Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2025/Votes/WikiBayer

< Stewards | Elections 2025
Warning

The 2025 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

WikiBayer

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: de-N, bar-N, en-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Since 2019, I have been an administrator on the Bavarian Wikipedia as well as a global administrator. In the following year, due to my global activities, I also took on the role of Meta-Wiki administrator. In 2024, I was proposed as an administrator on Wikidata.

    My main activities in Wikimedia projects include technical tasks, maintenance, cross-project processing of various requests, and combating vandalism and spam. For example, I have performed over 1,000 interface edits, such as .js, .css, or gadget definitions outside of my user namespace. Additionally, I have made over 150,000 deletions and performed many other actions or edits. With the Steward rights, I want to participate even more strongly in the project and more efficiently counteract spambots or long-term disruptors. I have no direct technical experience with Oversight or Checkuser tools, except for temporary accounts. However, I have already created some requests and am familiar with the basics. I am confident that I can also work in this area, as I am willing to continue my education and acquire new skills in collaboration with other experienced Stewards.

    My biggest weakness is my English, which is very limited. However, I have so far managed to overcome language problems very well. I am, however, willing to continue to improve my language skills in order to effectively carry out my work as a Steward. Additionally, as a global Sysop, I have already gained experience in deciphering very exotic languages. This is often not easy, but I have learned to deal with unusual scripts and languages.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2025/Questions#WikiBayer


  Yes

edit
  1. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good luck! Nurtenge (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per Johannnes and Leaderbord (neutral no. 2 and 3) Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 16:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Well very well (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I don't see the language barrier having a large impact on the user's communication. Well very well (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ~aanzx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --~aanzx · ✉ · © 16:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Contributor 118,784 (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  You got this! Contributor118,784 Let's talk 13:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pppery (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  * Pppery * it has begun 15:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Godihrdt (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Godihrdt (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. JyotiPN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  JyotiPN (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Adtonko (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. نوفاك اتشمان (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Helpful global user and global sysop. نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Kocgs (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hide on Rosé (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Phương Linh (thảo luận) 14:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pastelfa (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  --Pastelfa (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. J ansari (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  -J. Ansari Talk 05:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Henrydat (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Henrydat (talk) 18:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Superspritz (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Superspritztell me 23:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Galahad (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 06:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. M7 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  M/ (talk) 09:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Captain Ben Richards (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  We need such people. captain Ben Richards (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Kusurija (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Wiki Jonathan2 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wiki Jonathan2 (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Kisare (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Kisare (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. موسى (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Musa (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ferdinand IF99 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Ferdinand IF99 (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:27, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Tống Thành Hưng (Not eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) •  Tống Thành Hưng (talk) 23:56, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ikan Kekek (Verification pending) •  I was satisfied with their answers to my and other people's questions, they seem qualified, and I don't think fluency in English should be anything close to a requirement for stewardship.Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. En Merker (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  En Merker (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Grisvold (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  good luck from russia Grisvold (talk) 05:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Jeff G. (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 14:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Mbch331 (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Spielvogel (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Mö1997 (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tanbiruzzaman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 21:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Legonin (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Legonin (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Trygve W Nodeland (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Trygve W Nodeland (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Lemonaka (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Yes, for put an end to PlanespotterA320's doxxing behaviour. Lemonaka (talk) 10:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Wolf1949H (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wolf1949H (talk) 20:34, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ashlar (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Ashlar (talk) 04:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Erboldilyara (Not eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus) •  Well deserved! Erboldilyara (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. MrAureliusR (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Glad to see a Yubikey user running for Steward ;) MrAureliusR (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Holder (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Holder (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Asked42 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Asked42 (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Flyingphoenixchips (Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 20:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. P. W. Siebert (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  P. W. Siebert (talk) 07:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Oksmel 70 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Oksmel 70 (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. masegand (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Masegand (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oq10pass (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Oq10pass (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. A09 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  It's not only a language barrier problem, but a problem of how this person behaves on wikimeetups. As such I do not trust WikiBayer to posses steward rights.--A09|(pogovor) 14:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Sorry, but I’ve found WikiBayer’s communication skills and the way they handle controversy to be piss-poor, and I don’t find it entirely unexpected for someone who has failed three dewiki RfAs. And no, I would like to see a significant change in behaviour from someone with a history of insulting vandals and LTAs and treating it as a hobby. --shb (t • c) 14:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Block reasons like this is unacceptable for an admin, let alone a steward --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Arcticocean (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Temperament or communication is not right for the role. Perhaps in a future year and after some improvements are made. arcticocean ■ 14:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  per Minorax --TenWhile6 14:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Codc (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Codc (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Previous votes sway me here --Minilammas (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  I have not been impressed by this user's attitude in the past. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     14:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I'm concerned about communication issues and answers to questions do not convince as well. Per everyone else above as well. --Stïnger （会話） 14:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Icodense99 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per SHB2000 and Minorax Icodense (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Squasher (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per SHB2000 and Minorax Squasher (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Aqurs1 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per Minorax, that's not acceptable for sure. aqurs ❄️ 14:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Not trusted for the tools. JrandWP (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Brightt11 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per Minorax. It is not appropriate for a sysop, or rather a steward, to present an obstacle as such her is elected. bright mensaje 15:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bubo bubo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Bubo 容 15:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wüstenspringmaus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ternera (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Due to the diffs raised by Minorax and due to the language barrier. Ternera (talk) 15:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kenneth Wehr (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Kenneth Wehr (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Ursprünglich hatte ich vor, mit Ja zu stimmen, weil ein Mangel an Englischkenntnissen kein Grund für Widerspruch ist, aber die drei gescheiterten dewiki-RfAs demonstrieren einen Mangel an Kommunikation in mehreren Sprachen. --Ferien (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. 1989 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  1989 (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Holmium (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  as mentioned above... Holmium (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. JJPMaster (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  I was intending to be neutral here, but Minorax's diffs are entirely indefensible and unbecoming a global sysop, much less a steward. JJPMaster (she/they) 19:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  per Minorax, sorry. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Aopou (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  —Aopou {talk} 19:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DCB (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  DCB (talk) 20:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Zafkiel GD (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Zafkiel GD | Talk 20:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Hey man im josh (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per SHB2000 and Minorax Hey man im josh (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. FusionSub (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  I was originally going to support but seeing the block reasons Minorax has linked has changed my vote. No matter how much I or anyone else agrees with that personally, that is the type of thoughts you don't share online (or beyond one or two close friends). -FusionSub (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. RoBri (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --RoBri (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Sink Cat (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 22:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Eihel (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Eihel (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Codename Noreste (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Voted as oppose per A09, SHB, and Minorax. The OP's English-language skills are not good as they noted, and their attitude. They sometimes block vandals with no block reason, which does not inspire my confidence in the OP, and they occasionally report to SRG with the reason being Long-term abuse. and nothing else. Codename Noreste (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jet Pilot (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Jet Pilot 01:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pólux (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Due to the block logs presented by Minorax. Pólux (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Takipoint123 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Takipoint123 (talk) 04:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. JustARandomEditor123 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Per SHB2000 and Minorax. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 07:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Justiyaya (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  per Minorax logs Justiyaya (talk) 07:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Mx Lucy (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Mx Lucy (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. 3aFW (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  3aFW (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. খাত্তাব হাসান (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Per Minorax and EPIC খাত্তাব হাসান (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  cyrfaw (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  dwadieff ✉ 17:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per Minorax and Arcticocean. Daniuu (talk) 19:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Don-kun (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per Minorax and User talk:WikiBayer/Archiv#Your block reasons. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Xacaranda (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Xacaranda (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ulricus Angelus (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Ulricus Angelus (talk) 06:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Randomstaplers (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  ⸺(Random)staplers 07:11, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2025 •  per SHB2000.--Turkmen talk 08:36, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Trasheater Midir (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Communication problems and other concerns listed by others. Plus, for active display of political template on the userpage. Trasheater Midir (talk) 08:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Eta Carinae (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Grandmaster Huon (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Per above reasons. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. DynamicFolklore (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Folklorelet`s Talk! 21:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  mostly per minorax. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Per all comments above. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 12:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Alien333 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Per Minorax. — Alien  3
    3 3     17:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Helfmann (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  --Helfmann (talk) 07:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  per Minorax Ameisenigel (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  -- Ulanwp (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Fenikals (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Antoine.b (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Grand-Duc (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Likely insufficient proficiencies in languages to make a global job. Grand-Duc (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Triomint69 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Triomint69 (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Icandostuff (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Icandostuff (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Lollo98 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Per Minorax Lollo98 Text me 22:05, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sennecaster (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Sennecaster (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Udo T. (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  74. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  The failed RFAs on de.wiki and the concerns mentioned by the above editors make me think that they're not ready to be a steward. Chris ☁️(talk - contribs) 22:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  75. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  The block reasons are insanely telling that the user is perhaps not even suited for adminship, much less stewardship. In their maintenance of filter 300 (a private filter), the entire filter is in German, impeding much of any review of their filter by others without significant work to translate the filter. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  76. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  77. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Based on the concerns raised, empathy is important in this context, and I believe this should be a focus moving forward. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 07:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  78. User3749 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Good contributions but communication issues, and usage of blocking reasons such as this, as pointed out previously by Minorax, doesn't really give a good impression from a behavioral viewpoint. User3749 (talk) 07:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Niryhpr (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Niryhpr (talk) 10:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Estrellato (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Estrellato (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Alexisdepris (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •   Alexis EBRC Member 16:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Gymate (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Gymate (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nazgul02 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Nazgul02 (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  84. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Per Minorax: Offending remarks in block logs are an absolute no-go. And there exist more block logs of this kind: [1], [2] and even quite recent ones: [3] (in German language on meta). --AFBorchert (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @WikiBayer can you respond to the last one? Your answer to a question suggested that "I haven't used the criticized justifications for a long time" and one month isn't "a long time". Leaderboard (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My answer referred to the reasons criticised above. And the blocks that are criticised here are definitely different. The reasons that are criticised here are definitely unobjectionable. Most of all in the Barwiki. In Bavaria it is very popular to use this in such contexts. This is also not an insult! (even if the word can serve as an insult in other contexts), which is probably a little more difficult for you as a foreign speaker to understand. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 11:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @WikiBayer so if I get you correctly, in the Bavarian language, this is normal, but the same phrase used in standard German is an insult? Leaderboard (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Leaderboard not quite, It doesn't depend on the German or Bavarian language, but on the context in which the word is used, and there are also regional differences in where it is often used and in what context. Similar to ‘du’ and ‘sie’. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 13:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @WikiBayer If you think that block reasons like "Dork" (personal attack, actually) and "Clearly fell on their head" (implies cerebral trauma in childhood) are helpful and appropriate, I think you shouldn't have any advanced privileges, not only stewardship. Trasheater Midir (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @WikiBayer These are unquestionable insults that are inappropriate in any Wikimedia project. The fact that you continue to use such block notices (up to 15 January 2025) despite your claims in the questions section and your replies here are unfortunately an indication that you do not plan to change this habit. Yes, we block and lock all sorts of vandals. But we should do this decently while keeping always in mind that there is a human being on the other side. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I can see a dubious/offensive block reason [4] 2025-01-15 here at meta and in German Special:CentralAuth/Schlesien_wählt_Weidel_und_kehrt_Heim_ins_Reich ... I am tempted to change my neutral vote to oppose. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Al Lemos (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Al Lemos (talk) 00:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Muddyb (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  User:Muddyb (Talk) 14:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  87. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I think User:Minorax and User:SHB2000 summarize my rationale completely. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Even if en-1 wasn't an issue, persistent incivility in block logs is an automatic dealbreaker. ミラP@Miraclepine 15:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Hellenic Rebel (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Hellenic Rebel (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Vizziee (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Vizziee (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Perrak (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  Perrak (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Arwenmajer (Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Arwenmajer (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Moguy (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Moguy (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Lepricavark (talk) 04:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Ruy (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Per Minorax. Ruy (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Lentokonefani (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Lentokonefani (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Turtlecrown (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  valuable vandal fighter, but operates with too much "gusto" for direct access to user rights Turtlecrown (talk) 11:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Too rash with handling deletions at GSR. Can you explain why you deleted w:pih:Aach as a test page? It sure doesn't look like one to me. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 12:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Teles (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Pavel200071 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Pavel200071 (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Tzim78 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Tzim78 (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Mirzoulugʻbek (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  M𝐢rzoUlug'𝐁𝐞k 👤💬 06:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 15:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  103. QuickWittedHare (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  QuickWittedHare (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ciell (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Ciell (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Schlurcher (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Schlurcher (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Oh mein Liba, da sands a bissarl impulsiv gwesn (Hoffe, das Bayrisch kommt rüber). Depp, echt jetzt? Danke für den Hinweis AFBorchert.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Choucas Bleu (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)2025 •  Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 23:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Voceta (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Voceta (talk) 23:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kadı (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)2025 •  Kadı Message 08:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Känguru1890 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Känguru1890 (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Thesavagenorwegian (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per Minorax. Blocking language should be as civil as everything else. If WikiBayer addressed this reasonably, that would be a start. TheSavageNorwegian 17:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Alex Pereira falaê 18:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Flnario (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Per AFBorchert. Flnario (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Per Minorax Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Babegriev (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  as per Codename Noreste. Concerns from Prior Canadacy not yet addressed Babegriev (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Sunnyboi18 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Per Minorax & AFBorchert, It's actually quite shocking to me this isn't something that WikiBayer (considering he's an Admin) has been talked too about. I know German Humour can be different, but I don't see how "Long-Term Idiot" can be justified in any sort of way, and frankly it's something that ArbCom should possibly look into regarding "Conduct Unbecoming". Sunnyboi18 (talk) 10:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Wozal (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Per comments listed above. Wozal (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Sadads (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Sadads (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  For me "idiot" is a word from medicine. I do not believe, that WikiBayer (or anyone) can diagnose idiocy by edits only. If somebody claims to be able to do that, for me this is sign of incompetence. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  120. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  If my only hesitation were "long-term idiot" as a repeated block reason (examples provided by Minorax above), and if WikiBayer would convincingly state that would not be used in the future, I would change my vote. More concerning to me is the recent instance provided by AFBorchert on on German language Meta. Was that due to the editor's choice of user name? Something else? A rationale of "obviously stupid" is insufficient for a permanent block.--FeralOink (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The editors name is a barely veiled call to resurrect German expansive imperialism from the late 1930s. Considering the historical context, this hits rock bottom on any scale of acceptability. -<(kmk)>- (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Kudpung (talk) 03:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Omar7812 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Omar7812 (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  — Jules* talk 11:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Eschenmoser (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Eschenmoser (talk) 16:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Lordgilman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Lordgilman (talk) 20:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  127. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 05:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  128. HippoLoid (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  HippoLoid (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Daask (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2025 •  Daask (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  130. NickK (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Uncivil behaviour NickK (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  131. OrangKalideres (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  OrangKalideres (talk) 13:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. EPIC (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I feel like WikiBayer is one of the more difficult candidates to decide on. One of the main points to bring up is probably on the global locks/SRG topic - I've noticed from my experience that several stewards have complained about WikiBayer's SRG reports, either because they are missing information (so that one of us has to either decline or ask for more information) or because they are incorrect, and from my SRG work I've seen some signs of that from my side as well, such as [5] and the more recent [6]. With that being said, this might create controversy around how they will use the global lock tool which I want to avoid having. I've had the dewiki stuff in mind as well, such as the RfAs mentioned in the questions and this (about the fact that they were (and still are) using the GR flag to perform suppressredirect moves for regular maintenance at dewiki, a large wiki and outside the scope of how GR's suppressredirect right should be used). I feel like some dewiki users will oppose here, but I'm going to abstain for now, because on the flip side they are doing good work as a global sysop and my impression of their work as a Meta admin/GS has been generally positive. EPIC (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I agree with Minorax and EPIC. WikiBayer does a lot of work fighting xwiki vandalism and spam. And a lot of it is very helpful, especially for smaller wikis which lack the resources to fight vandalism/spam. But I would like to see improvements in the way they communicate. They've stopped with the block reasons Minorax criticised (as far as I know), but still communication is too often poorly when asked to justify some of their decisions as (global) sysop. I've considered giving them a motivational vote of support, because there is a lot of helpful GS work and right now they are receiving mostly opposes, but there are also too many reasons to oppose -> therefore neutral. Johannnes89 (talk) 15:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  You were the only candidature for me that I had to take a deep look, and it's not because of your language skills. Your English is OK, and it wasn't difficult for me to understand what you were saying. However, some of your answers (eg the U4C case) were plain weird - and not in a good way - for me. But on the other hand, your statement, theoretical candidature and the answers you gave to my questions were fine - so much so that I was surprised to see a bunch of opposes to your candidature. The issues regarding bad language on edit summaries were in 2023, and it appears to me that you've improved since then. Leaderboard (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  V0lkanic (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Given the objections of many users, I choose to be neutral. Drummingman (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Talimu0518 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  The language barrier is a big problem all the times but i think this person can progressive himselve in the future.Next time better! Talimu0518 (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mpns (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Mpns (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  --Ankermast (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Tvcccp (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  I don't want to pile-on, but my vote would otherwise be an oppose. MF-W 20:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 20:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  PoetVeches (talk) 21:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Miniapolis 00:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Skilsdhuo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Skilsdhuo (talk) 02:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  neutral for now Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Hehua (talk) 04:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  –FlyingAce✈hello 16:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Daisytheduck (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Daisytheduck (talk) 05:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Lymantria (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  --Lymantria (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Taylor 49 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  The block reasons mentioned above (last mid-2023). Users with enhanced rights must maintain decent respect towards other users, including those having a different opinion or having made a mistake. And they must maintain minimal respect towards convicted LTA users. This is a common problem no way limited to WikiBayer. Thus keep global sysop but against steward. Taylor 49 (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ulubatli Hasan (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Hasan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Caiaffa (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mazbel (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Mazbel (Talk) 02:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Rin [ T · C ] 04:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Aspere (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Aspere (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Rzuwig► 12:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Wolverène (talk) 04:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2025 •  Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Przemub (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Przemub (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Aca (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Aca (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Veracious (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Per EPIC. Veracious (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Gadir (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per Minorax and EPIC. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kompetenter (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Kompetenter (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Tetiana Tkachuk (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Tetiana Tkachuk (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  JavaHurricane 16:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Schützenpanzer (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Schützenpanzer (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Günther Pabst (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Günther Pabst (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Aurodea108 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Aurodea108 (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Franzekafka (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Franzekafka (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  ——d—n—f (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ikan Kekek (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  I was satisfied with their answers to my and other people's questions, they seem qualified, and I don't think fluency in English should be anything close to a requirement for stewardship. However, after I read the "No" comments about their behavior, I think there is enough doubt not to support. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. DBrown SPS (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  DBrown SPS (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. El flacucho venezolano (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  El flacucho venezolano (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Andrew Pertsev (talk) 08:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Unite together (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  In the discussion here, he claimed that he "semi-protected all articles in crwiki". No prior discussions. Neither do requests from someone else. He did solely based on his own decision. If he can make rationale behind this action clear, then I would turn to support, as he's a good candidate in other ways. U.T. 03:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Starlighsky (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Starlighsky (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Doc.Heintz (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Doc.Heintz (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Päppi (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Päppi (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Dash77 (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Emha (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Emha (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Leotalk 01:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Homeostasis07 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  I find comments regarding this user's "behavior at meetups" to be irrelevant to steward elections, but I still have reservations about concerns raised by other opposers. Homeostasis07 (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Lovelano (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Lovelano (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Masti (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  masti <talk> 11:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  61. علاء (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --Alaa :)..! 11:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  62. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  —MdsShakil (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2025/Votes/WikiBayer&oldid=28317538"