Ooswesthoesbes
Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Swati Wikipedia
editDear colleague, I saw your vote supporting close Wikipedia siSwati. I don´t know if you had visited, before your comment, the WP:ss. Moreover, I cannot to Know what you consider is activity.
I visit WP:zea (Zeêuws), where you collaborate. It has a similar number of users (84 zea: versus 87 ss:), so we could compare both. Of course zea: is more developed, 124 articles, and 2.459 editions. In the other side ss: has 35 articles and 910 editions. But these stats are from the projects exist.
I would like you attend these aspects:
- May 19, when it is proposed to close, ss: have "2" articles. We have today "35", only in one month.
- A Wikipedia project is not consider small (tiny) from 100 articles. In such case, it not should be closed.
- The last month we have realized in ss: "500" editions.
- The average of editions per day, in this last month, is bigger in ss: than in zea:.
I don't believe these wikis are inactive. But you are free to think so.
Thanks for yous time. Best regards.--Jatrobat 09:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Zèk, diech bies toch gebroeker:451 etc.? Wie kèns te noe bewere dats te dat Aeres-täölke neet sjprieks terwiels te ouch beweersj de beheerder van dae MSN-groep te zin? Kóm op zèk, houwt miech neet veur de gek en versjpil neet ander luuj hunne tied en geld (dit projek weurt door donaties betaald!) aan diet gedeuns! Cicero 15:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ich bön ouch admin gewaes dao. Tiedelik. Emes anges haet 't euver genaome. Ich höb 't tiedelik euvergenaome, omdet d'r op vakaontie ging en nog steeds is. Ich höb mien adminship euver gedrage aan User:Markvondeegel nao eine daag omdet ich d'rs toch nieks van begreep. --Ooswesthoesbes 17:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)P.S> det vanne donasies weit ich ouch waal
- En d'rs stong uûter-tæl, 'n paar histories later, 't innige waord det ich begriep: taal diese neet begrieps! --Ooswesthoesbes 17:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- 't Zal allenei waal. De bliefs mer oetvluchte verzinne. Flauwekul allenei, sjuus wie dat ónzinnig täölke. Cicero 18:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nou ja, dan geluifse mich maar neet, toch wil ich zegke det 't onmeugelik is det ich 20 accounts höb. Is 't dich neet opgevalle det ich de lètste tiejd väöl minder höb biegedrage oppe limburgse wikipedia? Ich dink det ich RSI höb.
- Ef om 't kort te haoje ich höb nog 'n tip: Ich wil neet verwietend daon, maar doe wakkers 't vuur kontstant veur aan mit taege argumente. Die aeresmiense reagere dao op en doe reageers dan weer op hun verdediging. Neet reagere! Dan gooje ze dit verhaal inne hoaxpot en heurse d'r nieks meer van. --Ooswesthoesbes 07:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- 't Zal allenei waal. De bliefs mer oetvluchte verzinne. Flauwekul allenei, sjuus wie dat ónzinnig täölke. Cicero 18:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- En d'rs stong uûter-tæl, 'n paar histories later, 't innige waord det ich begriep: taal diese neet begrieps! --Ooswesthoesbes 17:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Admin
editNo, I don't want to be an admin, it was just a temporary thing, and I will desysop me really soon. drini [es:] [commons:] 18:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Wolof Wikiquote
editCan you stop the closure? I want to create articles, I speak Wolof. here. SF-Language 09:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Bah
editYou're too fast for me.[1] :P EVula // talk // 06:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- I was slow :) 2 minutes... :( --OosWesThoesBes 06:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, you still beat me to the tagging, meaning I'm even slower than you, so I'm not in a position to complain about you. ;) EVula // talk // 06:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're not much slower. Five seconds after I tagged it for deletion I had a reply on my talk page! :) --OosWesThoesBes 06:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, you still beat me to the tagging, meaning I'm even slower than you, so I'm not in a position to complain about you. ;) EVula // talk // 06:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Volapük
editHi Oostwesthoesbes, I've seen you apparently removing some supporting votes for the closure proposal for the Volapük Wikipedia -- of course I'm against closure, but isn't this going a bit too far? I have restored the votes. (Or did I understand something wrong?). --Smeira 11:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- They're just votes. On Oppose is also a vote of user with the greek letters deleted. --OosWesThoesBes 11:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- True, but because it was duplicated; a user cannot vote twice. But the ones you eliminated didn't vote twice, did they? Or is it because they didn't justify their vote? Is it necessary to always add a reason? --Smeira 02:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I though that that Greek had only voted once, just like the others. I deleted those votes because indeed nothing was justified. And I thought it really is one of the necessary things. --OosWesThoesBes 06:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- True, but because it was duplicated; a user cannot vote twice. But the ones you eliminated didn't vote twice, did they? Or is it because they didn't justify their vote? Is it necessary to always add a reason? --Smeira 02:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Limburgse Wikipedia
editWilt u mij alstublieft deblokkeren? Ik heb misschien dan wel iets verkeerds gedaan, maar dat is geen reden om mij zolang geblokkeerd te houden. Ik heb mijn gedachten over het Limburgs veranderd en vind het nog steeds geen taal, maar een Wikipedia mag het toch hebben. Ik weet dat u geen moderator bent, maar u kunt misschien overleggen met de moderatoren op de Limburgse Wikipedia? JHaeneberghen 08:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ik zal het er met de systeemwerkers over hebben. Ik beloof je nieks. --OosWesThoesBes 08:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for corrections
editI could suppose that Google translator is bad with Dutch. I remember that it was useless even with German a year or two ago. But, something is better then nothing :) --Millosh 13:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it was not much work! Hajje :) --OosWesThoesBes 13:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for Your translations there, please note, that the text for the sitenotice was changed though, therefore there are some translations missing, if You have the time, please update them, please use this for copy and paste:
*code **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-headlines/li|update live]]) <strong>You</strong> can help Wikimedia change the world! **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-counter/li|update live]]) <strong>$1</strong> have donated. **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-donate/li|update live]]) » Donate now! **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-hide/li|update live]]) Verbèrg dit berich **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-show/li|update live]]) Laot mieër zeen **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-meter/li|update live]]) 1.234.567 miense höbbe gedoneerd. (please don't create, it has to be created by a developer) **([[MediaWiki:Centralnotice-target/li|update live]]) http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate (Only translate "Donate" if there exist a translated page)
thank You,
best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done :) --OosWesThoesBes 18:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank You :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Gein perbleem/No problem. No Limburgish = no good :) --OosWesThoesBes 18:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank You :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Sitenotice in 't Limburgs
editHai Ooswesthoesbes, Merci vuur 't verwelkómme. ;-) Ich wól dich effe vraoge ofs doe mesjiens de Limburgse sitenotice kins verangere, want d'r sjtaet "d'n waereld", wat "de waereld" mót zin. Volges d'r grammair mót "d'n" neet op die plaatsj, ómdat dat woeërd mit de lètter w begint. Zous te dao nao wille kieke? Groete, --Tibor 16:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ich zal 't aanvraoge. --OosWesThoesBes 17:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done, thank You, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Aha, nog ins danke! Op de Limburgse Wikipedia en Wiktionair sjtónt trouwes nog väöl tekste in 't Nederlands, bevuurbeeld "Speciaal:RecenteWijzigingen" es te in d'r adresbalk kieks. Noe höb ich mich laote vertèlle dat dat aoch via Meta-wiki wirkt. Kin ich (ofs doe) dat aoch örges laote verangere? --Tibor 17:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Nae, det wèrk via de BetaWiki. Die väöle tekste in 't Hollensj komme door 1. Nederlands is de fallback veur 't Limburgs, dus wo nag gein limburgse vertaling is, is 't Nederlands in gebroek. 2. Oppe li.wikipedia waere neet alle tekste van de BetaWiki gebroek omdet ze d'r al wore veurdet ich de interface vertaald haj, dees tekste kinne foute bevatte. Óm dae link te verangere höbse volges mich translator-rechte neudig. Bekiek dich de betaWiki meh 'ns esse tied höbs. --OosWesThoesBes 17:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Da gaon ich dao noe mer ins kieke. Adieë! --Tibor 17:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Good :) We can always need help there. You can change those names then via betawiki:Special:Magic, please leave a message at betawiki:Betawiki:Translator to get the status. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Da gaon ich dao noe mer ins kieke. Adieë! --Tibor 17:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Nae, det wèrk via de BetaWiki. Die väöle tekste in 't Hollensj komme door 1. Nederlands is de fallback veur 't Limburgs, dus wo nag gein limburgse vertaling is, is 't Nederlands in gebroek. 2. Oppe li.wikipedia waere neet alle tekste van de BetaWiki gebroek omdet ze d'r al wore veurdet ich de interface vertaald haj, dees tekste kinne foute bevatte. Óm dae link te verangere höbse volges mich translator-rechte neudig. Bekiek dich de betaWiki meh 'ns esse tied höbs. --OosWesThoesBes 17:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Aha, nog ins danke! Op de Limburgse Wikipedia en Wiktionair sjtónt trouwes nog väöl tekste in 't Nederlands, bevuurbeeld "Speciaal:RecenteWijzigingen" es te in d'r adresbalk kieks. Noe höb ich mich laote vertèlle dat dat aoch via Meta-wiki wirkt. Kin ich (ofs doe) dat aoch örges laote verangere? --Tibor 17:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done, thank You, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Re:Clarification
editHello,
For a case like Aeres, even if they had obtained an ISO code, an active community, and translated the interface, they would still need to demonstrate that the language isn't just used by, say, 20 hobbyists, and that there are publications, TV shows, newspapers, etc in the language. The goal of the Wikimedia foundation is to promote the spread of knowledge, not to promote constructed languages, so if someone wants to propose a project in a constructed language, they will have to provide evidence of widespread use.--Shanel 22:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Newspaper etc. Then I need to ask people who really speak Aeres and don't need a dictionary for each sentence if a newspaper etc exists. --OosWesThoesBes 07:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Where can I ask to launch the hungarian wikinews: http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wn/hu ? Thanx--News 16:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well it's a difficult process. You can read it: here. --OosWesThoesBes 16:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- When will we get a reasult about the Requests for new languages/Wikinews Hungarian [2] ?--News 16:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- It depends on the discussion and the test project, I can't tell. --OosWesThoesBes 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- What we have to discuss? :)
- It depends on the discussion and the test project, I can't tell. --OosWesThoesBes 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- When will we get a reasult about the Requests for new languages/Wikinews Hungarian [2] ?--News 16:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Requests for new languages/Wikinews Hungarian --News 18:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing. The only thing left to do is the completion of the interface and it will be approved I think. --OosWesThoesBes 18:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Diene bot mit zien artikels
editZouste estebleef get minder wille doon of stoppe? [3] [4] 't Ries de pan oet! 500 artikels drbie is te väöl. Dien artikels zeen kwaliteitsloos [5] of Wikipediaig [6]. Doe bös geveerlijk bezig. Umbel 12:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- ICH STOP NEET. Det moog ich zelf beslisse en doe moogs dich d'r boete haaje. Es doe det kwaliteitsloos vinj moogse ze van mich alle 250 verbaetere! --OosWesThoesBes 12:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Doe hoofs dich neet direct aangevalle te veule. Die artikels zeen geweun rotzooi, toegaeve. Es ich admin woor hej ich ze alle 1000 al weggesjmete! Dae sjaele zeiver van dich is geldverknoeiing! Doe mos van mich sjtoppe of ich zorg d'r waal veur det die op Wikipedia 's wakker gesjud waere. Umbel 12:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- 't Is génne rotzooi en wie wolse d'r veur zorge det die d'r veur zorge det ich stop? Die höbbe nag noeaits ómgekeke nao de Wiktionair! --OosWesThoesBes 12:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wat dachse van 'n berichske in de kaffee? Hae sjmiet 500 artikele in eine daag inne Wiktionair euver plaatse in Frankriek, euver cijfers en get fins en slowaaks. 750 is éinzevernde deil vanne Wikipedia! Waer 's wakker! --Umbel 12:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ich dink det ich diene gestalk baeter kin negere. Doe perbieërs mich gweun ómme haof te lieje. Oetsjeije mit dees perseunlikke aanvaller! Emes kin dich hiej waal 'ns blokkere! Oet mien furie gaon ich noe JUUS DOOR DICH mieë botartiekele d'r biej goeaje. Alvas bedank! --OosWesThoesBes 12:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dao det veural! Ich probeer dich allein maar te helpe! Umbel 12:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oetgeveurd. --OosWesThoesBes 13:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dao det veural! Ich probeer dich allein maar te helpe! Umbel 12:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ich dink det ich diene gestalk baeter kin negere. Doe perbieërs mich gweun ómme haof te lieje. Oetsjeije mit dees perseunlikke aanvaller! Emes kin dich hiej waal 'ns blokkere! Oet mien furie gaon ich noe JUUS DOOR DICH mieë botartiekele d'r biej goeaje. Alvas bedank! --OosWesThoesBes 12:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wat dachse van 'n berichske in de kaffee? Hae sjmiet 500 artikele in eine daag inne Wiktionair euver plaatse in Frankriek, euver cijfers en get fins en slowaaks. 750 is éinzevernde deil vanne Wikipedia! Waer 's wakker! --Umbel 12:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- 't Is génne rotzooi en wie wolse d'r veur zorge det die d'r veur zorge det ich stop? Die höbbe nag noeaits ómgekeke nao de Wiktionair! --OosWesThoesBes 12:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Doe hoofs dich neet direct aangevalle te veule. Die artikels zeen geweun rotzooi, toegaeve. Es ich admin woor hej ich ze alle 1000 al weggesjmete! Dae sjaele zeiver van dich is geldverknoeiing! Doe mos van mich sjtoppe of ich zorg d'r waal veur det die op Wikipedia 's wakker gesjud waere. Umbel 12:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Herinnering
editEach month a new book of the month. For December is it Täöfelkes. JHaeneberghen 09:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Wp/dum
editHoi daar, ik kwam je toevalig tegen op de lijst voor nieuwe aanvragen voor een wikisource in het oudHollands (middle Dutch), nu ga ik proberen een wikipedia te creëren in het oud Hollands, mischien heb je interesse??Klaveren 12:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Language boxes
editHello Ooswesthoesbes. I saw that you substituted the old babel templates. The new template is constantly refined based on suggestions from users. If you have any suggestions to improve {{user language}} to your liking, they are more than welcome.
If you still want to use the old format, this is possible with {{babelold}}, which is the old format but using the new text and categories (I've used it on your user page so you can see if you like it better). If you prefer to substitute entirely, we can use invisible templates to categorize instead, if that's okay with you. You can compare the three formats below. Again, any suggestions are welcome. :)
{{user en-3}} |
(deprecated) | ||
{{babelold|en|3}} |
| ||
{{user language|en|3}} |
|
—{admin} Pathoschild 21:32:32, 09 February 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate your work very much but I still preffer the substituted version. I don't know why but I think one of the reasons is the arcading (¿arcering?) Not all templates are translated yet, will be done soon I think. On my computer the colours seem very dull. I think these things are caused by the thickness. The old babel templates are thicker which make them fuller, which is my personal favourite :) --OosWesThoesBes 07:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I added the category template I mentioned, so you'll be categorized using the same system the template does. —{admin} Pathoschild 11:13:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) --OosWesThoesBes 12:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I added the category template I mentioned, so you'll be categorized using the same system the template does. —{admin} Pathoschild 11:13:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
requests for new languages
editHoi, I noticed that you asked yet again for another project for a language that you do not master. Why do this? There is a strong contingent of people who object to new projects when they are asked for by people who are unlikely to know the first thing about these languages. This is not helpful. GerardM 20:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Wilkóm!
editWilkóm in de Association for Stroopwafel Addicts!
- Danke :) Ik heb al zo vaak een stroopwafel gegeten dat ik erbij moest komen :) --OosWesThoesBes 07:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
User language box translation
editHello Ooswesthoesbes. Thank you very much for translating {{user language}}. The template has recently been changed to add two new levels, 0 and 4 (see detailed descriptions). Please update Template:User language/nl:
- 0: this user cannot read or write Nederlands.
- 4: this user can contribute at a near-native level in Nederlands. —{admin} Pathoschild 00:15:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- SPQ did it already :) I've fixed it a little bit. --OosWesThoesBes 09:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 21:01:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Language box Nederlandse taal: zou je deze op je Userpage misschien kunnen wijzigen in: "Deze gebruiker beschikt over een middelmatige kennis van de Nederlandse taal". Momenteel ziet het er nogal vreemd uit. Ida Shaw 15:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Gedaan :) --OosWesThoesBes 07:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Final translation needed for creation of Limburgish Wikisource
editHello Ooswesthoesbes. Please see Requests for new languages/Wikisource Limburgish#Final translation. Although the Limburgish Wikisource has been approved, it cannot be created until those translations are provided. —{admin} Pathoschild 07:37:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright :D --OosWesThoesBes 11:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
re:Little spelling mistake?
editHello Ooswesthoesbes, thanks for that, I am sure I do a lot, because English is not really a language I prefer and I am not good at it (You don't want to hear me speaking it XD ). I know in English they make a lot of spaces into words that have a single meaning, in German it would be the contrary, also in Icelandic, I like composita :)
Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Cherokees
editDo you think we could find a way to involve the Cherokee online community in their Wikipedia? Probably the best way to solve this out would be to reactivate that Wikipedia. Any ideas? --Leptictidium 12:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we could send them an e-mail or ask them to put a link to the Cherokee wikipedia on their website? --OosWesThoesBes 12:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- A link is not enough. The goal is to get people to edit, not only to know that the wiki exists. --Leptictidium 15:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well.. If they know it exists, they'll edit.. Right? --OosWesThoesBes 15:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- They know it exists, and they're not editing. So it's clearly not the case. --Leptictidium 10:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well.. If they know it exists, they'll edit.. Right? --OosWesThoesBes 15:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- A link is not enough. The goal is to get people to edit, not only to know that the wiki exists. --Leptictidium 15:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Your bot at li.wq
editWell, we are waiting for the actual implementation of the global bot policy on some wikis. I hope that someone will enable global bot on your wiki soon. Anyway, I've temporarly disabled the bot on li.wq. --Nemo 08:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: FY wiki
editI was wondering if there was still a need to translate the Fundraising 2008/appeal/fy and if you could look into this. Thank you. --Ida Shaw 05:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I can't speak any West-Frisian :( --OosWesThoesBes 08:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I hoped you might know someone who did :) --Ida Shaw 09:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked a local user at fy.wiki. :) --OosWesThoesBes 09:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Great! :) --Ida Shaw 10:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Translated by Swarte Kees. --OosWesThoesBes 13:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Y're a star :) I know someone who will really like to see this... --Ida Shaw 14:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- :) Yeah? --OosWesThoesBes 14:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- ij niet dan? --Ida Shaw 14:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Nee :) --OosWesThoesBes 14:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- ij niet dan? --Ida Shaw 14:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- :) Yeah? --OosWesThoesBes 14:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Y're a star :) I know someone who will really like to see this... --Ida Shaw 14:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Translated by Swarte Kees. --OosWesThoesBes 13:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Great! :) --Ida Shaw 10:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked a local user at fy.wiki. :) --OosWesThoesBes 09:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I hoped you might know someone who did :) --Ida Shaw 09:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Homshetsma Wikipedia
editIf so, Homshetsma Wikipedia may created in many alphabets (Turkish, Armenian, Georgian, Russian}. There isn't any Western Armenian project yet. "hye" code hasn't been used in any project so far. Why do you argue against this project. UNESCO has marked Homshetsma as a "hye" code. Just like http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/lzz
Wikipedia Prekmurian
editHello! You was voted for the Prekmurian wikipedia, under the condition, if there will be ISO code. 1. Doncsecztalk 15:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Closure of Albanian Wikinews
editHi, I fully intend to request closure of sq.wikinews as well, however I would rather wait a little bit so that it's been inactive for longer. The fact that bs.wikinews has been inactive since March and has already been requested to close once makes the case more convincing; I would rather wait until 6 months have passed for sq.wikinews as well, which will be in February. --Node ue 20:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, that's fine. But I'm hoping to see editors there before February instead of a proposal for closure :) --OosWesThoesBes 03:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Uit beta fase
editHallo Ooswesthoesbes,
Zag op de talk page van het language commitee dat je gevraagd hebt of de Limburgse wikiversiteit uit de beta fase mag. Las ook hun antwoord dat er meerdere mensen moeten zijn die een bijdrage moeten leveren. Zit zelf met hetzelfde probleem. Heb ondanks diverse pogingen nog weinig mensen kunnen vinden die regelmatig een bijdrage willen leveren. Ken jij misschien nog mensen die me zouden kunnen helpen? Of heb je andere tips?
Groet,
Tim, Timboliu (talk) 19:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hej, dat ging eigenlijk over de Limburgse Wikinuujs :)
- Ik weet dat het heel lastig is om gebruikers te vinden, vooral voor een "vaag" project als Wikiversiteit. Heb je al geprobeerd om mensen vanuit andere wikiprojecten aan te halen? --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 19:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Simple French Wikipedia?
editHi! I started a discussion about starting a Simple French Wikipedia. Please see Meta:Babel#Simple_French_Wikipedia_proposal_based_on_fran.C3.A7ais_fondamental WhisperToMe (talk) 06:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have now formally submitted my proposal: Requests for new languages/Wikipedia French Simple (2) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
NL Wikiversity
edit--Sorry, this message is in Dutch--
Ik zag dat er jaren geleden al een discussie is geweest hierover. Ik denk dat het tijd wordt dat deze er komt, als je je bedenkt dat we ook een van de grootste WP's hebben. Hoe kunnen we dat gaan aanpakken? Sangam (talk) 11:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Ja... Wikiversity is een project dat heel veel mankracht vergt. Volgens mij zijn ze al een paar jaar bezig om het op te zetten. Het voornaamste is dat er een stabiele, relatief grote gemeenschap (10 actieve gebruikers) is die het project aanvangen. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Superprotect status
editDear Ooswesthoesbes, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.
- Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
- An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer
Peteforsyth 09:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. Indeed, I was not aware of this discussion. While I oppose this new feature, I don't think it is relevant for smaller wikis, such as the Limburgish projects. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 15:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Wiki laki reply to your comment
editHi. How are you?thank you for your comment on laki request test ... I think ، not exist in the world nothing more difficult and time-consuming than to use prefix at wikitest ... If laki create ، Be sure all pages with better quality improve .... [[ https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/lki/1_آبان]] it is day in calendar and its important that day features be camplate ... hosseinblue hi .we are working for improve pages ...if this pages cemplate . can you support my languge?please sir. thank you so much ...--Abtin71 (talk) 09:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- You can always create those pages when the wiki is created. Also, it is no use having a page "1 april is a day in the year", as everybody knows it. The calender pages are only useful if they have real contents, even if it is just a little bit, like [7]. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Ok.your right ... Sure we fix all page and tell every users my language not create a small page ... Thank you very much --hosseinblue (talk)
- Very good. I would like to see your wiki approved :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 13:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thankyou so much with great health for you ... سپاسگزارم --Hosseinblue (talk) 00:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC) doo you know for approved laki wiki what is need now? and when laki language add in list on top interwiki ? plese --Hosseinblue (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- You will need at least a few months of activity. While you have made many edits this month, all months before are practically inactive. Sustained activity is one of the requirements for approval. I'd suggest you keep expanding pages the coming months, and you will surely be approved. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
So when add to this add list ?
- That depends on how much work you've done at translatewiki.net and very often it's just a matter of time. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
we camplate tis on translatewiki ... do You know how long it takes? --Hosseinblue (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I propose you contact one of the admins on translatewiki for this, either on the support page or directly on one of their talk pages: [8] [9]. As this is not my field of expertise or my task. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)hi me friend .greate wish for you ....do you know how to find all short page, jost in wp/lki?thank you so much-Hosseinblue (talk)
- With the current technology, unfortunately, that is not possible. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)ok.thank you so much .do you know how i admin test on wp/lki?i dont know do i work for acceptance --Hosseinblue (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I do not really understand your question. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Remove protection incubator:Template:Wp/orv/Userbox/Бюрократ
editRemove this, please. --5.228.177.137 13:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Should FuzzyBot remove all potentially outdated translations?
editHello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations?. Nemo (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Incubator Nahua languages
editGood afternoon, you are a witness that I have responded to the requests made to me in less than 72 hours Incubator:User talk:Marrovi, and I gave my word as a gentleman, I hope the discussion continues without blockages. I am not an ordinary user, I have studied the Nahuatl languages for many years. Thank you very much, regards.--Marrovi (talk) 21:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
It's my good work, I understand Nahua languages; Incubator:Wp/nhn/Tochtli, Incubator:Wp/nhn/Tochmeh, Incubator:Wp/nhn/Alotl, Incubator:Wp/nhn/Huehxolotl, Incubator:Wp/nhn/Ocelotl, Incubator:Wp/nhn/Malinalco, Incubator:Wp/nch/Mexko, Incubator:Wp/nch/Palach, Incubator:Wp/nci/Teutontlālpan, and others. It's obvious that people who attack always show the bad and never recognize the good in the people. --Marrovi (talk) 01:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Ooswesthoesbes, I am not an ordinary editor as some people have made you believe, I have a long history in studies of the revitalization of Nahuatl languages in prestigious institutions and I know many academic people [10], writers and people who speak Nahuatl languages, not only are my friends, sometimes I have worked together with them on the Nahuatl language projects. I have many years studying the languages of my country and logically I have the moral and professional quality to edit in any project of the incubator, so I have never had the attitude of scamming, as ripped off by a person who claims to be an eminence in Nahuatl language. I do not seek to make a mockery of anything because my work is serious.
I show you my photographs about my works and meetings at the University of Warsaw, in Poland [11], at UNAM (my mother university) and in Wikipedia about the Nahuatl languages, because now you can prove that I'm not an ordinary user as you were led to believe, many years of work guarantee me, is bother for me that you get ripped off. See you.--Marrovi (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Your questions have been answered, can you read my answer in my user talk, they never make a message on my user talk, about questions.--Marrovi (talk) 14:30, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Are you understand Nahuatl languages?--Marrovi (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- May name is Manuel Rodríguez Villegas, Everything you need to know about Nahuatl languages or about any problem, I can help you and respond immediately, I am not a wizard, I can not guess if you want to know something or ask me about a doubt, I have certified knowledge about the Nahuatl languages, but If something I do not know, I can ask friends who are native speakers.--Marrovi (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm not ordinary editor, I can help you about nahuatl languages, I'm studing Nahuatl languages since 2003, I have meetings with academics and native speakers. I have many books and a lot of material about the Nahuatl languages.--Marrovi (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Again the answer
editQuestion 1. How many pages (approximately) have you copied from Huiquipedia to Incubator? Let me point out to you that ... You are allowed to copy. When you copy, you must add attribution for the source. You have to say where you copied things from. If you did not do that, you are in violation of copyright under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL. And copyright violation can result in a block.
- Question 2. I note from the discussion we had at m:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Nahuatl Wikipedia 2 that the question of just what language(s) the Nahuatl Wikipedia is written in is not so clear. But it does seem pretty clear that Classical Nahuatl (nci) is certainly a language used in that project. So I do not see why we would have a project Wp/nci. How do you justify that?
- Central nahuatl is life language, Classical Nahuatl is dead language.--Marrovi (talk) 17
- 46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- The case around Central Nahuatl (nhn) is a little less clear, but on the whole I also wonder why we have a project Wp/nhn. Please explain that, as well. (Remember: two sentences, not a whole essay.)
- Question 3. If so many pages you copy of Nahuatl Wikipedia to different tests here are identical, then why do we need multiple tests here? Recall that LangCom is not willing to approve tests when the language is not noticeably different from that of an existing test. Please explain.
Please answer these questions. Thank you. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Huiquipedia is a jumble of words, words invented by users, mix Classical Nahuatl language with different life languages, that generates confusion and deception, that's why created (nci), so that once again the articles are hailed, be clear only in classic Nahuatl and not in inventions; that's why I copied them and pasted them in Incubator as (nci).--Marrovi (talk) 17
- 46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
You are witness that the questions were answered, as a gentleman I gave my word and my answers. Have you a nice day.--Marrovi (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I write to User talk:MarcoAurelio in Spanish language, because is other witness in this case.--Marrovi (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Un gran favor de hombre a hombre; si algo puede hacer usted, pídale al señor Francisco Maciel o Akapochtli, de la manera más atenta que me deje en paz, no creo que sea mucho pedir.--Marrovi (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hint
editYou also have to go and delete the bogus closure request itself. (;-) StevenJ81 (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's a bit difficult when you're not an admin though ;) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Somehow, I thought you were. (embarrassed grin) Tag it with {{delete}}, then, I guess. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hahah, I had done that. I guess the IP address reverted that without me noticing. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Somehow, I thought you were. (embarrassed grin) Tag it with {{delete}}, then, I guess. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Guianan Wikipedia !
editHi, sorry if I contact you again for the same thing, but I would like to know if you can inform us about what we miss for the approval of the Guianan Wikipedia, because it's been almost a month that we filled a few pages related to French Guiana, as you had asked us (more precisely 50 pages), it was made known to Steven and here we are still waiting for approval ? Maybe, you can approve this project or help us or you want more articles filled (if yes, the number around, please) ? Thanks again !
Below, there is a list of pages that have been filled, as you wanted :
- Lanmérik
- Lafrik
- Lazi
- Lanmérik di Nò
- Lanmérik santral
- Lanmérik di Sid
- Lagwiyann
- Lafrans
- Kayenn
- Kourou
- Kriyòl Gwiyannen
- Fransé
- Sourinanm
- Gwiyannan
- Brézil
- Karayb
- Lézanti
- Sen-Laurent-di-Maronni
- Lanmanzonni
- Lanmanzonn
- Lanmanpa
- Listwè di Lagwiyann
- Lanmérik laten
- Sant èspasyal gwiyannen
- Loséyan Atlantik
- Lis dé koumin di Lagwiyann
- Plato dé Gwiyann
- Frontchè ant Brézil ké Lafrans
- Djosèz di Kayenn
- Pari
- Konsèy jénéral di Lagwiyann
- Konsèy réjyonnal di Lagwiyann
- Annglé
- Potidjé
- Néyèrlandé
- Lérazi
- Lanng
- Rwéyonm-Ini
- Létazini
- Vénézwéla
- Loséyanni
- Léròp
- Lèspangn
- Politik annan Lagwiyann
- Loséyan Pasifik
- Loséyan Argtik
- Loséyan Endjen
- Loséyan Ostral
- Lanlmangn
- Larjantin
LeGuyanaisPure (talk) 04:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I cannot approve projects. This has to be done by the LangCom. I propose you put a message on the talk page there. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Server switch message looks for translators
editHello
In the past, you helped with the translation of Tech/Server switch. This message will soon be displayed to the public. We look for translators to update this message and check if everything is okay.
I hope you can help.
Thank you very much in advance, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)