop on one wiki), as also demonstrated in the answer to the question from Teles. --MF-W 14:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Insufficient global experience for me to support --Herby talk thyme 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I'm not convinced by the answers to the questions and do not feel the crosswiki experience suffices. --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not active enough on cross-wiki activities. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   This is a tough call. I appreciate that they are making requests that a steward would handle, and are a pl.wikipedia admin, but I would prefer two years of activity and a bit more crosswiki or functionary experience first (only other adminship is on pl.wikimedia, not a content wiki). I also have concerns about them remaining active throughout their term considering their global rollbacker resignation. Please don't be discouraged from running again in the future, if this does not succeed. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough cross-wiki activity, and only sysop on pl.wikipedia + pl.wikimedia. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per above. Mh7kJ (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SPQRobin (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per above; I would be glad to support next year with more activity in cross-wiki areas. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   lacking crosswiki experience Nrautava (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  19. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   I do have the feeling that many candidacies this year are premature, including this one.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Per above. --Uğurkenttalk 16:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Fikir Mühendisi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fikir Mühendisi (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I would support if the global experience was a bit higher. Sorry. — T. 13:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Jahaza (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Krol111 (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Ganímedes (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Just doesn't seem to have enough cross wiki experience. They do seem to know what they are doing and seem to have a good demeanor so not going to oppose either. Reguyla (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Dealt well with Wikinger, so understands that component. I don't know enough for xwiki and other decision-making to vote for.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   The cross-wiki experience might not be enough. I'm not sure. Ghiutun 22:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Not sure that the IRC activity's enough to qualify candidate as a steward, but deferring this to other editors with more insight. loupgarous (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]