Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

公開書簡、カメリア・ボバンさんを支持します

This page is a translated version of the page Open letter of support for Camelia Boban and the translation is 100% complete.
Other languages:

ウィキメディア運動全域の提携団体や関連組織の代表として、私たちは2016年にイタリア語版ウィキペディアでウィキドンネ（WikiDonne）を設立したカメリア・ボバンの勤勉さと献身に感銘を受けています。2016年設立のウィキドンネは「彼女の歴史」を意味するHerStoryへカメリア・ボバンが参加し、運営にあたるウィキドンネ利用者グループとその他の利用者はウィキ世界の多様性向上と、ジェンダー格差の縮小を目指した活動に携わってきました。カメリア・ボバンのモチベーションと関与は長年にわたり、イタリア語版ウィキペディアにおけるジェンダー格差の対処に影響を与えてきました。

残念ながら、カメリア・ボバンは2023年に無期限ブロックされました。私たちは追放が意味する厳罰に驚きましたが、イタリア語コミュニティの決定された制裁には疑問を抱きませんでした。今回は疑義を呈するものであり、無期限ブロックという非常に厳しい制裁とは、ことさらに問題のある行為に対してのみ実行されるべきで、私たちはカメリア・ボバンに貢献の機会が与えられるべきであると信じています。

これらの理由、さらにカメリア・ボバンはウィキメディア運動で数多くの役割を果たしている点から、この人物は前向きで充分に信頼に足りるボランティアであると認識しており、またブロック処分は私たちが複数言語にわたり実施するジェンダー格差対策という有益なプロジェクトのありようにも影響を与えているため、私たちはイタリア語コミュニティに対して、この人物の件を再検討し、当人にふさわしい再起のチャンスを与えてくださるよう、心から要請するものであります。

他の提携団体や組織の代表として、そしてウィキメディア運動の個人貢献者として、私たちはこの正式な声明を共に次のとおり発表したいと考えます。

  1. カメリア・ボバン — ならびにウイキドンネ・プロジェクトに関わるすべての人々 — がこれまでに達成した成果と取り組みのレベルは祝福に値します。
  2. イタリアのコミュニティに対して、すでに時間は経過しており無期限ブロックの厳しさが及ぼした影響を皆が回顧している今こそ、懲罰のレベル見直しと、許容可能な期間に減らしてカメリア・ボバンに投稿者として復帰のチャンスを与えるよう要請します。

カメリア・ボバンとウィキドンネがイタリア語の百科事典に関して、さまざまな視点や生きた経験をよりよく表現して、さらに優れた、より完全なものにするという重要な作業に集中できるよう、期待してやみません。

署名者

  1. Kritzolina (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sinkra (talk) 09:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC), president of the association les sans pagEs[reply]
  3. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC), founder of les sans pagEs . Camelia Boban has been unjustly blocked with an extreme severity for wanting to set up a Wikidonne notice board for articles of Wikidonne put up for deletion. The severity in this case is emblematic of the way women who stand up for more justice and fair representation in the movement are faced with. Harrassers of minorities, feminist, queer contributors are left free to roam under the predicaments of free speech, whereas women and LGBTIQ+ contributors are harshly treated for just voicing an opinion on assertive and affirmative ways, being called uncooperative and disruptive when they do so. (This is my own opinion that I write here, and dose not represent anyone else)[reply]
    Wikipedia:Citation needed Threecharlie (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Gender bias on Wikipedia --Slowking4 (talk) 01:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well @Slowking4, at its time this article was translated in Italian, but flagged for deletion one minutes after it was published. Because considered autoreferential, an original research, a non problem or a "not our problem" (but of enwiki's only). Re-writed after a magnificient work done by @LorManLor, it was "accepted" to stay only as essay, on a WikiDonne's subpage. Camelia (talk) 11:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WikiDonne is also prevented from receiving notifications for women bios and arguments about women targeted for deletion, that all projects - based on their work topic - receive in itwiki. Not only the automatic ones (the block it happened at the end of a discussion about the AfD), but also the manual ones. On the grounds that "WikiDonne has no expertise in the matter". Camelia (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hibrideacus (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Chinmayee Mishra (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ❋ CalliandraDysantha (✉︎) 10:57, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Imacat (talk) 11:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. GastelEtzwane (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nettime Sujata (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Shreya (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tochiprecious (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Laliv g (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Gereon K. (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Afek91 (talk) 15:17, 9 Augut 2024
  15. --Llydia (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Grizma (talk) 19:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Jalu (talk) 23:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Vjsuseela
  19. --Tetraeder (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. OwenBlacker (Talk; he/him), board member, Wikimedia LGBT+, 10:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Freddy eduardo (talk) 11:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. - Darwin Ahoy! 14:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Egezort (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Irdiism (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. PetiPandaRou (talk) 15:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Amrei-Marie (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Katsumo (talk) 11:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Laugriville (talk)
  31. ElleAnónime (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Peridotito (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mervat --Mervat (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Slowking4 (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) 🦜 20:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. -Aliva Sahoo (talk) 23:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. -MadameStael (talk) 06:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cédric Tarbouriech (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. YShibata (talk) 09:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. NANöR (talk) 17:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mx Lucy (talk) 21:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC) Wiki Loves Fashion the Netherlands[reply]
  42. Nivopol (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ruby D-Brown (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Synchroniseuse (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Manavpreet Kaur (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Zblace (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC) p.s. IMHO it is huge sytematic problem that needs to be addressed across all Wikimedia and especially by WMF, but in solidarity with Camelia I sign the letter as it is works in hope it works at least for her this time, knowing it is far from ideal from solution and/or justice for all in similar situation.[reply]
  48. Nada.FA (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. AfricanadeCuba (talk)
  50. SanaMA27 (talk)
  51. Omotecho (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC) as much as I support UCoC, universal.[reply]
  52. Tatakdh (talk)14:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Capucine-Marin Dubroca-Voisin (talk) 10:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Italian Wikipedia unfortunately likely needs a wider investigation by UCoC for failure to comply with the standards we expect of all Wiki projects Shushugah (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  55. I was indeffed myself, and on a project that for years and despite several denied unblocking requests didn't tell me I was allowed to edit with another account. The blocking admin then told me this on meta when I opposed him because of my denied unblocking request when he wanted to become a steward. As for me it shouldn't be this difficult to be collaborative.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    After reading the reasoning of Nattes à chat I much more support that the Italian wiki community takes a review of Camelia Bobans case.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Tesleemah (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Malikbr (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  58. per how Zblace has pointed out. Such blocks are also carried out on the other projects and needed a wider investigation. This kind of bureaucracy is detrimental to the growth of our projects. I'm droping this signature of support on behalf of DCW after having met Camelia in-person at Wikimedia Summit 2024 in Berlin, and finding her work extraordinary. She deserves to be given a chance, and infact the block in our opinion was uncalled for. signed, Aafi (DCW) (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Strong support Strong support for reconsidering Camelia's block. As an active Wikimedia organizer who has also faced an unfair indef, I understand how onwiki blocks can be used as a tool to deliberately stop the activism of real life organizers. Unfortunately, there is currently no effective mechanism to address or reconsider such controversial blocks, and this significant loophole in Wikimedia governance is being intentionally exploited. -- BIDROHI Hello.. 15:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Millodarka (talk)
  61. Pechypech (talk) 19:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Lvova (talk) 19:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Rave (talk) 19:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  64. I hope Italian Wikipedia community finds an acceptable balanced solution to the specific issue perceived as serious that does not involve blocking of an otherwise very constructive user with valuable contribution our itWP colleagues could actually be very proud of having in their midst. To @Camelia.boban:: We are impressed with what you have done yourself, inspired others you know and more of those you haven't met from various corners of the globe. Onwiki or offwiki - you move mountains. Thanks for all you've done for individuals, language and thematic communities in my part of the world. As for the local block in your homewiki - I myself would have preferred to have stayed indef blocked in mine, than having to become an admin and deal with the mess to keep community going after external intervention to give me the chance to edit that I specifically warned initiators against. Frhdkazan (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_letter_of_support_for_Camelia_Boban/ja&oldid=27478936"