Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Ellywa

Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Administrator: User page Wikibooks - Most active: User page NL-Wikipedia

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello to all of you. I am a Wikimedian from The Netherlands, female and born in 1954. From december 2002 I am active on Wikipedia-NL and later on various other projects. I have had several roles, from administrator/bureaucrat at NL-Wikipedia to president of the NL chapter. Currently I am an administrator at NL-Wikibooks, rollbacker on NL-Wikipedia, autopatrolled on Commons and member of the OTRS-team. When logged in, I am present on various IRC channels. In addition I am involved with the NL chapter in various tasks. People who know me might tell you I am a helpful person. I am especially committed to protect our beautiful project from vandalism. Fighting global vandalism and vandalism on small wikis will be my main job if I am selected as steward.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Ellywa


  1. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Viiictorrr (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Viiictorrr (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Natuur12 (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Moral support. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Nuhaa (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bmcln1 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Bmcln1 (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   While there are many broadly valid criticisms of this candidate, I support her candidature as someone that can step into the role. Hopefully, should she be elected she will take a closer look at the full gamut of responsibilities associated with being a steward on Wikimedia, and involve herself in some of those beyond the role of simply fighting vandalism. One of the strongest reasons I have for my support is that she is a female and there is a marked dearth of females either in authority or authorship on Wikipedia/Wikimedia, and Wikipedia, as an entity, needs to greatly expand that involvement and temper some of the testosterone that has historically fueled it. In the unlikely event that does get elected, hopefully Ellywa will take a closer look at the steward responsibilities and find some capacities that she can develop further. Good luck. Stevenmitchell (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Taketa (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Terry77 (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ferran Mir (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   12345danNL (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Aledownload (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elvesham (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mbch331 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Blackhat999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I've always been one to believe that rights should be granted based on past *track record of responsibility* - leave the *experience* part for the user to grow into. I personally mostly just do CV stuff, and I don't always have time to edit regularly. Yes, I understand that for security reasons we want to limit the number of people that *never* use administrative permissions, but I think that this attitude has gone so far that users feel uncomfortable asking for permissions and feel like their contributions aren't valued. If she didn't want to use steward permissions, she wouldn't have asked for them. We should have some more trust in our community members, rather than telling them they don't "need" rights when we have not even the shadow of a doubt that they will use them responsibly. Ellywa is a trilingual sysop, CV fighter, OTRS volunteer (which demonstrates experience and responsibility for some of the darker sides of stewardship), and IRC volunteer - a prolific contributor She has demonstrated technical capacity, maturity/responsibility, and the ability to work with difficult situations with "real world" impact. IMHO, that stands to make a good steward. Blackhat999 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. এম আবু সাঈদ (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   এম আবু সাঈদ (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mirer (talk) 04:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Jusjih (talk) 04:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rodejong (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  09:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   Shizhao (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Unusual for me but I have my reasons! Insufficient cross wiki experience but has been around long enough to know which way is up. Herby talk thyme 11:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Openskye (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Martix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Martix (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Vangelis (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Goed bezig op Wikibooks. Vangelis (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Bennylin 17:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Brateevsky (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   -Xbony2 (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sebek Adamowicz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Sebek Adamowicz (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Quedel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Quedel (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Aboulouei1 (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9)   Aboulouei1 (talk) 23:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9)   Predatorix (talk) 23:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Woudloper (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Woodwalkertalk 02:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Earthscent (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Esmost (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Grotesque (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Grotesque (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rostamxani (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Kate Phaye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Kate Phaye (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017    Klaas `Z4␟` V15:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC) the best a Wikimedian can get: friendly. experienced, neutral - need I say more? <<retorical question[reply]
  38. Verbistheword (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Verbistheword (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I'd like to support everyone... although honestly I've never seen this candidate any time before. Wolverène (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Figuerai (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good willing is an excelent way to start, but I hope that afterwards, good job in Stewards duties will become a fact too. A trusting vote here. Figuerai (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Full Rune (talk) 01:30, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jcornelius (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   It seems that you would be a good steward. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   MannMaus (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Plasm (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jbergner (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Coffins (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Arbustum (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Arbustum (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   This user created the article wp:Ear on the Dutch Wikipedia. Mathmensch (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Shriheeran (talk) 22:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Schnatzel (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   we need more active women Elmie (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Sean Clark (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Sean Clark (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bpierreb (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Min.neel (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. DALIBRI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   DALIBRI (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rberchie (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Plagiat (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Sb2s3 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Sb2s3 (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Bestoernesto (talk) 07:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Deb (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Deb (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Susant purohit (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ସୁଶାନ୍ତ ପୁରୋହିତ (talk) 12:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. JoRgE-1987 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   JoRgE-1987 (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Joalpe (talk) 13:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   BuffaloBob (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I trust her Tobovs (talk) 08:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HHubi (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ymnes (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Yikkayaya (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Yikkayaya (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Leftie11 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Leftie11 (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I feel like I'm taking a chance here. I hope the candidate doesn't prove me wrong. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   CactusWriter (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Someone Not Awful (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Long term Wikipedian, heard nothing bad about her. Someone Not Awful (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. IqbalHossain (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   IqbalHossain (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 10:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Dolotta (talk) 03:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   cyrfaw (talk) 08:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Deryni (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   UaineSean (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Sidheeq (talk) 03:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Marchy088 (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Samuele2002 (talk) 12:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Edoderoo (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ulilux (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ulilux (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Frīheidasliova (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Veleius (talk) 09:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   WiseWoman (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Denkhenk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Denkhenk (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Meeyola (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Meeyola (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   M.Karelin (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Medea7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Medea7 (talk) 08:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   I think interwiki experience is not critical here. Ankry (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Spinster (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017   Spinster (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Artur Franca (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Artur Franca (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good impression Minoo (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tiputini (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tiputini (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       BasBr1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   BasBr1 (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kenzia (talk) 10:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       T34 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   t34 16:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cbyd (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wae35244 (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gag0409 (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Язев (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   ukexpat (talk) 02:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cquoi (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Pelz (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017   Pelz (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017   Krassdaniel (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  109. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HMSLavender (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zozoulia (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Agremon (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ebear422 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ebear422 (talk) 04:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  112. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   YaganZ (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dick Bos (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  114. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   African Hope (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       PowerBUL (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   --PowerBUL (talk) 08:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Fantafluflu (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017   Fantafluflu (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gaeanautes (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  118. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   —DerHexer (Talk) 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Hayordi (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Ptolusque (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   this candidate has enough experience. Wpollard (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  122. يوسف عاشق الجبل (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   يوسف عاشق الجبل (talk) 11:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Best of luck! Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   While I appreciate the user's dedication to Wikimedia, I do not feel that the steward tools would be used much outside of a few select incidents, and serving as a global sysop might accomplish much of what the user proposes to do in their candidacy. I am not convinced by their board experience (not that relevant to the role of a steward, which is a technical role that implements community consensus), or their nl.wikipedia sysop/crat experience (which they resigned in 2005, see Steward_requests/Permissions/2005#Removal_of_access - Wikimedia was a different site entirely over 11 years ago.) I would be happy to reconsider with more crosswiki experience. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   The answers given at /Questions show there's unfortunately a lack of experience with regards to steward tasks. Also, the claim that SWMT work without steward tools feels "very ineffective" makes me a little worried, considering that much of the SWMT work is indeed done by volunteers who are no stewards (yet). However, I would be very happy to see Ellywa becoming active in global countervandalism activities even if this election should be unsuccessful. Vogone (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Her answers to the questions show missing experience and knowledge. KPFC💬 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   With regret I have to oppose. While I was very delighted to see her candidature as she is arguably cross-wiki active and also a multiple sysop, unfortunately she didn't answer any of the interesting questions for all candidates, which would shed much light on his knowledge of the steward role and policies (even though there was at least one week for this). Also with regard to the other questions, she confused global suppressions with global bans, and I don't see how such a confusion is possible at all even if one only read the policies cursorily. Finally, the reply about the SWMT activity is very saddening to me. Apparently it is oh-so-inefficient to do it without being a steward? I wonder how all the active non-stewards manage to do it, and how I did it for four years or so without constantly being frustrated by the described issues. Sorry, but not even Global Rollback requests are accepted with such a reason. --MF-W 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   No apparent use for using the tools. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017  I do not appreciate cross-wiki activity or patrolling tasks in several wikis, nor do I have global permissions (as GR or GS). So I do not see clear the benefit that the community would have with this candidate. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   experience will come with the work you will do as a steward. but i can't see the need of getting steward rights, sorry Pearli (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Not enough cross-wiki experience related to steward work. Stryn (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   per MF-Warburg —Ah3kal (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan)   Gorlingor (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   QEDK (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cross-wiki countervandalism is different than reverting in your main language. It's important for steward candidates to have experience in this before they run, especially when they intend to be mainly active in that area. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Milad A380 talk 19:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   The reasons to get the rights are not persuasive, also more (recent) cross wiki activity would be good. Hoo man (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Cross-wiki work is something I always think about FIRST when considering to support/oppose a candidate. Right now, I don't see a lot of experience in the cross-wiki field of Wikimedia (see CentralAuth). Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Zero edits of any kind on Wikiversity! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   rxy (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MechQuester (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Alex Khimich (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   MoiraMoira (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC) nice person but alas totally unqualified for the job. No activity in cross wiki work and not on her home wiki either.[reply]
  23. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Thank you for volunteering. However, cross-wiki experience for steward candidates is required. Érico (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Not demonstrate cross-wiki experience, Which makes it impossible to judge quality fot your work Leon saudanha (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Contributes are good, beautiful but she's cross-wiki activity is not enough. --Uğurkenttalk 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   The Banner (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Nice lady, but I do not like the idea of a steward who wants to use other wikipedias as source when she can not find proper evidence, even when the desired info is unsourced at the other wiki[reply]
  27. Rampion (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Rampion (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lack of cross-wiki experience worries me. Joshualouie711 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Lacking cross wiki experience fails my criteria. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Looking for more cross-wiki / non-Wikipedia activity. Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Slowking4 (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   Lacking cross-wiki experience. OneMember (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   M-J (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lord Roem (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   eurodyne (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   FASTILY 10:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Varina (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017  --თოგო (D) 21:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MZaplotnik (contribs) 23:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Jeff alef (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   a×pdeHello! 10:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Per rschen and Vogone. — regards, Revi 14:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hume42 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Unfortunately, lack of cross-wiki experience. Hume42 (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Silraks (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Naminsk (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Catmando999 (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Buggia 09:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   JurriaanH (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gts-tg (talk) 06:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Sorry, but insufficient crosswiki experience. JustBerry (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   --Fenikals (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Muhraz (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   insufficient cross-wiki experience. Lepricavark (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --SM7 --talk-- 19:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Lacking cross-wiki experience Smile4ever (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Music1201 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Music1201 talk 20:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   masti <talk> 22:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Jvikings1 (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Lotje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Sorry, as per Rschen7754 Lotje (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. J budissin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   j.budissin 13:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Pngtblrs (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Muijz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Muijz (talk) 09:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Nan (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   The user is active in rather many wikis, but that is not yet the cross-wiki activity I want to see. I consider that trait a prerequisite for the flag, so no. Not this year. Base (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   per concerns from current stewards. Suggest working with SWMT during 2017. Quiddity (talk) 22:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Wimmiden (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   If you do not know, what is global suppression of accounts, simply type "global suppression" into search box in Wikimedia and the first match is Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/revision-deletion-or-suppression Taivo (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Timk70 question? 21:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   GZWDer (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Miniapolis 15:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. AnselmiJuan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Prefiero mantenerme neutral respecto de este caso. Mucho se ha dicho respecto de la brecha de género existente en Wikipedia, y claro, si no les votamos a las MUJERES, les estamos retaceando OPORTUNIDADES. Igualmente, espero que mi abstención no la desanime. Los proyectos wiki son esencialmente PLURILINGÜES, asi que recomiendo a esta postulante mejorar su dominion en l--  AnselmiJuan (discusión) 15:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)enguas foráneas.[reply]
  5. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   B20180 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Unknown Rogi 16:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Ankry (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC) changing to "yes"[reply]
  7. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Adog104 Talk to me 19:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Gut says yes, brain is reluctant. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   On one hand, she seems like she would be an active candidate, however, I'm not entirely certain that she'd be fully able to work with other stewards. I'm neutral on this candidate. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Dostojewskij (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017   While I have no doubt that the user will do a great job, I am concerned with her cross-wiki activity and thus I remain neutral — TBloemink talk 11:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   BDaniel (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~Cybularny Speak? 19:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Stang 01:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Not really convinced. --——d—n—f (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   VictorBrice (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I like the demographic that you represent, much needed among stewardry. I haven't seen the xwiki work, so on that ground I hesitate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   not enough knowledge of languages Maynich (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Ruthven (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Az1568 (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Gridditsch (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Marumari (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Hatonjan (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Geraki TL 19:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Onverwacht (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lsanabria (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tvcccp (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yohannvt (talk) 07:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gampe (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Litlok (talk) 08:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kurtis (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seven twentynine (talk) 06:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elkelon (talk) 20:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Wiki13 talk 11:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dash77 (talk) 04:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]