Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
edit
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
edit
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
- Global user: Galahad (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 4 March 2025 05:28 UTC
Hello everyone,
I'm requesting Global Sysop rights to support in Global sysops/Speedy delete requests and GSR. Although my crosswiki maintenance activity is limited due to my circumstances in Venezuela, I have a significant amount of crosswiki experience.
I have been a sysop on eswikivoyage for the past twelve years and a rollbacker on several wikis, including eswiki and eswikiquote, gaining valuable experience with the sysop toolkit. After my account was compromised in 2018, I implemented two-factor authentication. Best, --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 05:28, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted user and administrator on Wikivoyage in Spanish, which is a clear example of the typical areas GSs oversee. He has the necessary knowledge to understand what to do and how to maintain proper limits. While he could improve his cross-wiki work, this should not be seen as a drawback. He has the trust and a clear understanding of how a GS should operate. —Aopou {talk} 05:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support very trusted user who has shown great dedication and perseverance in his long years as editor and administrator.Althair (talk) 06:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I will give you a
Strong supportNeutralWeak support. But, can I ask, what is my circumstances in Venezuela? Phương Linh (thảo luận) 06:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)- I experienced daily power outages lasting four to six hours and had to emigrate to another country (though I was forced to return). While this may seem like an excuse for my limited crosswiki contributions, I believe in being transparent about my situation. Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 07:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I changed my opinion per Svartava and DreamRimmer. Phương Linh (thảo luận) 15:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Changed to weak support. Phương Linh (thảo luận) 04:39, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- I changed my opinion per Svartava and DreamRimmer. Phương Linh (thảo luận) 15:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I experienced daily power outages lasting four to six hours and had to emigrate to another country (though I was forced to return). While this may seem like an excuse for my limited crosswiki contributions, I believe in being transparent about my situation. Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 07:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- A few things: (i) it is quite rare for people without global rollback to apply for global sysop. I wonder why you don't already have GR (though it's not something I expect you to have). (ii) your edit matrix is, for a GS candidate, rather weak - is there a reason for that? Leaderboard (talk) 06:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't interested in the GR until now, although I considered applying for GS due to my sysop experience. My limited contributions are mainly due to severe power outages in Venezuela, which have affected my crosswiki activity. And in any case it would not affect my activity as a GS if I were to be elected. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 07:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support - applying good faith here and I'm persuaded by FlyingAce's comment as well. Leaderboard (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't interested in the GR until now, although I considered applying for GS due to my sysop experience. My limited contributions are mainly due to severe power outages in Venezuela, which have affected my crosswiki activity. And in any case it would not affect my activity as a GS if I were to be elected. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 07:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral No trust issues here, but I don't see enough cross-wiki activity to support you for global sysop just yet. That said, I'd be happy to support you for global rollback if you spend a month doing cross-wiki anti-vandalism work. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I see that you manage the Wikimedia Small Projects, which focus on Spanish-language initiatives, and I appreciate your efforts in this project. It states "Reactive support is also provided to other language communities upon request from them or their respective chapters, user groups, or thematic organizations." Could you provide examples of cases where you have offered such support to any project? Looking at your activity on your home wiki, eswikivoyage, where you serve as an admin and bureaucrat, you have blocked 68 users, including 3 in 2025, 4 in 2024, and 13 in 2023. You have protected 45 pages, including 7 in 2024 and 5 in 2023, and deleted 1,357 pages, including 96 in 2025, 106 in 2024, and 138 in 2023. Additionally, you have performed 25 undo actions, including 3 in 2025 and 2 in 2024, and 127 rollback actions, including 6 in 2025 and 4 in 2024. On eswiki, you have performed 15 undo actions, including 2 in 2025 and 6 in 2024, and 68 rollback actions, including 3 in 2024. On commons, you have performed 43 undo actions, including 1 in 2025. On Wikidata, you have performed 3 undo actions, but none in the last 24 months. On eswiktionary, you have performed 1 rollback action in February 2025 and made 3 edits in the last 24 months. On eswikinews, you have performed 4 undo actions, including 2 in 2024, and made 4 edits in the past 14 months, with 2 in 2025 and 2 in 2024. On eswikiquote, you have performed 2 undo actions and 3 rollback actions, but none in the last 24 months. On en.wikivoyage, you have performed 3 undo actions, but none in the last 24 months. I have mentioned your total actions but highlighted those from the last 24 months in brackets. While some users have mentioned your involvement in the Wikimedia Small Projects initiative, I have not found significant evidence of engagement beyond a small number of edits on these projects over the past two years. Since wikidata, meta, commons, eswiki, and eswikinews are non-GS wikis, you would not be able to use global sysop tools there. Based on your activity, I do not see substantial contributions in GS-wikis that would justify global sysop rights. Your participation appears to be limited and you have made only 13 requests on GSR, which is relatively low for a global sysop candidate, and I also do not see reverts on other wikis. There is no doubt that you are a trusted user, but your current level of activity and experience does not meet the expectations for a global sysop candidate. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer: I appreciate your thorough review of my contributions. My focus with WikiSP has been on organizing activities rather than just making edits, particularly through initiatives like NewsVoyage and the three Wikivoyage anniversary editions. While this may not directly align with the GS approach, it has provided valuable experience about the smaller wikis. I understand things may appear quiet in 2025 as I'm just getting started, with only a couple of months into the year. Your comment about being a trusted user along with your change of mine suggests that I've no experience and you don't trust that I can gain it during my potential time as GS. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 17:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Organising offline activities is quite different from actually doing anti-vandalism and cleanup work on-wiki. Unfortunately, I can't assess your experience with small wikis based on offline activities alone. If you wanted to get involved in cross-wiki work, why didn't you first request global rollbacker before directly applying for global sysop? While I do acknowledge that you are a trusted user and hold some trusted roles, there isn't any evidence of cross-wiki experience. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer: I appreciate your thorough review of my contributions. My focus with WikiSP has been on organizing activities rather than just making edits, particularly through initiatives like NewsVoyage and the three Wikivoyage anniversary editions. While this may not directly align with the GS approach, it has provided valuable experience about the smaller wikis. I understand things may appear quiet in 2025 as I'm just getting started, with only a couple of months into the year. Your comment about being a trusted user along with your change of mine suggests that I've no experience and you don't trust that I can gain it during my potential time as GS. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 17:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per DreamRimmer, but I would support for GR. Trust is not the issue, just experience (based on XTools). //shb (t • c) 08:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- At the time of voting, I'd forgotten that Galahad was also the founder of WikiSP and I am very well aware of Galahad's tireless efforts to improve small projects. And I'm sure that if Galahad's IRL situation permits, he would in fact increase his activity levels, but can't because of the political situation in Venezuela, completely out of his control. As such, I'm changing this to a Support. //shb (t • c) 03:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral per SHB and DR. Would fully suppport a GR.--A09|(pogovor) 11:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral full trust, but there is not much GS-related experience. I'd support to get GR first. --TenWhile6 12:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose with regret: trusted user but since GS unlocks the admin toolkit on a large number of projects, I would be comfortable to support this request when there is more crosswiki experience since that naturally improves one's ability of using advanced tools and contributes to a better and more confident experience. Regardless, thanks for volunteering. Svārtava (tɕ) 15:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral per DR and Svartava. aqurs ❄️ 15:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support – I consider that Galahad's years of experience both as a sysop of a wiki that falls under the GS umbrella and as a founder and active member of Wikimedia Small Projects more than make up for any perceived lack of global experience. I'd argue that being more involved with smaller projects gives him the right perspective to understand what is expected of a global sysop and avoid overstepping. –FlyingAce✈hello 15:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral, per DreamRimmer. Ternera (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support, per Althair & Aopou & FlyingAce. Ayanami San (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per FlyingAce. --Pólux (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support per Aopou and FlyingAce. Zafkiel GD | Talk 19:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support I support because he has experience in different Spanish projects and with the hope that the user continues to contribute throughout more projects, as this is a global permission.--Igallards7 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Previous comment striked out. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral per above, would like to see more experience. --Stïnger (会話) 22:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC).
- Support per Aopou and FlyingAce. Bromoxido (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support By granting trust, we allow the candidate to gain experience. JOAN ~ (Questions?) 23:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. Ruy (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted user, looked through some of their contributions and all look fine to me. Would make a great global Sysop.--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per SHB and FlyingAce. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 13:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support While the lack of GR is unusual, I'm convinced that the candidate has enough experience. --Jan Myšák (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support --LuchoCR (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support without any concerns, and the OP is a sysop on a content project under the GS scope. Codename Noreste (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Due to his cross-wiki experience, as mentioned above. --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 05:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support no concerns about crosswiki maintenance.--HakanIST (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per SHB and DreamRimmer. Borhan (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted user. --Bedivere (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is an interesting request. On the surface of it, the candidate has approximately 100 edits across gs wikis where they do not currently hold permissions. Only a few of these are reverts. In the last two years (!!), the candidate has made 13 requests on GSR. The reverts and requests seem unproblematic, but this is not enough experience in my view for global sysop permissions. I would expect a GS candidate to have extensive experience in administrative areas on small wikis to justify being granted admin access on 400+ wikis. I am also highly concerned with these edits on DerHexer's confirmation page - both Galahad and one of their supporters opposed DerHexer after he opposed this request, then removed their opposes when he removed his comment here. That is completely unacceptable behaviour. I can't remember the last time I voted this way on a request on SRGP, but
Strong opposeOppose - serious concerns with candidate experience,judgment and collaboration ability.– Ajraddatz (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Ajraddatz: While I typically refrain from addressing opposing comments without a direct question, I feel it's necessary to respond this time. It's great to see your response to my request; our last interaction was in the OC from 2020-2022.
- My justification for my low crosswiki maintenance activity due to the crisis in Venezuela may seem like an excuse, and I don't intend to change your perspective on this.
- Regarding the impasse with DerHexer (the "DerHexer-Aopou-Galahad incident"), I invite you to discuss my perspective privately on IRC or Discord. This isn't about changing your opinion on your oppose comment, but rather about providing you, as a knowledgeable steward and U4C-Com member, the complete context for a fair and impartial judgment. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 18:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Happy to expand a bit more on a couple of pieces here. First, regarding activity, I certainly do not expect people to be spending excessive time on Wikimedia projects - in fact I counsel against it. This should be a hobby and I completely understand when people have other real-life commitments or factors limiting their participation. However, global sysop is a sensitive right that grants advanced access with very little supervision on hundreds of wikis. I need to be able to see that a candidate would be capable at using the tools across multiple languages, on some projects that are hostile to outside user involvement, and in some difficult and unclear situations. 13 potential sysop actions in the last few years is just simply not enough for me to evaluate, though if there is other work I am missing please do let me know.
- I will reach out on the DerHexer conflict, but I want to note that this does concern me quite a bit. As a global sysop, it is highly likely that someone will express disapproval with one of your actions at some point or another. How you react to that disapproval is very important, and taking revenge against users expressing disagreement with you is quite fundamentally opposed to proper behaviour in that case. The fact that such actions appear coordinated with the person who first supported this request 10 minutes after you created it, and who is also an eswikivoyage admin, is a further level of concerning. Additionally, DerHexer's comments here were not incivil or otherwise problematic. Even if there is a very good justification that I am not considering, I consider this behaviour to be quite incompatible with sysop-level access, but I will hear you out and respond here again once I have. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Just noting that I have talked with Galahad, and it seems that the removal of the confirmation votes was at DerHexer's request rather than coordinated between Galahad and Aopou, and that Galahad opposed DerHexer's confirmation after being pinged onto Aopou's talk page and disagreeing with DerHexer's message there. That does relieve some of my concerns, though I remain concerned with a lack of experience, and I'm still not fully sure what to think about the (now removed) opposes on DerHexer's confirmation. Changed to a normal oppose, and would feel comfortable supporting once the candidate gets more experience in this area. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:42, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Regarding the impasse with DerHexer (the "DerHexer-Aopou-Galahad incident"), I invite you to discuss my perspective privately on IRC or Discord. This isn't about changing your opinion on your oppose comment, but rather about providing you, as a knowledgeable steward and U4C-Com member, the complete context for a fair and impartial judgment. Best, Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 18:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Trusted. --V0lkanic (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Trusted user whose years of experience managing Wikimedia Small Projects give him enough expertise. Similarly, by granting trust, we allow candidates to gain experience. After all, there are mechanisms to withdraw their permissions if they fail. The incident with DerHexer can be resolved in a reasonable and diplomatic manner, as expected. --Cargival.97 —Preceding undated comment added 00:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC).
- Support, sharing Aopou's, FlyingAce's, and Cargival.97's opinions. I understand the perceived lack of experience and don't think it's an unreasonable concern, but I believe the experience Galahad does have falls right within the GS scope. — Rubýñ (Scold) 02:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per concern raised above. Hasan (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support I have collaborated with Galahad since 2012 both online and offline and can attest his dedication, knowledge and commitment to the different projects he has worked over the years. --Maor X (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support bright mensaje 07:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Leotalk 11:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Considering your real-life circumstances, how do you plan to maintain your activity as a GS and Ombuds, along with your other on-wiki responsibilities? —MdsShakil (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- My involvement in the OC has been quite manageable for me, especially since I've been part of the commission for a considerable time—through some pretty intense political challenges, even tougher than what we're seeing now. I've managed to meet my responsibilities fully, and I'm confident that I'll have plenty of time to dedicate to the GS role as well. Of course, I know life can be unpredictable, and if I ever find myself stretched too thin, I'm more than willing to make adjustments to ensure I can give the GS position the attention it deserves. Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 17:34, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
edit
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Malarz pl (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 8 March 2025 21:59 UTC
I am asking for global rename permissions. I've read Global rename policy. I am sysop of pl.wiki since 2006 and bureaucrat there for one year. I'm also bot operator on several wikis (mostly pl.wiki of course), including bot with sysop permissions on pl.wiki (pl:user:malarzBOT.admin). Malarz pl (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support sysop on plwiki for over 18 years, no-brainer request. //shb (t • c) 22:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not entirely convinced by candidate's answer to Codename's question – why would you ever consider applying for GS when you have no cross-wiki experience? I'm not entirely sure the candidate understands what global permissions are for, but I'll abstain for the timebeing. //shb (t • c) 04:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Should I wrote that I want to help others by changing their usernames, probably focusing more on the pl community? After all, that's obvious. This permission is so narrowly defined that it's impossible to indicate the need for it in any other way. In the case of global admin, you could specify a group of wikis, type of tasks, etc. Here, there is one task, and the permission has no local equivalent. So I presented my other motivations. Malarz pl (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Malarz pl "Should I wrote that I want to help others by changing their usernames, probably focusing more on the pl community? After all, that's obvious" - and that's enough? We aren't expecting a lot of depth here, but some rationale is needed, and this is fine. Leaderboard (talk) 15:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Should I wrote that I want to help others by changing their usernames, probably focusing more on the pl community? After all, that's obvious. This permission is so narrowly defined that it's impossible to indicate the need for it in any other way. In the case of global admin, you could specify a group of wikis, type of tasks, etc. Here, there is one task, and the permission has no local equivalent. So I presented my other motivations. Malarz pl (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not entirely convinced by candidate's answer to Codename's question – why would you ever consider applying for GS when you have no cross-wiki experience? I'm not entirely sure the candidate understands what global permissions are for, but I'll abstain for the timebeing. //shb (t • c) 04:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Aopou {talk} 22:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Openbk (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per SHB --TenWhile622:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)- Support per shb. Ternera (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)Neutral – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)- Support: highly trusted and qualified. Svārtava (tɕ) 10:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support aqurs ❄️ 12:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Jan Myšák (talk) 17:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support —MdsShakil (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Malarz pl, in addition to that you've read the global rename policy on Meta, what is your main reason for having a demonstrated need for this right? Codename Noreste (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- A few months ago I was thinking about applaying to global sysops or stewards. However, I think I am too tied to one wiki. After another attempt by someone to set up/change a login for similar to mine (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and some others), I decided that I need to become more recognizable on other wikis so that similar attempts will be harder for vandals. I think that this permission is not too broad and working with it won't take me too much time, and it will allow me to get known my login on other wikis (and especially among global renamers). Malarz pl (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Malarz pl Hi, this is a confusing rationale, and how is "I need to become more recognizable on other wikis so that similar attempts will be harder for vandals" exactly supposed to work? Leaderboard (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- A few months ago I was thinking about applaying to global sysops or stewards. However, I think I am too tied to one wiki. After another attempt by someone to set up/change a login for similar to mine (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and some others), I decided that I need to become more recognizable on other wikis so that similar attempts will be harder for vandals. I think that this permission is not too broad and working with it won't take me too much time, and it will allow me to get known my login on other wikis (and especially among global renamers). Malarz pl (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Borhan (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support bright mensaje 07:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wüstenspringmaus talk 19:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral: your answer to Codename's question is quite surprising, because it does not indicate any real need to have these permissions. I would even say it's a bit of a w:WP:HATSHOP. The reason you give for having these permissions is a bit inconsistent with the general idea of GR, as it seems that you want to use it for a private purpose in the first place. I have nothing against you in general, but I think you should get a little more involved globally and participate more here on Meta. BZPN (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Leotalk 11:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Question: What kind of experience do you have with the Global rename policy and the local plwiki username policy? How would you ensure that a rename complies with other local policies (such as those on enwiki, dewiki, frwiki, etc.)?—I am asking because renaming is global and affects other projects. I still do not see any specific experience in this area, nor do I see a demonstrated need for global renamer rights. I reviewed your last five years of block logs on plwiki to check how many users you blocked for username policy violations, but I could not find any. In total, you have issued 321 blocks, including 140 for registered users. These 140 blocks appear to have been issued for vandalism, sockpuppetry, or trolling. If I have missed any blocks related to username policy violations, could you please point them out? I also checked the username policy page on plwiki (pl:Wikipedia:Nazwa użytkownika), that states that username policy violations can be reported at pl:Wikipedia:Prośby do administratorów. You have made 134 edits on this page, but based on the section titles in your edit summaries, I could not find any cases where you acted on a username violation. If I overlooked any, could you provide examples? Also, could you share diffs where you warned users about username policy violations? How many users from your wiki have requested renames but faced delays due to a lack of renamers from your community? Just noting that you have edits on wikidata, commons, enwiki, and dewiki, but I could not find any username violations you reported. I do not see any other way to assess your experience with username-related matters, as these administrative venues are the only available sources. It also appears that most of the support votes you received are based on your administrator status rather than specific renaming/policy experience. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Trusted. --V0lkanic (talk) 16:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
edit
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
- Global user: DBatura (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
DBatura (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: YikyuenG (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #98724 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: Julwajs (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #99151 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Global IP Block Exempt for Ulaanjo-Batar-Yang
edit- Global user: Ulaanjo-Batar-Yang (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #99751 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: Asheiou (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hiya, I was granted GIPBE last year as I travel and use VPNs frequently (as I'm often in places where I don't feel comfortable using exposed wifi), and I noticed that my IPBE will expire in a few months. Can this be extended? > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 02:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be better to request a renewal closer to the expiry, if there is a continued need by then? EPIC (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: 63in9 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #100293 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: Kdh8219 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #100340 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 07:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Global user: ubh (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #100705 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Global IP Block Exempt for Tisykfylde
edit- Global user: Tisykfylde (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Per UTRS #100777 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
editPlease be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for other global permissions
editPlease be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
See also
edit- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation