Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Teles

< Stewards | Elections 2012 | Votes
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Teles (Lucas Teles)

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Teles talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Personal info: Hi. I'm a wikimedian since 2007 and my global account is "Teles". I mainly work with antivandalism-related tasks. I became a sysop on pt.wikipedia on 2009, passing through two confirmations already. I'm still an active sysop on pt.wiki and also a bureaucrat. In 2009, I was checkuser on that project and still help the stewards here on Meta to process checkuser requests from pt.wiki and, less frequently, from other wikis. I have two global permissions (global rollback and global sysop), which are very useful for me. I have been using them for a while and they were very important to me on getting a little more cross-wiki experience. I am also sysop here on Meta and on Strategy Wiki. There are some links on my page that can bring numbers of my cross-wiki activity.

    For matters of transparency, this is my second participation on steward elections. Last year, I had 77% of approval. Most people didn't support me due to an accusation of misuse of checkuser tool done by another user. However, the Ombudsman Commission analyzed the case and said that no abuse was made by him (diff). Pt.wiki Arbcom was consulted, but it was never active enough and its members couldn't even decide if they would accept to judge the case, which ended by confusing instead of resolving. Due to this inactivity, pt.wiki Arbcom doesn't exist anymore after community decision. I tried to be short here and if anybody have any question about it, feel free to ask me.

    My previous statement has a more detailed timeline of my participation as a wikimedian. I've been close to almost all steward tasks and I am aware of the most important policies, like privacy, checkuser, oversight and steward policies. I believe I can help a bit more than I already do nowadays. Thank you for reading and good luck to other candidates.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
български:
  • Езици: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Лична информация: Здравейте. Уикимедианец съм от 2007 година и глобалната ми сметка е "Teles". Основно се занимавам с борба с вандализма. Станах администратор на португалската Уикипедия през 2009 година и досега съм преминал успешно през два вота на доверие. И в момента съм активен администратор и бюрократ там. През 2009 бях чекюзър на проекта и продължавам и досега да помагам на стюардите тук в Мета да изпълняват заявки за чекюзъри от pt.wiki и, макар и по-рядко, от други уикита. Имам два глобални статута (на отменител (rollbacker) и на администратор), които са ми много полезни. Използвам ги от известно време и благодарение на тях трупам повече опит в проблеми, простиращи се над множество уикита. Администратор съм в Мета и в Стратегическото уики. От връзките тук можете да добиете по-добра представа за моите кросуики дейности.

    За да бъде всичко прозрачно, това е моето второ участие на избори за стюарди. Миналата година получих 77% одобрение. Повечето хора не ме подкрепиха, заради обвинения от друг потребител за злоупотреба с правата ми на чекюзър. Въпреки това, Комисията на омбудсманите анализира случая и се произнесе, че не съм извършил злоупотреба (източник). Запитване постъпи и до Арбитражния комитет на португалската Уикипедия, но той никога не е бил достатъчно активна структура и членовете му не можаха дори да решат дали трябва да приемат да се произнесат по случая, който завърши с повече объркване, отколкото яснота. Поради неактивността си, Арбитражният комитет на pt.wiki вече не съществува след като общността взе решение да го закрие. Опитах се накратко да изложа случая и ако някой има някакви въпроси в тази връзка, да не се колебае да ме попита.

    Моето предишно изложение съдържа по-детайлно представяне на дейностите ми като уикимедианец във времето. Наясно съм с почти всички задължения на стюардите и са ми известни най-важните политики, като тази за защита неприкосновеността на личните данни, политиката за чекюзърите, за наблюдателите и стюардите. Вярвам, че като стюард мога да помагам малко повече отколкото понастоящем. Благодаря ви за отделеното време и желая успех на всички кандидати.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Informationen zur Person: Hi. Ich bin seit 2007 Wikimedianer und mein globales Benutzerkonto heißt „Teles“. Ich bin hauptsächlich mit Vandalismusbekämpfung beschäftigt. Ich wurde 2009 Administrator auf pt.wikipedia und wurde schon zweimal bestätigt. Ich bin immer noch dort aktiv und mittlerweile auch Bürokrat. 2009 war ich auf dem Projekt Checkuser-Berechtigter und helfe den Stewards hier auf Meta immer noch dabei, Checkuser-Anfragen für pt.wiki, und weniger häufig auch für andere Wikis, zu bearbeiten. Ich bin Mitglied in zwei globalen Benutzergruppen (globaler Zurücksetzer und globaler Administrator), die sehr nützlich für mich sind. Ich benutze sie schon eine Zeit lang und sie waren für mich sehr wichtig, um mehr Crosswiki-Erfahrung zu sammeln. Ich bin auch hier auf Meta und im Strategie-Wiki Administrator. Auf meiner Benutzerseite finden sich einige Links, die Details zu meinen Crosswiki-Aktivitäten bereithalten.

    Es ist eine Frage der Transparenz: Ich muss sagen, dass dies meine zweite Kandidatur bei den Stewardwahlen ist. Letztes Jahr hatte ich 77 % Zustimmung. Die meisten Leute, die mich nicht unterstützt haben, taten dies wegen einer Anschuldigung, dass ein anderer Benutzer die Checkuser-Rechte missbraucht hätte. Allerdings hat die Ombudskommission den Fall untersucht und festgestellt, dass kein Missbrauch durch ihn vorlag (diff). Das Schiedsgericht der pt.wiki wurde konsultiert, war aber nie aktiv genug und seine Mitglieder konnten sich nicht einmal entscheiden, ob sie den Fall annehmen würden, was statt zu einer Lösung nur zu Verwirrung führte. Wegen dieser Inaktivität besteht das portugiesische Schiedsgericht heute nach einer Community-Entscheidung auch nicht mehr. Ich habe versucht, mich hier kurz zu fassen, und wenn jemand irgendeine Frage dazu hat, kann er sie mir gerne stellen.

    Meine Vorstellung von der letzten Wahl enthält einen detaillierteren Überblick über meine Beiträge als Wikimedianer. Ich war fast allen Steward-Aufgaben nah und bin mir der wichtigsten Richtlinien bewusst, wie denen zum Datenschutz, Checkuser- und Oversight-Einsatz und zu den Stewards. Ich glaube, dass ich noch ein bisschen mehr helfen kann, als ich es jetzt schon tue. Danke fürs Lesen und viel Glück allen anderen Kandidaten.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
فارسی:
  • زبان‌ها: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • اطلاعات شخصی: سلام. من از سال ۲۰۰۷ کاربر ویکی‌مدیا هستم و حساب کاربری جهانی من "Teles" است. عمدتاً روی وظایف مربوط به مقابله با خرابکاری کار می‌کنم. در سال ۲۰۰۹ در ویکی‌پدیای پرتغالی مدیر شدم و تاکنون دو تأییدیه را پشت سر گذاشته‌ام. من همچنان مدیری فعال در ویکی‌پدیای پرتغالی هستم و همچنین یک دیوان‌سالار. در سال ۲۰۰۹ من در آن پروژه یک بازرس کاربر بودم و هنوز به ویکی‌بدان فراویکی در امر رسیدگی به درخواست‌های مربوط به ویکی پرتغالی کمک می‌کنم و گهگاه نیز در مورد ویکی‌های دیگر. من دو دسترسی جهانی دارم (واگردان جهانی و مدیر جهانی)، که برایم بسیار مفیدند. مدتی از آن‌ها استفاده کرده‌ام و در کسب اندکی تجربهٔ میان‌ویکیایی برایم بسیار بااهمیت بوده‌اند. من همچنین اینجا در فراویکی و ویکی استراتژی مدیر هستم. چند پیوند در صفحهٔ من موجودند که نشانگر میزان فعالیت میان‌ویکیایی من هستند.

    برای شفاف شدن موضوع، این دومین بار است که در انتخابات ویکی‌بدان شرکت می‌کنم. سال گذشته، من موافقت ۷۷٪ از رأی‌دهندگان را جلب کردم. اکثر افرادی که از من حمایت نکردند دلیلشان اتهام سوءاستفاده از ابزار بررسی کاربر بود که توسط کاربر دیگری انجام گرفته بود. گرچه هیئت بازرسی موضوع را بررسی کرد و اعلام نمود که سوءاستفاده‌ای از جانب او صورت نگرفته‌است (پیوند تفاوت). هیئت حکمیت ویکی پرتغالی مورد مشورت قرار گرفت، اما این هیئت هیچ‌گاه به قدر کافی فعال نبود و حتی اعضایش از تصمیم‌گیری در باب پذیرش و یا عدم پذیرش رسیدگی به دعوی ناتوان بودند؛ و در نهایت نیز به جای حل مشکل اوضاع بغرنج‌تر شد. به دلیل این عدم فعالیت، هیئت حکمیت ویکی پرتغالی بنا بر تصمیم جامعه منحل شد.

    اظهارات قبلی من گاه‌شمار دقیق‌تری از فعالیت‌های من به عنوان یک کاربر ویکی‌مدیا ارائه می‌دهد. من تقریباً با تمامی وظایف ویکی‌بدان آشنا هستم و از مهم‌ترین سیاست‌ها، نظیر حفظ اسرار، بررسی کاربر، پنهان‌گری و سیاست‌های ویکی‌بدی آگاهی دارم. بر این باورم که می‌توانم اندکی بیش از آن‌چه تاکنون انجام داده‌ام، به جامعه کمک کنم. سپاسگزارم برای خواندن این اظهارات و آرزوی موفقیت دارم برای سایر نامزدها. Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
suomi:
  • Kielet: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Moi. Olen ollut Wikimediassa vuodesta 2007 ja globaali käyttäjätunnukseni on "Teles". Toimin pääasiassa vandalismintorjuntaan liittyvissä tehtävissä. Minusta tuli ylläpitäjä pt.wikipediassa vuonna 2009 ja oikeuteni on vahvistettu jo kahdesti. Olen yhä aktiivinen ylläpitäjä pt.wikissä ja myös byrokraatti. Vuonna 2009 olin projektissa osoitepaljastajana ja autan yhä ylivalvojia täällä Metassa pt.wikin, ja harvemmin myös muiden projektien, osoitepaljastuspyyntöjen käsittelyssä. Minulla on kaksi globaalia käyttäjäoikeutta (globaali palauttaja ja globaali ylläpitäjä), jotka ovat erittäin hyödyllisiä minulle. Olen käyttänyt niitä jonkin aikaa ja ne ovat olleet todella tärkeitä wikienvälisen kokemuksen hankkimisessa. Olen myös ylläpitäjä täällä Metassa ja Wikimedian Strategiawikissä. Sivullani on joitakin linkkejä joista wikienvälisiä toimiani voi tarkastella.

    Avoimuuden vuoksi sanottakoon, että tämä on toinen osallistumiseni ylivalvojavaaleihin. Viime vuonna sain 77% kannatuksen. Suurin osa ihmisistä, jotka eivät kannattaneet minua, teki valintansa perustuen syytökseen toisen käyttäjän tekemästä osoitepaljastintyökalun väärinkäytöstä. Wikimedian oikeusasiamieslautakunta tutki tapauksen ja totesi että tuo käyttäjä ei ollut väärinkäyttänyt työkalua (diff). Asia vietiin pt.wikin välityslautakuntaan, mutta se ei ollut koskaan tarpeeksi aktiivinen eivätkä sen jäsenet pystyneet edes päättämään pitäisikö heidän ottaa tapaus käsiteltäväksi, mikä johti vain sekaannukseen sen sijaan että asia olisi ratkaistu. Tämä inaktiivisuus johti siihen, että pt.wikin välityslautakuntaa ei yhteisön päätöksellä enää ole olemassa. Yritin kertoa asian lyhyesti ja jos jollakulla on kysymyksiä siitä, kysykää vapaasti minulta.

    Edellisessä lausunnossani on tarkempi aikajana osallistumisestani Wikimedian projekteihin. Olen ollut läheisesti tekemisissä lähes kaikkien ylivalvojien tehtävien kanssa ja olen perillä tärkeimmistä käytännöistä kuten yksityisyyden suojasta sekä osoitepaljastin-, häivytys- ja ylivalvojakäytännöistä. Uskon että voin auttaa enemmän kuin mitä teen nykyisin. Kiitos lausuntoni lukemisesta ja onnea muille ehdokkaille.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
magyar:
  • Nyelvek: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Személyes információk: Személyi információ: Üdv. Vagyok egy wikimedian óta 2007 és globális számlám "Teles". Én főleg munka antivandalism-related feladatokkal. Én történt egy sysop pt.wikipedia 2009, elmenő keresztül kettő megerősítés már. Vagyok még egy aktív sysop pt.wiki és szintén egy bürokrata. 2009BAN, Voltam checkuser az terv és még segítség a pincér itt Meta feldolgozni checkuser kérés -ból pt.wiki és, kisebb gyakran, -ból egyéb wikis. Nekem van kettő globális engedély (globális rollback és globális sysop), melyik nagyon hasznos nekem . Vagyok használ őket rövid időre és voltak nagyon fontos nekem megszerzés kis híján cross-wiki tapasztalat. Én vagyok szintén sysop itt Meta és Hadászat Wiki. Vannak néhány linkek oldalam az tud hoz számai cross-wikinak tevékenységem.

    dolga átlátszóságnak, ez az második részvételem pincér választás. Elmúlt évben , Nekem volt 77% jóváhagyásnak. Legtöbb emberek nem támogatás engem köszönhető egy vádja visszaélésnek checkuser eszköznek kimerült további felhasználó. Bármennyire, az Ombudsman Megbízás elemzett az eset és mondta az nem visszaélés elkészült őt (diff). Pt.wiki Arbcom utánanéz, de volt soha aktív elég és tagja nem tudta egyenlő elhatároz ha elfogadnának bíró az eset, melyik befejezett zavarbaejtő helyett felold. Köszönhető ez tétlenség, pt.wiki Arbcom nem létezik anymore után közösség döntés. Én kipróbált hogy rövid itt és ha valaki van valamennyi kérdés róla , érez ingyenes kérdezni engem.

    előbbi állításom egy több részletezett idővonala részvételemnek mint egy wikimedian. I've lesz közel majdnem az egész pincér feladatok és Tudatában vagyok a legtöbb fontos politikanak, szeret magánélet, checkuser, tévedés és pincér politika. hiszem tudok segíteni egy kicsit több mint Én már mostanában. Köszönöm olvasás és sok szerencsét egyéb jelöltek Teles
italiano:
  • Lingue: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao. Sono un wikimediano dal 2007 e il mio account globale è "Teles". Mi occupo principalmente delle attività legate alla lotta contro il vandalismo. Sono diventato amministratore su pt.wikipedia dal 2009, superando già due conferme. Sono ancora attivo come amministratore su pt.wiki e sono inoltre un burocrate. Nel 2009, sono stato checkuser su questo progetto e aiuto tuttora gli steward qui su Meta a processare le richieste ai checkuser provenienti da pt.wiki e, meno frequentemente, dalle altre wiki. Ho due permessi globali (global rollback e global sysop), che sono molto utili per me. Li sto usando da qualche tempo e si sono rivelati veramente importanti per me, dandomi l'opportunità di ottenere un po' più d'esperienza cross-wiki. Sono anche amministratore qui su Meta e su Strategy Wiki. Ci sono alcuni collegamenti sulla mia pagina che possono fornire numeri sulla mia attività nel cross-wiki.

    Per questioni di trasparenza: questa è la mia seconda partecipazione alle elezioni degli steward. Lo scorso anno, ho avuto il 77% di approvazione. La maggior parte delle persone non mi ha appoggiato a causa di un'accusa di abuso dello strumento di checkuser fatto da un altro utente. Tuttavia, la Commissione Ombudsman ha analizzato il caso stabilendo che non è stato commesso alcun abuso (diff). L'Arbcom di Pt.wiki è stato consultato, ma non è mai stato abbastanza attivo e i suoi membri non sono nemmeno riusciti a decidere se accettare di giudicare il caso o meno, fatto che ha reso la vicenda ancora più confusa anziché risolverla. A causa di questa inattività, l'Arbcom di pt.wiki è stato sciolto a seguito di una decisione della comunità. Ho cercato di essere breve qui: se qualcuno ha qualche domanda a riguardo non esiti a chiedere.

    La mia richiesta precedente ha una più dettagliata cronologia della mia partecipazione come wikimediano. Ho toccato con mano quasi tutte le attività di uno steward e sono consapevole delle politiche più importanti, come quelle sulla privacy, i checkuser, gli oversight e quelle sugli steward. Penso che potrei aiutare un po' di più rispetto a quanto non faccia attualmente. Grazie per la lettura e buona fortuna agli altri candidati.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Hoi. Ik ben een Wikimediaan sinds 2007 en mijn wereldwijde account is "Teles". Ik ben hoofdzakelijk met vandalismebestrijding bezig. Ik werd een moderator op pt.wikipedia in 2009 en doorliep reeds twee herbevestigingen. Ik ben nog steeds een actieve moderator op pt.wiki en ook een bureaucraat. In 2009 was ik checkuser op dat project en ik help nu nog stewards hier op Meta met de afhandeling van checkuser-verzoeken van pt.wiki en, minder vaak, van andere wiki's. Ik beschik over twee wereldwijde bevoegdheden (global rollback en global sysop), die erg handig zijn voor mij. Ik gebruik ze al enige tijd en ze waren zeer belangrijk voor me om wat meer crosswiki-ervaring op te doen. Ik ben ook moderator hier op Meta en op Strategy-wiki. Er zijn een paar links op mijn pagina die een beeld geven van mijn crosswiki-activiteit.

    Voor de duidelijkheid, dit is mijn tweede deelname aan stewardverkiezingen. Vorig jaar had ik 77% aan steun. De meeste mensen besloten mij niet te steunen in verband met een andere gebruiker, die beschuldigd werd van misbruik van de checkuser-tool. De Ombudsmancommissie heeft de zaak echter geanalyseerd en oordeelde dat geen misbruik was gepleegd door hem (diff). De arbitragecommissie van pt.wiki was geraadpleegd, maar zij was nooit actief genoeg en het is de leden niet eens gelukt om te beslissen of ze de zaak in behandeling zouden nemen, wat resulteerde in verwarring in plaats van een oplossing. Door deze inactiviteit bestaat de Portugese arbitragecommissie niet meer na een gemeenschapsbesluit. Ik heb hier getracht kort te zijn en als iemand er vragen over heeft, voel je vrij om ze aan mij te stellen.

    Mijn vorige verklaring biedt een meer gedetailleerd overzicht van mijn deelname als wikimediaan. Ik ben nauw betrokken geweest bij vrijwel alle stewardtaken en ik ben op de hoogte van het belangrijkste beleid, zoals dat aangaande privacy, en checkuser-, oversight- en stewardbevoegdheden. Ik geloof dat ik wat meer kan helpen dan ik nu al doe. Bedankt voor het lezen en veel succes aan de andere kandidaten. Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 januari 2012 (UTC)
português:
  • Línguas: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Informações pessoais: Oi. Sou um wikimediano desde 2007 e minha conta global é "Teles". Eu trabalho principalmente com tarefas contra vandalismo. Tornei-me administrador na pt.wikipedia em 2009, já tendo passado por duas confirmações (renomeações). Eu ainda sou um administrador ativo na pt.wiki e também um burocrata. Em 2009, fui verificador naquele projeto e ainda ajudo stewards aqui no Meta a efetuar pedidos de verificação da pt.wiki e, menos frequentemente, de outros projetos. Eu tenho dois estatutos globais (reversor global e administrador global), que são bastante úteis para mim. Eu tenho usado esses estatutos por algum tempo e eles foram muito importantes para que eu pudesse obter um pouco mais de experiência "cross-wiki". Eu também sou administrador aqui no Meta e na Strategy Wiki. Há algumas ligações em minha página que podem trazer números sobre minha atividade entre wikis.

    Por uma questão de transparência, devo dizer que esta é minha segunda participação nas eleições para steward. No ano passado, eu obtive 77% de aprovação. Muitas pessoas não me apoiaram devido a uma acusação e mau uso da ferramenta de verificação feito por outro usuário. Entretanto, a Ombudsman Commission analisou o caso e disse que ele não cometeu nenhum abuso (diff). O Conselho de Arbitragem da pt.wiki foi consultado, mas nunca foi suficientemente ativo e seus membros não puderam decidir nem se o caso seria aceito para ser julgado, o que acabou trazendo mais confusão do que resolução. Devido a essa inatividade, o Conselho de Arbitragem da pt.wiki não existe mais após decisão da comunidade. Eu tentei ser breve aqui e, se alguém tiver qualquer dúvida sobre isso, fique à vontade para me perguntar.

    Minha declaração prévia possui uma linha do tempo mais detalhada sobre minha participação como wikimediano. Eu estive próximo a quase todas as tarefas de steward e estou ciente das políticas mais importantes, como as políticas de privacidade, checkuser, oversight (supressão) e de steward. Eu acredito que posso ajudar um pouco mais do que já ajudo hoje em dia. Obrigado por ler e boa sorte aos outros candidatos.” Teles (T @ L C S) 13:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: pt-N, en-3, es-2
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Xin chào. Tôi là thành viên Wikimedia từ năm 2007 và tài khoản toàn cục của tôi là "Teles". Tôi chủ yếu thực hiện các tác vụ liên quan đến chống phá hoại. Tôi trở thành bảo quản viên tại pt.wikipedia vào năm 2009, và đã vượt qua hai lần xác nhận tại đó. Tôi vẫn là một bảo quản viên tích cực trên pt.wiki và cũng làm hành chính viên. Năm 2009, tôi trở thành kiểm định viên tại dự án này và vẫn giúp đỡ những tiếp viên ở Meta-Wiki này giải quyết các yêu cầu checkuser từ pt.wiki và, ít thường xuyên hơn, từ các wiki khác. Tôi có hai quyền truy cập toàn cục (người lùi sửa toàn hệ thống và bảo quản viên toàn hệ thống), chúng rất hữu ích với tôi. Tôi đã sử dụng hai quyền này của mình bao lâu nay và chúng rất quan trọng với tôi vì qua đó tôi từng chút hiểu biết thêm về các trải nghiệm liên wiki. Tôi cũng là bảo quản viên trên Meta này và Strategy Wiki. Một số liên kết trong trang cá nhân của tôi có thể liệt kê số lượng các hoạt động liên wiki của tôi.

    Để cho minh bạch: đây là lần thứ hai tôi tham ứng cử tiếp viên. Năm ngoái, tỉ lệ ủng hộ tôi là 77%. Đa phần mọi người không tín nhiệm tôi là vì một người dùng khác buộc tội tôi lạm dụng công cụ checkuser. Tuy nhiên, Ủy ban Thanh tra đã phân tích trường hợp này và ra quyết định là tôi trong sạch (xem lời bình). Ủy ban Trọng tài ở Pt.wiki đã được mời tư vấn, nhưng Ủy ban này không có đủ thành viên hoạt động và các thành viên hiện có thậm chí còn không quyết định được xem họ sẽ chấp nhận xem xét trường hợp của tôi hay không, và mọi chuyện thay vì được giải quyết ổn thỏa đã chấm dứt một cách khó hiểu. Do không có ai hoạt động, Ủy ban Trọng tài ở pt.wiki đã bị xóa bỏ theo quyết định của cộng đồng. Tôi đã cố gắng trình bày ngắn gọn ở đây và nếu có ai thắc mắc thêm về việc này, xin thoải mái hỏi tôi.

    Bài phát biểu trước đây của tôi có nêu chi tiết hơn về sự tham gia của tôi với vai trò là thành viên Wikimedia. Tôi gần như đã tiếp xúc với mọi nhiệm vụ của tiếp viên và tôi nhận thức được những chính sách tối quan trọng, như chính sách về quyền riêng tư, về kiểm định viên, về giám sát viên và về tiếp viên. Tôi tin rằng mình có thể hỗ trợ nhiều hơn một chút so với những gì đã làm hiện nay. Cảm ơn các bạn đã đọc và chúc những ứng viên khác may mắn.” Teles (T @ L C S) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2012/Questions#Teles


  Yes

edit
  1. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Teles has served the Wikimedia community as a global sysop for almost a year now, and during that time he has used his tools very well. Teles will be a great asset to the team of stewards here, and we really do need more. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC) support, let's trust ptwiki a bit more.[reply]
  3. Jcaraballo (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Jcaraballo 00:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Barras (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  No reason why not. Barras 00:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Vituzzu 00:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Experienced global sysop who will make a great steward! Snowolf How can I help? 00:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  The Helpful One 00:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Techman224 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Techman224Talk 00:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Good work as a GS/GR, and I trust him with these rights. πr2 (t • c) 00:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MBisanz (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  MBisanz talk 00:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  too. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 00:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Lord Roem 00:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Katarighe (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Yes, please Katarighe (Talk) 00:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Wikit 00:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Jon Harald Søby 00:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pedroca cerebral (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  PcTalk 01:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Wjalves (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Jardel Alves 01:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Courcelles 01:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Borovv (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Yes! Borovv 01:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jeffwang (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Jeffwang 02:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  minhhuy (talk) 02:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Magister Mathematicae (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  es:Magister Mathematicae 02:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Fetchcomms (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  ←fetchcomms 03:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Marcus Cyron 03:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Shizhao 03:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Diegusjaimes (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Diegusjaimes 03:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Miss Manzana (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 03:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AOC25 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  AOC25 03:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Érico Júnior Wouters 03:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. محمد الجداوي (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  M.Gedawy Talk 04:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  YES ►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 05:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Savh (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Savhñ 05:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Addihockey10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Addihockey10 05:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Vago (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Vago 06:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Matanya 06:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Nixón (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Nixón 06:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Filzstift (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Filzstift 07:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Eddyghazaley (Not eligible, checked by Geitost) •  Has passed most levels of expertise in wiki and he currently has many involving tasks which are worthwhile in seeing. Eddyghazaley 07:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Nihonjoe (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  FASTILY (TALK) 08:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  --Philippe 08:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Przemub (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Przemub 08:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Jafeluv 08:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Looks ok - thanks Herby talk thyme 08:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. BRUTE (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  –BruTe talk 09:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  no objections a×pdeHello! 10:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rsrikanth05 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Excellent work at maintaining articles. Has my support. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Reder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Reder 11:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Laurent Jerry 11:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  -- Trusted user and good candidate. Wagino 20100516 11:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  sure Morning Sunshine 11:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. M7 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  M/ 11:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Bencmq (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  should've been one already Bencmq 11:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  mostly per Bencmq above me TBloemink talk 12:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Can't see why not Mátyás 12:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Hosiryuhosi 13:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Great candidate. Has experience on almost all aspects of the steward tasks and will be a great benefit for the current team. Trijnstel 13:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Extra999 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Extra999 13:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Wvk (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  No objections! Wvk 14:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  quality candidate, plenty of work to be done billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  I think it is possible to be falsely accused of vandalism others do. Wpollard 14:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Vdkdaan 14:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Trollhead (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Trollhead 15:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Ramesh Ramaiah (Not eligible, checked by Addihockey10) •  Ramesh Ramaiah 16:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Frigotoni (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Sebleouf 17:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Pandukht (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Pandukht 17:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Olivier Bommel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  18:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Every confidence in you. QU TalkQu 18:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Same support as a fex months ago. I'm happy to see that your vote is not turning bad as the last one did ;) Quentinv57 (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Have my support Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira 18:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Microcell (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Microcell 18:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  good luck! Pundit 18:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. VonTasha (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Good candidate VonTasha 18:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. JohnThorne (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  JohnThorne 19:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Experienced and trusted global sysop and rollbacker, with local sysop and bureaucrat rights on other wikis. I believe this is a trustworthy and eligible candidate.  Hazard-SJ  ±  20:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. GRS73 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Minha razão.GRS73 20:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  JurriaanH 20:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Vitor Mazuco (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Vitor Mazuco Msg 21:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Narayan89 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Narayan89 21:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Grondin (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  -- Bertrand GRONDIN   → (Talk) 22:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Observatore (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Observatore 03:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC); Justificativa de voto: Devido a carência de verificadores no projeto Wikipédia-pt, vejo como salutar que um usuário da minha nacionalidade esteja na posição de Supervisão, além do que entendo ser maduro o suficiente lá e aqui, bem como os percalços existentes, outrora, sejam superados, agora.[reply]
  81. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  –Ejs-80 04:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Taichi - (あ！) 05:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Wgfinley (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Wgfinley 07:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Bidgee (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Bidgee (Talk) 08:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Sctechlaw (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Qualified; and patient. Sctechlaw 09:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Jbribeiro1 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  José Luiz talk 11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 11:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Raylton P. Sousa (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Raylton P. Sousa 12:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  mickit 12:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kiran Gopi (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Kiran Gopi 13:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards 15:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. VasilievVV (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012 •  vvvt 17:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Felipegaspars (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Felipegaspars 18:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  –Juliancolton | Talk 20:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Rsloch (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012 •  Rsloch 20:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Raimundo Pastor (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Raimundo Pastor 21:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Romaine (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Romaine 00:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Tiptoety talk 01:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Slon02 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Slon02 02:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Bruno2wi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  --Bruno2wi ↗au zinc ♫ 08:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Mellebga (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Mellebga 09:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Alex Pereira falaê 09:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Voto de confiança.[reply]
  103. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  -jkb- 09:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Vive la Rosière (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 13:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Stanqo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Stanqo 14:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Lavallen (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  -- Lavallen 15:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Mehran Debate 16:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Odder (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  odder (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor)2012 •  Brateevsky 17:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  --Mathonius 18:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Luizpuodzius (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Luizpuodzius 19:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Patriot8790 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Patriot8790 19:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Definitely a good user FiliP ██ 20:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. WizardOfOz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  No reason not to support. WizardOfOz talk 20:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Chicocvenancio (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Chico 20:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Sj (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Experienced, has the strength of ten normal editors. –SJ talk | translate   01:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Mikhailov Kusserow (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Mikhailov Kusserow 07:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Saga City (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Saga City 10:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Anacleto 00 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Anacleto 00 10:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Henryk Borawski (Verification pending) • 
  121. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Yes İncelemeelemani 10:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Thompson.matthew 10:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Asav (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Asav 11:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Mercy (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Mercy 11:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Finnrind (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Finn Rindahl 11:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Taweethaも 13:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Toto Azéro (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Toto Azéro follow the guide ! 13:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. BetelgeuSeginus (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  BetelgeuSeginus 15:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Armbrust 16:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Xania (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Xania 22:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. AGK (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  AGK [•] 22:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Theking17825 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Theking17825 01:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Ottava Rima (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Solid candidate with a lot of cross-wiki experience and technical know how. Ottava Rima (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Bhawani Gautam (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Bhawani 05:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Deu (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 • . Deu. 10:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. M 93 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  M 93 11:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Linksfuss (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Linksfuss 12:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Floflo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  All right. Floflo 14:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Tranminh360 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Tranminh360 (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  B20180 04:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Glavkos (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  --Γλαύκος 08:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Bff (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Bff 08:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Mihewag 09:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Puffin)2012 •  Jusjih 15:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Baba Tabita (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  per Ajraddatz no.1 :) Baba Tabita 17:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  rubin16 18:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Kascyo (Not eligible, checked by Logan) •  Merece! Kascyo 19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  yup. Schon wegen der ersten, politisch vermurksten Wahl :) Hedwig in Washington 02:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Naval Scene (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  good luck! XoXo 06:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  John Vandenberg 14:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. GatoSelvadego (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  GatoSelvadego 14:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Artur Vaz (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Artur Vaz 16:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Wiki13 18:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. The wub (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  the wub "?!" 19:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Bua333 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Bua333 21:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Mato (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Mato 00:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Aytrus (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Aytrus 01:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. X-Fi6 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Hit the experience in all areas and has a comprehensive understanding of policies. X-Fi6 07:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  --Srikant Kedia 12:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Has my trust and has done a lot of important inter-wiki work. CT Cooper · talk 15:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Pratyeka 16:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Gjue (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Gjue (talk) 04:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Tlustulimu (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Tlustulimu (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Meno25 (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Roberto Mura (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Banaticus (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Banaticus (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Marianian (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Marianian (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. SpeakFree (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  SpeakFree (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. FkpCascais (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  FkpCascais (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Wholle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Wholle (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Conrado (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Conrado (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Modernist (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Modernist (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Amats (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Amatstalk 20:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Reade (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Reade (talk) 00:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Qban (Not eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) •  Qban 02:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Leandromartinez (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Leandro Martinez msg 05:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Grunny (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Grunny (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Sail over (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Sail over (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Briegers (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Briegers (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Comments. Sokac121 (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Sahim (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  very good-- Ομιλία Sahim 12:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. GastelEtzwane (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  GastelEtzwane (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Man2fly2002 (Not eligible, checked by axpde) •  No reason why not. [Man2fly2002 ܐܫܘܪܝܐ] 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Vinicius Lima (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012 •  The admin has made a good job with sysop tools in Wiki-pt. Vinicius LimaDiscussion 11:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. FalconL (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  --FalconL ?! 13:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. AlleinStein (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 • AlleinStein (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Njaelkies Lea (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Njaelkies Lea (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Smartcom5 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  No problems, strongy support.. Smartcom5 (Any thoughts ?) 18:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Seb35 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  ~ Seb35 [^_^] 22:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Ronhjones (talk) 00:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Ankit Maity (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Ankit Maity (talk) 11:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Mwaldeck (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Mwaldeck msg 21:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Maax (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Maax (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2012 •  Ruslik (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Avraham (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  I have worked with Teles as a steward on ptwiki issues and have found him to be helpful and competent. His work as a global sysop indicates that he would make a good addition as a steward. Avi (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC) I'd be even happier if you became a local CU on ptwiki so that their requests can be handled in-house :) -- Avi (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Ooswesthoesbes (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  I remember supporting this candidate from last time and have no reason to change my opinion. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Achado (Not eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) •  Achado (talk) Achado (talk) 23:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Jewbask (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Comments. Jewbask (talk) 01:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Blanket   Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. Yair rand (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  198. MARKELLOS (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  MARKELLOSLeave me a message 07:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Epbr123 (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Epbr123 (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. everton137 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Tom (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Lechatjaune (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Lechatjaune (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. seewolf (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. André Koehne (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Good luck, Teles. André Koehne (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Ceradon (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Ceradon (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Castelobranco (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Sure! Claro! Klare! CasteloBrancomsg 05:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208. DarkFalls (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  —Dark talk 05:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Biologo32 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Good luck!. Márcio Muniz What's up? 18:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  210. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 22:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Why not? Hoo man (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Bk1_168 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  --Bk1 168 (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. SeoMac (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  SeoMac (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Orsb (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 • . Orsb (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  continuing my last year's vote, and opposing Riffic's vote ✒ Bennylin 13:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. MuZemike (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  MuZemike (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. JSSX (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  In pt.wiki, one word about this user: Aggressive. JSSX 00:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    There is an ongoing discussion related to this vote or comment which can be found on the talk page.
    This is an Election Committee action made by Wikitanvir because potential long discussion is not allowed on the vote page and should be moved to the respective talk page.
  2. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Ul1-82-2 07:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  NaBUru38 21:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. T137 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Sorry T137 02:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  My explanation is on the talk page. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Aleposta (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Aleposta 14:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Hatonjan 18:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Nemo 19:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Windchaser (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Windchaser 01:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Puffin 22:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Beyond My Ken 11:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hurricanefan25 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Hurricanefan25 19:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Begoon 08:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Guido den Broeder (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Guido den Broeder 20:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Junius (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Junius (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Aggressive.[reply]
  16. Tgeairn (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Although the Ombudsman discussion resolved the issue, the local -pt noise is carrying over. We need 'clean' Stewards. Tgeairn (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. riffic (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates to protest open balloting. riffic (talk) 08:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Alia 2005 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Alia 2005 (talk) 15:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beria (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Not even in a million years! Béria Lima msg 18:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Martin1978 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Martin1978 07:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Anne-theater (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Anne-theater 00:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. O.tacke (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  O.tacke 13:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ngagnebin (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Ngagnebin 15:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Duffyduck97 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Duffyduck97 21:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Margit51 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Margit    (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Erik1991 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Erik1991 (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Night of the Big Wind (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  I don't like that Ombudsman thingy. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 02:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2012/Votes/Teles&oldid=22557162"