Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Érico

Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: pt-N, en-2, es-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone. I'm Érico from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and I would like to serve as steward.

    I started contributing on Wikimedia projects in April 2010 at the Portuguese Wikipedia, where I become a sysop in January 2012, a bureaucrat in April 2012 and a CheckUser in March 2015. Although isn't a mandatory process in my home wiki, I passed in two confirmations (I & II).

    In early 2012, I joined the Small Wiki Monitoring Team (SWMT) and since then I work in antivandalism-related tasks. In May 2012 I was approved as global rollbacker, and, in December of the same year, as global sysop. I'm also a sysop on Commons and a global renamer. In February 2014, I left to contribute in some projects due to student issues, but I came back to stay active in December 2014.

    I'm easily contactable by my email and talk page, as well in the IRC sometimes. If elected as steward, I intend to handle with SRG, SRP and SRCU requests. Furthermore, I believe that the tools can help me more quickly and easily to deal with LTAs and cross-wiki vandalisms.

    I agree to abide by the steward policy, as well its related policies (Privacy, CheckUser and Oversight). If you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to ask them. Thank you for your time and consideration. Érico (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Érico


  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I found your profile interessant. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Southparkfan 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Holder (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Experienced SWMT member. Good luck. RadiX 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Good crosswiki experience, good experience with CU, easy to work with. Frankly, I think the Commons community missed out on a good potential CU. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   GodeNehler (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gato Preto (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gato Preto (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Biologo32 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Márcio Muniz What's up? 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Are you freaking kidding me (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Are you freaking kidding me (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Competent OlEnglish (Talk) 19:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Antero de Quintal (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Antero de Quintal (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Petronas (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Maragm (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. TuCove (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Like that you are in South America. We need diversity. TuCove (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 20:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   intrigued. Go ahead. Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Per Rschen7754. Has been using all rights he requested so far. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Candidate with good potential Prof tpms (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Rschen7754. User has the right experience — NickK (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   The pros weigh out the cons here eurodyne (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Sure. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jim Carter (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Jim Carter (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ruthven (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   I am willing to give Érico a chance Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Has advanced tools and no known mistakes; may have a low presentation, though competence, trust and teamwork is what is needed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Might be young, yes, but he's competent and trusted. So per Rschen7754 and Billinghurst. Trijnsteltalk 13:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Arnoldus9 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   competent. Arnoldus9 (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fernando2812l (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Enirack (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Enirack (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Belanidia (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Belanidia (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Ghiutun 22:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fasouzafreitas (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Fasouzafreitas (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Welcome! Risk Engineer (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jarould (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Edmenb (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Edmenb ( Mensajes ) Wikipedia en Español 01:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Jrt989 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jrt989 (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yes. SJ talk  06:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Carshalton (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Carshalton (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Defender (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Assuming good faith. — T. 13:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   M.Tarnowski (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Capella87 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Capella87 (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   rxy (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Mvictor talk 18:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. L'editeur (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   L'editeur (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Obelix (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Darwinius (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Trustworthy. - Darwin Ahoy! 00:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. White whirlwind (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   White whirlwind (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 08:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   - tucoxn\talk 13:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I really dislike the fact that an apparently competent, active and clueful candidate is being opposed because he's potentially young. I'd consider this ageism. He's clearly a suitable candidate, no matter how old he is. -Barras talk 14:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. FriedC (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   FriedC (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Syum90 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016   Jan KovářBK (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   INeverCry 23:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Trustworthy and competent Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Excellent candidate. Erne Mogilevich (ノート) 00:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016     Rauletemunoz 03:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 08:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Lucas Landin (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lucas Landin (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ok :) まSan [TCES] 21:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CourtlyHades296 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   CourtlyHades296 (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Chronus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Chronus (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Eager Lin (Message) 05:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   AMPERIO (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Jeff alef (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DanielTom (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Bya97 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bya97 (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Infinite0694 (Talk) 03:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   B20180 (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Nannadeem (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016     Support Ferran Mir (talk) 08:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Dbastro (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NaBUru38 (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   – Meiræ 12:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fraxinus (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   The questions asked were brutal, but they appeared to be answered honestly. Wpollard (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Taichi - (あ!) 06:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Snow Rise (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Snow Rise (talk) 07:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sebleouf (talk) 08:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Morza (sono qui) 11:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   VisaBlack (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Saehrimnir (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Vanthorn (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Vanthorn (talk) 03:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. GRS73 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   GRS73 (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ankry (talk) 07:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LEANSER (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   ok tufor (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Matiia (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. OnlyJonny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   OnlyJonny (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. HCa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   HCa (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 16:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Excellent user, active em many projects, executor of many regular tasks in all. able, therefore, to be Steward Leon saudanha (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Önni (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Önni (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Shizhao (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Nioger (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Experienced in cross wiki stuff. Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NicatronTg (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Trusted. Stang 05:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   +1 for non-English, +1 for active, +1 for comprehensible, +1 for accessible, +1 for policy-aware. Pratyeka (talk) 06:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Srikant Kedia 14:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016   Mathonius (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Amaling (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Pedrassani (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Pedrassani (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Magog the Ogre (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Emin message 07:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I liked what I read, FWIW. Popo le Chien (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Trusted and experienced. Taketa (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ashaio (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ashaio (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   DangSunM (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. DAVID MAS V. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Un Gran Candidato sin dudas a Steward. TELETRECE (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   BRP ever 18:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Yair rand (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Tom29739 (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Boshomi (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Osy (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Osy (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. LaZ0r (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   LaZ0r (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Manytexts (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   interesting profile, capabilities good; friendly tone Manytexts (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Yakifahmi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Yakifahmi (talk) 01:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Lt2818 (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Alexandru M. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Alexandru M. (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Seems like a good if young candidate. The "no" case is mostly devoid of supporting evidence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mick Knapton (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Good luck in the election. You'd be a good steward. Mick Knapton (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zyephyrus (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   I'm going with yes for this candidate Bennylin 04:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  168. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Thumbs Up! Stevenmitchell (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Somercet (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." -- Groucho Marx Somercet (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  169. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Ajpvalente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Ajpvalente (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  173. PauloMSimoes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PauloMSimoes (talk) 22:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  174. La femme de menage (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   En espérant qu'aux âmes bien nées...--La femme de menage (talk) 09:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  175. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Kirk39 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kirk39 (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  178. EstanislaoVinse (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   EstanislaoVinse (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Jabberwoch (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   " Largely per Vogone; some concerns but also has relevant experience" Jabberwoch (talk) 01:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Dimitra megest (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  182. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   DARIO SEVERI (talk) 03:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  183. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   J7729 (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mazuritz (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       69alex69 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   69alex69 (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Zdzislaw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zdzislaw (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   アンタナナ 16:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   per NickK Ліонкінг (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Herby talk thyme 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   To young and imho not active enough for the rather large number of advanced permissions he sought in the past. Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Ganímedes (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough experience yet. Miniapolis 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Almondega (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   He demonstrated partiality and lack of education in conflict resolution. As could be seen here Almondega (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Try again in a few years; it looks like you've done good work, but experience is important for this. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   MF-W 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Buggia 14:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   I wish to be more active in the future his/her. --Uğurkenttalk 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)   Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Veleius
  26. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Technopat (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   after your actions, when changed politics in pt.wiki, to protect a sysop, I can't vote in your name as Steward. Alex Pereira falaê 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stanglavine (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Beria (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Agree with Natuur and Alex Pereira Béria L. de Rodríguez msg 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fdssdf (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Vitor Mazuco (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Vitor Mazuco Msg 12:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   odder (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. JMGM (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   JMGM (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Nice poa (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   with Natuur12 and Alex Pereira Nice poa (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. João Carvalho (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   --João Carvalho (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) no longer deserve my confidence after having distorted the rules to defend an administrator.[reply]
    Sorry, but to which you are referring? I do not understend your vote. Érico (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. André Koehne (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   André Koehne (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC) (Wikimedia needs no inquisitors, but who respects the community.)[reply]
  42. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Has made some 187 edits to Wikiversities, but none since 2012. Sorry for your loss! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Qewr4231 (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Braz Leme (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Braz Leme (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Agree with Alex Pereira, Nattur and Almondega. Partial, he protects certain users over others. Very dangerous to be steward![reply]
  45. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Too many politicians among his early creations Mathmensch (talk) 06:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. JSSX (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   JSSX (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC) He don't respect the decisions of the community of pt.wikipedia. He changed a internal politic of pt.Wikipedia to protect a sysop. He don't respect the privacy rights of other users in sites offwiki, like Facebook, for example. To do this things he has the protection of steward Teles and other friends.[reply]
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   CrazyD (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Tonton_Bernardo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Tonton_Bernardo (talk) - Falta de respeito. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Pedrohoneto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Not now. Pedrohoneto (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Caiaffa (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. OTAVIO1981 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   OTAVIO1981 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Saramag (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Saramag (talk) 11:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --ContributorQ (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   When I read this section and the affiliated comments, I say no. Brejnev (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Varina (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Imbericle (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Next Year maybe! Pratyya (Hello!) 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Experienced SWMT member, though recently not as much present as I'd expect a steward candidate to be. Furthermore, I'm not sure if running for stewardship so shortly after failing a request for checkuser rights is such a good idea. --Vogone (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Might be well suited in the future. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Largely per Vogone; some concerns but also has relevant experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per Vogone DCB (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Excellent candidate, I am just concerned with the lenght of the experience Caballero1967 (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jmvkrecords (Intra talk) 14:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   I liked working with Erico, but (s)he needs to show a sustained return to activity in order to get a support from me. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   EmreDuran (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016  --DerekvG (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Wetterwolke (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 17:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Avi (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Banfield - Reclamos aquí 23:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]