Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 25

Logo re-designed to move away from C like languages and be more inclusive of further languages
Logo colour scheme to follow as Wikimedia's branding
Logo overall visual structure meant to be legible at smaller sizes
Logo has some similarity to the Deutsche Bank logo

Voting

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Really neat, appreciate the simplicity. Outreach for all (coding) languages [including wikitext :)], works for me! And hope it works for everyone. ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shizhao (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LeoAShima (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chaddy (talk) 03:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support YFdyh000 (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Enaldodiscussão 04:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Герман Мейстер (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ValeJappo 【〒】 06:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Abuluntu (👨🏼‍💻💬) 07:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RG067 (talk) 07:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Betseg (talk) 07:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, clear design, easily understandable. Perfect logo for this project. KKDAII (talk) 10:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Barcelona (talk) 10:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support MisterSynergy (talk) 10:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kingbjelica (talk) 11:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nw520 (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wierzbowski (talk) 12:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Afaz (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ‐‐DutchTina (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xnet1234 (talk) 16:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support elegant and simple in old-school style - nice Zblace (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jagro (talk) 17:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Joseph (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hogü-456 (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support definitely. Simplicity is good. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simplicity. Marinna (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — xaosflux ^Talk 20:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danapit (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear, strong Bertux (talk) 23:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Keo010122 (talk) 14:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cortex128 (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Smaug the Golden (talk - my contributions) 19:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KRLS (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support rubin16 (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nicolabel (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kasyap (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wiki13 (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ériugena (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LydiaPintscher (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support BrokenSegue 17:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support WikiLuke (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NMW03 (talk) 23:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Macuser10 (talk) 09:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support josecurioso ❯❯❯ Tell me! 00:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Peacearth (talk) at 03:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NaufalF (talk) 04:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Emojiwiki (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LaMagiaaa (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KirkLU (talk) 07:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support if legally permissible KPFC 💬 09:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OwenBlacker (Talk) 10:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iluvatar (talk) 11:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Julle (talk) 12:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NotGiraffer (talk) 12:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, evident. Waltercolor (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Connor Hiddleson (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 00:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support simple, nice, easy to understand for a person not much familiar with mathematics or alike languages. i find it very positive that it keeps the tricolor pattern of other wiki-logos. Seriously worrying though the similarity with D.Bank... :( but still i believe this is best of the proposed. Lantuszka (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adamant.pwn (talk) 01:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support DSwissK | 💬 10:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kharkivian (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nikki (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support FiliP ██ 06:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Antilight gmp (talk) 13:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Runner1928 (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the wub "?!" 18:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nouill (talk) 14:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support simple, easily identifiable Moebeus (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support stwalkerster (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Venca24 (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noé (talk) 08:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support εΔ ω 14:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Support SVcode (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lagewi (talk) 16:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support AHollender (WMF) (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ckoerner (talk) 18:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support MarcoSwart (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.