Stratégia/Wikimédia-mozgalom/2018–20/Munkacsoportok

Áttekintés

Javaslatok

Megvalósítás

Jelentések

GYIK

Synthesis Groups

¹ A 2018-as Wikimedia Conference során a „Szerepek és felelősségek” munkacsoport javasolta, hogy nevük „Teljesítménydinamikára” változzon. Mivel az új név csak a globális és helyi felelősségek egy részét fedné le, a stratégiai csapat az eredeti név megtartása mellett döntött.

Detailed timeline October 2019 - June 2020 (Version as of January 2020)

Harmonization Sprint participants in Tunis (September 2019).

Between November 2019 and March 2020, the main focus of movement strategy will shift to synthesizing the recommendations produced by the nine working groups into one coherent set. Movement perspectives and feasibility assessments will then be gathered as a basis for creating the final and approved product. The immediate next steps will involve working groups ranking and refining their recommendations (if they wish to) and concluding their duty as thematic area groups. A new working/writing group with those members who are keen and available to continue working will help develop the final product.

Writers will do the actual sense-making and synthesis of the recommendations into one coherent set and finalize the end product, taking incoming information from the connectors (like community conversations, research, feasibility assessments) into account. Writers will use the overlaps that have been identified in the recommendations to synthesize multiple recommendations and outline where changes could be made that would address these.

Connectors will help the writers digest, reference, and (where applicable) use existing material, research, input from community conversations (incl. existing material and active participation in upcoming conversations with organized groups and online contributors).

They will go through the material, and bring together the main points to present to the writers. This might be in the form of summaries to the writers or, where necessary, targeted info that might be relevant to a specific recommendation. The goal of this will be to support the writers in integrating the material into the final product.

Reviewers will bring in specific, additional perspectives, expertise, contexts, and advice at different times of the process. This could range from weekly/monthly reviews of specific issues to only one review of the draft before it is finalized.

The goal here would be to ensure that:

• the output of the nine working groups is reflected in the final product;
• a diverse range of perspectives and contexts are accounted for;
• input from phase 1, research and community conversations is well integrated;
• the recommendations are relevant and meaningful to the wider movement.

Working Groups timeline

The timeline for the process takes into account movement events (e.g. Wikimania, Wikimedia Summit) as well as general planning procedures in our movement. All Working Groups are expected to tweak the timeline according to their own needs and expectations.

1. June-July 2018: Call for Working Group members.
2. August–November 2018: Working Groups set-up, agreement on working mode, definition of support needs, and first steps on content exploration.
3. By March 2019: Working Groups develop the scope of their work, define guiding questions and engage in community conversations for refinement.
4. Wikimedia Summit (end of March 2019): The scope of their work is reviewed and revised, bringing many different perspectives in, so that they can then move into analysis.
5. April-August 2019: Analysis of data, research, and outputs of community conversations; development of recommendations.
6. Wikimania 2019 (August 2019): First draft of the recommendations is published online and presented during working group sessions at Wikimania. Feedback and input gathered in person and online is used to refine the recommendations.
7. September–October 2019: Refine draft recommendations using input from research and community conversations. Start identifying and mapping overlaps in each of the nine groups' work. Put finishing touches on recommendations, rank recommendations. Working groups dissolve (by 1 November).
8. November-December 2019: New working group established to begin synthesizing recommendations and develop one coherent, comprehensive set.
9. February-May 2020: Synthesized recommendations presented to Board of Trustees. Finalization of recommendations. Working group engagement officially concludes.
10. 2020: Implementation begins; implementation structure and support set-up.

The timeline is subject to change depending on the progress of the conversations and workstreams. Steps in the process will not happen simultaneously for all Working Groups. Some might be faster, and some might need more time, especially if they have strong interdependencies with other groups.

Draft recommendations groups overview

In July 2018, 90 members from our global community formed into nine Working Groups. These Working Groups were at the center of this process; they were the agents of change. Each Working Group had dedicated itself to one of nine key thematic areas of the movement, which members were putting under the microscope, exploring how it could look in 2030 and finalizing a set of guiding questions. The answers to these questions formed the basis of recommendations for structural changes so that we can successfully and strongly advance in our Strategic Direction.

• Each Working Group was working on:
  • Scope - map the present situation of the thematic area, the obstacles and opportunities, using all the data already collected over the years and further research if needed. Identify the changes needed and build a case to explain why these changes help us progress in our Strategic Direction.
  • Draft recommendations - identify possible strategies for making these changes and develop drafts of concrete recommendations for the movement on how to ratify and implement them.
  • Implementation - advise on and iterate changes based on the draft recommendations.

• Working Groups are there to complement existing movement structures, and not to create redundancies. The groups are not decision-making bodies themselves, but will develop recommendations as a basis for decision-making.
• Each group represents the diversity of the movement, as well as the diversity of skills and experience needed to work on the respective thematic area.
• Connection and collaboration between Working Groups is essential. Working Group coordinators will identify collaboration needs and opportunities, as well as to actively maintain collaborations across groups via a Steering Group.
• The Core Team will be prototyping and improving the Working Group method as we use it, so that it fits the movement’s needs and culture. Feedback is always welcome.

Working Group structures and set-up

In June 2018, a Steering Committee supported the Core Team with selecting the Working Group members, and groups were established in June-September 2018. Members of the Working Groups are expected to act in the interest of the movement, not in the interest of their own organization or community.

Each Working Group decides how to organize their work, and the Core Team provides guidance and support on a process level. The ideal group size is 10-15 members, and those members have to represent diverse perspectives and roles within our movement. We have a mix of staff and board members from Organized Groups as well as Individual Contributors in the groups. Additional members are welcome to apply and can be appointed throughout the process, depending on the changing needs of each group.

Working Groups are supported in communicating with the movement via reports, community conversations, participation at events and meetings, and publication of updates or results of their work on their meta pages. To ensure communication across Working Groups, a Steering Group has been formed.

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation is committed to the Movement Strategy process and each member has joined one of the Working Groups.

Support options

Working Groups will be supported by the Core Team of the Strategy Process, with the Information and Knowledge Manager being the main point of contact. Support includes logistics such as scheduling calls, note taking and summarizing of meetings, creation of templates and toolkits to be used in structuring and designing the workflow of the Working Groups, as well as management of information flows to enable Working Groups to have informed discussions and make informed decisions. The Information & Knowledge Management team will also ensure that the progress of Working Group discussions will be shared with the wider movement in a timely manner.

In addition to that, support for facilitation, travel, translation, research or training can be arranged with the Core Team according to the needs of each Working Group.

Working Group procedures

• Application page
• Selection process and criteria
• Working Groups timeline
• Guidelines for replacement of inactive members
• Representation at events
• Working Groups advisors

Thematic Areas

The key thematic areas have evolved from conversations we have had in our movement for years, for example in various Wikimedia Conference sessions and group discussions on governance, resources, diversity, partnerships, etc. For each of these areas, the Core Team has mapped the focus and a couple of core questions that need to be answered to enable us to fulfil the Wikimedia mission and advance us in the Strategic Direction. The key questions these Working Groups are addressing all focus on the structural level, not on programmatic work. Many of those questions have been persistent over the years; they are enduring questions. For the first time, we do not only have a process to answer them, we also have a mandate and the necessary resources. Click on the name of the thematic area to read more:

Thematic area	Draft description	Mailing list
Advocacy	legal frameworks, public policies and agendas to define areas where active advocacy and political engagement supports our mission and our Strategic Direction; build capacities to break down political barriers; identify partners for political impact.	wg2030-advocacywikimedia.org
Capacity Building	goals for investing in capacity building in our movement; understanding what capacities we need within the movement as such and identifying priorities for target groups; development of leadership skills to build leadership and expertise in our movement – in volunteer as well as staff roles; systematic approaches toward scouting, recruiting and retaining people with the needed skill sets (volunteer and staff) to support our work toward the Strategic Direction as a global movement; implementing organizational and cultural change.	wg2030-capacitybuildingwikimedia.org
Community Health	structures, practices and resources necessary for supporting a culture of trust and collaboration in Wikimedia communities and organizations; the future perspective of engaging and including newcomers in a sustainable manner; balancing workload and personal health; critical roles in the communities and providing support to retain people with these roles and responsibilities.	wg2030-communityhealthwikimedia.org
Diversity	to map the current areas of diversity and the diversity gaps within the movement as well as projects that have been concentrating on bridging these gaps; finding ways to increase awareness of privilege and to overcome related cultural, institutional, technological and behavioral barriers to inclusion and to knowledge equity; ways to include missing voices and bridge gaps in content, reach, and users (in terms of both access and contributions).	wg2030-diversitywikimedia.org
Partnerships	opportunities and challenges related to building partnerships at the local, regional and global levels; strategic approaches to scaling the work that we do in ways beyond our own capacity and reach; collaboration with other organizations and movements to promote our vision and values; and move in our strategic direction with opportunities for wider impact.	wg2030-partnershipswikimedia.org
Product & Technology2	together with a wider spectrum of stakeholders, map future scenarios for product and technology development; develop structures for continuous communication and ongoing connections between product/technology teams, groups, communities and other stakeholders in the movement and beyond; map the needs and expectations for local technological capacity building.	wg2030-productandtechnologywikimedia.org
Erőforrás-allokáció	szerkezeti egyenlőség a pénzügyi források felhasználásához a mozgalmon belül és kívül helyi, regionális és globális szerepek az erőforrás-allokációhoz és a mozgalmon keresztülívelő pályázatokhoz a szervezetekkel és döntéshozatali módszerekkel a globális és helyi erőforrás-allokációs modellek értékelése a mozgalmi szereplőkre költött források hatása és elszámolhatósága	wg2030-resourceallocationwikimedia.org
Bevételi források	a mozgalom bevételi forrásainak elvei a mozgalomban és a más nonprofit szervezetekben és mozgalmakban jelenlévő bevételi források a bevételi források modelljeinek a termékfejlesztéssel összhangban lévő kialakítása a szervezetek, csoportok, partnerek, szponzorok stb. mozgalmi szerepének hasznosítása a jelenlegi felépítés és a bevételi forrásokkal kapcsolatos felelősségek kiértékelése	wg2030-revenuestreamswikimedia.org
Szerepek és felelősségek1	a Wikimédia-mozgalom szervezeti és társszervezeti felépítése az Alapítvány, valamint annak partnerei és bizottságai által vállalt szerepek, célok és kapcsolatok a mozgalmi szervezetek globális, helyi és tematikus szerepkörei (létező és kialakulóban lévő is) mozgalomszerte jelenlévő vezetési, irányítási és döntésvégrehajtási folyamatok a struktúrán belüli esélyegyenlőség és a mozgalom által igényelt feladatok (jog, adománygyűjtés, adatvédelem, szoftverfejlesztés és kommunikáció) elosztása	wg2030-rolesandresponsibilitieswikimedia.org

² A 2018-as Wikimedia Conference-en a munkacsoport a „Technológia” nevet kapta, azonban a szélesebb szerepkörök miatt „Termék és technológia” névre kereszteltük át.