User talk:WikiBayer/Archiv
Welcome to Meta!
editHello, WikiBayer. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
Globall rollbacker
editWelcome! Please feel free to ask any question you have and be careful when reverting :). Matiia (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Please don't edit war with vandals
editIf we have these goofballs undoing edits, then it is usually better to get them blocked prior to reverting them. Having a undo revert war is pointless and noisy, it is also feeding the trolls. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The Affiliate-selected Board seats process welcomes your support
editHello. You are receiving this message because you are active in the field of translations <3 The movement needs you! The Nominations phase has started for the ongoing selection process of two Board members, and the timeline is quite tight.
A Translation Central is available to help translators figure out what's been covered and what's left to do. Over the course of the next few weeks, your attention on candidates' profiles is particularly welcome.
While there are four languages that are especially relevant for multiple affiliates (namely Arabic, French, Russian and Spanish), we are asking your help for Chinese, Ukrainian, Bengali, Czech, Hungarian, Romanian, Italian, Korean, Portuguese, Polish, Farsi, German, Cantonese, Finnish, Hindi, Thai, Dutch, and Greek, as these also matter to affiliates! If you can't help: please see if you know anyone in your circle who could, and spread the word :) Thank you! Elitre (WMF) and Facilitators of ASBS 2019, 21:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Spambot
editNicht, dass ich dir nicht glauben würde, aber wo war denn dieser Spambot aktiv? Gruß --Schniggendiller (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Schniggendiller: entweder im Warwiki oder gvwiki wurde von Vermont inzwischen gelöscht.--WikiBayer 👤💬 20:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Aha ja, es war warWP.
- Problem: Du findest etwas, z. B. in warWP. Du hängst ein delete-Schild ran und gehst auf m:SRG wg. global lock/block. Bis sich das ein Steward ansieht, hat auf warWP aber vielleicht schon ein lokaler Admin oder ein global sysop gelöscht (letzteres war hier der Fall). Als Steward kann ich dann nicht mehr sehen, wo der mit evtl. gelöschten Beiträgen unterwegs war. Lediglich Treffer in globalen Filtern wären via Special:AbuseLog sichtbar (bei globalen Filtern und Wikis, die globale Filter unterstützen). Ergo ist es sinnvoll, auf SRG auf das entsprechende Wiki/die entsprechenden Wikis zu verweisen. Am kürzesten (und global funktionierend):
[[war:Special:Contribs/110.49.101.58]]
→ war:Special:Contribs/110.49.101.58[[war:Special:DeletedContributions/110.49.101.58]]
→ war:Special:DeletedContributions/110.49.101.58[[war:Special:Log/spamblacklist/110.49.101.58]]
→ war:Special:Log/spamblacklist/110.49.101.58
- Das Missbrauchsfilterlog lässt sich soviel ich weiß leider nicht so schön darstellen :-/
- Gruß --Schniggendiller (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Signature
editHello WikiBayer. I note that your Meta-Wiki signature does contain Benutzer Diskussion:
which is not a recognized namespace on Meta. You may wish to change it to User talk:
so it points to this talk page. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you--WikiBayer 👤💬 15:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
wikivoyage
edit74.124.128.104
im not a vandal
Baozon90 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- contact for your problem an local admin--WikiBayer 👤💬 15:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Election
editHello, the election haven't started yet, its still hour away.--AldnonymousBicara? 13:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't consider the time zone--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬
- Hahahaha no worries, let just see who will be the first voter.--AldnonymousBicara? 13:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
About global blocks
editSo they can be unblocked globally? I was confused. Please answer? Gale5050 (talk) 15:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Gale5050:Local blocks are local and have nothing to do with global / crosswiki projects. A global unblock is a unblocked of a global block and and has nothing to do with local blockages.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 16:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for clarification! Gale5050 (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, Dear Administrator!
editDeutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | Nederlands | português | Türkçe | русский | العربية | Tiếng Việt | edit
Congratulations, WikiBayer! You now have the rights of an administrator on Meta-Wiki. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-adminconnect. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading although it doesn't always completely apply here at Meta. Please also check or add your entry to Meta:Administrators#List of administrators and the Template:List of administrators. You're also allowed to subscribe the metawiki admins private mailing list. Again, congratulations and welcome to the team. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Congratulation dear janitor!--AldnonymousBicara? 20:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Congratulations :)Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. I received a request to subscribe an email address to metawiki admins claiming to be you. Could you please confirm to me you indeed requested access? Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Congratulations :)Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio This is my E-Mail-Adress-𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 18:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Wikibreak
editI'm on a (quite long) wikibreak and I check emails intermittently. Please send your emails to meta-oversight lists.wikimedia.org, not my personal email.
Thanks. — regards, Revi 13:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Please no
editPlease don't touch the offensive usernames. Less log == GOOD. — regards, Revi 18:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Now that I've sorted out, this means that - (at least while I am around) please don't touch with offensive usernames mentioning me. That helps me by sorting them out immediately, so there's less logs to clean up. Thanks, and sorry since this might sound bit harsh. — regards, Revi 18:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean.-𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Just fyi, but when you protected this talk page (many thanks for doing so though!) you left a block notice on it; but that notice was actually placed by an IP, not by Billinghurst. I assumed the IP was BB logged out, although why they would want that notice I've no idea. All the best! ——SerialNumber54129 10:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
I've just seen the section above—congratulations on your shiney new mop :) ——SerialNumber54129 10:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks to Billinghurst responding to the ping, the page should cause no further drama. Thanks both! ——SerialNumber54129 11:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- I was aware that it was not billinghurst. Why this a other blocked sock of the LTA's , I didn't care whether the box was there or not.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Vandalismusmeldung auf Meta
editWäre dir verbunden, wenn du das auf die IP ändern würdest. --Harald Krichel (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- User:Seewolf Erledigt: Entschuldigung war ein Fehler--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 11:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
???
editWhat are you DOING???? This is not within your athority as a global syso. Dont' just fullfil some interface-request by an outsider that doesn't know shit about tyhe project without consulting with local sysops first! This needs to be reverted! Seb az86556 (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- See request on SRM These are important links from MediaWiki. Removing these links will affect operation.
- GS, Stewards and Global Interface Administrators are also authorized to make changes that fix impairments in the operation of the Mediawiki software.
- Serious processing of the surface is generally not permitted without community consensus. Since this code represents an impairment, I assume that you wrote this code single-handedly at the time.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 06:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- A local sysop asked you to not make changes at their wiki, that is a completely reasonable request and you should give that request due consideration, not just apparently dismiss it. Your changes to their common.css page were uncommented in both the edit summary and the talk page, and nothing on their general VP with any reference to [[SRM]. Would that be suitable at your home wiki? So, to me, the criticism is fully and duly delivered. Your response seems tone deaf, and dismissive, and that is not how global sysops should or seen to be acting to that wiki's admins. Please could you reflect on your approach; we work as a team. Global sysop is not a free pass, and really we should be doing more rather than less documentation when we act. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Urk, I misspoke, you did have a link to the SRM permalink, though suggest more overt something targeted to the section. I retract that part of the criticism. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Looking at the original request, why was it not directed to the wiki itself, it had admins, why would a global sysop undertake that action rather than suggest to the requester to ask locally first? — billinghurst sDrewth 00:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC) This case has already been resolved elsewhere. This was an interface editing that a local user could not do. It is about very important controls of the MediaWiki where hiding is very annoying for everyone..--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Urk, I misspoke, you did have a link to the SRM permalink, though suggest more overt something targeted to the section. I retract that part of the criticism. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- A local sysop asked you to not make changes at their wiki, that is a completely reasonable request and you should give that request due consideration, not just apparently dismiss it. Your changes to their common.css page were uncommented in both the edit summary and the talk page, and nothing on their general VP with any reference to [[SRM]. Would that be suitable at your home wiki? So, to me, the criticism is fully and duly delivered. Your response seems tone deaf, and dismissive, and that is not how global sysops should or seen to be acting to that wiki's admins. Please could you reflect on your approach; we work as a team. Global sysop is not a free pass, and really we should be doing more rather than less documentation when we act. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Question
editWhat LTA is the German swear word vandal? --one + one 20:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Title blacklist
editI believe that your changes to the title blacklist today were premature. There was no urgent requirement for a change, where a discussion about a long term regex could take place. As admins here it is our job to implement a consensus, some determined from previous discussion, some following discussions now. Can I ask that you please take adequate time in decision-making, not acting unilaterally just because someone asks. Where a wiki requires an immediate remedy, they have complete control through local tools to make whichever exclusions they like. Point them to those tools, and allow a discussion to continue and a decision with understood consequences to take place. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
The reason I removed this one RegEx prevents articles from people that exist in multiple wikis (large and medium sized). Thus, this regex is generally an obstacle for other projects that translate the articles. For the further RegEx I have informed the deWiki admins of the possibility of an entry in the title whitelist.-𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 00:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
@Billinghurst:To the blacklist entry: The title blacklist entries also interfere with good contributions and has been ineffective against the abuse of the troll for about 1 year, as it always creates them with wrong titles. These entries are better to combat with the global abuse filter that analyzes the content.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Removal of my old username
editHello,
My old username can be linked to sensitive information and that is why I changed it. Could you please delete the page and stop reverting my deletion request?
Best regards
--NoFWDaddress(d) 16:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Your old username cannot be deleted completely. Name changes are always noted in all projects in the logbook and the forwarding to the discussion is required so that the links on other pages continue to work.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬
- Hello WikiBayer. A simple explanation like this one whould have been welcomed.
- I understand your point. But deleting the talk page will reveal the rename (since the log is diplayed) while sending a 404 to the web browser, so that it doesn't get archived by search engines (See this page for example).
- This would allow me to remove the NOINDEX from my talk page, while still giving the information to where to find me if needed.
- Best, NoFWDaddress(d) 19:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would you please agree to delete the page? The move log will then be displayed, so it is still transparent for the end user. NoFWDaddress(d) 10:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- @NoFWDaddress I can't delete this. The link or redirect is required by the Global rename policy. Don't make a editwar with delete requests or blanking this page.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 10:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- The policy requires a visible link (like the log entries that appears when the page gets deleted) and not a redirect. Can I ask another admin since you seem not to want to discuss this issue or to be sensible to the origin of it (off-wiki harassment)? NoFWDaddress(d) 11:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- NoFWDaddress A logbook entry is not "duly and visibly". I understand what you mean. This case would need to be discussed in greater detail, but this attracts even more attention. In addition, if you hope to be able with off-wiki harassment in this way, this will do very little. The people who have a name know it anyway, and your old name remains visible.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 12:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would you agree with a soft redirect then? The content would be
__NOINDEX__{{Soft redirect|User talk:NoFWDaddress}}
. NoFWDaddress(d) 12:33, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would you agree with a soft redirect then? The content would be
- NoFWDaddress A logbook entry is not "duly and visibly". I understand what you mean. This case would need to be discussed in greater detail, but this attracts even more attention. In addition, if you hope to be able with off-wiki harassment in this way, this will do very little. The people who have a name know it anyway, and your old name remains visible.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 12:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- The policy requires a visible link (like the log entries that appears when the page gets deleted) and not a redirect. Can I ask another admin since you seem not to want to discuss this issue or to be sensible to the origin of it (off-wiki harassment)? NoFWDaddress(d) 11:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- @NoFWDaddress I can't delete this. The link or redirect is required by the Global rename policy. Don't make a editwar with delete requests or blanking this page.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 10:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would you please agree to delete the page? The move log will then be displayed, so it is still transparent for the end user. NoFWDaddress(d) 10:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Ops
editHey! You're right, I didn't notice that the wiki is listed in the opted-out list. My bad, sorry! Regards, Bencemac (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
sig
editHi. Kindly re-sign on the RfA. Thanks. --Minorax (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Danke
edit...fürs beinahe globale Löschen meiner Userseiten. --Janwo (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Lock
editSpecial:Contributions/Medelam_Medan. --MRZQ (talk) 09:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Paolo.marraffa unblock?
editI ask you for unblock Paolo.marraffa on Wikipedia please Paolo.marraffa (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- No! The block is only for 1 month on User:Paolo.marraffa. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
No, Paolo.marraffa block|BLOCK can you help me? --Paolo.marraffa (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Udha and his socks/Open Proxies
editHello @WikiBayer: After your block of sq:user:185.248.103.164 and sq:user:212.200.181.121, the next open proxy sq:user:185.32.22.90 is getting active and is disrupting on Albanian wikipedia. He and sq:user:Pjeter1991 are socks of squser:Udha. A global block for these disruptors:
- Udha (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Udha1 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Pjeter1991 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Udha2 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Udha3 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Glaukias (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- 37.161.7.128 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- Tllja rikes (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- 83.85.92.164 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
- 51.159.148.219 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
Would be nice.--Franz Kasulke (talk) 13:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Franz Kasulke 51.159.148.219 and Udha socks are now local blocked. GS can't Lock/block Accounts and IPs global. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 13:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi: for information --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 13:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC) @WikiBayer: Thank you for informing me! :) I hope you've seen the discussion on the checkuser board about this subject. There are informations there that clarify my distancing with this situation. Moreover, cases like these are bound to reappear and it would be good to have some background information on knowing how to act in the future. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
"you should study the subject very carefully"
editI did not get what you meant, could you clarify? Also, with respect to "The discussions do not show that you have the skills to take on this task.", did you mean communication, technical, neither or both? The latter I can fix, not the former. Thanks in advance. Leaderboard (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021
editGreetings,
I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 26 June, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up under the appropriate section.
Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 14:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021
editGreetings SWMT member,
I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 10 July, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.
Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 03:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
🗿 ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
'Crat action
editYou are the fifth person I've asked. English Wikinews is fairly active......however, we only have one 'Crat and she has been largely asleep for some time now. Can you please look at our Request for Permissions and take some action on making new 'crats. Myself and two other Admins there have been nominated and there has been a fair amount of voting going on.....but someone needs to actually throw the switch.--Bddpaux (talk) 02:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Bddpaux How do you think a user who is not active on Wikinews can help? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)- My hope, rather simply: is that you can turn on the magic knobs which give us 'Crat privs. (e.g. The ability to give people at our project Admin. privs etc. etc.).--Bddpaux (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Bddpaux You might want to contact a steward instead. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Bddpaux You might want to contact a steward instead. ~~~~
- My hope, rather simply: is that you can turn on the magic knobs which give us 'Crat privs. (e.g. The ability to give people at our project Admin. privs etc. etc.).--Bddpaux (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm going to give the whole business a few more days. --Bddpaux (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
editHi WikiBayer,
I don't know where I should ask speedy deletions. Could you please delete a draft I won't longer use and a mistaken redirection I made?
- Draft: User:Bédévore/Draft counterspam
- Redirect after mistake: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Pierre_Malinowski&redirect=no
Thanks! Best regards, Bédévore (talk) 15:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Please use the Template delete ({{delete|reason}}) 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Disney-Vandalismus
editHallo, wenn ich mich nicht irre, hattest du in letzter Zeit den Disney-Vandalen verfolgt. Könntest du vielleicht hier mal einen Blick darauf werfen: ml:Special:Diff/3680100, ml:Special:Diff/3680100? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Falscher Link... ml:Special:Diff/3680099. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)- Die Vorlage gibt es schon seit Jahren und wurde von einen Account erstellt. Der italenische Disney Troll erstellt massenhaft Artikle und mit ständig wechselnden IPs aus Italien. Accounts hatte der zumindest im letzten Jahr noch nicht. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, ist tatsächlich ein Admin auf mlwiki. Danke und Entschuldigung für die Störung. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, ist tatsächlich ein Admin auf mlwiki. Danke und Entschuldigung für die Störung. ~~~~
- Die Vorlage gibt es schon seit Jahren und wurde von einen Account erstellt. Der italenische Disney Troll erstellt massenhaft Artikle und mit ständig wechselnden IPs aus Italien. Accounts hatte der zumindest im letzten Jahr noch nicht. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
About zh-min-nan and eo wiki
editHello, is there any sysop in zh-min-nan and eo wiki? If not, then please delete zh-min-nan:Dipak Barua and eo:Dipak Barua, spam page about a Bangladeshi. -- Afeef (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
nds.wiktionary.org
editHallo, ich bin normaler Admin, technische Admins hat das nds-wiktionary nicht. Du hast dort an Sylvester eine Änderung vorgenommen, https://nds.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&curid=5101&diff=140483&oldid=134392 Vielleicht kannst du mir auch bei einem anderen Problem helfen. Mithilfe der "MediaWiki:Edit.js" sollte man eigentlich beim Editieren die jeweilige Vorlage in das Editier-Fenster übernommen bekommen, wenn man diese unten anklickt. Nur irgendjemand muss irgendetwas geändert haben, so dass das schon lange nicht mehr funktioniert. Selbst wenn ich noch alle Berechtigungen besitzen würde, ich bin einfach überfordert, herauszufinden, woran es liegt, warum es nicht mehr funktioniert, und wie man es wieder zum Laufen bringt. Und es wäre sehr lieb, wenn du dir das einmal anschauen würdest, und versuchen würdest, den Fehler zu finden. Ursprünglich habe ich die edit.js im englischen Wiktionary "geklaut", auch noch viel mehr, weil deren Vorlagen und Module usw. bei uns besser passen als das von den deutschen Schwesterprojekten. Allerdings mehr als anpassen kann ich die nicht, das fällt mir schon schwer, aber wenn irgendwo einer irgendetwas ändert, ich nicht einmal weiß, was geändert wurde, bin ich völlig überfordert. Und es würde auf Dauer die Arbeit doch sehr vereinfachen, wenn man wieder die Vorlagen durch einfachen Mausklick in das Editierfenster bekäme statt mit Paste and Copy. --Joachim Mos (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
My pages
editWhy you delete my userpage? Why ZV is not allowed? Why Ukrainian flag is not "unacceptable symbol"? Овтот (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- The Ukrainian flag is not unacceptable. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
hello wikibayer, is there any discussion or a consensus about "oppressing russian propaganda symbols" on wiki projects? also is "slava ukraine" need removal? Modern primat (talk) 11:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Can I ask ?
editHello I hope you are well, I noticed you reverted my request of translation adminship, am I not allowed to request for translation Adminship ? Thank You Rebel Agent (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- You have not created a candidacy, you have only written on the page that you want to have the rights. It would be advantageous if you read through the intro. There it says how to create a request. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 20:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
SRG
editDanke dafür [1], da hab ich mich wohl irgendwie verklickt, wollte eigentlich eine IP reporten. --Johannnes89 (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
West African Hub survey
editFYI, Sunkanmi12 (talk · contribs) is sending the same message as Leticia Boateng (talk · contribs) was. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JJMC89 please make a cu request 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 20:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the observation @JJMC89. We are both working on the same project and are reaching out to community members in West Africa. Kindly suggest a better alternative if you have any and reach out to me if you have any concerns. Thanks —Sunkanmi12✉️ 20:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not create bots and do not notify mass users if you do not know if they want to do so
- For mass messages there is a function that you can request.
- MassMessage @Sunkanmi12 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 20:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Your RfO
editHello WikiBayer, your recent request for oversight permissions has been closed as unsuccessful. Thank you for volunteering, however the request was below the minimum support threshold and the minimum absolute support quantity. As always, if you run across entries that you think may need suppression, feel free to submit to the oversight team. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 16:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Global filter 300
editHello. On french wikipedia this diff was filtered. I don't know the goal of this filter so I don't know if it's a false positive or not. The detection is on line #16. Please, let us know if it is a false positive or not (in my opinion, this detection on line #16 is too large, but I may be wrong). Supertoff (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes this is a false positive. I have remove this line. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Supertoff (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Unblock
editHello. I've unblocked U.S.S.R+RUSSIA, as though the username is concerning, it is certainly not blockable. The account also hasn't edited yet. Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think we should allow such names.
- I see the username as inconsistent with the Global Username Policy, mainly due to recent events.
- Quote:Do not use the name of a political, military or religious figure or event (including real people). 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 04:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Notice of reply
editRespectCE (talk · contribs) has a reply, making an appeal to your block on User_talk:RespectCE. Please take a look if convenient. Lemonaka (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm now requesting a global lock for this user on SRG, for cross-wiki issues and uncivil to others Lemonaka (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Diskussionslöschungen
editDann sei doch so nett, mir zumindest auch zu verraten, wo eine Diskussion stattfindet. Seit wann löschen wir Diskussionen weg, ohne Verweis und irgendwas? MGChecker (talk) 12:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Der Beitrag ist nicht gelöscht, er wurde nur verschoben. Stewards' noticeboard 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 12:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ist ja schön und gut, aber wäre nett gewesen, darauf bei der Löschung auch hinzuweisen. Gerade weil von dewiki aus auf die andere Stelle verwiesen wird. --MGChecker (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Cross-wiki canvassing of PlanespotterA320
editPlanespotterA320 is accusing you of Nazi behaviour, censorship and something on Hebrew Wikipedia. FWIW, [2]. Sorry for noticing this. Lemonaka (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
You had your chance
editMoin WikiBayer, ich will dich nicht dazu überreden, deine Stimme zu ändern, aber anregen, für künftige Fälle drüber nachzudenken, ob diese strikte Haltung [3] nicht vielleicht etwas zu streng ist. Insbesondere jungen Leuten gegenüber, deren charakterliche Entwicklung noch nicht abgeschlossen war, muss man doch auch Fehler zugestehen können und zumindest in Erwägung ziehen, mit ausreichend Abstand eine zweite Chance zu ermöglichen? Viele Grüße Johannnes89 (talk) 11:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Eine zweite Chance gebe ich schon her, trotzdem muss ein Kandidat die Vorraussetzungen erfüllen. GS sind vertrauenswürdige Benutzer, dies ist Tulsi definitiv nicht. Außerdem gilt das. Tulsi versucht seitdem er entsperrt wurde, in allen möglichen Projekten rechte zubekommen seine Tätigkeiten sind gezielt so ausgelegt das er die bekommt. Dazu kommt noch, dass er offensichtlich der Meinung das Rechte ein Statussymbol sind. Nebenbei Zitat:"jungen Leuten" er ist ~ ungefähr gleich alt wie ich es bin. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nachtrag@Johannnes89 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Moin, danke für die Rückmeldung, dann hab ich deinen Beitrag harscher aufgefasst, als du es meintest. Klang für mich so, als würdest du prinzipiell gegen zweite Chancen bei solchen Ämtern sein. Wollte wie gesagt gar nicht über den konkreten Kandidaten diskutieren, deine konkreten Ablehnungsgründe verstehe ich natürlich. Viele Grüße Johannnes89 (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nachtrag@Johannnes89 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Servus! Bist du dir sicher, dass die Kategorie b:uk:Категорія:Статті до швидкого вилучення gelöscht werden sollte? Sie war mit dem Wikidata-Objekt Category:Candidates for speedy deletion (Q5964) verbunden – sie soll also eine Schnelllöschkategorie gewesen sein und deshalb ist es normal, dass sie leer war. – Tacsipacsi (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 12:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Textlöschung durch User:Tulsi
editHeute erfolgte eine Versionslöschung [4] auf meiner Meta-Wiki user page durch User:Tulsi. Mein deutscher Text Besser spät als nie ("diese Dynamik zu unterbrechen") wurde von User:Tulsi mit der Begründung [5] "Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material: Violation of Meta:Civility" versionsgelöscht. Meines Wissens ist User:Tulsi der deutschen Sprache nicht mächtig - wie kommt er zu seiner Entscheidung? Ich ersuche dich, um Überprüfung und Wiedereinsetzung meines Textes.--GFreihalter (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Überprüft, die entfernung war richtig. Dein Beitrag verstößt gegen unsere Richtlinien und verhaltensweißen.
- @GFreihalter 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
REPORT
edit@WikiBayer This user need immediate block. Vandalises pages, inserting hate speech on this wiki. Tumbuka Arch★★★ 08:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh didn't see, already done. Tumbuka Arch★★★ 08:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Your block reasons
editHello WikiBayer. I noticed you have been making a large number of blocks, both as a global sysop and a meta admin, with the logged reason "Long-term idiot". This is counterproductive and sets a bad example for other users. Please stop. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- OK I understand, I only gave this reason if it was true. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 21:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- The same applies to revision deletion summaries in my opinion [6], see en:WP:Do not insult the vandals. Johannnes89 (talk) 06:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- just stop. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC) - Seconding the above. I understand being annoyed with LTAs, but the point of providing a summary is to inform both the blocked user and others (readers, local communities, etc.) about why an action was made. These "long-term idiot" summaries are unhelpful and not what is expected from global sysops. Please do not use summaries like this in the future. Regards, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 00:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- just stop. ~~~~
- The same applies to revision deletion summaries in my opinion [6], see en:WP:Do not insult the vandals. Johannnes89 (talk) 06:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Revert edits
editHello! Can you globally revert edits of the user 31.173.240.37? Their contributions consist only of spam edits like this. Radmir Far (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS
editDear interface administrator,
This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.
As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.
Have a great day!Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Help from a steward
editHello, I'm sorry to bother you but My request on Bot status hasn't been reviewed for over 3 weeks now and I was wondering if you could help me or direct me to someone who can help. Thank you! Balyozxane (talk) 21:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
File talk pages that you deleted in the Breton wiki
editHello,
You mass-deleted many file talk pages created by an anonymous user in the Breton wiki recently. In fact this user was really helping to locate files that were not useful because there were identical files in Commons, or because of license issues. Additionally, you only deleted the talk pages and not the files themselves, which is not a useful action in my opinion since they contained the reason for the deletion request.
Regards, Huñvreüs (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- The IP has create Talkpages only with one word. There was nothing in the talk pages about the pictures, it was not to be recognized here that this should be a deletion request. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Vorschlag
editWas hältst du davon, Requests for comment/IP-Info for global groups erneut für ip-view-full durchzuführen? Die Rechte sind mE quasi redundant (ohne ipinfo keine IP, aber mit IP könnte man auch Whois nutzen), aber leider getrennt. TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 18:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Das letzte Signal seitens der WMF war, dass die Richtlinie zum IP Infotool vermutlich nochmal angepasst wird, weil sie unsinnigerweise strikter ist als die Berechtigung zum Zugriff auf die IP-Adresse.
- Insofern bitte also erstmal abwarten, ob die WMF nicht einfach von sich aus die Rechte ändert, dann brauchts gar kein RfC. Johannnes89 (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, gemäß den Vortrag glaube ich nicht das es ein RFC braucht, außerdem wir eine Diskussion für das upgrade warscheinlich ausreichen. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Na, wenn ihr meint… dann hoffe ich mal auf den Grips der WMF :) TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 19:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, gemäß den Vortrag glaube ich nicht das es ein RFC braucht, außerdem wir eine Diskussion für das upgrade warscheinlich ausreichen. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Help needed
editHello wikiBayer hope u are doing well am from kanuri Wikipedia in incubator sorry is there any advice u may give us to help our community to get its own side we been very active thank you Umargana1 (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Pls be our mentor Umargana1 (talk) 05:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A request
editHi WikiBayer, hope you are doing well. Can you please change User:Prodraxis/rainbow-text.css to a sanitized css content model? I am asking this as you are an interface administrator. Thanks, #prodraxis connect 05:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Frohe Weihnachten!
editLieber WikiBayer, ich wünsche dir ein frohes und gesegnetes Weihnachtsfest! TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 15:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Userright
editDear WikiBayer, I think you don't removed autopatrollers permission of 64andtim because you added patrollers right on here account per on his request WM:RFH, so, please remove them, because in patrollers group also contains autopatrolled rights. 😊 ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
igWP article creation
editJust to note that I see the article "Ranjeet Yadav (journalist)" at w:ig: which seems to indicate the issue at haWP is elsewhere. I haven't had a change to more fully explore that space, and may not for some days, so flagging it for other eyes. :-) — billinghurst sDrewth 04:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- [7] Johannnes89 (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst and WikiBayer: I have identified multiple domains which are frequently used related to this xwiki spam: [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]
- Johannnes89 (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- oops, accidentally send before posting all the links. Question is: should we put these link on the spam blacklist or just monitor them (it seems to me, that the intention is not linkspam but spamming those people/companies, so they might just shift to using new links for those page creations?) --Johannnes89 (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- ... some more links [30][31][32] Johannnes89 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm considering setting up a global abuse filter to monitor page creations using these links? --Johannnes89 (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Johannnes89: THOUGHTS. I have a really light (proto-)filter at haWP that was doing some identification based on use of certain English-language words, so we could have an OR component that looks for the words and a section that looks for the problematic domains. I will also note that it haWP, igWP, etc. should be more used as identifying wikis, as the spam is also taking place in esWP and other wikis just more hidden among many more good edits. Re blacklisting, do it if they meet the blacklist criteria, otherwise we can prevent through the filter, if they are okay domains to use, though are abused through this user cases. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- fyi I'm using Special:AbuseFilter/338 to monitor IP/newbie page creations using any of the links I've identified and have added the content of your haWP filter to this global filter. Johannnes89 (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Johannnes89: THOUGHTS. I have a really light (proto-)filter at haWP that was doing some identification based on use of certain English-language words, so we could have an OR component that looks for the words and a section that looks for the problematic domains. I will also note that it haWP, igWP, etc. should be more used as identifying wikis, as the spam is also taking place in esWP and other wikis just more hidden among many more good edits. Re blacklisting, do it if they meet the blacklist criteria, otherwise we can prevent through the filter, if they are okay domains to use, though are abused through this user cases. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm considering setting up a global abuse filter to monitor page creations using these links? --Johannnes89 (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- ... some more links [30][31][32] Johannnes89 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- oops, accidentally send before posting all the links. Question is: should we put these link on the spam blacklist or just monitor them (it seems to me, that the intention is not linkspam but spamming those people/companies, so they might just shift to using new links for those page creations?) --Johannnes89 (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Abuse filter #300
editHi! I'm a sysop on itwiki. Can you take a look at the global abuse filter #300? I noticed it has been triggering on itwiki, but the edits look mostly fine to me. As an example, the attempted edits on "Magi (Bibbia)" are pretty harmless. I also checked the last two months and only a few of them seem to warrant a trigger. I'm contacting you because the only thing I can see is that you edited the filter last, but feel free to ping other people. Thanks! --Titore (talk) 10:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
@Titore It's true, there were false positives. But I wasn't aware of them because they got lost among the thousands of entries in the log. I have edited the filter a little.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Restore page request
editHi! Can you undelete b:ru:TimedText_talk:Коктейли/Шприцер_из_виноградного_сока_и_газировки please? It is a page moved by the vandal and it should be moved back. Thanks! --魔琴 (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Edited comment
editHi, just FYI it seems like you edited two of my comments here to be combined. But it now shows that you sent my comment rather than me. If you could change that to avoid confusion, that'd be appreciated. Kisare (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Kisare i have only restore your first version.Which you rewrote because of a false positive of an abuse filter.This is noted in the summary line. I have done this so that the answer is not influenced by the abuse filter. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- but you accidentally changed the signature [33] --Johannnes89 (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- UPS i have fix it now. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- i have make now a small change in the filter. @Kisare the filter should no longer stop you in the future. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Kisare (talk) 10:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- i have make now a small change in the filter. @Kisare the filter should no longer stop you in the future. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- UPS i have fix it now. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 19:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- but you accidentally changed the signature [33] --Johannnes89 (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Danksche
editÜber diesen Vandalismus. Du bist ein großartiger Mann. Ich möchte nicht, dass er dich liest und belästigt. Deshalb schreibe ich auf Deutsch. Ich spreche weder Bairisch noch Deutsch, tut mir leid, wenn das falsch ist. Habe einen wunderschönen Tag! Dream Indigo 19:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
pfl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albania
editHi, I received an email asking me to change the name of two articles created by him.
he says that the articles are in the correct language but that you deleted them previously - please See https://pfl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanie
As I don't understand if the language in which the article is written I preferred to communicate it to you.
I will appreciate if you checking they are correct.
Yours sincerely DARIO SEVERI (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- @DARIO SEVERI The account IzoRe92 is now synchronized with the previous accounts.(Exclusive logout permission) Special:CentralAuth/ZoranBesic91, Special:CentralAuth/Helga92, Special:CentralAuth/EriMatia and many more. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. Best wishes. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
You have mail, please feel free to check it if you have time. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Follow up on answer at stewards' noticeboard
editHi @WikiBayer, thanks for answering my request at the noticeboard. However, I am not sure how to proceed from here. I cannot request a local interface administator on eswiki to make an edit on MediaWiki:Gadget-MoreMenu.messages.es.js since they (or we, as I'm a local interface administrator on eswiki too) do not have permission to edit MediaWiki-namespaced pages on Meta. I haven't found any IA-specific noticeboard for meta on the IA page or among the sitelinks of the corresponding Wikidata item. How do you usually proceed when you need an action made from an interface admin on Meta? thank you in advance. Nacaru · Talk ✉ 15:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I just noticed that you made the edit. Thank you! Nacaru · Talk ✉ 15:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I mean Talk Pages or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Talkback
editSteward requests/Miscellaneous|Unblock request at bugwiki Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Dear WikiBayer, this is to let you know that I have reverted you deletion of this page on the local wiki per Meta-Wiki decisions on what's SPAM can't override local wiki-community decisions about what content's appropriate. Showing cross-wiki SPAM or steward/global sysop action as reasons is irrelevant in these cases. In the future please avoid deleting local content in any wiki without discussions with local community. Thank you for understanding. Regards, ttWP admin en:Farhad Fatkullin - Frhdkazan (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Frhdkazan"Meta-Wiki decisions on what's SPAM can't override local wiki-community decision" ??? Heavyrain111 was the only editor. If the local community has not yet do anything, no decision can be overide. Deleting crosswiki spam is standard procedure when the local community has doing nothing to these pages, as in this case. It is also not possible to put every clear spam up for discussion. There are over 800 projects for GS/Stewards and most of them would not get a response anyway. This was clearly spam (which, by the way, was not only deleted by me. Local admins of larger projects had already deleted the spam). 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- the same here Diff. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your opinion. Views of admins from other wikis and even cross-wiki majority opinion about what's SPAM have no force over local community's view of content importance, thus irrelevant. As Wikimedia Language Diversity folks, we don't like cultural imperialism or arrogance of folks from larger wikis. Thank you for your understanding and respecting the needs of all 800+ local wiki-communities. Frhdkazan (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)