Stewards/Confirm/2014

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Amqui

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr-N, en-4, es-1, it-1 (mic/cr-0.5)
Personal info: I have issues in real life that I don't want to expose here. I'm confident I will come back one day, but I understand if people would vote against my confirmation. Thanks for everybody, Amqui (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC) Note: Prior to the statement's addition, users saw and commented on a placeholder statement.[reply]

Comments about Amqui

Keep the greatest user on Wikimedia. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has been completely inactive since October and did not even create his own statement. I also still hold Peter's view that not creating a confirmation statement should leave to removal, almost regardless of other things, as the user has had a full month to do so. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm OK with Amqui keeping the rights despite being unavailable right now; there could be some good real-life justification in this case. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (weak) if he wants to. My interactions with this user have been very positive, and I am very pleased with their work on- and off- wiki, but it is true he is not very active. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf, but I am open to changing my !vote if there is good justification for his absence. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I miss you! --Rs chen 7754 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove exact same as what Mh7kJ said. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove A very kind and reasonable user but nearly totally inactive as a steward, also already in the time when he still was active otherwise. --MF-W 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove November, December, January?--Ald™ (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, you should be more active. --Stryn (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Technically Amqui did run into the inactivity policy of stewards, although that policy does not seem to be in force.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are differing interpretations of the inactivity clause of the steward policy and I would say that given we hold yearly reconfirmations it's much easier to just handle it this way. Some day we should take a serious look at removing it. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 06:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active, even no statement created rubin16 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Too inactive, with only 39 log entries in 2013 and none in 2014. Plus you didn't write a statement. Techman224^Talk 19:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, Inactive. --Wiki13 _talk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I agree both sides--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as no issues with any of their work, though not making a confirmation statement seems tantamount to a resignation — billinghurst sDrewth 02:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove reasonable user but not very active. --Glaisher [talk] 04:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No statement created --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no statement = removal Laaknor (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral no statement, per Billinghurst. --Abd (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive + no statement --Golden_burg111 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per above. --Zerabat (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – stewards should be active. T C N7JM 03:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove1. Per Jasper Deng; 2. We have full En-3~En-N, and they're at least bilingual.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Great user but inactive steward. --Base (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Guycn2 (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 18:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove What Base said. And for sure I would have preferred voting something else here... :/ -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 21:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- We need active stewards which Amqui isn't. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per user req -FASTILY 12:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral not very active, but no issues with their work either; neutral due to the reason for his inactivity Trijnstel_talk 18:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove} per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Thanks for your work, Amqui, but I feel you haven't been active enough since your election to remain a steward for another year. I hope you'll someday get the chance to become more active again. Mathonius (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, give him a chance. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per AGF. Please become more active, Amqui. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He does a good job, even if is not very active for the moment. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Would be open to re-election with a half-year or more of sustained activity, but, like others have sad, good eprson, not active enough for the role. Courcelles 14:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cannot remember any mistakes. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm very confident about Amqui. A very serious and devoted contributor. He did a great job. Everyone can have personal issues that have consequences on its Wikimedia activity. --Deansfa (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive --Holder (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - per Snowolf. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Marcus Cyron --Gamma127 (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Remy34 (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive. Legoktm (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, sadly inactive. Jafeluv (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "real life" --KhabarNegar 12:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: Once again, I am pleased to see that the current body of stewards has, in the main, been able to support the corpus of Wikimedia projects relatively efficiently. I would like to continue supporting the projects as a steward, especially with global renames hopefully arriving this year, as I have years of experience with renames on my home wiki. I will also be serving as a member of the m:Ombudsman commission during 2014. Thank you for your past trust, and I hope to be able to continue to deserve it for this coming year.

Comments about Avraham

Remove I prefer ombudsmen not to serve as stewards during their OC term. Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active as a steward, no need to remove the rights for their term on OC I'd think. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Alan ^(talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stewards do more than just checkusers and oversights. The other activities stewards do are not private. Techman224^Talk 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone, OC activity should be independent from the activities it audits. Montgomery (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems. --Stryn (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Shou;d not be an ombusman while steward. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 22:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An excellent team member. This, that and the other (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no problems for me. Laaknor (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have seen us lose one of the best stewards over the alleged COI. --Abd (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't ever personally interacted with the user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though I hope Avi will restrain his activity until his OC term ends. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't think that the roles of steward and ombudsman are incompatible. However, it may be wise to drop the steward bit during your term to entirely focus on the ombudsman work. But it remains your choice ;) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No problem --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral only active around the confirmations, has too many buttons and isn't able to use them all (nothing against combi steward-OC) Trijnstel_talk 18:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- At second thought I was a bit harsh, so changed from remove -> neutral; my opinion still stands though. Trijnstel_talk 23:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per Vogone. Bernard (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TCN7JM. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems IMO, experienced enough, active enough. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although I am hostile to being both a steward and an OC member. Elfix 18:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vivaelcelta (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dan.- (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep although I'm not happy with stewards being ombudsman at the same time but if you stay kinda active, I'm fine. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
of course --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- per Vogone. Collecting positions is a big problem. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. OC doesn't require members to relinquish steward tools anymore, and there's still plenty of steward stuff Avi can do without conflict with the OC role. Jafeluv (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-4, fr-1
Personal info: This is my third steward confirmation, as I've been elected in 2011. I've been quite active during this year of services. I've used the steward tools for various purposes, such as helping with crosswiki deletions and blocks. I also dealt with vandalism and spam and locked and blocked many users and IPs. I also did some right changes, mainly to my own account to prevent more abuse and to remove abusive things, but also changed many other people's rights. I usually help everywhere, where help is needed, on IRC and also on-wiki. If you've any question, just ask me.

Comments about Barras

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, no concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seen him on wikitech, and many more.Ald™ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent steward, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with all comments above mine. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and no concerns with their work at all. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wonderful work, active, what's not to like? T C N7JM 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mahgue (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zieglhar (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Techman224^Talk 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 22:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm sure I disagree with this user on many levels, but he always promptly responds to calls for help fighting vandalism on smaller wikis, which is commendable. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John Vandenberg (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He's an excellent steward, and has exceptional judgment. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work Laaknor (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - JurriaanH (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most possible weakest Keep - There's no point in expressing my opinion, as I will get blown to bits. I do not like his handling at Simple, yet, I had some blame, but I really hated his response to a concern at Simple Wiktionary. But... keep, is where I'll go for now (I don't need to be embarrassed anymore) --Golden_burg111 16:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Unhelpful at Simple English Wiktionary, with no response to my questions, and has been a bit incivil. --Golden_burg111 17:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldenburg111: Where has he been uncivil? --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per DanielTom and similar experience (in both directions) --Abd (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 11:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For sure ! His opinion is quite often valuable and helpful to the team. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and always willing to help, easy choice Trijnstel_talk 18:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: helpful, knowledgeable, active. Mathonius (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Okeydokey. Elfix 18:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stepro (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You know that you're sometimes a bit heady but that doesn't prevent you from being a good steward, imo. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rus793 (talk) 05:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barras is one of the good guys. Jafeluv (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bencmq

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: zh, en-3
Personal info: Hi all, this is my second confirmation as a steward. It has been an honour to serve as a steward for the past two years and a half (roughly). I have been rather inactive during the later part of 2013, overwhelmed with real life commitments. I appreciate the community's trust in the past and I would like to continue serving the community this year. Hopefully I'll be back to active duty in a month or two. Thanks for your support.

Comments about Bencmq

Keep Vogone talk 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 19:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No problems since last time, active, trusted, etc. PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bencmq's activity levels have been historically pretty good and as such even a complete break since September is acceptable if he feels he will become active again in the near future. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If they think they'll be active again, that's enough for me. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John Vandenberg (talk) 09:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PiRSquared17. --Abd (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf. Risker (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't ever personally interacted with the user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hoping to see you return soon -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 12:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hopefully you'll be back soon, it's nice working with you :) Trijnstel_talk 18:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns whatsoever. Also per Trijnstel. Mathonius (talk) 11:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ok Elfix 18:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep that great gut. :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 16:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems active enough. Jafeluv (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 17:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--小躍 (talk) 10:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bennylin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: id, en-5, jv-3
Personal info: Hi, I would like to continue helping with steward duties for the next year if the community think that I have contributed as stewards for the past year. Thank you. Addendum: My past roles as stewards has been focused on SRs, and I also stand-by on steward's IRC channel on most days until couple months ago. If I'm confirmed again as a steward, I'm in the process of purchasing a new laptop to replace the broken one, and hopefully using my new machine I could be more active on IRC and answering requests.

Comments about Bennylin

Could you explain your nearly complete inactivity in the last few months? --MF-W 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- RL stress over the past 6+ months... Thanks for the question. ✒ Bennylin 13:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a very stable contributor aren't you, hehehe.Ald™ (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
:) Well, historically I used to have near above 90% attendance-contrib on my home wiki... but that contribution had been diversified to wikt, ws, meta, and jv projects lately... ✒ Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Activity levels are too low for my standards and have historically been on the low end of the spectrum. One month of the year with reasonable activity is not enough to justified continued access to the steward toolset, imo. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Activity is low. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Indonesian language skills are an advantage and I have found responsive to my requests through the year. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Wiki13 _talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sDrewth, it's good to have stewards with diverse skills. PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Alan ^(talk) 16:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PiRSquared17. periods of inactivity are not necessarily a problem. --Abd (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ --> Keep per Billinghurst, but share criticism with inactivity. --Golden_burg111 18:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- If I were to choose one highlight of last year, I'd pick this. Thank you for your input/concern. I'll try to expand my profile more. ✒ Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks. --Golden_burg111 23:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sDrewth, and for their presence on old Wikisource. --Zyephyrus (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral an inactive stew is very useless thing but I hope user will return to his past activity. --Base (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Like Base. Guycn2 (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 19:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I was about to vote remove, but the opinion of sDrewth makes me reconsider. Let's give him one more chance to be active ? -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- per sDrewth. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not very active, but his language skills (Indonesian) is useful and he responds pretty quickly to requests Trijnstel_talk 18:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Trijnstel. Armbrust (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reasonably active. Elfix 18:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Activity is low, but not yet inactive.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please become more active though. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not the most active steward we have, but always engaged and only 1 month with no steward action. Vogone talk 11:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this time, though I think more activity is needed going forward Courcelles 14:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep language skills are useful and is still active enough to keep the rights IMO. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems available enough for me. Jafeluv (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Billinghurst

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: I plan to continue in the role of steward, if the community is willing to confirm me. I have pretty much undertaken the tasks I said that I would, the majority of it in global spam defences. My mop has been active and consistent in my areas of strength, and I have undertaken activities in other areas as required. Stewards have worked cooperatively and respectfully; as a team sharing the work, sharing advice and requesting assistance as necessary, some robust discussions, and it continues to be a harmonious and pleasant group with whom to work, and I commend them for their passion, diligence and efforts. — billinghurst — billinghurst sDrewth

Comments about Billinghurst

Keep incredibly active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Alan ^(talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No serious concerns. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course. T C N7JM 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; rather active! --MF-W 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active with the spam blacklist and other steward activities. Certainly keep. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent work as a steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. --DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – active and competent, and more importantly, seems to have a good heart. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active, kind, helpful, respectable. Can I regard him as mentor? ;)--K egns 01:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- No issues. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, Nice and Hard Working. --Golden_burg111 16:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Evenhanded, stable, responsive. --Abd (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, he is one of the most active stewards and he did a good job. --Zerabat (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 06:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hard working steward. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No problem.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and strongly; hardworking, and the most active steward right now Trijnstel_talk 18:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course. Mathonius (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, he looks rather active. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, great work. Bernard (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, wears the Super Steward T-shirt with pride. Invaluable. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I'm against useless mass locks of "spambots" and thus I am not willing to see his term prolonged unless Billinghurst intends to change his rather liberal use of the lock button. Vogone talk 16:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I must say I do the same everytime I have the possibility. Maybe I missed your point but leaving tons of xrumer-generated accounts is, in best scenario, a breach of our security. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But I doubt you resist to unblock a mistakenly gblocked IP, which is what I mean with a, for my feeling, too liberal use of the buttons. Vogone talk 17:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I trust both you and Billinghurst so I'm pretty sure there's some misunderstanding. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Interested in the conjunction of ideas by Vogone, account locks are different from global IP blocks, so I am missing that point too, sounds personal. Apart from that the statements are an opinion not supported by fact. I have one of the highest block removal rates. Unblock requests are at SRG, open to all stewards, and visible to users, thoroughly reviewable. Show me a case where I have refused an unblock where I have mistakenly blocked an IP. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Contentwise I agree with Vogone. I don't get anything out of locking accounts with no edits who will most likely never edit either (I did that for hundreds of socks in January which were created months ago and will never edit which is why I still don't think that this has been quite useful for Wikimedia); that was completely different a couple of years ago when real spambots created hundereds of index.php pages crosswiki on a daily base. Anyway, it's your time and as long as it doesn't harm anyone, I'm the last one to tell you how to spend your time on. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And I am against pointless locking of spambot accounts. The issue is what is pointless? There are numbers of accounts that are locked with zero edits as they have been caught by the abuse filters. There are numerous accounts that are created and spam (and those that attempt to spam) on creation, there are those that are created and haven't spammed, until some of them spam one/two/three/.../six (day|months) later. When I investigating active spam, when I detect the other spambot accounts, 'lock them when you see them' is my approach, rather than go back and have to clean up their mess later. I certainly don't trawl the wikis looking for lonely spambot accounts. Similarly, we have some spambots that go xwiki, and some that do not, some chose to globally lock, and others do not. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think someone might say it's useless or almost useless but it is harmless for sure. I personally endorse lock on sight of software-generated accounts though the both views about it can peacefully live together ^^

I must also underline the "index.php attack" (along with the "test, just a test" series) was just the preparation of the current ongoing spamming. I don't see any decrease in spam but simply more effective countermeasures. We are currently experiencing a peaceful period in spam because of the strong actions taken by many people including the extraordinary efforts by Billinghurst, Trijnstel, INC, Beetstra, etc. Above all the aggressive spam-pit blocking campaign, the deep inspections on loginwiki, the reactive management of the abusefilter and the solid use of blacklists and COI-bots gave us the incredible results of managing 850 wikis with few then a dozen of incredible volunteers. I don't think any paid webmaster ever made such a complete success on so many *open* wikis. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - blocking for Blockcount - no thanks. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Rillke (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Activitity levels are a bit low— oh wait, those were thousands. Jafeluv (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. Keep. — Ivan Shmakov (d ▞ c) 10:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No problem.--KhabarNegar 12:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: Since my last confirmation (2013), I've been very active in dealing with spambot accounts and crosswiki vandalism/abuse. I hope to continue working with my fellow stewards (and new stewards) and also focus on more tasks (such as right changes, etc). --Bsadowski1 (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Bsadowski1

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Alan ^(talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and I have no serious concerns. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep certainly. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep T C N7JM 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; hardly steward activity beside spam-fighting, but ok. --MF-W 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! LlamaAl (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep obviously, by far exceeding any possible standards for an exemplary and outstanding steward in terms of activity Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns either Trijnstel_talk 18:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! It's a great pleasure having you as a fellow steward. Mathonius (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. Elfix 18:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep doing a lot of good stuff without any mistakes. Keep on doing that! —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 17:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. Does consistent useful work. Jafeluv (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
Personal info: Dear readers,
I'm one of the longest continuously serving stewards as I was elected back in December 2007. With my broad experience in handling steward actions, I'm not only dealing with almost all kinds of them (mostly via IRC) but also advise new stewards and help as a contact person between stewards, communities and developers. For that purpose, I created help pages and reports for the announced Single User Login finalisation in English and German, held a presentation about global administration at the German AdminConvention and about global administration and tools at Wikimania 2013 (last part by Hoo man; slides, video), had meetups with developers and functionaries involved, created a roadmap for that purpose etc. Looking back at my last year's confirmation page, I'm a bit disappointed in the progress of the SUL finalisation on the part of the Wikimedia Foundation but I'm confident that it will happen this year and I want to pull my weight.
Last year, my lower activity depended on my master thesis and participation in the Board of Wikimedia Germany. As the latter (besides others) frustrated me a bit, I decided to take a break in September and came back much more actively. Further, my Board term expired and I didn't step up again; additionally, I'll finish my master next month. In the last weeks, I occupied myself with CheckUser activities mostly on loginwiki (in what I was not as experienced as in Oversight rights that I hold on metawiki and which were one my main steward activities) and closed a difficult crosswiki CheckUser case in collaboration with German, French and English CheckUsers. Besides, a couple of German administrators requested a removal of their sysop rights on my user talk page and I granted this request according to our policy which caused a couple of uncontroversial steward actions on one of my homewikis.
Recently, I became a member of the steward election committee again (a job I did in the last couple of years too) and thus hope to approve some new fellows elected by the global community. I'd be happy to serve the community and my venerable fellows with my experience for the next term. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexer

Keep DerHexer's extensive experience as a steward is very much needed on the team, he has provided historical insight on past practices and their evolution over time many times in the past and is active and very competent. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DerHexer Der Amazing John F. Lewis (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove this is unaccaptable for a steward. JurgenNL (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just read through it with Google Translate and didn't see any problems. Each candidate was presented neutrally, and then with some pros and cons, and there were no personal attacks. What about this made you change from keep to remove, exactly? Is it the idea, or the actual text (which does not seem to be attacking anyone)? Is your decision based in policy or your own opinion? PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - To me that doesn't seem any different from giving a detailed rational when voting, and is often done by people in large elections. I prefer to give my rational on the voting page (or not at all when there's a closed ballot), but I'm not sure how this is so different. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sure. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WOW, almost 1K(845) action on January.--Ald™ (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I don't trust him. --►Cekli 829 20:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why? PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unexpected error is doing. For example, the following: [1] note that voting has not yet begun. --►Cekli 829 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm that would even deserve a keelhauling :D --Vituzzu (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One Member Election Committee should not make such mistakes. --►Cekli 829 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree: the eagerness to vote "Oppose", and his offensive "You're kidding us, aren't you?" comment, is both shocking and disappointing coming from a steward (not to mention a member of the Election Committee). ~ DanielTom (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree: Barras has done that offensive comment before, the "You're kidding" comment, which sickens me, but does not that much. I feel DerHexer has covered that comment. --Golden_burg111 17:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for once having lost my countenance when I saw this unpromising candidacy for the fifth time. Even though it's the truth, I should not have told it so rudely. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How can a sarcastic question be "the truth"? Vogone talk 16:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There was no sarcasm albeit impoliteness: It was as clear as mud that he would fail again, for the fifth time, as he still disrespects the community's unambiguous decision of the past years. I adhere to this view but regret my behaviour in edits and wording as this cannot change anything either. Which is why I am going to propose a limitation of candidacies. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All the issues which were brought up in the past were fixable and 1 year isn't that little time to do so. Thus, I don't understand why one needs to oppose without even awaiting the candidate's questions to possible answers etc. to see whether those issues have been fixed but rather to react in a bugged and impolite way. Whether a candidate has changed towards a good direction is something which should be evaluated by the community and not by eligibility limitations, in my opinion. And I clearly don't believe Cekli829 is trying to kid us but rather has some problems to understand the concerns raised and I don't think you have the right to constitute your assumption to be "the truth". Vogone talk 18:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with your view on his candidacies (and by renominating right after the last election he obviously has not fixed one issues which was raised the years before which I critized in a very rude, very impolite way on the wrong place, at the wrong time, in the wrong position) and kindly ask you for accepting my opinion. Besides, this is not the place to discuss limitations or Cekli's candidacy but my work in the past year and whether you trust me for another year. I can see my stupid mistake and regret my misbehaviour. Best regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ I do trust him Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove I'm sorry but this is a huge nono. Natuur12 (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Avi (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I always admired his work as a steward and looked up to him as a role model. Good luck. --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This, that and the other (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~--Wiki13 _talk 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Because of this I don't want to support you anymore for now. I don't want to vote vote for remove either, so this is between both. --Wiki13 _talk 12:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Mediatus (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep na gerade so ;) IW 16:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep everyone makes mistakes, DerHexer fixed his within 10 minutes. I wish everyone, including me, could be so swift. --Abd (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Golden_burg111 18:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove I don't think a user who types about other users in a public wiki is an acceptable candidates, per User:Natuur12 --Golden_burg111 22:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically, everyone commenting here is typing about other users in a public wiki. ;) Can you please explain why this is any different from just leaving a reason when supporting/opposing? Let me clarify: I respect your opinions. but don't see why this is a reason to oppose. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Risker (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I've only interacted with this user once or twice, but he seems like a great steward. T C N7JM 03:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't trust him, but whatever. Nixón (wop!) 04:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 06:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hopefully he's recalled that he shall be active. --Base (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I've been inactive? —DerHexer (Talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stadtbaumeister24 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Unterstrichmoepunterstrich (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I still love you ;-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krib (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, no reason to vote otherwise Trijnstel_talk 18:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! It's an honor and a pleasure working with you as a steward. Also per Snowolf. Mathonius (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all gut. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep+ @xqt 10:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bene* (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aschmidt (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wnme (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stepro (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cekli. --Nemo 22:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Chricho (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but in respect of Cekli829 reproach, I hope you will be a bit more neutral in discussions. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work, no complaints. Mach weiter so! :-) --Troubled @sset ^{Work • Talk • Mail} 10:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
rock in the storm still, as every year. --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- there`s no cause (OK, his mother would maybe say something other ;)) that speaks against him. One of the less Wikimedians, I really would call "friend". And that also because of his work and activity here. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- trusted. Stefan64 (talk) 16:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pankoken (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Na, klar! --Gamma127 (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep When reading this, it is obvious to me that he expresses his personal opinion. I do not always share it but that's no reason to remove the steward flag as requested by some users above. DerHexer did and will hopefully continue doing indispensable work in the WMF wiki farm. Thank you. -- Rillke (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --denny (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bubo 容 08:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Flugs (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, helpful and devilishly handsome. Jafeluv (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --PerfektesChaos (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shisha-Tom 16:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elfix

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr, en-3
Personal info: Hello! I would like to continue to serve as a steward. I was elected back in 2012. Most of the steward operations I have carried out here for the past two years were upon my own initiative or upon IRC requests. I do not plan to change my approach towards the steward tools, if the community is willing to support my confirmation. Elfix 17:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Elfix

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active John F. Lewis (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 20:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- Active user. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mais oui! Trijnstel_talk 18:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! Mathonius (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schlum ^{=^.^=} 12:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Authueil (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep haven't heard of any mistakes. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems here. Jafeluv (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 05:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J.delanoy

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: I apologize for my lateness in making my confirmation statement. I have given a lot of thought on whether to stand for reconfirmation this year or not. My activity level, while not terribly low in terms of raw actions, is admittedly quite erratic and sporadic. I think that I can still provide benefit to the project as a steward during those times that my real-life obligations allow me to participate here, but if people think that my activity levels are too low, I am willing to step down. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about J.delanoy

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep J.delanoy's activity levels are highly volatile, with generally half of the year of little to no activity, but they are significant enough for me to see a continued benefit in his rights being maintained. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Not as active as he once was but still active enough. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (weak support) --Alan ^(talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove; months of total inactivity, no thanks. --MF-W 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no problems with their actions, some more would be beneficial — billinghurst sDrewth 02:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (weak) more helping hands are needed but activity levels are concerning. --Glaisher [talk] 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove; months of total inactivity --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not active --Golden_burg111 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We need experienced stewards around, even if they only occasionally contribute. --Abd (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep support --►Cekli 829 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, inactive for some months = seems to not need steward rights. --Zerabat (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – the volatile activity doesn't concern me enough to oppose this confirmation, and the user has done otherwise well as a steward. T C N7JM 03:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 06:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep J. is indeed inactive half of the year, but is active enough to me the rest of the year. Considering his actions since 2010, he is not that inactive. If he wants to continue to serve as a steward, I'm certainly not going to stand in the way. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a little doubt as he's not that active, but no concerns with their actions either Trijnstel_talk 18:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with Quentinv57. Mathonius (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ajraddatz. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reasonably active in the past 12 months, that's enough for me. Elfix 18:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have some very small concers with low activity and with being more active close to elections. However, he does a good job when around.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately, never seen before.--Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, when active Courcelles 14:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
continues to have my trust --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very useful steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Harald Søby

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: I am not seeking confirmation as a steward. When I was elected last year, I thought I would have a lot of time for steward tasks, but this turned out not to be true, and I have not had the time to do what I was supposed to do. So, to my fellow stewards: best of luck; and as always: see you at Wikimania! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Jon Harald Søby

Thank you for your years of service! Rs chen 7754 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work as Steward. --Alan ^(talk) 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A pity that you didn't become active in this "term", but thanks for having volunteered in the last election and for stepping down in this calm way. --MF-W 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work as a steward, and I hope to see you continue to be active in other parts of Wikimedia. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On March you perform 6 action, you tried your best, Thank you for all your work as steward.Ald™ (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanx! MoiraMoira (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Thanks for your work as Steward. Success in their work. --►Cekli 829 21:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for work!--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much!! -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your previous work. Wishing you the best in your life. --Meno25 (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No norwegian stewards any more? :( Laaknor (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Come back if you can! --Abd (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work. Congrats! --Zerabat (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Best wishes to you. Thank you for your work, which has spanned many years and many areas. Risker (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service John. Best on luck on future endeavors. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 04:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Laaknor.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Please..... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Guycn2 (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your years of service. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the work you've done as a steward ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work as a steward. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. Trijnstel_talk 18:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help as a steward! Good luck in your future endeavours. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Quite sad. Would have liked to see you active again. Thanks for your help in the past! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
we owe you a lot, Jon; please, continue in orbit more broadly and best of luck :) --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{keep}} -jkb- 20:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)~~ oh Jon, I have just seen your notice above - thank you much for your serving us! -jkb- 20:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to see you around! Legoktm (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! for your work. Hoping you come again some day. -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your wørk as a steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jusjih

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: zh-hant, zh-hans-3, en-3, fr-1
Personal info: Hello everyone. Natively using traditional Chinese, I became a steward in December 2007. In the past year, I mostly processed Steward requests/Bot status and Steward requests/Permissions, while also checking on other steward requests. Always remembering my role in the wiki community, I look forward to serving the wiki for another year. Leaving a message to my Meta talk page will also email me a notice of its posting.--Jusjih (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Jusjih

Keep Only concern is a lack of activity, but he's still active enough to do a good job. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Lack activity. --Alan ^(talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Activity levels throught the year have been incredibly low, not even one month with more than 10 actions. Sorry, but I see no need for the steward toolset. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues with their actions taken, language skills useful — billinghurst sDrewth 02:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He opened de-adminship request on ko.wikisource (see s:ko:위키문헌:관리자 선거/Caffelice (De-adminship)), and then he requested removal of this user's Admin and Crat access on Jan 2013 (See here). At that moment, AAR was not a policy, and he should have communicated with kowikisource community first before filing De-adminship request or requesting other stewards to his rights to be removed. —레비 Revi 04:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the problem. He filed a request for de-adminship, and then requested it to stewards. Inactivity policies were not involved, but rather the community decided to desysop (I think). PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All support wothout 배우는사람 were not an active contributor of kowikisource(they had -50 contributions as of now and when the vote started), but an active contributor of kowiki. Because they are not actively contributing to kowikisource, it cannot be real community decision. —레비 Revi 05:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But does kows have criteria for voters in there? --Base (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, Inactive. --Wiki13 _talk 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for his work on en.wikiquote, though I don't always agree with his positions. ~ DanielTom (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive at enwikiquote. --Golden_burg111 16:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DanielTom. However, if removed, thanks to this steward for his efforts. --Abd (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep support --►Cekli 829 19:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters ^msg 22:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, low activity level, but at least do a few actions every month. --Zerabat (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – Barely active with the steward toolset. T C N7JM 03:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I know you're 3rd Chinese Steward, however you're too inactive. BTW how about sysop of PhiLiP.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive steward = useless steward. Useless steward = remove. Sad. --Base (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Jusjih focuses on user rights requests. That's why he has not as much actions as stewards locking tons of spambots. As far as I know there were no problems with the actions taken. Like most people in favour of removal, I'd like to see Jusjih more active, but I'm not opposing at this stage. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Quentinv57. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Quentinv57 Trijnstel_talk 18:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Armbrust (talk) 05:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I see no inactivity, but low activity. If that is the ammount or work he want to give us as volunteer, I wouldn't even require more activity from him as all I see is a benefit from having him as a stwward.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Teles here. Vogone talk 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive Courcelles 15:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to compensate Base's quite rude comment. People are never useless. No matter if they are inactive or just rarely active on Wikimedia. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC) full trust[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concerns with limited recent activity. -FASTILY 09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Quentinv57 put it quite well. Concerns about activity level, but not enough to oppose confirmation. Jafeluv (talk) 13:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because he has continous activity over the year, while others are absent for months and still get nearly only confirm votes. --MF-W 18:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I see no inactivity, but low activity. That is the amount of work as volunteer,--KhabarNegar 11:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jyothis

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: 2013 was a very busy year in the real life and my main contribution was in being available on the IRC channel for emergencies and global locks and blocks to help CV fellows. If the community trusts me with the tools, I would like to continue for another year in the role and work with the community.

Comments about Jyothis

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Alan ^(talk) 19:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Would like to see more activity, but it's constant and enough to justify continued access to the steward toolset. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 21:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral no problems, may review and change this comment. --Abd (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep support and trust --►Cekli 829 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, tendency to Keep. Guycn2 (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Because we also need wise people in our team -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Golden_burg111 01:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fine by me Trijnstel_talk 18:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! Mathonius (talk) 11:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good Elfix 18:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 15:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this great guy. :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 14:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, continuously useful. Jafeluv (talk) 13:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leinad

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: This steward did not create their confirmation page before the start of the comment phase. Page created on behalf of the Election Committee by Snowolf

Comments about Leinad

Remove No statement and only 2 actions this year. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove completely inactive this year except for 2 actions, did not create his own confirmation statement. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive. --Alan ^(talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above John F. Lewis (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, inactive. T C N7JM 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove JurgenNL (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, total inactivity. --MF-W 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Only 2 action for user right per November.Ald™ (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, too inactive. Techman224^Talk 19:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Snowolf. odder (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why? Is there a time limit? Then get automatic Confirm... --►Cekli 829 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove seems to have disappeared, no statement is not a good sign — billinghurst sDrewth 02:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per others. --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per others. --Wiki13 _talk 10:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Abd (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Golden_burg111 18:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Goldenburg111: What is so funny? Vogone talk 18:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vogone: Sorry... I thought it was some random newbie... --Golden_burg111 23:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, inactive as steward. --Zerabat (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Removeper above, especially PER VOGONE.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- No statement. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I don't care about statements but user shall not be completely inactive. But he unfortunately is. --Base (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - not inactive... Guycn2 (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean just "inactive"? Not being inactive is basically the same as being active, which is not a reason to remove. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove only because of no statement.--Jusjih (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above, sadly. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I see no reason to support him per Vogone.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He already got enough opposes... sad that he's this inactive. Trijnstel_talk 18:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Leinad is inactive not only as steward, but also as editor, sysop, bureaucrat (on pl wiki; I don't know how about CU). For me it is obvious: no activity = no flags. Einsbor (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. Armbrust (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity. Thanks for offering help tough.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I don't think statements are that important, but he's completely inactive. Defender (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove because of inactivity. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Who is he?.. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Didn't create statement, this should be an automatic removal. Courcelles 15:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Will loose his rights due to our policy, what a pity. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- he don't want to be longer Steward Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -FASTILY 09:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, inactive. Jafeluv (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Who is he?--KhabarNegar 11:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

M7

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-3, it, de-1, es-1, fr-1
Personal info: I am a Steward since 2006 and I'm willing to continue this service for another year. I plan to be slightly more active at least in dealing with RfP and in fighting cross wiki issues. I follow the mailing list and monitor meta.wiki logs and RfP page. I also can be reached on meta user talk page, that is set to E-mail me when changed. [Adde]: on last December I sent an application to serve the Ombudsman Commission and it has been accepted for next term, so there will be an interesting and entirely new set of problems, luckily well supported by other expert members of the commission. To enable better communication, I have restored my IRC client, also there my nick is "m7" (wikipedia/m7).

Comments about M7

Remove I prefer ombudsmen not to serve as stewards during their OC term. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fine by me. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Became active again and has valuable experience. --MF-W 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The significant bump in M7's activity last month is, I hope, an indication of things to come, for I would not be supporting continued access to the steward toolset otherwise. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Be more active this year :) --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Ombudsmans should not be also stewards. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 14:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep prefer to keep Ombudsmen if they use rights with caution. No problems noted. --Abd (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always been much more than correct and wise --g (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Golden_burg111 00:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I've encountered M7 a few times while I was doing antivandalism work on the Simple English Wikipedia. Have no reason to believe given my limited interactions with him along with basic preliminary research that he should be removed from stewardship. T C N7JM 03:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I agree with Vogone. Ombudsmen should not be stewards while he is ombudsmen... —레비 Revi 06:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Delfort (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 (talk) 13:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't think that the roles of steward and ombudsman are incompatible. However, it may be wise to drop the steward bit during your term to entirely focus on the ombudsman work. But it remains your choice ;) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Quentinv57 for your words of encouragement in this new work. Actually, when I submitted my application, I wrote Maggie that I was aware that, in the past, Stewards were requested to abstain and that my right would have removed and eventually restored at the end of the term. When selected, I have been told that the WMF requires to abstain in any case where the role as a steward may constitute a conflict of interest. Since my main activity is dealing with users' permission grant and removal, and I give a hand with countervandalism, I can definitely avoid CU and OS activities. Stewards, noted Maggie, are many more than OC commissioners but have various different requests, and sometimes it's useful to have somebody around. In any case, I am committed in making clear notes in order to allow other people to fully understand any use of tools; the whole wiki community counts on your and other fellow Stewards careful supervision of the logs. Ciao, M/ (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Thank you for your answer. I'm more concerned about the workload that comes with the ombudsman status than about the possible conflicts of interest. To me, if you really take on the ombudsman responsability and keep the steward bit too, you will have a lot of work for 2014. Anyway, thanks for volunteering on this. And good luck if you still want to hold concurrently the two statuses :) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fine by me (nothing against combi steward-OC) Trijnstel_talk 18:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good (despite the OC role). Elfix 18:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep although I'm not happy with stewards being ombudsman at the same time but if you stay kinda active, I'm fine. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- per Vogone. Collecting positions is a problem at Wikimedia projects. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 05:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, per the Ombudsmen/ Steward conflicts raised above - Hoo man (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mardetanha

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fa, az, en, tr-2
Personal info: This year my activity was in moderate-level, and I assume I can do my job for another year, I have been available on IRC almost most of the year to handle emergencies situation specially those requested on IRC, With the communities trust, I wish to serve community next year. Mardetanha ^talk 08:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mardetanha

Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --►Cekli 829 19:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The activity levels are on the low end of the spectrum, but consistent. I would like to see more activity in the coming year. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 21:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep language skills useful — billinghurst sDrewth 02:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Billinghurst and Snowolf. --Zerabat (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Never personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Though I would like to see more actions this year. LlamaAl (talk) 03:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--danghula (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
KeepSicaspi (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mehran^Debate 09:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Kasir ^talk 10:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--ماني (talk) 10:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep H.Fatemi 10:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not very active but a Farsi speaking steward can't hurt Trijnstel_talk 18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep بشرزاد (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dan.- (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not incredibly active but still continuously involved. Vogone talk 11:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, haven't heard of any mistakes. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good luck! In fact ( contact ) 04:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Vogone. Jafeluv (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Though I would like to see more actions this year, up the good work! I would like to see more activity in the coming year. , good luck!--KhabarNegar 11:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he
Personal info: Hello, I have been at the same activity level this year: (links: steward activity, Meta logs), mainly anti-vandalism and SRP requests. A nice graph is available here. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year, (if you still want me around). questions and comments are welcome. best Matanya (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sensible. --MF-W 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, sure. --►Cekli 829 21:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is helpful on irc request when urgent.--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is extremely fast and is usually available on IRC for dealing with emergencies. --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Neukoln (talk) 09:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hi --Golden_burg111 18:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good job. --Zerabat (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Active, good work. T C N7JM 03:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. PiRSquared17 (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 07:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure ! Active steward who does a good work dealing with urgent requests on IRC. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep certainly! Trijnstel_talk 22:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I appreciate your dedication, and great work as a steward! Also per Hosiryuhosi. Mathonius (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Okay Elfix 18:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this great guy. :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 17:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
naturally :) --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hosiryuhosi--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work this year... QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and useful. Jafeluv (talk) 13:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Puppet herder! - Hoo man (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mathonius

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1, af-1
Personal info: I was elected a year ago, so I'm up for confirmation for the first time. My work as a steward is mainly focused on dealing with spambots and the occasional cross-wiki vandals. I'm happy with the amount of work I've done in the past year, although I've been less active since (roughly) August 2013 due to other obligations. I'd love to continue my work as a steward, and I'm very interested in hearing what you think. Please feel free to ask any questions you might have. Mathonius (talk) 01:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mathonius

Keep Ik moet een steward hebben om te knuffelen. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! LlamaAl (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He was very active before August and I hope will continue to be in 2014. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LlamaAl used the reason I was going to. Definitely! Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Absolutely! -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mattie! JurgenNL (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 21:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Superrrrrr Mathonius, and of course per JurgenNL. Southparkfan 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - JurriaanH (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no problem... --Golden_burg111 16:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep helpful work on en.Wikiversity! --Abd (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - helpful cross-wiki, maintains a high level of activity, and has done an excellent job as a steward. Sportsguy17 (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I thought I already commented here, but I guess I didn't. No concerns. T C N7JM 03:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 07:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, mainly based on the endorsements above (I don't think I've came across your work as a steward at all, so I have to rely on the opinions of better-informed people). AGK [•] 18:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mijn wederhelft ;-) dank voor jouw hulp het afgelopen jaar! Trijnstel_talk 22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All good Elfix 18:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with no doubt. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on your good work! —DerHexer (Talk) 17:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Does important work. Jafeluv (talk) 13:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, mainly based on the endorsements above (I don't think I've came across your work as a steward at all, so I have to rely on the opinions of better-informed people). --KhabarNegar 11:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 15:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: Hello again. It has been a busy year for me on the projects and in real-life. I am glad to see my fellow Stewards have been active on the projects and hope they too have balanced it with their real-life commitments. With the continued hope for SUL finalization, I believe I still have something to contribute to the community as a Steward and seek confirmation to pursue that particular task, in addition to the other duties and responsibilities of Stewardship. Also, while not a frequent task, I think my ability to process requests involving small wikis and en.wiki with a single action (because of my local cratship) is a continuing benefit in the pre-finalization period. Please feel free to approach me here or on my talk page with any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MBisanz

Keep MBisanz's area of expertise (renames) is likely to be a focus in the coming year (hopefully global rename will be a reality) and his expertise will be very needed then. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Snowolf John F. Lewis (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, fine. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral no problem, just want to review before finalizing. --Abd (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has done great work as a steward and as a 'crat at enwiki. Sportsguy17 (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK support --►Cekli 829 19:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't personally interacted with MBisanz, but have seen nothing but good work from the user. T C N7JM 03:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I'm sorry but the finalization after a year of expecting sounds as a myth for me and on the other hand I do see low and descending activity during the last year. --Base (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is the forthcoming SUL Finalisation process mythical? AGK [•] 18:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surely he refers to the fact that the SUL finalisation was initially announced by the WMF to happen last year already, but then got delayed and still has no clear schedule for when it finally will be done. --MF-W 04:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf Trijnstel_talk 18:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns with your work. Also per Snowolf. Mathonius (talk) 11:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All good Elfix 18:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quite inactive and pretty low availability in the last months, it's also not like he's the only steward with expertise in dealing with rename requests but since there don't seem to be any problems with his actions and he was at least a bit more active in the first half of the year i'm not going to suggest a removal of his access. Vogone talk 11:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
sure --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- but please learn at least one second language. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf —DoRD talk 15:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Snowolf. Jafeluv (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "hope they too have balanced it with their real-life commitments" --KhabarNegar 12:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melos

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, en
Personal info: Hi, like last year I haven't been certainly the most active steward for number of actions but however I've guaranteed my presence. This year will bring me much more free time with the possibility to spend more time in fighting crosswiki abuse, spambots and vandalisms. I'm happy to serve with the usual passion the community and for this reason I hope I will be confirmed also this year as a Steward. --Melos (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Melos

Keep --Aplasia (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Became active again and has valuable experience. --MF-W 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" Keep --Alan ^(talk) 19:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Great user, but the activity levels have been disappointing. Only two months with 10 actions or more is too low for my standards and 5 months of absolutely zero actions indicate to me a lack of need for retained access to the steward toolset. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues with actions, and says more active coming — billinghurst sDrewth 02:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sDrewth. --Glaisher [talk] 04:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Activity concerns me a bit. I didn't want to vote remove. --Wiki13 _talk 10:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Snowolf. Érico Wouters ^msg 22:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --g (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Zerabat (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – If he says he'll be more active, I trust him. T C N7JM 03:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Delfort (talk) 10:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf as well. --Base (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 (talk) 13:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Low activity alone should not remove.--Jusjih (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Melos has indeed been much inactive last year, but he can take a pause as he serves the community as a steward since 2010. I'm confident he'll return to a normal level of activity in the next few months. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep was indeed not so active, but I believe Melos when he says he will become more active this year :) Trijnstel_talk 22:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Trijnstel. Armbrust (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Activity is irregular throughout the past 12 months, but that's no concern to me. Elfix 18:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please become more active though. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Almost no presence in steward areas during the past term, at least not openly visible. But since he seems to return to a moderate level of activity I'm okay with him serving for another term. Vogone talk 11:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reasoning per Vogone. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kal-El ^{drop me a line!} 18:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 19:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per inactivity.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Low activity alone should not remove. also this year as a Steward. --KhabarNegar 11:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mentifisto

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, mt, it-2
Personal info: Hi there. I'm usually 'passively' around (handling the more background tasks, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around - being a lover of the night helps). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL. Ultimately, I'd be unable to objectively judge whether my level of activity is sufficient, or whether my actions are adequate - so I'll leave this for you to decide! :-) -- Menti fisto 16:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mentifisto

Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf, I don't have any concerns. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Activity has dropped off severely over the past few months but I don't see a reason to believe they will become fully inactive. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean last summer? Everyone needs a holiday at one point or another! ;-) -- Menti fisto 21:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, certainly. -Mh7kJ (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 02:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 10:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 02:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Nice work. T C N7JM 03:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't like low activity in last months but here I do hope that user will return to high activity. --Base (talk) 12:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns Trijnstel_talk 22:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns whatsoever. Mathonius (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alright Elfix 18:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another steward to cuddle. :-P Vogone talk 11:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trustworthy user. Jafeluv (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MF-Warburg

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-N, en-3, fr-1, tet-1, la-1, es-1
Personal info: After I was elected last year, I was, I think, quite active in steward areas. I handled requests on all steward requests pages, but especially right requests, global blocks and locks, SUL conflict solving and username changes. I'm also still active in the SWMT, blocking and locking spambots and vandals out of my own initiative or per requests on IRC. Although I have recently for real-life reasons not been able to be online on IRC as frequently as before anymore, I'm still available there and belong to those stewards who run the stewardbot project (soon on Labs, yes, yes). I'm also involved in the Admin activity review and stewards' OTRS queue.

Comments about MF-Warburg

Keep Akzeptabel. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, does invaluable work on the inactivity review process, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because. --Rs chen 7754 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes! --Alan ^(talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active user who is involved in (almost) every steward area and does a good work with the tools. LlamaAl (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agreeing with all comments above mine. Of course! PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above messages John F. Lewis (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, duh. T C N7JM 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, abuse. --Stryn (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I don't trust him. --►Cekli 829 20:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why? PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this mistake decision were. --►Cekli 829 19:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Cekli829: do you know that the "translator" group is only needed if you are going to translate in the MediaWiki namespace? Even though you previously had "translator" privileges, you have 0 edits to the MediaWiki ns. In addition, your nomination and replies to questions did not indicate that you understood that "translator" rights are only for MediaWiki namespace translations. Your answer to a question asking for examples of pages you would use it to translate did not include any MW ns pages. Sorry, but I think MF-W did not make a mistake here; In fact, I think I would have done the same in this situation. Since most messages are on translatewiki.net, where you are already a translator, I really do not see the need for this right. Is there a specific message or group of messages in the MediaWiki namespace of incubator.wikimedia.org that you want to translate? I also think do not think it is good to judge a user based on a single incident such as this. PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Have you been able to convince me. I agree with you. --►Cekli 829 06:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 22:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Rarely active on cu-l, and one of those few emails made it sound like spambot-related reports to the list are annoying to him. Spambot activity is a serious problem, and stewards shouldn't be discouraging the reporting of spambots and their ranges, directly or indirectly, or ignoring them. INeverCry 22:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote to cu-l once after a day on which you had flooded it with dozens of mails about spambots data; and asked for ways to be able to better sort such e-mails etc. That is because 1.) I often access my e-mail from mobile phone and then can't go to lock the spambots you mail about anyway; 2.) I have found it to be rather pointless to lock most of the spambots, as most of them are of such a configuration that they make exactly one edit and never do anything else again. This I have found to be so after I have checkusered and locked lots of spambots & blocked their IPs since I became a steward. I still do such actions, but many locks are actually of little use. --MF-W 23:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dozens? That's not true. I may have posted a few emails and got responses, but I've never posted more than 3 or 4 emails to that list in one day. You're the only steward who posted such an email, and you rarely post or respond there at all. The tone of your email wasn't exactly respectful or considerate either. As for spambots, if you're saying locking IPs/ranges is of little use, you're wrong. I've seen many times when ranges are spammy cross-wiki and over long periods of time. Also, if these get locked, how would you know how many spambot creations that stops? I've even seen quite a few ranges/IPs where spambot activity has continued after blocks and locks have expired. Spambots are going to use available proxies wherever they can be found, so why not lock IPs and ranges with repeated abuse? INeverCry 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's not possible to lock IPs. I still think blocking abused IPs is of use. --MF-W 23:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I said lock instead of block. You scored a point. INeverCry 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you think a steward should be removed based on a single disagreement? I think MF-W's dedication to fighting spam is well established, regardless of whatever disagreement on CU-l you two might have had... Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do a huge ammount of work with spambots, and I didn't appreciate having my posting to cu-l about it ridiculed and made to look less important by this steward. INeverCry 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that you do a lot of work with spambots and that you didn't appreciate MF-W's comments, but if I may offer you a word of advice, I've often not appreciated comments directed at me by others, including other stewards, fellow enwiki admins, and whatnot, but that doesn't mean that they were any less suited for the job :) The yearly confirmations are a good occasion to offer constructive criticism to stewards, and we all welcome that, but I think you might be throwing out the baby out with the bathwater here :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Having someone make me feel unwelcome on an email list for checkusers by complaining about my emails, and then to have this backed up with an untrue and dismissive response like the one above is concerning to me. INeverCry 23:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 10000000% per Vogone. Southparkfan 23:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please be mindful of INeverCry's criticism here. I really hope you're not brushing them off as "abusive" (to everyone else - "abusive" is a common SWMT joke that perhaps should be credited to this candidate).--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have no intention or reason whatsoever to think that constructive criticism of actions of me or of things I wrote is abusive. It's hard however to put up with comments that claim that I am somehow opposed to fighting spambots when I have locked, CUd, blocked the IPs & deleted the contribs of many of them. --MF-W 19:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – one of the few sane people here. ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep without a doubt. His work as a steward and LangCom member is phenomenal. This, that and the other (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per INeverCry, --Golden_burg111 18:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 07:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- too busy to answer simple questions [2] (as we know from Steggalfiisch: this is not the only example of inappropriate avoidance behavior) --Schmei (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, I simply forgot to answer there. --MF-W 19:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And I hope you'll return to your activity of first months because last months weren't as good. --Base (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the good work ! :) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 06:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Best regards, --Midnight Gambler (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep proved to be useful, thanks for your help the past year Trijnstel_talk 18:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. For all I know, we've found a good solution for the CU-l issue, though I understand some of INeverCry's concerns. Anyway, I think it's a great pleasure working with you. Keep up the good work! Mathonius (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oh yeah! Elfix 18:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Should be okay. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, excellent work. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sargoth (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stepro (talk) 22:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Na ich weiß ja nicht … manchmal etwas allzu wild, gell? :-P Na gut, gerade so noch Keep ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
top --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good luck! In fact ( contact ) 04:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --denny (talk) 17:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Consistently active steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--M Zaplotnik ^(contribs) 22:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Shisha-Tom 16:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en, fr
Personal info:
I won't continue as a steward after this traditional final confirmation, so I'll no longer be a steward as of 28 February 2014. In recent years my contributions have shifted entirely to development, and the introduction of OAuth means I no longer need steward access to continue the Synchbot service. I'll still be around as a non-steward. :) (My usual confirmation statement follows for historical context.)

I have been an active steward since 2006. In recent years my activity has shifted to technical development: I maintain several tools for stewards (such as StewardScript, stewbot, stalktoy, stewardry, and crossactivity), maintain accounteligibility for the elections, and use my steward access to run the Synchbot service. (Synchbot enables global CSS and JavaScript by synchronising user pages across all Wikimedia wikis; I have handled 514 Synchbot requests for 243 users since 2008.)

Historically, I wrote the standard bot policy and maintained the global bot list, wrote much of the steward handbook, coded and maintained many of the templates used on steward pages, and performed various steward tasks as shown in the recentlogs. See my user page for information on my non-steward contributions.

Comments about Pathoschild

Thank you for your years of service! Rs chen 7754 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pathoschild's years of service have been very valuable, and I hope he sticks around still. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to see you go. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work and help as Steward. --Alan ^(talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work here. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service as a Steward. I didn't interact with you all too often, but you did help me in modifying all my global userpages and user talk pages with that script. T C N7JM 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work as steward. JurgenNL (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanx! MoiraMoira (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nevertheless in honour of his countless lasting effects! --MF-W 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in case you change your mind.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your steward work! And Keep in case you change your mind. — Danny B. 21:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping, Keep per Jasper Deng--DangSunM (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for all of your work; you will be missed. -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep against user's wishes. MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service as a steward. --Glaisher [talk] 05:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work over the years. Wishing you the best in your life. --Meno25 (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work over the years :) Laaknor (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes, just in case. I've watched your work for years, and it was excellent. --Abd (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for having served as a steward here. I've always admired your ability to delicately balance the task of administering and maintaining several Wikimedia wikis as a steward combined with your technical expertise on the MediaWiki software. I hope you continue the work, especially on the technical side on mediawiki.org, to support Wikimedia in any form. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Best wishes to you in the future. Thank you for all that you have done over the years. Your work here has been invaluable. Risker (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Pathos. The work you did for the project as a steward will never be forgotten. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 04:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Please..... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. --Base (talk) 12:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Guycn2 (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to see you go, but pleased that you're leaving on a good note. Thank you for your years of service. AGK [•] 18:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in case you reconsider. Thank you for your excellent work. LlamaAl (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the work you've done here ! We'll certainly miss you... -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if you change your mind. Thank you for your work. Defender (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work; hopefully you'll stay around a bit, and good luck IRL! Trijnstel_talk 22:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work as a steward. Mathonius (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for being so helpful!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please don't go... But thanks for your service. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your work! --Stepro (talk) 22:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and thank you. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep his access forever. :-D Thanks for your help over the past years and happy to see you around. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thank you; for lots of things --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your work. --Holder (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work, your tools and your help! -- Rillke (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sincerely thank you for your help.--miya (talk) 00:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
:( Legoktm (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your great work over the years. Jafeluv (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pundit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl, en-4, ru-1, de-1
Personal info: Hello, this year has been busy for me at work (I've finished my book on Wikipedia), and in wiki-life, too, as I've been very active on the Funds Dissemination Committee. I've made a minor increase in my activity as a steward, but it is far from desired. I hope to do better, definitely. My activities as a steward included also one more minor (but uncountable) item, that is a little bit of coordination of communication of stewards with the WMF (I've attempted to collect feedback and requests in February and in December, with a subsequent IRC conference of developers and stewards). In the future, I would like to do a bit more of that as well, if fellow stewards find it useful. Pundit (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Pundit

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit's activity levels are never very high, and I would love to see him around more, but he is active enough and has done valuable work in coordination between the WMF and the Stewards. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not very active and also from this "background work" I have never seen much effect. --MF-W 19:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" keep Good but low activity level. --Alan ^(talk) 20:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not nearly active enough for my liking, and I trust MF-Warburg on the behind-the-scenes part of his activities. Trying to be consistent with my 2012 vote. odder (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit conflict] Remove mostly per MF-Warburg (and Snowolf). I appreciate he tried to be a bit more active after last year's confirm round but the experience accumulated is still not enough to be able to supersede the concerns about the inability to judge/confirm trust in his work as steward (please let's not have the same discussion again, one time is enough). I always stick to a principle of fair treatment of the stewards pool during confirmation, so I'll check the situation better towards the end of the commenting period to confirm my personal conclusion. --Nemo 23:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral it is meant to be working role, not a policy space — billinghurst sDrewth 03:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (weak) per others. --Glaisher [talk] 05:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Wiki13 _talk 11:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove eh? --Golden_burg111 18:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no harm, possible benefit --Abd (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I trust him. --►Cekli 829 19:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – If he says he'll try to be more active, I trust him. No concerns otherwise. T C N7JM 03:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Snow keep pile up? --Piotrus (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive. I don't see what WMF, FDS and whatever stuff like this has to do to stew's service. --Base (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. AGK [•] 19:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral In my opinion, he hasn't been active enough at a technical point of view to keep the buttons. I'm not opposing because of the efforts to coordinate with the WMF staff, which I appreciate. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Whilst I respect Pundit and the work he does, the fact he clearly has acted when canvassed on English Wikipedia (as per this) turns my positive view on Pundit as a steward into a negative. Sorry mate, really, it was sloppy of you to respond to private canvassing by Piotrus. Russavia (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry mate, I respect your vote, but not its explanation - I also think you could ask first, and jump to conclusions later. I know Piotrus as a researcher (and value his works) and I met him in HKG. I hardly ever weigh in in RfAs at en-wiki, mainly because I do so only when I have an opinion or know the candidate, which is rare. But I do follow my watchlist daily. Piotrus has a snowball chance of success in his RfA (and I understand people who vote against him, as he does seem to have a dark past; although from years ago). But I seriously doubt if he would lower to votes canvassing (and he has not asked me to vote for him neither). Pundit (talk) 11:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I have spoken to Pundit about this, and he guarantees me he was not canvassed. Given other canvassing by Piotrus, and not being entirely active on en.wp, it is understandable why this was thought. Given Pundit's words to myself, I am "positive" about him, so no need to oppose on that basis at this time :) Russavia (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf Tar Lócesilion|queta! 12:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per MF-Warburg. Érico Wouters ^msg 22:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf Trijnstel_talk 22:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf and AlanL. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reasonably active and friendly. Elfix 18:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I never thought of the main wings of Meta's technocracy as mutually exclusive and Pundit has not given me reason to change that view at this stage. --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf Ankry (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Legoktm (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concerns with limited recent activity -FASTILY 09:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per sDrewth --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quentinv57

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr-N, en-3, de-1
Personal info: Hi everybody ! Elected steward in 2011, I've been mainly involved in fighting against vandalism and spambots, which includes the development of some bots and tools to help the community on a global basis. Being recently busy, I wasn't as much active in the last few months than before, and will not be able to return to my previous level of activity soon. I am currently migrating my tools and IRC bots to Wikimedia Labs. Once it is done, I'll be happy to continue to deal with steward stuff. Thanks for your continuous support ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Quentinv57

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quentinv57's has been inactive for some time, but they've always been very communicative about it and when active they are very active. I am sure that they will return to full activity as soon as possible and the projects will benefit from that. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Variable activity, but still active enough. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While I do admit Quentin has become wholly inactive; he is slowly working on becoming active again. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agreeing with comments above. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, sure. --►Cekli 829 20:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and serious — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per John F. Lewis --Glaisher [talk] 05:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. SM ** =^^= ** 13:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep who is this, Quentinv or QuiteUnusual? :P --Golden_burg111 16:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Active enough for my liking. T C N7JM 03:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep irregular activity but enough. --Base (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the developer of sulutil:.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Calak (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nice to see you around a bit more :) Trijnstel_talk 22:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a great pleasure working with you. Also per Snowolf. Mathonius (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Elfix 15:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schlum ^{=^.^=} 12:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Are you that guy from ragnarok online?.--AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 22:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not. I didn't even know this game. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this great guy! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 17:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, shame you've been busy, but always great when you are around. QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Rillke (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --denny (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sème la zizanie : Planet_Wikimedia/Discussions_concernant_fr.planet - Drongou (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coyote du 86 (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, certainly. Jafeluv (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see no reason to oppose him. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Being busy", Wow! a human being.--KhabarNegar 11:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 15:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

QuiteUnusual

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, fr-2
Personal info: This is my first confirmation as I was elected in 2013. During the year I've been reasonably active (in the top quartile of most active Stewards I believe) in terms of logged actions. I've also been a major contributor to the admin activity review which doesn't result in a large number of logged actions but takes a significant amount of time. Although the demand isn't high, I've covered a fair number of renames for projects without 'crats and closed a difficult RfC. With the SUL finalisation my bureaucrat experience will hopefully be useful in dealing with the actions required after the forced renames. Finally I have a fair number of global sysop actions too. If confirmed, I would expect to continue at broadly the same level of activity throughout 2014, including seeing the activity review through to a close. QuiteUnusual (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about QuiteUnusual

Keep I opposed at SE last year but QuiteUnusual convinced me with his work during his first term. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is that your way of saying "I was wrong"? ;-) AGK [•] 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep basically per Vogone. --Rs chen 7754 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, yes. T C N7JM 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep QuiteUnusual's activity has been very convincing and useful, especially in the AAR. --MF-W 19:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, same as Vogone. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Golden_burg111 16:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course! Trijnstel_talk 22:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course. No concerns whatsoever. Mathonius (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite (usually) active. Elfix 18:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Convincing activities in the last term. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and trustworthy. Jafeluv (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK -jkb- 20:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslik0

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-3, ru-N
Personal info: This is my third confirmation since my election in the February 2011. During the third year as a steward I have maintained approximately the same level of activity as in the previous year, and I believe that I still remain useful to the the Wikimedia Community. I have been mainly making userrights changes, processing CU requests, helping users to rename/merge their accounts as well as helping with local administrative tasks. I still have a lot of enthusiasm for this role and wish to continue to serve as a steward. I hope that the community will support me. Thank you.

Comments about Ruslik0

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik0 does invaluable work in bot requests, SUL issues and renames which are sometimes neglected by others (like me). Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Continuous activity and sensible in handling much of the on-wiki requests. --MF-W 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Abd (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I trust him. --►Cekli 829 19:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't ever interacted personally with the user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'd like to see more activity but that's enough for my support. --Base (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have seen this user done some handy work. --Golden_burg111 00:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf (again) Trijnstel_talk 22:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep enough activity, no problems, good work. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All good Elfix 18:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Continue in the same spirit.:) --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Haven't heard of any complaints. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep carry on please. QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems here. Jafeluv (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "helping users to rename/merge their accounts" --KhabarNegar 11:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 16:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shizhao

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: zh, en-1, ru-1
Personal info: Hi! I have been a steward since late 2005. In the past year, I processing requests in SRG, SRB, and SRCU etc. I would like to continue to serve the wikimedia project community as a steward for 2014. Thank you for your past support.

Comments about Shizhao

Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 20:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, sure. --►Cekli 829 20:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no problem, good steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, no concerns that I'm aware of. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep why not? --DangSunM (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Good work. T C N7JM 03:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the former ombudsman.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and kudos for still being around nine years after your election! AGK [•] 18:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He sometimes made some errors, but is always in good faith about fixing them. Thanks to the oldest steward, helping since 2005 ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns whatsoever Trijnstel_talk 22:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Never seen him but this has probably more to do with the timezones rather than with his activity. Vogone talk 11:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
--Emergency doc (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- 8 years, all good. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :) --miya (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work. Jafeluv (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns that I'm aware of. --KhabarNegar 11:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Snowolf

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, it
Personal info: This is my second confirmation as a steward, having been elected in February 2012. Since then, I have switched timezone to PST and, after having reviewed my activity levels in the second half of the past year and found them unsatisfactory, I have shed some of my user-rights (on the English Wikipedia and the English Wikivoyage) in order to ensure a proper focus on my Steward duties and to be significantly more active. Most of my recent activity has been handling requests on IRC during the European night and requests on Meta-Wiki. I would love to continue carry on my duties as a steward, if the community thinks me still worthy of their trust.

Comments about Snowolf

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, very active and helpful user, always seems to be online... PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Speaking honestly; Until a few days ago I was coming here to remove due to incivility and showing a 'You can't do anything to me' behaviour but after speaking them; the conditions around it (on both sides) removes my concern. I am just warning them to try and avoid uncivil comments and such. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and very sensible. --MF-W 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. -Mh7kJ (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PiRSquared17. --Ricordi samoa 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and also, have some cookies: . odder (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's way better than the usual rations they feed us stewards, thank you! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Usually when Snowolf has to show his not-so-happy side, it's for a good reason and not out-of-line.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 22:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the stewards who is active in mediation. --Glaisher [talk] 05:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm concerned when those who are active are opposed to the participation of the less active, and Snowolf has been very visible in this confirmation process opposing confirmation of marginally active but otherwise-no-problem stewards. I considered removal, but decided that his good contributions probably outweigh my concern. --Abd (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --g (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I must have missed this one. You seem to have survived 2013 without locking yourself so you're probably fine for another year. :) T C N7JM 00:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral User creates a war during arguments. --Golden_burg111 00:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? A verbal war or an edit war? Snowolf doesn't seem to do either. Sportsguy17 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A comment war... And please, don't ask me for evidence, do it yourself... --Golden_burg111 17:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) .
Keep Risker (talk) 03:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nixón (wop!) 04:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but c'mon I expected more activity from the one who provided such nice graphs. --Base (talk) 12:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the crown on her head ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, great work on voy and kind person in communication --Gobbler (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep our one and only Queen! Trijnstel_talk 22:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! Your work as a steward is exemplary, and it's always a great pleasure working with you. Mathonius (talk) 11:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has always been a great help with his advice. Elfix 18:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course. One of the "team leaders" among the Steward corps. QuiteUnusual (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good guy, but just don't lock your account again ;):P. Sportsguy17 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Long live the queen! Theo10011 (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 14:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Although we had quite a lot of arguments in the past as we represent two opposing ways how to deal with policies and such, this can be helpful to find a compromise which is suitable for all. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep at every election, Snowolf consistently gets his votes wrong, but other than that he seems to be a hard working steward... ~ DanielTom (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --denny (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active enough and the statement is convincing. Jafeluv (talk) 13:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, yes, obviously. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. the statement is convincing. --KhabarNegar 11:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Shisha-Tom 16:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tegel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: sv, en-3
Personal info: I have been a Steward for two year now so this is my second confirmation. My activity this year has been a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies, and with the upcoming global rename I can benefit from my previous experience as Bureaucrat at Wikipedia in Swedish. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel _(Talk) 12:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tegel

Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Also the fastest user in reverting vandalism. LlamaAl (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LlamaAl is so right, as all frustrated SWMT members know :P --MF-W 19:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep naturligtvis. --Stryn (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rollbacker-man --Alan ^(talk) 20:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active in SWMT work. --Glaisher [talk] 05:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per LlamaAl. A big pain in the ass when reverting ;-) --Wiki13 _talk 11:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Golden_burg111 18:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, I trust him. --►Cekli 829 19:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 22:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I think every time I've done any kind of SWMT work, this guy's beaten me to at least one revert or deletion tag. T C N7JM 03:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An active small wikis anti-vandalism monitor. --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hard working steward. Thanks for your help ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and thanks for your continuing help on fighting spambots! Trijnstel_talk 22:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a pleasure working with you. Mathonius (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have no doubt that Tegel will continue his good work in 2014. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Okay Elfix 18:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Impressively raised his activity levels this year. Congrats.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as Tegel airport still exists in Berlin. :-P —DerHexer (Talk) 17:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I know nothing about airports, but keep anyway. QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Consistently active steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I too, know nothing about airports, but keep anyway. --KhabarNegar 11:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 16:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teles

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: Hi, all. This is my second confirmation and I hope you agree that I can still help being a steward. I have been helping with almost no interruption and some links on my page provide numbers for those who like it. I am, however, not so active as I was months ago due to less time available since 'real' life is taking more and more of it, but can always save some minutes daily to do any task related. I will be happy to read any message that will help me to improve as a volunteer. Thanks for participating. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 04:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Teles

Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 18:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No question. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 21:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active.--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I like your signature :P --Golden_burg111 18:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Great work. T C N7JM 03:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and trusted; no concerns either Trijnstel_talk 22:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! Obrigado! Mathonius (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OkayElfix 18:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - How you deal with inexperienced User like Amgauna convince me to vote for you, thank you for assistance, thank you for not being mad at her, and thank you for being neutral.--AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 22:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DerHexer (Talk) 17:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – His services have very much been appreciated. CT Cooper · talk 17:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Einsbor (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm not always happy with him but he's overall a good steward who helps where he is able to do so. Vogone talk 21:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, does a lot of good work. Jafeluv (talk) 13:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thogo

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en, some basic knowledge in es, fr, ru, ar and others
Personal info: In the previous year, I served in two global groups, steward and ombudsman commission. As I also have a full-time position in my outside life, and because there are many more stewards than ombudsmen, I decided to spend as much time for the OC as was needed to fulfill the tasks at hand there, and only if there is time left, I would do steward work. It didn't work out that well, as that left-over amount of time was not too impressive. So I ended up with very little logged action on the steward side. However, I did a lot of things in the background, too, which I really want to continue, like (trying to) mediate in communities which don't have other possibilities than to ask the stewards for help, and such things. I also pretty much enjoyed the collaboration with the WMF people, especially Maggie Dennis and Philippe Beaudette, both as a steward and in the OC. Now that I leave the active seat on the OC (I will remain in close contact to the commission in a sort of advisory function), I will have more possibilities to do other things, too. Therefore, I would like to offer my services as a steward to the global community again.

Comments about Thogo

Remove Thogo regained the Steward permission at last year's confirmation following a change in WMF policy regarding the OC, however thought the year his activity levels have been highly volatile and rather low, with few actions since June, concentrated in a single month. While I found Thogo insightful and helpful in my dealings with him and would have loved to see more of him this year, that did not happen and the activity levels are too low for me to support continued steward status. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Like Snowolf. --MF-W 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ moved to (Weak) Keep OmbCom keep you busy eh.--AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 15:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per above. --Alan ^(talk) 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above--DangSunM (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues with actions, has been slow to get back into an active role; willing to cut some slack due to comment about increased activity — billinghurst sDrewth 03:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per others. --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Wiki13 _talk 11:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has been active in Wikimedia with steward-related global work and hopefully will be active in steward-work again this year. Laaknor (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Golden_burg111 18:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We lose good stewards based on strong activity standards, who may provide occasional gravitas as needed. --Abd (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters ^msg 22:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a steward, Thogo has provided good advice and judgement over his tenure. As he was in the first "class" of stewards who were able to retain their rights as ombudsman (I believe), I can understand that the dual role was more difficult to handle than expected. I believe that Wikimedia as a whole is better served with Thogo as a steward, and I am willing to cut him some slack, especially with his statement that now that he will be focusing more closely on the steward role, his activity will increase. -- Avi (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, low steward activity, however he did not have controversies. Then, I cannot vote positively or negatively. --Zerabat (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral to (Weak) Keep: low activity, but I do trust him and have no problem with any of his actions as a steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --PaulT (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Guycn2 (talk) 18:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This user has contributed to the steward role, even if he hasn't been as active with the tools as previously. AGK [•] 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove IMHO you were true on focusing on the ombudsman work instead of the steward tasks. The OC group is quite small and has a lot of work to do, it is therefore important for people working on it to be active. Nevertheless, my vote is the same as for other inactive stewards, and I'll be delighted to support you when you'll have returned to a normal level of activity. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- How will Thogo be able to return to an active level of steward actions if he is not confirmed as a steward? -- Avi (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep was not so active, but since he has an advisory role in the ombudsman commission now, I expect that he will become more active Trijnstel_talk 22:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf.Armbrust (talk) 05:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep reasonably active, and friendly. As for the rest, per Trijnstel. Elfix 18:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per AGF. Please become more active though. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's some participation in Steward matters other than logged ones. He also claims he will be more participative.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Trijnstel. --Rs chen 7754 17:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Want's to be active again, and I see no reason to deny. --Stepro (talk) 22:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, too many votes for remove. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not active during the past term, but I believe that will change in the next one. Vogone talk 11:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ACK Stepro --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no-brainer —DerHexer (Talk) 17:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Knows what he is doing and sayng with a track record backing both up. The OmbCom vs. steward role question with its activity implications ought to be resolved as a matter of policy, not persons. --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive --Holder (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- If you really want to do this. But I think, you are too good to be "only" a Steward. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stefan64 (talk) 16:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 14:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aschmidt (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Flugs (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concerns with low recent activity levels -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Trijnstel. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "have a full-time position in my outside life,"--KhabarNegar 11:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trijnstel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
Personal info: This will be my second confirmation round as I was elected at the end of 2011. And I'm still one of the most active stewards. I deal with almost everything where a steward is needed, the various request pages, on-line requests, RFCs etc. I can't promise to stay as active as I was, but I'll try to help out where I can. Trijnstel_talk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Best steward there is. Always willing to help and always nice to people. Natuur12 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course! Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes! --Alan ^(talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, very competent. Has always been willing to put up with me more than one should have to. No concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perfect example of a steward. Helpful, active, willing to admit mistakes etc. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She is very active and helpful. No concerns about steward work. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above. T C N7JM 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Tjoeketjoek! JurgenNL (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira I agree with DerHexer below - your steward work is fantastic in all aspects and that is what counts for me. (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all above. -Mh7kJ (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easy choice. --Stryn (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You are awesome. odder (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 22:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful, dedicated, and great to work with. INeverCry 22:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very kind and helpful, it's pleasure to co-operate with you on CU affairs :)--K egns 00:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuurlijk! --Wiki13 _talk 11:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ja --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Zeker! JurriaanH (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Her last contributions on Wikiversity shows that she does not care about mentoring misguided users. --Golden_burg111 18:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards' jobs are to implement community consensus and act in a capacity for local communities where users are not in position to do so themselves. Mentoring a user is completely irrelevant to stewardship. It is like opposing an Oversighter because they don't know how to use CheckUser. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So she can't simply leave a message on the user's talkpage about quick tips on becoming productive on a Wikimedia Project? --Golden_burg111 18:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is her choice, but opposing her stewardship confirmation because she chose not to is wrong. T C N7JM 18:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This vote most likely has something to do with this CU because of vote-stacking (see also this file made by someone else). Trijnstel_talk 18:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Likely, Trijnstel. Now, Goldenburg, drop the cudgel! I fact, I suggest you review Trinjnstel's Wikiversity contributions and consider changing your comment based on overall balance. Even if she made a mistake then -- and I don't agree she did -- there would then be the matter of how much work she has done to support Wikiversity. --Abd (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have had very positive interactions with Trijnstel at Commons and she knows what she's doing. Sportsguy17 (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reviewed Wikiversity contributions. Trijnstel has done a great deal of useful work there, and did not beat a newcomer with a stick. Not a Wikiversity mentor, that's all. That's optional and voluntary. --Abd (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nixón (wop!) 04:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Of course. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hard working steward who does a really good job -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course! Always a great pleasure working with you, Trijn. Mathonius (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oh yeah! Elfix 18:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very competent steward :). Bernard (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I disagree with your high demands on steward activities and regret the repeated arguments which emerged therefrom. Anyway, your steward work is fantastic. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, lovely, helpful, what would we do without you QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She is one of the most active stewards at Commons (not in her role as steward - but still showing she is capable of handling all these roles). Thanks for all your indispensable work. It is much appreciated. -- Rillke (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One of the most active and prominent stewards. Strong keep from me. Jafeluv (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--M Zaplotnik ^(contribs) 22:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 16:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, en-2, fr-2
Personal info: 27 months and some thousands actions before being a steward is still a challenging and interesting task (though it's pretty hard) to be accomplished in a great team. I must apologise for the dramatical increase of my average response (time because of my various duties) and how we (both stewards and the Foundation's team) weren't yet able to solve the issues of a certain wiki. I hope, anyway, them will be fixed within some weeks. Finally I'd like to thank the whole Community for the trust which has been given me since late 2011, I'd like also to spend some words to remember all those who passed away this year, Diamant above all.

Comments about Vituzzu

Keep --Aplasia (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good and quick responses. Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While we've had our differences at times, I very much value Vituzzu's expertise and dedication to the job. He is a great asset to the team. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with Snowolf. Although I have probably annoyed Vito in the past about specific things, his work as a steward has always been quite good in general. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 19:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 20:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No more CU fishing, please. — Danny B. 22:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind providing some more background to other people? I don't think so many people will call "fishing" the ability to find out which admin on cs.wiktionary used a sockpuppet to defame another user ;) --Vituzzu (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most helpful stewards, especially with locking socks and spambots. INeverCry 22:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please warn before blocking, please don't block people indefinitely for truthful posts to their own talk pages, and please avoid involved blocks. Please don't threaten to globally lock people's accounts for "childish trolling" – that shows alarming ignorance of policy, and is incredibly worrisome coming from a steward. You have done some good things, and should focus more on that – please defend helpless users from the abuse of admins, instead of joining with the abusers. You know it makes sense. ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In short: you are still using meta to insult people related to your incidents on other wikis, until you won't understand incivility is *never* acceptable you'll always be in a borderline situation. For the record, you "truthful post" was calling en.wiki's checkusers "cowardly anonymous psychopaths". I honestly find almost unbelievable someone can even doubt that was *so* uncivil. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is the second time in a matter of minutes that you deliberately misquote me. I wasn't referring to "en.wiki's checkusers" in that edit summary, I was referring to someone who has sent me death threats and who has had access to IPs (though he recently lost it), you just combined my words out of context. If you want to quote me properly, it's either "cowardly anonymous people", or "anonymous psychopaths". If your reaction after reading that (yes, truthful) post is, "hmm, I should really block DanielTom", there is something seriously wrong with you. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe you were referring to someone in particular but that won't change a thing. Anyway going on will change nothing the same, it was my fault to try catalysing you and you cannot use meta this way. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that I have translated many more pages at Meta than you have in several years (in fact, you don't seem to have translated any page at all in years, no doubt because you are busy with other work, like blocking me). In any case, I was under the impression that this section was about you, not me. It's a huge problem that you don't know how to take criticism—even if phrased extremely politely, you immediately come to my talk page and threaten to block me; please follow the advice you give to other people, and look yourself in the mirror, so you can become a better ~~person~~ contributor. ~ DanielTom (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can become a better person that's definitely your main mistake, we are dealing with onwiki behaviour, while, in order to self-justify your behaviour, you include what shouldn't be included at all. Personal attacks are an easy consequence then. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, sorry if I offend you by thinking of users as persons. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – Per Danny B., DanielTom, and the "remove" votes from last year. In addition, Vituzzu was one of Nemo bis' enablers: [3], [4]. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- My "remove" vote here has caused Vituzza to censor criticism of Nemo bis. Vituzzu is still an enabler of disgraced former sysop Nemo bis. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vituzzu revert warred today over the removal, leading to page protection.[5][6][7]. --Abd (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Block before warning of DanielTom explains the whole thing, and per Michaeldsuarez. Message at DanielTom's talk page show obvious lack of maturity, that messages slaps me in the face. --Golden_burg111 17:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove See steward's response to DanielTom above and, after DT's comment, on DanielTom talk,today, and [8], and per Michaeldsuarez. During this very confirmation process, this is conduct unbecoming of a steward, showing an inability to tolerate even mild criticism. --Abd (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In short I've lifted DanielTom's block just to see him deeming "truthful post" a bunch of blatant personal attacks he made. That's definitely a dramatic failure in my attempt to catalyse him. A failure which is, speaking frankly, also due to the very bad advices you gave him. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This page is not about DanielTom, it is about Vituzzu. This "ex-enwiki user" has never before been threatened by a steward. Now, today. Abd (talk) 23:04, 9 February 2014
Keep - The opposes are not at all convincing. Sportsguy17 (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per DanielTom, Danny B., and Michaeldsuarez. Is somewhat trigger happy with his tools and I don't believe he can stay impartial enough in disputes. jni (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Great all around! --Gobbler (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A great guy, a great user. Thank you for your note about Diamant; I appreciated you brought his memory with you here --g (talk) 00:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per DanielTom, Danny B., and Michaeldsuarez. Seems to have used his own rights for unblock himself in 2012, but this not passed in 2013. --Zerabat (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Self-unblock legitimate, buggy edit filter.~~ However, he's using his tools inappropriately here, today, deleting, without discussion, User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive ~~and full-protecting User talk:Jimbo Wales, claiming vandalism, when there wasn't.~~--Abd (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I misread another log, maybe not an accident. Vittuzu's block log on itwiki for 30 March 2012 [9] shows self-unblock for block at 21:10 for personal attack. It then has some self block and unblock actions by Vituzzu. The full block log then has a three more blocks and self unblocks, 8 Nov, 2012, from edit filter blocking. I have seen this behavior from a user pushing information away from the top of a display. There may be an innocent explanation; however, Zerabat was correct. The objection was made at confirmation in 2013, and wasn't "passed", i.e., it may not have been noticed, for quite the same reason I misread the log. There are many more opposing this time. --Abd (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Abd, you misunderstand. Vituzzu was restoring "move" protection after the "move" protection was lost during the deletion. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 04:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Michael, I misread the log. --Abd (talk) 04:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, that action was performed with the sysop tools that Vituzzu possesses on this project and is not related to steward work. LlamaAl (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The timing of his various actions shows reaction to comments here, which reflects on his ability as a steward to handle criticism evenly and without retaliation. --Abd (talk) 04:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Delfort (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Totally unconvinced by opposition. AGK [•] 18:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep from my personal point of view and what I've seen in 2013. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 22:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Demart81 (Qualcuno mi cerca?) 22:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 22:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep certainly! Trijnstel_talk 22:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The opposes are not convincing. Armbrust (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf and Quentinv57. Besides, most of the opposes seem to focus on his work as a local admin here, not as a steward. Mathonius (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alright. Elfix 18:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 20:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per AGF. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, why not? --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kartoffeln sind wichtig. Vogone talk 11:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 12:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kartoffeln. Nothing to say more. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kal-El ^{drop me a line!} 18:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unconvinced by the opposes. Jafeluv (talk) 13:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - εΔ ω 22:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Sure! --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitanvir

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: bn, en-3, as-2, de-2, bpy-1
Personal info: Hello everyone! It has been more than two years of my stewardship. I was fairly active before my last confirmation, but this time I have to admit that I was inactive in the most of the last year. It was a tough time for me from real life perspective and I was also without stable internet for months. Despite that you will see a few activities in my log if you take a look. In fact, my internet situation developed only around two months ago from which time I am getting to be more active. I can say I can offer more than what I did in my past year and if the community thinks the same I would be delighted to serve for another term. Thank you for your understanding. — T. 14:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Wikitanvir

Keep --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No problems, helpful. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You're doing backstage work no wonder seen as inactive.--Ald™ (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Jasper Deng (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ^(talk) 20:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously just symbolical Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 22:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Southparkfan 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Abd (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I trust him. --►Cekli 829 19:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good job despite the little activity on some months. --Zerabat (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Haven't ever personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. T C N7JM 03:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 18:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- No reason to remove him. --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hope you will be more active next year (and I can see you more often :P) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Quentinv57, we miss you! :) Trijnstel_talk 22:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Quentinv57. Mathonius (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Okay Elfix 18:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Dan.- (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 12:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In Ordnung. Vogone talk 12:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
:) --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this great guy! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 18:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —레비 Revi 16:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard SJ 03:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not terribly active, but trustworthy for sure. Jafeluv (talk) 13:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 17:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Haven't ever personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. --KhabarNegar 11:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Behalten! - Hoo man (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wpedzich

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl, en, de-2
Personal info: As usual, repeating myself like an old record, I am not one of the most active stewards. In the past 12 months my activities mostly concerned an LTA case of a particularly stubborn character whose home edits were done at pl.wikipedia. I am also usually around on the IRC channel to help out in emergencies. If the Community wishes to maintain my steward status, I will be happy to serve yet another year as the second-liner of this great team.

Comments about Wpedzich

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While I'd love to see Wpedzich more active, they have always been fairly active on a regular basis for years. No concerns. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep basically agree with what Snowolf said. Not the most active, but still quite an asset to the steward team. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" keep --Alan ^(talk) 20:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK. I trust him. --►Cekli 829 20:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, and with a passion. The way you treated me on IRC last year is absolutely unacceptable for a steward. odder (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please elaborate? To oppose somebody's reconfirmation based on a single incident is pretty harsh, and so maybe a bit of background into this would be useful for us to understand this. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Snowolf: I'll try to dig some logs, but in the meantime, I'll let Wpedzich respond to this if he wants to. odder (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not recall the incident as especially harsh, so the passionate vote is a little exaggerated in my books. It was not the first time we disagreed on some principles either, as well as not the first time I removed you from the channel, the first case having ended up in plwiki's ArbCom. On the other hand, the previous ArbCom's decision was not very favourable to you, and the current decision to remove you from PLWikipedia's IRC channel has not - as far as I can remember - been objected to by any of the several channel ops who can see and alter the banlist. On the... what, third? hand - I am surprised that the passionate vote came up as a result of lack of communication on the matter and is severely limited in its range to an IRC channel of plwiki, which is not per se part of the wikimedia wikis. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 11:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wojciech Pędzich: What a load of bollocks. Firstly, you know full well that you and I have never been part of the same ArbCom case; not to mention that that particular ArbCom case had nothing to do with your removing me from #wikipedia-pl. Secondly, you know full well that I am not currently banned from #wikipedia-pl, and thirdly — seeing that you were a member of the Polish Wikipedia ArbCom when it decided to extend its jurisdiction to IRC channels, I can only say that your last sentence is the biggest example of hypocrisy I have seen on a Wikimedia wiki in a long time. odder (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-D --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep wise, sensible and mature. Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending review of odder's objections. --Abd (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK for me from what I've seen. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course Trijnstel_talk 22:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Mathonius (talk) 12:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reasonably active and friendly. Elfix 18:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no issues here. Jafeluv (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yeah.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]