Amikeco

the os wiki

If it wouldn't be for the empty dates, the os wiki wouldn't have more that 204 articles making it a fifth less articles that what it has now. When i see that just like Bengali and the other bearing the no actual content I am thus putting the no actual content on that page too as I was doing the updates and nobody complained till you came this mention of content was ok. Even if you want your wikipedia to be as full as the other ones, make sure that it is not an empty one but that it has some content thus removing the comment in parenthesis. Thank you. 24.201.116.26 19:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

There are no date articles there yet, though the stubs for years 1300-2010 are really there (not all of them empty). As I calculate the number of articles manually (statistics malfunctions) I do substract several hundreds from the actual number of articles considering the newer stubs for years and similar.

Still you can't say that the whole Wikipedia has no actual content, for there are more than 200 real articles, dozens of which are really good. --Slavik IVANOV 00:14, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

I agree with you on the last info you give so you would actually put that your wikipedia has 200 articles rather that 1000 as it shows, the no actual mention shows that there are info on this page but it is rather sparsed and before people get to this page. The main page (www.wikipedia.org) doesn't show any mention about the content or anything like that and it is shown having 1000 articles. When the percentage of non-stub articles will go higher, the mention will be removed as you wish it will be. 24.201.116.26 01:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

You are absolutely not right in your crusade against the stubs in os:! Most wikipedias have stub-articles about years — say, uk: or fy: have lots of them (see uk:900, uk:901, etc.) — still nobody would change the number of their articles in the language list. The Os.wiki cannot be called guilty for early acquiring the bot use. - Slavik IVANOV 07:06, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

I think you by mistake voted against Tamil Eelam at Translation of the week.. [1] /Johan Jönsson 11:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Please, confirm your vote in Tamil Eelam, for ordering the list.--Taichi - (あ！) 04:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Oh, really! Thank you for your kind attention! - Slavik IVANOV 22:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Tradukoj

Dankon ke vi ektradukis la proklamon de Kim Bruning kaj fintradukis la proklamon de AaronSw . Bonvolu aldoni vin al la listo de tradukistoj se vi emas plu traduki. Restas tradukendaj jenaj kandidatproklamoj - mi jam tamen tradukis la bazajn informojn : t.e. ĉion krom la proklamojn :-). Ĉu vi bonvolos fari kelkajn ? Mi jam esperantigis la ceteron de la balota materialo. Dankas Arno Lagrange ✉ 07:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Nu mi nur havis iom da libera tempo kaj emon helpi vin. Mi ne povas promesi multe da konstanta helpo ĉi-rilate. - Slavik IVANOV

Mi nun fintradukis Election candidates 2006/Arnomane/Eo AL ✉ 07:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Final translation needed for creation of Sakha Wikipedia

Hello Amikeco. Please see Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Sakha#Final translation. Although the Sakha Wikipedia has been approved, it cannot be created until those translations are provided. —{admin} Pathoschild 07:26:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Superprotect status

Dear Amikeco, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

• Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
• An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer

Peteforsyth 09:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Slavik IVANOV. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Slavik IVANOV~metawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

04:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Isn't my account Amikeco?.. Amikeco (talk)

Hello Amikeco. This message was probably meant for User talk:Slavik IVANOV, which redirects to this page. Your account is fully unified and will not be renamed. —Pathoschild 23:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

что аффилиаты (филиалы) Викимедиа

Здравствуйте, коллегa

Совет попечителей Фонда Викимедиа считает, что аффилиаты (филиалы) Викимедиа являются ключевой и неотъемлемой частью движения Викимедиа, и их успех жизненно важен для успеха движения Викимедиа. С этой целью крайне важно разработать четкое видение в отношении аффилиатов, что позволит оценить, способствуют ли инвестиции Фонда, сотрудничество и политика в отношении аффилиатов целям движения. Совет приступит к разработке стратегии аффилиатов Фонда Викимедиа в сотрудничестве с Комитетом по аффилиатам (AffCom), аффилиатами и другими членами движения. Эта стратегия поможет направлять непосредственную работу Фонда по поддержке аффилиатов в течение следующих нескольких лет.

Вы можете помочь фонду сформулировать стратегию путем заполнения данной формы (никакие данные заполняющего не регистрируются). Форма на английском, но она легко переводится.

Форму можно заполнить, даже не будучи аффилированным – участник сообщества может сообщить о работе аффилиатов в своем регионе, языке или тематической деятельности. Поэтому, пожалуйста, заполните опрос. Также есть возможность запросить встречу с представителями Совета попечителей в Комитете по аффилиатам.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScyRTQSIMYj9ymX4S-pbjtpZSqnQ8Icr-P3quvlAeh6sAk0aw/viewform

После сбора анкет данные будут обработаны, и будет подготовлен отчет, включающий все точки зрения. Этот отчет, включая некоторые неотложные рекомендации, будет сначала представлен и обсужден AffCom, Комитетом по делам сообщества и, в конечном итоге, Советом Фонда Викимедиа на сингапурской встрече в Викимании в августе 2023 года.

Спасибо за участие. Victoria (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)