Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2011/votes/Swatjester

< Stewards | elections 2011
Warning
English: The 2011 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2011 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2011 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2011 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2011 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد. [update needed: en]
Français : Les élections Steward de 2011 sont terminées. Il n'est plus possible de voter.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2011 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2011. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2011 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2011 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה. [update needed: en]
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el. [update needed: en]
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2011 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2011年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2011 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2011 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2011 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2011 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2011 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2011年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（简体）： 2011年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（繁體）: 2011年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢 [update needed: en]
Tiếng Việt: Cuộc bầu cử tiếp viên năm 2011 đã kết thúc. Không có phiếu bầu nào tiếp tục được chấp nhận.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2011 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι. [update needed: en]
Türkçe: 2011 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2011 stüard seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha səslər qəbul olunmur.

Swatjester (Dan Rosenthal)

edit

Swatjester talk · contribs · SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I'm a former WMF staff member (contractor), former intern, current volunteer press-contact, and an admin on English Wikipedia, Meta, and Ten-Wiki, as well as an OTRS volunteer (mostly legal queue). I'm also an attorney. For the past several months I've worked as a community associate for the 2010 fundraiser for the WMF (my contract ends this week). In that role, I did a fair amount of monitoring of smaller wikis, and I'm familiar with modifying user rights (my staff account was flagged to do so), so I'm already familiar with some of the Steward functions. I was also a temporary admin on meta on my staff account. Finally, I am one of few users who handles emergency incidents at emergency@wikimedia.org. I'm also an active editor, with around 19000 edits (primarily to English Wikipedia, but this spans across 30 projects or so between my staff and volunteer accounts). As you can tell from my history, I've been trusted to do a lot of sensitive work for the foundation, and one of the things I found myself consistently needing was stewards to handle various small cross-wiki requests. I would like to give back as a volunteer by helping with those requests for others. Oh, and as a helpful bonus, my new job will be paying for me to go to language school for a year, so I'll have some multi-lingual capability as well.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin Administrator auf der englischen Wikipedia, Meta und Ten-Wiki sowie im OTRS, wo ich mich vor allem mit rechtlichen Aspekten befasse, aktiv. Die letzten Monate habe ich als community associate für den WMF-Fundraiser gearbeitet (der Vertrag endete diese Woche). In dieser Funktion habe ich bereits mitgeholfen, viele kleinere Wikis zu schützen, und bin mit den Konventionen zur Ab- und Zuerkennung von Benutzerrechten (mein Staff-Benutzerkonto war mit der Funktion ausgestattet) sowie anderen Steward-Funktionen vertraut. Zudem hatte mein Staff-Konto bereits einmal reguläre Adminrechte, hier auf Meta. Ich bin einer der wenigen Benutzer, die Notfälle via emergency@wikimedia.org bearbeiten, und aktiver Autor mit rund 19000 Edits; Schwerpunkt auf en.wp (insgesamt verteilen sich die Bearbeitungen beider Konten auf über 30 Projekte). Aufgrund dieser Erfahrungen und der damit verbundenen Wahrnehmung sensibler Aufgaben für die Wikimedia-Stiftung weiß ich, dass deutlich mehr Stewards unter anderem zwecks Abarbeitung diverser kleinerer Transwiki-Anfragen benötigt werden. Ich würde daher gern an diesem Punkt als Freiwilliger etwas zurückgeben und mithelfen, diese Aufgaben zu erledigen. Oh, und als hilfreicher Bonus wird meine neue Arbeit mir zusätzlich einen einjährigen Fremdsprachenkurs bezahlen und daher werde ich alsbald einige multilinguale Fähigkeiten aufbieten können.
suomi:
  • Kielet: en
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Olen ylläpitäjä englanninkielisessä Wikipediassa, Metassa ja Ten-Wikissä sekä vapaaehtoinen OTRS:ssä (enimmäkseen lakiasioissa). Olen toiminut yhteisön edustajana WMF:n vuoden 2010 varainkeruuhankkeessa (sopimukseni umpeutuu tällä viikolla). Tuossa roolissa seurasin melko paljon pieniä wikejä ja olen perillä käyttöoikeuksien muuttamisesta (henkilökuntatunnuksellani oli oikeudet siihen), ja olen valmiiksi perehtynyt osaan ylivalvojien tehtävistä. Olin myös väliaikainen ylläpitäjä Metassa henkilökuntatunnuksellani. Lopuksi, olen myös yksi harvoista käyttäjistä joka vastaa hätätilanteisiin emergency@wikimedia.org-osoitteessa. Olen aktiivinen käyttäjä ja minulla on noin 19000 muokkausta (pääasiassa englanninkieliseen Wikipediaan, mutta lukema jakautuu noin 30 eri hankkeelle henkilökunta- ja vapaaehtoiskäyttäjätunnuksellani). Kuten voitte nähdä historiastani, minulle on uskottu paljon arkaluonteista työtä säätiön puolesta, ja yksi asia jota olen huomannut tarvitsevani jatkuvasti ovat ylivalvojat, jotta erinäiset pienet wikienväliset pyynnöt saadaan toteutettua. Haluaisin antaa jotain takaisin vapaaehtoisena auttamalla toteuttamaan noita pyyntöjä myös toisille. Ja vielä: hyödyllisenä bonuksena uusi työpaikkani kustantaa minulle vuoden kielikoulun, joten tulen saamaan sitä kautta myös monikielisiä valmiuksia.
עברית:
  • שפות: en
  • מידע אישי: דיבור כאן
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: en
  • 候補者の情報: 所信はこちら
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben moderator op de Engelstalige Wikipedia, Meta en Ten-Wiki, en ook OTRS-vrijwilliger (vooral juridische zaken). De afgelopen maanden ben ik werkzaam geweest als community associate voor de WMF-fundraiser (mijn contract eindigt deze week). In die rol heb ik aardig wat kleinere wiki's gemonitord en ik ben bekend met het wijzigen van gebruikersrechten (mijn staf-account had die rechten), dus ik ben al bekend met de meeste stewardsfuncties. Ik was met mijn staf-account ook tijdelijk moderator op Meta. Tenslotte ben ik een van de weinige gebruikers die incidenten op emergency@wikimedia.org behandelen. Ik ben ook een actieve gebruiker, met ongeveer 19.000 bewerkingen (vooral op de Engelstalige Wikipedia, maar ze omvatten zo'n 30 projecten met mijn staf-account en mijn vrijwilligersaccount. Zoals u aan mijn geschiedenis kunt zien is me veel gevoelig werk voor de Foundation toevertrouwd en een van de dingen die ik steeds weer nodig bleek te hebben waren stewards om verschillende cross wiki-verzoeken af te handelen. Ik zou graag als vrijwilliger iets teruggeven door anderen bij zulke verzoeken te helpen. Oh, en als nuttige bonus, mijn nieuwe baan gaat een jaar lang talenschool voor me betalen, dus ik zal ook enige vaardigheden in meerdere talen hebben.
русский:
  • Языки: en
  • Личная информация: Я бывший сотрудник WMF, бывший стажер, в настоящее время доброволец, работающий с прессой, и администратор английской Википедии, Меты, Ten-Wiki и OTRS-агент (в основном, занимаюсь правовыми вопросами). Я - адвокат. Последние несколько месяцев я работал над сбором пожертвований 2010 для WMF (мой контракт истекает на этой неделе). В этом качестве я достаточно много следил за малыми языковыми разделами, и я знаком с изменением прав (мой рабочий аккаунт был для этого предназначен), поэтому я уже знаком с некоторыми функциями стюардов. Я также временно был администратором на Мете. Наконец, я один из немногих участников, которые обрабатывают экстренные сообщения emergency@wikimedia.org. Я также являюсь активным редактором с 19000 правок (в основном, в английской Википедии, но также в 30 других проектах). Как вы видите из моей истории, мне доверяли заниматься большим количеством важных задач для Фонда, и в чем я постоянно нуждался, - так это в стюардах, обрабатывающих кросс-вики запросы. Я хочу помочь с этими запросами в качестве добровольца. Кроме того, моя новая работа оплачивает мне годовое изучение языка, так что я буду обладать определенными языковыми навыками.
српски / srpski:
  • Језици: en
  • Лични подаци: Ја сам администратор на Википедији на енглеском језику, на Мети и на Ten-Wiki, а такође и ОТРС волонтер. У протеклих неколико месеци сам био запослен током кампање прикупљања средстава у 2010. години за Задужбину Викимедија (уговор ми истиче ове недеље). Обављајући ту функцију, доста сам пратио мале викије, а упознат сам и са променом корисничких права (мој налог је имао ту могућност), тако да сам већ упознат са неким стјуардским функцијама. Такође сам био привремени администратор на Мети. На крају, ја сам један од неколико корисника који решава хитне случајеве на emergency@wikimedia.org. Такође сам активан корисник, са око 19.000 измена (углавном на Википедији на енглеском језику, мада се то односи на 30 пројеката или тако нешто). Као што се види из моје историје, поверено ми је да обављам много осетљивих послова за Задужбину и једна од ствари које су ми стално биле потребне су били стјуарди да реше различите захтеве. Волео бих да се вратим као добровољац и да помогнем око тих захтева. Ох, као бонус, на новом послу ће ми бити плаћено да годину дана похађам школу за језике, тако да ћу располагати и одређеним знањем других језика.

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2011/Questions#Swatjester

Accounts checked till now, see result here. For the ElectCom, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes

edit
  1. --თოგო (D) 00:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  fetchcomms☛ 00:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Theo10011 00:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MBisanz talk 01:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Monolingual stewards are not my major concern Ronk01 02:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Sven Manguard 02:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Chick Bowen 03:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support --Cekli829 05:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. WWGB 05:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13. GerardM 05:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Happy to see you as a steward for your meta involvement[reply]
  14.   Support--Torin 05:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Jan eissfeldt 08:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC) kompetent & verlässlich, gerade für die häufiger werdenden schweren fälle[reply]
    1ForTheMoney 09:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support I'm not overly happy with opposes just because you only speak English, I'd much rathor a steward who is competetant and can only speak one language over a steward who can tell me to fuck off (sic) in two different langauges per se. Promethean 10:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17. OlEnglish (Talk) 11:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jc iindyysgvxc 11:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Aprendes otra idioma rápidamente. Lara 13:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Good candidate. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Absolutely. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support
    ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 15:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support VR-Land 16:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Terence 17:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24. I agree with Promethean, and would like to add that internet translators have advanced to a degree where linguistic borders are going to fall anyways. Master&Expert 17:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25. –Diego Grez return fire 18:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support --WizardOfOz talk 19:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Support —mc10 (t/c) 19:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- Ulanwp 20:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  29. NW (Talk) 20:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support - Experienced and trustworthy user. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Davecrosby uk 20:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support - Sure. Tiptoety talk 21:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -- Maximillion Pegasus 21:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Epbr123 22:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Eddylandzaat 01:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 04:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support Casliber 13:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support Willking1979 13:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Timotheus Canens 14:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Support Of course understanding several languages is an advantage, but experience has shown that monolingual stewards can still be very efficient and helpful. And my interactions with Swatjester have all been positive, so I have no concerns with him becoming a steward. Jon Harald Søby 14:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 19:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Doesn't seem to be any reason I can't vote for myself, as an eligible voter. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 22:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  43.   Support. He worked for me for the past several months and i have full confidence in him. In my personal capacity and not as an official act of the Foundation. --Philippe 22:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support--Shizhao 00:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support The main opposition to this candidate seems to be that he is an anglophone monoglot. As are many of the most knowledgeable experienced and helpful people on wikimedia. Barring him in favour of someone less experienced just because they are bilingual seems a false argument... some one who is bilingual in English and Latin is going to be more useful exactly how? Is there a particular language that we agree that we need more stewards able to speak: Or do these objectors each have preferred languages (probably their own) which they would like stewards to have? Jpb1301 00:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --Patio 01:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Support - Gamaliel 04:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support - The concerns below are valid but I think the benefits outweigh the cons in the end. He has a solid and logical head on his shoulders and doesn't act without thinking. James (T C) 05:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support...Modernist 13:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Lolsimon 14:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC) - benefit of the doubt[reply]
  50. In the absence of editors who can speak every language I think it inevitable that sometimes stewards will be operating outside a language that they speak. Being multilingual would be an advantage, but I don't agree that being monolingual should be a disqualification. WereSpielChequers 17:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Guido den Broeder 18:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support. Complaints about speaking only one english don't matter to me. Protonk 22:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support Long term highly involved Wikimedian. Glad to see him interested in steward's job. --Millosh 23:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support--Yopie 23:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support We shouldn't pass up high competence based on "monolingual." If Swatjester being elected pushed out someone with more languages, okay, problem. But that's not the case. We don't gain a multilingual Steward by losing Swatjester. These are not contested elections. --Abd 03:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  55.   Support —Ancient Apparition 06:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Support - Fransvannes 12:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Support Ralf.treinen 23:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support Comte0 00:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Support --Az1568 (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Savhñ 08:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support --Bhawani 11:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support Ruhrfisch 12:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Support Trusted user - monolingual shouldn't be a problem since we have plenty of polyglot stewards anyway. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support Good luck --Brandon5485 22:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Support Swat has a wealth of experience to draw on that would be helpful for any steward. He'll be taking language classes, and anyway, English is perhaps even more widely spoken among Wikipedians than the world at large.--chaser - t 22:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Support Competence and trustworthiness are more important than a huge number of cross-wiki contributions in multiple languages. It seems to me like part of the role of a Steward is being able to use your best judgement even if you're not totally familiar with a particular language or situation. I think Swatjester has great judgement, and thus I trust him to be a Steward whether he speakers four languages or not. Steven Walling (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support --Zeljko 02:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Support Banaticus 09:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support I think it's all right. --Floflo 22:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Geitost diskusjon 01:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC) per Jon Harald Søby and Lolsimon. I'm not very convinced about the lacking crosswiki thing either, so I have to convince myself a bit because having a bit more experience with other language wikis would be helpful. So let's just give him a chance since he seems to be a trusted, experienced and also engaged user (and we need engaged people here) with the capability of reading other languages and with difficulty also writing them. There are less stewards now in comparision with earlier times, and we need more though there also are global admins helping out now. I think he can help with the work that surely isn't getting less with more wikis and more sides on every one of them and I'm convinced that we really need more helping hands and also more stewards with that. I also think he's tearing language borders down ;-) with automatic translators help at the time and he'll manage that cause he seems to be able to communicate in different languages despite of not speaking them well enough and he promises to learn more of that in a few months. And if you won't get through this election come back half a year later and run in the next elections again.[reply]
  71.   Support--Ex13 12:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support I would like to offer not just a support but a ringing endorsement of Dan for Steward. I've been contributing to en.wiki for most of a decade now, and one of the most consistently helpful users and admins around is Swatjester. Not only on wiki, but through our shared participation on the unblock-l mailing list, Dan goes above and beyond the call of duty not willing to pass the buck should something require a bit of sweat equity to make sure the job gets done. --Mask 15:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Njaelkies Lea 18:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Support Bearian 23:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support Kaldari 23:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support - Spoladore 16:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  76.   Support Geoff Who, me? 20:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support - Panyd 22:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ineligible, since there is no link from meta to home wiki and/or vice versa. --FiliP ██ 00:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support I think I was a bit hasty in my oppose vote. After looking into it a bit more and thinking about it further (after a note from Swatjester) I find myself thinking along the same lines as Abd above. We do not gain a multi-lingual steward by opposing Swatjester. The judgement calls I have see from him have been spot on in my opinion and that is what we need in a steward, excellent judgement and experience, something he has. Woody 23:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support --Ragesoss 01:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Support - I think Swatjester will do just fine as a steward; while his editing contribution is mainly limited to enwp, he has established working relationships with several other communities. He's definitely trustworthy. Should this candidacy not be successful, I'd suggest that Swatjester consider Avi's advice below. Risker 02:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  80.   Support--Brewcrewer 03:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Support Bejinhan talks 04:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  82. --Gribeco 05:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Keegan 05:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  84. -- Eusebeus 09:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Support with a suggestion to learn another language WormTT 10:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support Udufruduhu 21:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Sergey Semenovtalk 03:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  88.   Support --Slon02 06:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  89.   Support Elen of the Roads 13:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  90.   Support Absolutely, very active, very knowledgeable. BD2412 T 04:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support For demonstrated usefulness and trustworthiness; While I can see the point of the monolingualextinguishists I see monomania there too, nicht wahr? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shenme (talk) 05:36, 20 February 2011 (CEST) (UTC)
      Support Vik-Thor 16:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Not eligible[reply]
  92.   Support --Lucas Nunes 02:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Support This user is clearly a net plus to have as a steward and he has certainly earned the trust of the community. That to me is a win and we should give him the tools he needs to help us, no matter how many languages he speaks. Plus he's even stated that he'll develop his language skills. Stewards are volunteers, not superhuman polyglots, and we should accept the good candidates as they are instead of throwing up philosophical objections. Zachlipton 07:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  94.   Support William Avery 16:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Support Zyephyrus 19:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  96.   Support KillerChihuahua 17:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  97.   Support --Roberta F. 21:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  98.   Support - Tvoz 22:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  99.   Support I completely agree with Steven Walling. Béria Lima msg 17:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  100.   Support-- deerstop. 09:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  101.   Support JoshuaZ 16:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support Parsecboy 16:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  103.   Support Seddon 13:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Blanket   Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. --Yair rand 21:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Qualified candidate. Sure, there may not be as much visible crosswiki work, but he has more than enough experience behind the scenes to compensate. sonia 09:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  106.   Support Kubek15T C 14:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  107.   Support - Worthy Wikipedian who wants to help out. The English-only thing is minor since there is plenty to do within that limitation. Best wishes, Jusdafax 03:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  108. The need for lawyers is always present. Outback the koala 03:31, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support - Although it would be helpful if Swatjester was fluent/advanced in a second language, I think he would still be an asset to us as a steward, working the legal OTRS queue and such, and definitely trust him. Aude 17:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support Andreas Werle 17:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. same procedure as every year: "No" to possible monolingual stewards. Next year there may be my support → «« Man77 »» [de]·[bar] 01:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  ℳono  01:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per Mardetanha and Man77. We don't need more "only-speak-English" stewards. Sorry. CasteloBrancomsg 10:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Per above. --Flopy 17:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Very little cross-wiki work, edits only on english-speaking wikis which needn't stewards (on Drosenthal account, contribs to other wikis consist only in setting up its userpage). Besides, we've enough english-speaking stewards for meta/global work. Cenarium 18:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Oppose, agree with concerns of mono-language as raised above by Man77 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), and Castelobranco (talk · contribs), and lack of significant cross-wiki work, as pointed out astutely by Cenarium (talk · contribs). Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 22:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose per lack of cross-wiki work, as well as a lack of experience with other languages. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jafeluv 10:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cross wiki work is an issue for me and I guess I would see that any "emergency" stuff directed to wikimedia should be dealt with by the staff account. --Herby talk thyme 12:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Herby; the "emergency stuff" exists entirely on email and requires no on-wiki action from either account. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 22:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Skydrinker 12:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lack of crosswiki work and monolingual. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Language issue. Carolmooredc 14:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Per Pmlineditor — NickK 17:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Active back-stage in the wiki-foundation, my compliments! But I prefer that level independant and not mixed up with the steward level on stage. --Havang(nl) 17:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ” Teles (Talk @ C G) 00:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC) - O conhecimento de outras línguas não é pré-requisito, mas é importante e isto não resolve esse problema (Google tradutor?). Pouca atividade crosswiki no combate ao vandalismo. Além disso, eu acho que é conflito de interesse um candidato votar em si mesmo, o que deveria ser evitado.[reply]
  16. Junius 03:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Speaking English only is not convincing here.Jusjih 10:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose -- Lack of interwiki experience and monolingualism is disconcerting. Neelix 17:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. rubin16 17:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Per Havang. --Brownout(msg) 12:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Ziko 19:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Bunnyfrosch 00:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC) monolingual i suggest[reply]
  23. --Holder 08:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Oppose Very limited x-wiki experience. Yeah, he is trusted at WMF, but it's not really relevant to the role of Steward. He must satisfy the voters that he has capacity to deal with x-wiki issues.--Tomo suzuki 16:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. riffic 18:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Oppose per Tomo suzuk. Lack of x-wiki experience (glob contribs). Chzz 00:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fauust 10:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Sympatico 15:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sympatico ineligible to vote. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Oppose Lack of cross wiki experience and language skills. odder (talk) 17:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Oppose Caiaffa 11:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Lack of cross wiki experience Woody 13:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Oppose Lack of experience and monolingual. Maybe next year. --Mercy 14:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Oppose due to lack of experience and only being able to speak one language. Additionally oppose due to previous encounters on a WMF project where the candidate's judgement was incredibly poor. -- Alexandr Dmitri 16:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Swatjester, I was oriented toward a "support", but I really don't like this. Ok, there isn't any policy against self-voting, but imho it's not so honest. I'm sorry--Nick1915 - all you want 01:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC) I change my vote, see section below --Nick1915 - all you want 17:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Oppose lack of cross-wiki experience, monolingual --NSH001 14:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Oppose Not enough crosswiki activity, not enough contributions imho and monolingual. VonTasha 11:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Oppose monolingualism not compatible with the position. Carlossuarez46
  35.   Oppose Iridescent 18:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Oppose per Man77. — MZaplotnik (contribs) 20:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Oppose, some concerns about partisanship, and seems to want to collect all the baubles. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Oppose does't seem to fit. --Stormbay 01:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Oppose I do not mind that this user is not multilingual but I do mind that this user is asking the community to judge him on the potential he has now for having made a commitment to take language classes in the future. Stewards need maturity at the time of election. Apply again when you feel you are mature. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Sorry, I firstly wouldn't vote at all in this election, but this self-supporting is a clear no-go for me, even if there is no rule against it. Voting for yourself in such an election doesn't really look good and gives people not really the best impression. This self-supporting is the only reason I vote here at all. -Barras 23:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. seems good candidate , but never seen you around and being only English speaker is another concern which makes me hesitant to support Mardetanha talk 00:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Neutral Hi, Swat. I'd like to pass on the same sage advice I received in 2009, and explain why I am abstaining from supporting you this go-round. You are a good EnWiki sysop and you volunteer in many ways behind the scenes. However, each project in the wikimediaverse has its own "flavor" and style, as it were. The vast majority of your wikiverse edits come from from EnWikiP. Someone coming, as I did, from what is perceived as the w:800 lb gorilla project does need to demonstrate that they are comfortable in understanding the climate and adhering to the guidelines of multiple other projects. Showing significant cross-wiki activity, even on another English-speaking project such as the Commons or Wikiquote, demonstrates that one can be a member of differing communities and will not let the mores and climate of one overwhelm the other. I'm not opposing, because I don't think that there is anything that you would do that would be inimical to the projects, but I would be more comfortable supporting if over the next year you showed a significant contribution to Meta and other projects. As for multilingualism; it certainly would be a plus in my mind. Personally, I give extra weight to knowing other languages, as the stewards job is made much easier when one is fluent in one of the languages of our larger projects (Spanish, Chinese, Portuguese, etc.). I do not think that stewards must be multilingual, but having that facility would certainly have helped, and will help in the future. -- Avi 03:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Neutral --Aristeas 19:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Neutral-- Get some experience with another language and I'd support you. Marauder09   Long live the thrash Marauder09 17:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Neutral --Gamma127 00:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Neutral Swatjester, I was oriented toward a "support", but I really don't like this. Ok, there isn't any policy against self-voting, but imho it's not so honest. --Nick1915 - all you want 17:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. per Mardetanha. --Emaus 02:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Soenke Rahn 11:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Not a lot informations to him on his user page etc.[reply]
  9. Elvaube 03:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Neutral Swatjester is known for great work on en:wp, but has little crosswiki work to judge by, and I had a concern similar to Jyothis's about recent crosswiki work which gives me pause. More involvement with projects with different policies and cultures, including smaller projects, would make me more comfortable supporting, and I second Avi's comments above. –SJ · talk | translate 03:16, 22 February 2011 09:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Neutral Rubicon 02:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    -- Hesitate to support outright, because of lack of cross wiki experience, other wise clearly a trusted editor and good volunteer to the project. Outback the koala 07:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. LeinaD (t) 19:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Neutral, per SJ, Avi and Marauder09. –Tommy Kronkvist, 21:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2011/votes/Swatjester&oldid=5738907"