Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Matiia

< Stewards | Elections 2016

Matiia

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: es, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I registered on Wikimedia projects in June 2014, I speak Spanish as my native language, English at an intermediate level and I can understand a few other romance languages on a basic level (e.g. Portuguese & Italian). My timezone is UTC-3.

    I started doing global counter vandalism/spam on Wikimedia projects in October 2014, although I wasn't very active on this task at that moment, since I was more active on Wikia projects, I became more active in December 2014 here. I became a global rollbacker in February 2015, a global sysop in June 2015 and an admin here on Meta-Wiki in September 2015. I've been very active both reverting vandalism/spam and performing other global sysop actions.

    I nominated myself for stewardship in order to be able to lock/gblock spambots, spammers, LTAs & vandals myself, but I'll help out with other steward tasks (both on-wiki and on IRC) as well. Thanks for your time. :)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Matiia


  Yes

edit
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm convinced Matiia will be a very helpful and especially clueful addition to the steward team. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No doubt.--Syum90 (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very good user--6AND5 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seems well suited for the task. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Matiia has the required skills and his activity level is sufficiant. I am sure he would be a great steward. Polite, helpfull and excellent communicative skills. Natuur12 (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active, trusted and helpful user. No reason to oppose. RadiX∞ 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Yeza (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active cross-wiki, could use the tools well. eurodyne (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. RomanLier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --RomanLier (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oscar_. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Oscar_. (talk) · @ 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Always there to give a hand.[reply]
  14. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Cárdenas (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Olsi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Olsi (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  trusted and experienced —Ah3kal (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --geo ») 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active on SWMT and has a lot of crosswiki experience. Very good candidate. Reguyla (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Definitely. You do very good work on here, and would make a good addition to the steward team. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  very active cross-wiki Leništudent (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Why not? He is very active. White Master (es) 18:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Does great work Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very helpful in global patrol tasking. Good luck! Taichi - (あ！) 19:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Raystorm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active cross-wiki. Raystorm (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Trusted and helpful user. Petronas (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Active crosswiki user. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Very active and would be a good addition to the team Riley Huntley (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wiki13 talk 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Helmy oved 21:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I hope Matiia will be a good asset.Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. C. Jonel (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  C. Jonel (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Gato Preto (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gato Preto (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Very active on IRC and in the SWMT. Hoo man (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HakanIST (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  +1 -jkb- 00:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Good activity and very convincing answers, particularly the answer to a tough question about CU wiki — NickK (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Gharouni (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Does deserve a try. Not being an admin on any project is not a big problem IMHO. The proof is in the pudding, we'll see how Matiia will react. I think it will be just fine. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  A bunch of experience due to his work for the SWMT team. No-brainer. Trijnsteltalk 13:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Knows the basics, acts maturely, makes good recommendations. I have no concerns.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Ochilov (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Trusted Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Herby talk thyme 15:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Uğurkenttalk 16:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  FN Markus (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Geohakkeri (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No problem. Geohakkeri (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Satdeep Gill (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gasdine (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Gasdine (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Ghiutun 22:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Jcaraballo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  ¡Adelante! Jcaraballo 00:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wildcursive (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 10:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Yes. Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  84. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Active contributor, no reason not to assume good faith in regard of other lacking. — T. 13:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zotezangu (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  rxy (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Irwin アーウィン 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ghilt (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I had some doubts, mainly described by Rschen7754 below. However, Mattia is extremely active and demonstrates work well as a team. So, ¡Buena suerte! Érico (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. XanaG (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Consistently shows common sense and good judgement Xana (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I was really happy to see your candidature this year and I'm sure you'd do well as a steward. You are often around and ping the stewards fairly frequently on IRC. It would be great if you could just deal with all that yourself. -Barras talk 13:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Take care of the tools ! DrTrumpet (talk) 13:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stepojevac (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Seems suited for the job. Stepojevac (talk) 13:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nawaraj Ghimire (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Nawaraj Ghimire (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Mvictor talk 19:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. PetrohsW (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  petrohs (gracias) 20:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. ElGatoSaez (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Great user. Very interested in the projects. Also very active. ElGatoSaez (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  ¡Suerte!. まSan [T•C•ES] 22:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  104. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  INeverCry 23:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •    Rauletemunoz 03:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis and has global rights.--Snaevar (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Rosymonterrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rosymonterrey (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Excellent cross-wiki experience[reply]
  111. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Appreciate his help on Outreach wiki. Msannakoval (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. JMCC1 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  JMCC1 (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Dave Braunschweig (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  B20180 (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 09:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Melos (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  — regards, Revi 17:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Active and experienced in cross wiki stuff. I hope Matiia would be a good steward Shanmugamp7 (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  Jan KovářBK (talk) 00:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Tadol (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Tadol (talk) 01:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Obaid Raza (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  – Meiræ 12:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LEANSER (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Steschke (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  ST ○ 20:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Of course, he's doing good work. Experienced and active. tufor (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fdssdf (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BAB ZAA (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) • --BAB ZAA (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. ציון הלוי (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  ציון הלוי (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Saehrimnir (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ciberprofe (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ankry (talk) 07:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. WiseWoman (Verification pending) •  --WiseWoman (talk) 11:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  While Matiia has some good crosswiki experience, they have been active on Wikimedia for less than two years, and are not an administrator on a content wiki. Considering how powerful the steward toolset is and the damage that can be done with it, I would prefer that they had another year of experience, and more admin experience on a content wiki so that we can see how they react in more tense situations. Please don't be discouraged from running again in the future, if this does not succeed. Rschen7754 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Per Rschen7754. Also it took too many time to get for an answer. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per Rschen Sujalajus (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen, but would definitely be open to supporting in the future. Mh7kJ (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mar del Sur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Just a year and a half of experience here and still very unsound ideas on the law and about the legal importance of protecting privacy. Mar del Sur (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Discasto (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Dubious privacy statements Discasto (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Per Rschen7754 Laberinto16 (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  your experience for Steward is very low and you can't speak to many languages. Sodeif (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I think this is way too big of a jump. CLCStudent (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I think you don't have enough experience, you've only a year and some contributing on Wikimedia projects. But you're a great candidate, for the future. Erne Mogilevich (ノート) 00:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Jarould (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ninjastrikers (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 04:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Scriptartis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --  Scriptartis |   Parley 05:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 • --Technopat (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per Rschen7754, WSNT Alexmar983 (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Registered in 2014??? Chiumbi (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Texaner (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  --Texaner (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Kubura (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Too unexperienced. Stewardship requires a lot of years of editor and sysop experience, at least five. So, this candidacy came too too early. Also important is being sysop on the content wiki (especially mother tongue Wikipedia, Wiktionary), not on bureaucracy wikis; therefore he'll more be able to understand the problems the users of those contentprojects meet and more and more complex situations in which they get in. With the fullfilled conditions above, this user might be a good choice in future. Kubura (talk) 05:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Aquilaaa (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Aquilaaa (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I’d like to see at least two years of experience on some Wikimedia wiki. –Ejs-80 09:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC) per Rschen7754[reply]
  34. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  not enough experience. I'd expect active adminship for at least a year on a content wiki. თოგო (D) 23:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Maragm (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  odder (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I think another year is needed, sorry. Courcelles 22:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate had very little time in Wikimedia projects. I think a candidate needs a broad experience, including writing and editing articles. I encourage this candidate to get more experience and I would in a few years consider a 'yes' vote. Wpollard (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Too young on the Wiki projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Would've like to have seen a bit longer duration of experience. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  That is a candidate I would like to support but not now. Similar with what I said to Defender, countervandalism is not enough IMO. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I am undecided so far. Mainly per Teles. MF-W 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yasir72.multan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Yasir72.multan (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I am swayed by Rschen7754's reasoning, but I can't see myself voting against it yet. Caballero1967 (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I'm deferring a Yes/No vote to those who can more knowledgeably judge the candidate's response to issues touching user confidentiality. loupgarous (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Excellent user, but he is still a new user. Maybe in a year. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 14:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Un poco pronto Morza (sono qui) 11:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Matiia&oldid=24929671"