Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Masti

Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: pl-N, en-4, de-3, ru-2 several -1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello. I am masti from polish Wikipedia. Started my wiki experience in 2006. Became pl.wiki admin in April 2007, CheckUser in January 2009, Bureaucrat in March 2009, Abuse Filter operator in September 2009. Since the beginning I am active in vandalism fighting and prevention especially Long Term Abusers. Since the function became available I am also Global Renamer. I have served on polish Wikipedia ArbCom. Helping small projects like Silesian Wikipedia or Polish Wikivoyage. Since 2007 I am operating a bot mastiBot with 1.5 million edits on pl.wiki alone.

    I am also member of the Board (Treasurer) of the Wikimedia Polska chapter. Participated in 3 Wikimanias and hepled organize Wikimania Gdańsk.

    I am active most of the day on the internet and reachable on various IRC channels and email. I would like to help with my experience.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Masti


  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   OK for me. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ralf Roletschek (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   — Green Zero обг 14:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Holder (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --MannMaus (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   While they are mostly active on Polish Wikipedia, I think that their local experience (ArbCom, board, bot/admin experience) plus being a global renamer is broad enough so they have something to contribute to the steward team. Rschen7754 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I find that Masti has the right experience, particularly as a CU involved in fighting long-term abuse. I feel that he would be useful as a steward, notably in dealing with vandalism and LTA as he mentioned above — NickK (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   GodeNehler (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Helpful, respectable and amiable. Krol111 (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   FiliP ██ 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ludmiła Pilecka (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ludmiła Pilecka (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Wieralee (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mo Cuishle (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mo Cuishle (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. PMG (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   PMG (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Tsca (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   tsca (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Migel Sances Huares (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   metaΜΣΧ 18:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Visem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Visem (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ejensyd (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Adamt (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Adamt (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Andrewredk (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Tak! OlEnglish (Talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Polimerek (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Polimerek (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   With absolute confidence and trust Pundit (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Plogeo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Plogeo (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Rschen7754. Let's give him a chance. RadiX 20:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jacek555 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Jacek555 (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Highly trusted. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Andrzei111 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Andrzei111 (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Boston9 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Boston9 (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Emptywords (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Myopic pattern (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Experienced, reliable, knowledgeable. Myopic pattern (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pnapora (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jagro (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Strong support, highly trusted user. Jagro (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016   Jan KovářBK (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Per Rschen7754 Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Michał Sobkowski (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Danny B. (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   — Danny B. 07:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Xqt (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016    @xqt 10:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Sir Lothar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   per Rschen7754 Sir Lothar (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. El. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --El. (talk) 11:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fil211 (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Trusted and experienced. No reason why not. Trijnsteltalk 13:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Ptjackyll (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   FN Markus (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Experienced Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Elfhelm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Elfhelm (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Micpol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Micpol (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Silvanka (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Silvanka (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Rzuwig 21:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Anton n (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Anton n (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Halibutt (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Most definitely Halibutt (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Phinek (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Phinek (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Jrt989 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jrt989 (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wildcursive (talk) 02:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Unionville (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Unionville (talk)
  76. Mirek46 (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016   Mirek46 (talk) 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Buggia 10:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  80. Stanko (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Stanko (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Romanm (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   romanm (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Zotezangu (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Magalia (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Magalia (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Лорд Бъмбъри (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lord Bumbury (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ghilt (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Effeietsanders (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Effeietsanders (talk) 23:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Павел Петро (talk) 06:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Rdrozd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Rdrozd (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Gytha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gytha (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Lombanto (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Lombanto (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rather weak support in delight of the delay to answer the questions. However, I can understand that people don't really check meta regularly. I think or better hope that comes with more responsibility on that project. Since I don't really like the "question to all" section, I also don't mind people ignoring them. -Barras talk 13:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Papuass (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Papuass (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Tyytoo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Tyytoo (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Maire (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   A highly trusted and experienced user. Maire 20:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pablo000 (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Highly experienced, communicative and helpful user. Ankry (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Doctore (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Doctore→∞ 00:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Kubura (Eligible, checked by )2016   Experience is here. Kubura (talk) 06:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 08:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Krokus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Krokus (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Clivemacd (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Yashaa (Eligible, checked by )2016   Yashaa (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Mediatus (talk) 12:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seems a good candidate for me. Good luck! Syum90 (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Eager Lin (Message) 05:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Devwebtel (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --Devwebtel (query) 14:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Msannakoval (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Matt918 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Matt918 (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Julo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Julo (talk) 10:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Melos (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Kggucwa (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Chrumps (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Chrumps (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jarould (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Wpedzich (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   My idea of a technical steward. I have been trying to have Masti nominate himself for over a year, but as a busy person he was too busy to do it... I am sure he will put his practical tech knowledge to good use. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Torrosbak (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   good luck! Torrosbak (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Рулин (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Рулин (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Quodvultdeus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Quodvultdeus (talk) 04:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 08:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Obaid Raza (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ooo86 (talk) 11:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fraxinus (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   まSan [TCES] 14:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. UY Scuti (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   —UY Scuti Talk 17:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --S.Didam (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Эрг (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016  --Эрг (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Wulfstan (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Full credibility. Wulfstan (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Steschke (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   ST 20:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC) like Rschen7754[reply]
  143. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Experienced, active and helpful. tufor (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Nice to have an Eastern European on board. Fadesga (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fdssdf (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Targje (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Targje (talk) 00:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   This candidate seems to have much experience. In the question section, however, the questions asked were so technical I was quickly lost. Wpollard (talk) 02:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Stefan Bernat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Stefan Bernat (talk) 09:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Kaftaj (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kaftaj (talk) 09:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Saehrimnir (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Jerzyjan1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Jerzyjan1 (talk) 16:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Mpn (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Mpn (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Wnme (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --Wnme 21:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Courcelles 22:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Ashaio (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ashaio (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Hektor Absurdus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Hektor Absurdus (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. John Belushi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   John Belushi (talk) 01:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   --WiseWoman (talk) 10:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lonio17 (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Lonio17 (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Good luck Meno25 (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LEANSER (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Lisek94 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Lisek94 (talk) 06:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   per Rschen7754, NickK & Jagro. Ліонкінг (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  166. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fessor (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  170. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   P.T. Aufrette (talk) 02:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  171. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Pawel Niemczuk (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 03:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  173. AndriiKhmelkov (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   AndriiKhmelkov (talk) 04:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Shizhao (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  175. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   EmreDuran (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Stanqo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stanqo (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Justus Nussbaum (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Justus Nussbaum (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Bruno Rosta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --(talk) 14:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nebydlogop (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Nebydlogop (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Masti is active in global work, and has enough experience to use the various tools in the areas that they have indicated on answers to questions. Communication is key within the steward group, so thank you for answering the questions put to you (even if there was a delay). Ajraddatz (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Noel baran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Noel baran (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   +1 multilingual, +1 technically competent, +1 speaks concisely. Pratyeka (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Pradeepabk (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Oefe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Oefe (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Srikant Kedia 14:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Cynko (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Cynko (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Wikifreund (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   VisaBlack (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Tar Lócesilion (queta) 20:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Indu (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Candidate highly trusted and right experienced. Indu (talk) 22:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Zetifree (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Zetifree (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Emin message 07:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Veto75 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Veto75 (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Trusted and experienced. Usefull language skills. Taketa (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  198. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  199. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  200. A1 (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   A1 (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Seems good here Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  202. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   DangSunM (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Chrism (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Chrism (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Seven twentynine (Not eligible, checked by Syum90)   Seven twentynine (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   CrazyD (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Duży Bartek (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Duży Bartek (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  205. D kuba (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   D kuba (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Alexmar983 (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Lkarasawa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Lkarasawa (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Teukros (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Teukros (talk) 14:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Volker1978 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   good inforations about your wiki-lifeline Volker1978 (talk) 18:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Mareklug (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Very reasonable and rational Wikipedian. Mareklug (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016  . Kelvin (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  212. RoodyAlien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   RoodyAlien (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Rpclod (talk) 00:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Lt2818 (talk) 08:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Виолетова (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Виолетова (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  218. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mick Knapton (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Good luck in the election. You'd be a good steward. Mick Knapton (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Yodaspirine (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  220. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 22:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Viswaprabha (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I personally know Masti can look after the entire globe with a true uniform vision :) ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 22:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  222. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --DrTrumpet (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC) go[reply]
  223. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zyephyrus (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Roxyuru 03:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  225. taweetham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Taweethaも (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Seen quite a lot in IRC. No doubt a good candidate for a steward. Bennylin 04:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  227. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  231. Kayser Ahmad (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Kayser Ahmad (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  232. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  233. TheInfernoX (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   TheInfernoX (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Kirk39 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kirk39 (talk) 12:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Vvven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Vvven (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  237. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --ContributorQ (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  239. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   [[مهدی فیلو]] (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  240. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   MirkoS18 (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Romayan (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Iceandsnow (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Iceandsnow (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mazuritz (talk) 11:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  245. BeeCeePhoto (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BeeCeePhoto (talk) 14:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 15:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Zdzislaw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zdzislaw (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   per NickK アンタナナ 16:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  248. Ilya (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Ilya (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  249. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Anatoliy (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gecko (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Gecko (talk) 02:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Muso (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  252. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mallikarjunasj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Mallik (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  253. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 12:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Did not answer any questions (actually made no edits on Meta anymore after posting the candidature). Also, the statement does not contain any description of what he would like to do with the steward tools or why he candidates at all. --MF-W 14:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Southparkfan 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Vogone and MF-Warburg Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SPQRobin (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Doesn't seem to have enough cross-wiki experience. Miniapolis 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    A hard decision, because if they had answered the questions with reasonable answers then I would have supported. Has experience as a global renamer, but communication is so important in the steward role that I can't ignore this. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Moving to support. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   No cross-wiki experience Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Communication seems to be a problem. No answers to Q in a timely manner. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 19:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)   Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-W. Masti has skill but that sort of attitude is not acceptable for a steward. — T. 13:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   I don't know what to make of this creation of his. Mathmensch (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   — regards, Revi 17:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   no answers to questions at all, that's not how stewards work. თოგო (D) 23:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   odder (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   The lack of cross-wiki countervandalism experience makes me oppose here. I am of the opinion at least some basic level of x-wiki countervandalism experience should be there before applying for use in that area, and gaining that is also possible without the full steward toolset. Might be a good candidate for the future. Vogone (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per MF-W, stewards are supposed to be forthcoming and responsive...also, his cross-wiki activity looks weak and is mainly edits to his own userspace. Stemoc 02:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Well, some 4 contributions to betawikiversity. I hope you voted to keep it, but none on any of the others. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Qewr4231 (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Wetterwolke (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Boshomi (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. OTAVIO1981 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   OTAVIO1981 (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Per Vogone, again.[reply]
  48. Rosymonterrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Needs more experience.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 15:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Considerably less x-wiki activity than I'd expect from a steward. I know that he is experienced but I would like him to extend his activity to broader scope than just Polish wikis a little bit Commons & WD. Number of edits is a bad assessment metric but when it's just 2637 when the wikis mentioned are subtracted it's ways too loud to ignore one. Base (talk) 12:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
Looks decent to me, but the complete absence of answers to questions and the rather vague SE statement unfortunately makes me unable to support. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Herby talk thyme 16:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Not sure why running, and the statements of Ajraddatz make me hestitate. Definitely competent, abuse filter writing is advantage, and trusted, so have no concern about the person themself.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Ghiutun 22:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Needs to answer the questions. Not answering questions on an en-wp RfA would earn a swift oppose vote. Otherwise, the candidate looks good. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Awaiting for answers in the question section. Caballero1967 (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   for now Érico (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 00:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Masti has a long-standing crosswiki experience and in my interaction with him I've always found him clueful. I'd vote yes but I need some time to check his "meta" activity and so on. Nemo 10:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I am neutral as there are no questions asked/answered. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Liridon (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Liridon (talk) 21:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Taichi - (あ!) 06:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I would like to support, but I do not know Masti from his work, and thus would have to rely on his statement and his answers to the questions. The former is a bit light; the latter nonexistant. I reserve the right to switch to support should he answer the questions satisfactorily, but have to go neutral at this point. Hopefully this will change :) Avi (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kharkiv07 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Simply can't vote with the information presented at this point. Kharkiv07 (T) 02:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ocaso33 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ocaso33 (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 05:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --DerekvG (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   ysjbserver (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]