Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta!

edit

Hello Prosfilaes, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

Cirt 21:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia reform

edit

Hello, I thought you might be interested in my proposal for democratic reform of wikimedia governance structures 79.224.84.5

My own question

edit

Hi. I want to remove my own question which i added here. I think that was the right place to ask and the page you mentioned is mostly for requests. Please do not undo. ok?--Companionship 10:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Appalachian English

edit

Appalachian English as it stands, is well-known within the US and it's known that "outsiders" have difficulty comprehending it, but it has no formal "recognition" due to the idea of "There is only one English". (I'm actually shocked that Scots has recognition, while Wikipedia easily has a dozen varieties of the German-Dutch continuum).

Now as far as ISO goes, in order to have a Wikipedia in Appalachian, would we need to approach SIL and obtain this code? Or would Wikimedia simply consider Appalachian to fall within en and then just create something like en-app? Wōdenhelm 10:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for the stuff on X-rays

edit

You deserve a big barnstar for this Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP Kotava project

edit

Hi Prosfilaes,

I apologize if some of my sentences are not totally nuanced, but I weakly speak English (I think you would be as embarrassed as me if you were to express yourself with nuances in French).

Just tell me, objectively, if the Kotava project is unworthy to appear in Wikipedia, if all the work done for months by a significant group of contributors deserves such silence?

And since you are interested in Esperanto, look at this simple table* that I try to keep up to date, comparing the various constructed languages in Wikipedia: Kotava comes in second or third place (after Esperanto far ahead of course ) in terms of dynamism and created content.

Regards. Axel xadolik (talk) 11:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

/* bu (avk word) = page

Merry Christmas 2021

edit

Whaddo I gotta do...

edit

...to get in that Wikisource cool kids club? :p -Pete Forsyth (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Slowking4 question

edit

How does a global ban prevent a ban on Italian Wikipedia? Not an admin, so this is a new concept for me. Explain it to me slow? 09:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Elinruby (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Troll comment

edit

Why is reverting a rude, unproductive remark from a largely inactive user inappropriate? Dronebogus (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because reverting old remarks is often inappropriate, and especially from a highly involved user that the remark is pointed at.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
An insult from a barely involved commentator is not important to the discussion. Dronebogus (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply